Dudes on truerateme on Reddit said Jesse Eisenburg is better looking than me. Is it over?

J

JayBro70

Iron
Joined
Jul 18, 2021
Posts
26
Reputation
9
View attachment E94C2EDA-6890-4A1D-B0D0-9CA303E05507.webp
View attachment 003F25FE-F130-4213-958B-022B334C366F.webp
View attachment 8FF9CA16-DB31-4851-96A1-BB3DAD78DE35.webp
AAA5CA34 9EBE 4038 B776 E29E1049ECAF



1DC94510 9CDF 4C57 8851 4B7108CE3CDD

3FD64C49 EBCB 45E1 BEE8 A796E09423D4

404E130D 8866 404B 9B6E C7449D226585
40911D1E 7C77 4980 9811 6E9E8129010C
 
  • +1
Reactions: Enfant terrible and Deleted member 7098
You look like a tranny with 2 inch dick
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: watah, Deleted member 65825, Deleted member 17164 and 6 others
no, start mewing and chewing
 
not over but the redditor is right tbh
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 17164, WhiteGoodman and Enfant terrible
You have potential
 
They're right.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: WhiteGoodman and Enfant terrible
  • +1
Reactions: WhiteGoodman
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17164 and WhiteGoodman
Your eye area is slightly better but his lower third is far better so he mogs. His hair is also better.

If you get leaner you might be able to sharpen your lower third up
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17164 and WhiteGoodman
Eye area and nose isn’t good
Your nose isn't, your jaw isn't, your bones aren't, he could easily chuck someone minox on his brows and fix 99% of his issues, you on the other hand are boneless. If he made his hair something less autistic he would also look significantly better as well.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17164 and WhiteGoodman
looks like twins:y'all:
 
Your nose isn't, your jaw isn't, your bones aren't, he could easily chuck someone minox on his brows and fix 99% of his issues, you on the other hand are boneless. If he made his hair something less autistic he would also look significantly better as well.
How is my nose any worse than his
 
Your eye area is slightly better but his lower third is far better so he mogs. His hair is also better.

If you get leaner you might be able to sharpen your lower third up
So lower third > eye area?
 
So lower third > eye area?
No dude, your eye area is slightly better but his lower third is significantly better. You obviously can’t logically deduce lower third being more important than eye area from that
 
No dude, your eye area is slightly better but his lower third is significantly better. You obviously can’t logically deduce lower third being more important than eye area from that
Damn, fuck me then. Can’t even beat out a freaking nerd/geek. It’s way over
 
Damn, fuck me then. Can’t even beat out a freaking nerd/geek. It’s way over
He’s above average looking and you aren’t ugly chill out
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Enfant terrible
I ran into Jesse Eisenburg at a moderately upscale breakfast place in New York

Can confirm he is not good looking and looks pale and emaciated but has Winkelvoss Halo
 
You look better than that guy by far
 
Delete acc please
what shit raters
this site is falling downhill
If everyone else disagrees with you maybe you're the one who's wrong :unsure:

I will say it doesn't help OPs case at all that he's comparing dogshit pictures of himself to high quality pics of eisenberg
 
If everyone else disagrees with you maybe you're the one who's wrong :unsure:

I will say it doesn't help OPs case at all that he's comparing dogshit pictures of himself to high quality pics of eisenberg

Argumentum ad populum

is a fallacious argument which is based on affirming that something is real or better because the majority thinks so.

nice argument
 
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: Enfant terrible and SendMePicsToRate

Argumentum ad populum

is a fallacious argument which is based on affirming that something is real or better because the majority thinks so.

nice argument
The entire point of attractiveness is the majority of people prefer something you fucking clown :lul:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17763
The entire point of attractiveness is the majority of people prefer something you fucking clown :lul:
4 users are the majority of people okay
you dont even know what the majority opinon is dumbass
 
Argument from fallacy is the formal fallacy of analyzing an argument and inferring that, since it contains a fallacy, its conclusion must be false.[1] It is also called argument to logic (argumentum ad logicam), the fallacy fallacy,[2] the fallacist's fallacy,[3] and the bad reasons fallacy.[4]
i didnt say your conclusion is false but its simple a fallacy and not a good argument
 
you mean the three ratings a dude normally gets on a true rateme post by a bunch of random dudes
1646789588268


Looks like a legit tranny chief, might want to tell us something about your fetishes.
 
i didnt say your conclusion is false but its simple a fallacy and not a good argument
Nah like I literally just showed you, just because something is a fallacy doesn't mean it's a bad argument. This is why your argument is fallacious in and of itself.

For example, saying you shouldn't listen to someone's advice on becoming successful because he's a broke crackhead is ad hominem. But it's not wrong.
 
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: SendMePicsToRate and Enfant terrible
Nah like I literally just showed you, just because something is a fallacy doesn't mean it's a bad argument. This is why your argument is fallacious in and of itself.

For example, saying you shouldn't listen to someone's advice on becoming successful because he's a broke crackhead is ad hominem. But it's not wrong.
Argument from fallacy is the formal fallacy of analyzing an argument and inferring that, since it contains a fallacy, its conclusion must be false.[1] It is also called argument to logic (argumentum ad logicam), the fallacy fallacy,[2] the fallacist's fallacy,[3] and the bad reasons fallacy.[4]

No its about the truth value of the conclusion of the argument. Its about how a fallacy in an argument does not necessarily invalidate the conclusion it doenst make your argument good.
The conclusion can still be the truth despite the argument containing a fallacy.
But that doesn't make the argument good because it contains a fallacy in its premisses.
” A fallacy is a violation of one or more of the five criteria of a good argument.”
 
Jesse Eisenburg looks pretty good in some pics tbh, hes HTN I'd say
1646790600222
 
You look like a tranny with 2 inch dick
Guan guan guan guan guan, guan guan, guan guan. Guan guan guan guan guan guan, guan guan guan guan guan guan guan
 
Argument from fallacy is the formal fallacy of analyzing an argument and inferring that, since it contains a fallacy, its conclusion must be false.[1] It is also called argument to logic (argumentum ad logicam), the fallacy fallacy,[2] the fallacist's fallacy,[3] and the bad reasons fallacy.[4]

No its about the truth value of the conclusion of the argument. Its about how a fallacy in an argument does not necessarily invalidate the conclusion it doenst make your argument good.
The conclusion can still be the truth despite the argument containing a fallacy.
But that doesn't make the argument good because it contains a fallacy in its premisses.
” A fallacy is a violation of one or more of the five criteria of a good argument.”
I couldn't have possibly had enough information to make a perfectly sound argument tho
 

Similar threads

D
Replies
3
Views
96
Falcon_Flam
Falcon_Flam
Funnyunenjoyer1
Replies
16
Views
274
Kelly Oubre Jr
Kelly Oubre Jr
darwizzy27
Replies
25
Views
357
Deleted member 103913
D
SquareChinOrDeath
Replies
15
Views
131
SquareChinOrDeath
SquareChinOrDeath
tongueguy
Replies
13
Views
566
coopm4tt
coopm4tt

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top