Einstein theory of relativity is jewish propaganda

[LefortCandidate]

growing up we were taught that einstein is some giga high iq scientist that solved the mystery of the universe

in reality he was just good at solving equations thats it

no repeatable expiriments no proof

just mathematical models that aren't even unique or "correct"

do you know why they picked his ?

its because it looks pleasing (not even trolling) and is simpler thats it

 

[KT-34]

Do you know what it actually takes for something to be considered proofs in math?

 

[catastropy]

 

[LefortCandidate]

Do you know what it actually takes for something to be considered proofs in math?

thats not the problem

it can be plenty of correct models

the one thats get picked is it being simple and has to look pleasing jfj

 

[RichardSpencel]

Do you know what it actually takes for something to be considered proofs in math?

Being a Jew kike faggot???

 

[KT-34]

thats not the problem

it can be plenty of correct models

the one thats get picked is it being simple and has to look pleasing jfj

Not how it works, there multiple ways of writing the same formula or model, but mathematicians do typically prefer something that is considered "elegant" which Einstein's formula is by their standards

 

[Tenres]

Yeah that's how modern physics is done for the most part. You compare models that are informed by equations + the empirical observations (which would be the experiments) in this case

 

[LefortCandidate]

Not how it works, there multiple ways of writing the same formula or model, but mathematicians do typically prefer something that is considered "elegant" which Einstein's formula is by their standards

noooo

it can be entirely different model

just like newtons relativity, it is considered "wrong" although it makes accurate predections

but it is more complicated then einstein's

so they picked his instead

 

[Tenres]

Not how it works, there multiple ways of writing the same formula or model, but mathematicians do typically prefer something that is considered "elegant" which Einstein's formula is by their standards

Well I assume it's just considered from the perspective of occams razor. Simple means less assumptions.

 

[LefortCandidate]

Yeah that's how modern physics is done for the most part. You compare models that are informed by equations + the empirical observations (which would be the experiments) in this case

there's no experiments in cosmology

 

[Tenres]

there's no experiments in cosmology

The experiment would be predictions. That's literally what experiments are, a hypothesis and tested results. If I create a hypothesis that if the universe works x way, then y will happen. That's an experiment.

 

[LefortCandidate]

The experiment would be predictions. That's literally what experiments are, a hypothesis and tested results. If I create a hypothesis that if the universe works x way, then y will happen. That's an experiment.

serval theories can make accurate predections but are considered "wrong"

this is a popular probelem called the underdetermination problem

 

[Tenres]

serval theories can make accurate predections but are considered "wrong"

this is a popular probelem called the underdetermination problem

Yeah I looked into and I don't see how it especially applies to Einstein, or science in general. We could say there is underdetermination for believing in any claim, including the validity of deductions because there is always an alternate theory that is the same except in one unprovable claim (like brain in a vat, any of Descartes thought experiments). To get out of that you'd need to value simplicity, consistency, explanatory value etc which is what happens anyway

 

[LefortCandidate]

Yeah I looked into and I don't see how it especially applies to Einstein, or science in general. We could say there is underdetermination for believing in any claim, including the validity of deductions because there is always an alternate theory that is the same except in one unprovable claim (like brain in a vat, any of Descartes thought experiments). To get out of that you'd need to value simplicity, consistency, explanatory value etc which is what happens anyway

it depends on the axiom

real hard science, experiments and tests are the deciding factor even if you don't have it yet

in shit like cosmology you will have to accept that you will never know what happened billions of years ago

 

[molecule00]

well what do you think about something like GPS which is only possible because of einsteins equations that are used to correct for time dilation which would otherwise add like 10km of error each day?

 

[LefortCandidate]

well what do you think about something like GPS which is only possible because of einsteins equations that are used to correct for time dilation which would otherwise add like 10km of error each day?

gps only confirms epmirical and testable time dilation equations without bringing stein philosphy

lorentz equation can do it too without einstein space time theories

 

[Wexilarious]

Well, his surname is literally stein

 

[molecule00]

gps only confirms epmirical and testable time dilation equations without bringing stein philosphy

lorentz equation can do it too without einstein space time theories

it cant with the precision gps needs. lorentz only covers velocity time dilation but the bigger effect in gps is gravitational which lorentz doesnt account for at all.

 

[LefortCandidate]

it cant with the precision gps needs. lorentz only covers velocity time dilation but the bigger effect in gps is gravitational which lorentz doesnt account for at all.

