D
Deleted member 20704
Doesn't vibe with humans much anymore.
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2022
- Posts
- 1,484
- Reputation
- 2,378
I think this is water but you know how we correlate how evolved someone is with intelligence? Well, here's essentially what that means...
MORE evolved (smarter, higher inhib, thinks twice, semi-NT, etc.) = higher intellect. Someone who thinks before doing worries about consequences. Harm avoidance is a beta trait but it's also an evolved trait because avoiding harm is what civilized, more evolved animals do -- they try & keep the order. Alphas just want to impose and dominate under any way they find fit -- IQ may matter here, sure, but look at how ruthless and careless some are at obtaining their goals. Now give those most destructive people an IQ test & watch it be low.
LESS evolved (lower inhib, dumber usually, very wired/talkative, usually NT) = lower intellect. Someone who never thinks before doing sees danger more. This is more alpha/lower intelligence usually because (look at blacks and curries for reference) they often destroy communities, become crime-infested, etc. This is why there's that correlation between inceldom, higher IQ, higher inhib, etc. It all goes together. Incels are often average to high IQ, almost never low IQ/low sentience. Meanwhile low IQ thugs can slay plenty while booksmart incels rot.
So the general rule of thumb here is that more "evolved" people lose some animalistic tone but gain rationale; less "evolved" are more animal but less thought-oriented AKA why low-inhib dudes tend to also not be too intellectual/foresight-like. How low-inhib/brute are guys like Einstein, Tesla, etc,? All "historical geniuses" are always average inhib or high inhib. Show me a big brain who's super low inhib/low sentience/doesn't think before speaking ... YOU CAN'T. All you gotta do is observe the people to see all you need to know. Are whites/Asians -- often highest IQs -- low inhib gangbangers/thugmaxxers/etc.? No ... It's 3rd world shitskins, blacks, etc. mostly.
Most of the smartest dudes in history who were our founding fathers hated blacks and considered them to be lower IQ due to their aggressiveness. Many believed that the reason for separating the races is due to their inherent differences that couldn't work together, like a bunch of blacks looting and robbing in hordes probably doesn't go along well with a bunch of whites trying to work/uphold society somewhat.
It is the thought that counts when it comes to determining how rational or evolved one is -- one who blabs/talks a lot/is low-inhib is usually not too smart. One simple way to do this is to consider Mensa/other super high IQ individuals and tell me how many of those are low-inhib swagmonkeys with no filter. The people here on Looksmax who post themselves probably are low-inhib, high alpha, but low IQ.
You are probably aware of this if you have even a smidge of sentience ... It's not hard to see because you can tell it by looking at one; their body language; their face (physiognomy); etc. Spend 5-10 minutes around someone unhinged & you'll know everything of 'em.
It is all a tradeoff in the end ... Higher T = less evolved = lower IQ/poorer decision making is more likely (see: crime & testosterone). You can testmaxx but then you'll low inhib/de-evolvemaxx & be more likely a crime factory; make dumber choices. On the flipside you can evolvemaxx but you must re-wire your mittaz and alter your hormones & experiences to be more fit for an evolved order. You cannot change this much but some can be forced to evolve/de-evolve, but most is innate AKA you will never change much.
We are the result of God, so odds are you're either a natural born monkey or an incel. Monkeys = more ruthless; more alpha; less smart but higher chance at mating/sex/etc. But higher IQ/more evolved/more restricted & held back; thinking; foresight? You are a natural born incel ... Congrats. You are either monkey or incel for the most part ... Or GL & ugly too.
MORE evolved (smarter, higher inhib, thinks twice, semi-NT, etc.) = higher intellect. Someone who thinks before doing worries about consequences. Harm avoidance is a beta trait but it's also an evolved trait because avoiding harm is what civilized, more evolved animals do -- they try & keep the order. Alphas just want to impose and dominate under any way they find fit -- IQ may matter here, sure, but look at how ruthless and careless some are at obtaining their goals. Now give those most destructive people an IQ test & watch it be low.
LESS evolved (lower inhib, dumber usually, very wired/talkative, usually NT) = lower intellect. Someone who never thinks before doing sees danger more. This is more alpha/lower intelligence usually because (look at blacks and curries for reference) they often destroy communities, become crime-infested, etc. This is why there's that correlation between inceldom, higher IQ, higher inhib, etc. It all goes together. Incels are often average to high IQ, almost never low IQ/low sentience. Meanwhile low IQ thugs can slay plenty while booksmart incels rot.
So the general rule of thumb here is that more "evolved" people lose some animalistic tone but gain rationale; less "evolved" are more animal but less thought-oriented AKA why low-inhib dudes tend to also not be too intellectual/foresight-like. How low-inhib/brute are guys like Einstein, Tesla, etc,? All "historical geniuses" are always average inhib or high inhib. Show me a big brain who's super low inhib/low sentience/doesn't think before speaking ... YOU CAN'T. All you gotta do is observe the people to see all you need to know. Are whites/Asians -- often highest IQs -- low inhib gangbangers/thugmaxxers/etc.? No ... It's 3rd world shitskins, blacks, etc. mostly.
Most of the smartest dudes in history who were our founding fathers hated blacks and considered them to be lower IQ due to their aggressiveness. Many believed that the reason for separating the races is due to their inherent differences that couldn't work together, like a bunch of blacks looting and robbing in hordes probably doesn't go along well with a bunch of whites trying to work/uphold society somewhat.
It is the thought that counts when it comes to determining how rational or evolved one is -- one who blabs/talks a lot/is low-inhib is usually not too smart. One simple way to do this is to consider Mensa/other super high IQ individuals and tell me how many of those are low-inhib swagmonkeys with no filter. The people here on Looksmax who post themselves probably are low-inhib, high alpha, but low IQ.
You are probably aware of this if you have even a smidge of sentience ... It's not hard to see because you can tell it by looking at one; their body language; their face (physiognomy); etc. Spend 5-10 minutes around someone unhinged & you'll know everything of 'em.
It is all a tradeoff in the end ... Higher T = less evolved = lower IQ/poorer decision making is more likely (see: crime & testosterone). You can testmaxx but then you'll low inhib/de-evolvemaxx & be more likely a crime factory; make dumber choices. On the flipside you can evolvemaxx but you must re-wire your mittaz and alter your hormones & experiences to be more fit for an evolved order. You cannot change this much but some can be forced to evolve/de-evolve, but most is innate AKA you will never change much.
We are the result of God, so odds are you're either a natural born monkey or an incel. Monkeys = more ruthless; more alpha; less smart but higher chance at mating/sex/etc. But higher IQ/more evolved/more restricted & held back; thinking; foresight? You are a natural born incel ... Congrats. You are either monkey or incel for the most part ... Or GL & ugly too.
Last edited:
