Egalitarianism isn’t correct but it may be better to pretend it is.

[wishIwasSalludon]

There’s this idea that people are inherently the same. So any difference in outcome between people is because they didn’t do something. The reason the homeless man doesn’t have the life of Sean O’pry is because he didn’t work hard enough.

Absolutely brutal. But even though this is not true founding a society against this principle may actually be more dangerous.

It’s clear it’s not the most capable people necessarily who make it to the top. The incompetence of our leaders should be proof enough of this.

Now imagine if these leaders were given absolute power. Just the thought is enough to horrify me. In a strictly hierarchical world what do you think is more likely. Do you think people will pass down power to those most capable or will they pass it down to their children, friends and family?

Very soon what you will have is a society run based off bloodline and connections not based of superiority which is the goal we wanted in the first place.

Thoughts:
@imontheloose @SlayerJonas

 

[SlayerJonas]

Real individualism starts with above average intelligence

 

[Vermilioncore]

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

View attachment 4078110

Bro

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

Real individualism starts with above average intelligence

The ability to see reality is a skill that is rare even among high iq people.

The blackpill is the obvious truth of reality, not only is there ample anecdotal evidence but scientific studies repeatedly prove it true.

So why aren’t more “high iq” people BPed? And why does the average iq here seem to be 80?

People are blinded by their own perception of this world. Philosophers call this qualia, it’s incredibly hard to look past this.

That’s why o always question my beliefs.

 

[SlayerJonas]

The ability to see reality is a skill that is rare even among high iq people.

The blackpill is the obvious truth of reality, not only is there ample anecdotal evidence but scientific studies repeatedly prove it true.

So why aren’t more “high iq” people BPed? And why does the average iq here seem to be 80?

People are blinded by their own perception of this world. Philosophers call this qualia, it’s incredibly hard to look past this.

That’s why o always question my beliefs.

Wow a lot of words to say I'm blind, I never implied I'm a genius but rather only above average (my life backs that up) because I know that I know more than the rest, but still comparatively nothing

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

Wow a lot of words to say I'm blind, I never implied I'm a genius but rather only above average (my life backs that up) because I know that I know more than the rest, but still comparatively nothing

A lot of dudes here are social rejects who cope by calling themselves sigmas and calling people who have friends NPCs

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

Wow a lot of words to say I'm blind, I never implied I'm a genius but rather only above average (my life backs that up) because I know that I know more than the rest, but still comparatively nothing

A lot of dudes here are social rejects who cope by calling themselves sigmas and calling people who have friends NPCs

I’m one of those dudes btw

 

[SlayerJonas]

A lot of dudes here are social rejects who cope by calling themselves sigmas and calling people who have friends NPCs

Yeah idk why I got protective, I'm tired it's 4AM

The ability to see reality is a skill that is rare even among high iq people.

The blackpill is the obvious truth of reality, not only is there ample anecdotal evidence but scientific studies repeatedly prove it true.

So why aren’t more “high iq” people BPed? And why does the average iq here seem to be 80?

People are blinded by their own perception of this world. Philosophers call this qualia, it’s incredibly hard to look past this.

That’s why o always question my beliefs.

Not many thoughts right now but I'll reply

I think blackpill being the truth looks obvious, but it requires some actual thinking unlike seeing stuff like a stone

Also above average people are faster realising stuff, but they don't concern themselves with unnecessary stuff sometimes like Einstein is busy doing some physics stuff he doesn't care a molecule about society and it's problems, we do tho

IQ is relative to the population so median is 100 here, it's easier to stand out because most users are 14yo and low lifes

I also always question my beliefs and don't see anything as a hard truth, well I have to though else I couldn't function, because simple stuff could be so wrong changing everything about the perspective of reality and shit

 

[imontheloose]

You can’t really pretend something is correct. Only superficially is that possible; I doubt that has much physical merit.

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

You can’t really pretend something is correct. Only superficially is that possible; I doubt that has much physical merit.

It’s pretty easy to get the masses to believe something that isn’t true. So it’s not really a big problem.

 

[SplashJuice]

Giving the illusion of equality pacifies people, it's a power move because telling them they aren't shit will lead to constant rebellions and unrest.

 

[widdi]

No, you fucking retard, egalitarianism promotes rape and revenge narratives.

Poor people wonder why they are poor and low status if everyone is equal. It's painfully obvious that those at the top are not super hard workers and didn't start from the same point as poor people did. The only logical conclusion is that those at the top are putting them down.

Then you have opportunists who rile up all these poor people on this false narrative and commit mass killings in the name of justice and equality.

This is how you have modern south africa, mao's china, the soviet union, khemer rouge etc etc

It's literally the most dangerous ideology to ever exist.

 

[looksmaxxed]

almost all philosophies outside of fascism is rooted in anti science rejection of darwinism. any equality/univeralist focused worldview is essentially psychological coping mechanism for weakness and stupidity. hence the fear of hierarchy and standards, because the know under such a system they would have to be held to standards and possibly killed for failing to meet them.

they're all just excuses to be complacent, weak, and non violent.

 

[looksmaxxed]

the only political system that stands the test of modern science is fascism. all the others are essentially based on christianity. communism is especially egregious because it's based on utopianism which is christianity except so retarded even christians laugh at it.

 

[widdi]

almost all philosophies outside of fascism is rooted in anti science rejection of darwinism. any equality/univeralist focused worldview is essentially psychological coping mechanism for weakness and stupidity. hence the fear of hierarchy and standards, because the know under such a system they would have to be held to standards and possibly killed for failing to meet them.

they're all just excuses to be complacent, weak, and non violent.

fascism produced nothing and went nowhere. It's just a slightly less dysgenic offshoot of socialism. Mussolini was literally a socialist for the early part of his life. We don't really have any philosophy that's close to what essentially accidentally happened (what I mean by accidentally is that it was emergent and not planned out by any political system) in Northwestern Europe from 800-1500 CE that created the modern European genotypically (see vid). The only "ideology" that can be backengineered from this is ruthless eugenics.

 

[imontheloose]

It’s pretty easy to get the masses to believe something that isn’t true. So it’s not really a big problem.

Even if this is true, why would you pick egalitarianism knowing the ridiculous absurdities it brings?

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

Even if this is true, why would you pick egalitarianism knowing the ridiculous absurdities it brings?

This thread is more about posing a potential problem that non egalitarian societies would have to solve.

 

[looksmaxxed]

fascism produced nothing and went nowhere. It's just a slightly less dysgenic offshoot of socialism. Mussolini was literally a socialist for the early part of his life. We don't really have any philosophy that's close to what essentially accidentally happened (what I mean by accidentally is that it was emergent and not planned out by any political system) in Northwestern Europe from 800-1500 CE that created the modern European genotypically (see vid). The only "ideology" that can be backengineered from this is ruthless eugenics.

hitler and mussolini were high openness, they went socialist because that was the limit of political ideology at the time, as they were exploring options that allowed them to escape the control of international jew bankers, they saw that it didn't work, so they created fascism.

fascism literally produced the greatest but shortest era in human history. had the world not joined the jewish marxists in destroying germany, it would still be the most successful nation to this day

 

[imontheloose]

This thread is more about posing a potential problem that non egalitarian societies would have to solve.

Ok bored Chad.