Each rating tier and their corresponding percentiles

[seethe]

To me:

top 100~85% = subhuman= 1~2/10
Top 85~60 %= ltn =2~4/10
Top 60~20 %= mtn =4~6/10
Top 20~2% = htn =6~8/10
Top 2~0.5% =chadlite =8~9/10
Top 0.5% chad =9+/10

Does this make sense, is my math mathing, does this align with forum standards?

Wrote this on a toilet

Edit: drew this ooga booga tier graph to illustrate my idea cus I’m bored, the sampling source would be males on a western college campus

@shabby890 @N8verBegan @murdah @Jason Voorhees @Michael Myers @st.hamudi but 6‘5 @thecel @Monobloc @try2beme @dragomaxxer

 

[Jason Voorhees]

The distribution isn't linear like that. The looks scale has very short tails. Meaning most people look mediocre with subhumans and chads being very rare. Being a chad is just as rare as being a subhuman. 1 in 10,000 or something is a legit psl 6 chad. And people above that rating are so rare you'll probably only see them 1-2 times a year and psl 7+ men and women are basically mythical unicorns that you'll only find on the internet or maybe once in your lifetime

 

[seethe]

The distribution isn't linear like that. The looks scale has very short tails. Meaning most people look mediocre with subhumans and chads being very rare. Being a chad is just as rare as being a subhuman. 1 in 10,000 or something is a legit psl 6 chad. And people above that rating are so rare you'll probably only see them 1-2 once year and psl 7+ are mythical unicorns.

Ofc Ik It’s not linear ,my percentiles will form a bell curve with lower skewness , my numbers just says bottom 15% are subhumans where it should be more like bottom 2%, anyway it’s not very clear without a diagram.
but you should get the rough idea

 

[Deleted member 23558]

I’m psl god

 

[Hernan]

To me:

top 100~85% = subhuman= 1~2/10
Top 85~60 %= ltn =2~4/10
Top 60~20 %= mtn =4~6/10
Top 20~2% = htn =6~8/10
Top 2~0.5% =chadlite =8~9/10
Top 0.5% chad =9+/10

Does this make sense, is my math mathing, does this align with forum standards?

Wrote this on a toilet

@shabby890 @N8verBegan @murdah @Jason Voorhees @Michael Myers @st.hamudi but 6‘5 @thecel @Monobloc @try2beme @dragomaxxer

like 5th thread on this but good thread ig. Chads are rarer tho. Its a bit more exponential on both sides like @Jason Voorhees said

 

[seethe]

like 5th thread on this but good thread ig. Chads are rarer tho. Its a bit more exponential on both sides like @Jason Voorhees said

Is 1/200 not rare enough lol

 

[Deleted member 23558]

The distribution isn't linear like that. The looks scale has very short tails. Meaning most people look mediocre with subhumans and chads being very rare. Being a chad is just as rare as being a subhuman. 1 in 10,000 or something is a legit psl 6 chad. And people above that rating are so rare you'll probably only see them 1-2 times a year and psl 7+ men and women are basically mythical unicorns that you'll find on the internet.

OG

 

[Deleted member 23558]

Is 1/200 not rare enough lol

Not at all ur basically saying Trevor signirino ( psl 6 facially) is found among 200 guys . It’s cope

 

[seethe]

Not at all ur basically saying Trevor signirino ( psl 6 facially) is found among 200 guys . It’s cope

I don’t follow model faggots but if ur 1/200 irl you’ll do exceptionally well, therefore a chad, any better looking than that it’s diminishing returns

 

[Hernan]

Is 1/200 not rare enough lol

surprisingly (not rlly but alr) no

 

[Jason Voorhees]

I don’t follow model faggots but if ur 1/200 irl you’ll do exceptionally well, therefore a chad, any better looking than that it’s diminishing returns

Yea but this forum has very high standards.

 

[seethe]

Yea but this forum has very high standards

distorted reality, psl fried our brains, if ur top 15% on a uni campus you are gl enough to slay

 

[try2beme]

Doesnt matter irl

 

[Deleted member 19957]

Nothing more than that.

 

[Deleted member 53670]

distorted reality, psl fried our brains, if ur top 15% on a uni campus you are gl enough to slay

Meanwhile an ugly BBC is walking into frat parties slaying weekly

 

[seethe]

Doesnt matter irl

Rating system here needs some mathematical basis, I just want to establish it

View attachment 2941634

Nothing more than that.

check out the graph I just drew in the op

 

[innervoid765]

dnr

but this shit gave me ptsd from a level stats

 

[seethe]

View attachment 2941658

dnr

but this shit gave me ptsd from a level stats

Kys, alevel stats made me coom

 

[innervoid765]

Kys, alevel stats made me coom

a rice cooming to maths

what a shocker

 

[seethe]

a rice cooming to maths

what a shocker

Get iq mogged turkroach or whatever tf

 

[Deleted member 19957]

Rating system here needs some mathematical basis, I just want to establish it

check out the graph I just drew in the op

Yea, but there is no reason for nature to skew a bell curve. Subhumans gotta be as rare as chads. Also it should be taken within the same age bracket.

 

[seethe]

Yea, but there is no reason for nature to skew a bell curve. Subhumans gotta be as rare as chads. Also it should be taken within the same age bracket.

there are significantly more repulsive subhumans than chads that’s for sure. And yes, like I said on a college campus

 

[Deleted member 19957]

there are significantly more repulsive subhumans than chads that’s for sure

Yea i'd kinda agree, but it doesn't make any sense tho

 

[seethe]

Yea i'd kinda agree, but it doesn't make any sense tho

Hypergamy son, don’t have to be as ugly as a giga deformed burns victim for females to rate you 1 or 2/10

 

[ElTruecel]

This is completely wrong and dogshit

 

[seethe]

This is completely wrong and dogshit

I literally pulled it out of my ass ik but it’s an educated guesstimate , say why it’s so wrong then useless nigger

 

[ElTruecel]

I literally pulled it out of my ass ik but it’s an educated guesstimate , say why it’s so wrong then useless nigger

0-2 is bottom 0.5% 6.5 - 7 alone is top 1% 8 is like top 0.1% yada yada

 

[seethe]

0-2 is bottom 0.5% 6.5 - 7 alone is top 1% 8 is like top 0.1% yada yada

This is simplified ratings it’s not about black pill muh psl rating scale

0-2 is not bottom 0.5%,my argument is that you don’t have be to once in a blue moon deformed to get rated that

 

[ElTruecel]

This is irl ratings it’s not about black pill muh psl rating scale

0-2 is not bottom 0.5%,my argument is that you don’t have be to once in a blue moon deformed to get rated that

So who gets rated 0-2? Michael cera and Jonah hill?

 

[seethe]

So who gets rated 0-2? Michael cera and Jonah hill?

Idk,just ugly repulsive guys

, like the type of stemcel with nerd glasses wearing a musty ass t shirt zero drip retarded haircut
zero harmony face with several blatantly bad features
manlet who don’t wear deodorant and their breath stinks
Low class third world pheno

That consists of 15% of the college population, and they’ll definitely get treated as 1s and 2s , this is my logic

 

[Gengar]

To me:

top 100~85% = subhuman= 1~2/10
Top 85~60 %= ltn =2~4/10
Top 60~20 %= mtn =4~6/10
Top 20~2% = htn =6~8/10
Top 2~0.5% =chadlite =8~9/10
Top 0.5% chad =9+/10

Does this make sense, is my math mathing, does this align with forum standards?

Wrote this on a toilet

Edit: drew this ooga booga tier graph to illustrate my idea cus I’m bored, the sampling source would be males on a western college campus View attachment 2941652

@shabby890 @N8verBegan @murdah @Jason Voorhees @Michael Myers @st.hamudi but 6‘5 @thecel @Monobloc @try2beme @dragomaxxer

I didn’t get a notification for this, you must have tagged me later. But brootal, I’m subhuman.

 

[seethe]

I didn’t get a notification for this, you must have tagged me later. But brootal, I’m subhuman.

Ur ltn at least, this is frankly just a retarded personal scale, cus I’m bored, got a flight to catch in 5 hrs and I haven’t slept a wink

 

[Gengar]

Ur ltn at least, this is frankly just a retarded personal scale, cus I’m bored, got a flight to catch in 5 hrs and I haven’t slept a wink

Where you going? And no if anything I’m weak LTN at best.

 

[seethe]

Where you going? And no if anything I’m weak LTN at best.

Back home for summer. Cope

 

[Gengar]

Back home for summer. Cope

Again?! What the fuck man. And no!

 

[gooner23]

To me:

top 100~85% = subhuman= 1~2/10
Top 85~60 %= ltn =2~4/10
Top 60~20 %= mtn =4~6/10
Top 20~2% = htn =6~8/10
Top 2~0.5% =chadlite =8~9/10
Top 0.5% chad =9+/10

Does this make sense, is my math mathing, does this align with forum standards?

Wrote this on a toilet

Edit: drew this ooga booga tier graph to illustrate my idea cus I’m bored, the sampling source would be males on a western college campus View attachment 2941652

@shabby890 @N8verBegan @murdah @Jason Voorhees @Michael Myers @st.hamudi but 6‘5 @thecel @Monobloc @try2beme @dragomaxxer

nothing matters more than appeal at this point can rate someone chadlite but perform like a ltn on dating apps