The GPS gravitational correction doesn’t require the full curved spacetime formalism of general relativity it was even discobered before general relativity eqautions where sett in place

plus lorentz can be extended without adding stein interpretation of space time even newtons relativity can do it with relativistic corrections

 

[LefortCandidate]

The GPS gravitational correction doesn’t require the full curved spacetime formalism of general relativity it was even discobered before general relativity eqautions where sett in place

plus lorentz can be extended without adding stein interpretation of space time even newtons relativity can do it with relativistic corrections

and hella other theories can too but they don't match previous assumptions in cosmology so thats why they reject them

 

[willsmith]

growing up we were taught that einstein is some giga high iq scientist that solved the mystery of the universe

in reality he was just good at solving equations thats it

no repeatable expiriments no proof

just mathematical models that aren't even unique or "correct"

do you know why they picked his ?

its because it looks pleasing (not even trolling) and is simpler thats it

My dearest nigga in atom, they picked his because of predictions its made alone, like predicting starlight deflection during an eclipse :

„Einstein showed in 1915 how his theory explained the anomalous perihelion advance of the planet Mercury without any arbitrary parameters ("fudge factors"),[12]and in 1919 an expedition led by Eddingtonconfirmed general relativity's prediction for the deflection of starlight by the Sun during the total solar eclipse of 29 May 1919,[13] instantly making Einstein famous”
Source : wikipedia



, also thanks to the theory of relativity, we have the dirac equation, which predicted the existence of antimatter before it was discovered

 

[LefortCandidate]

My dearest nigga in atom, they picked his because of predictions its made alone, like predicting starlight deflection during an eclipse :

„Einstein showed in 1915 how his theory explained the anomalous perihelion advance of the planet Mercury without any arbitrary parameters ("fudge factors"),[12]and in 1919 an expedition led by Eddingtonconfirmed general relativity's prediction for the deflection of starlight by the Sun during the total solar eclipse of 29 May 1919,[13] instantly making Einstein famous”
Source : wikipedia



, also thanks to the theory of relativity, we have the dirac equation, which predicted the existence of antimatter before it was discovered

solution ?

anti matter ?

jfl i was about to talk about this reddit level science

my nigger did you know newtons relativity also predilected this even tho it is considered wrong ? both predicted the light passing by the sun with roughly simmilair seconds then the deciding factor was arthur eddigton expedition but the data was poor

this is a popular probelem called the underdetermination problem

where hella wrong theories make accuarate predections

 

[molecule00]

The GPS gravitational correction doesn’t require the full curved spacetime formalism of general relativity it was even discobered before general relativity eqautions where sett in place

plus lorentz can be extended without adding stein interpretation of space time even newtons relativity can do it with relativistic corrections

early anticipation of gravitational time effects doesnt replace a working theory because they did not have a consistent formula yet. saying that you can just "extend" lorentz isnt a theory. lorentz by itself has no gravity so it cant produce the correct gps correction. if you claim an extension what exact equations give that result and also match lensing and gravitational waves? otherwise you’re just using GR results without calling it GR

 

[Societal Reject]

Who's smarter a jewish phenome with 200 IQ or a nigger on looksmax?

 

[LefortCandidate]

early anticipation of gravitational time effects doesnt replace a working theory because they did not have a consistent formula yet. saying that you can just "extend" lorentz isnt a theory. lorentz by itself has no gravity so it cant produce the correct gps correction. if you claim an extension what exact equations give that result and also match lensing and gravitational waves? otherwise you’re just using GR results without calling it GR

buddy gps uses weak field approximation

the newtonian gravitational potential is used in gravitational time dilation formula which does not not require stein field equations

not even stein cultist uses gps as an argument for gr

 

[LefortCandidate]

Who's smarter a jewish phenome with 200 IQ or a nigger on looksmax?

his theories are heavily criticized and he was not 200iq

he took Lorentz work and added baseless philosophies to it

 

[willsmith]

anti matter ?

jfl i was about to talk about this reddit level science

Its not reddit level science, its literally the answer which dirac came up with while he derived the equation, antimatter is just particles of the same mass, but opposite sign, and it was later confirmed real through an experiment by Andreson

 

[Societal Reject]

his theories are heavily criticized and he was not 200iq

he took Lorentz work and added baseless philosophies to it

If einstein was wrong gps wouldn't work

 

[molecule00]

buddy gps uses weak field approximation

the newtonian gravitational potential is used in gravitational time dilation formula which does not not require stein field equations

not even stein cultist uses gps as an argument for gr

bruh. weak field approximation is just the low field limit of GR. the formula uses the newtonian potential but it comes from the GR metric not newtonian mechanics. newtonian physics has absolute time so it cant derive that result at all. and gps was just the first example that came to mind but it doesnt matter because what youre saying makes no sense at all.

 

[LefortCandidate]

Its not reddit level science, its literally the answer which dirac came up with while he derived the equation, antimatter is just particles of the same mass, but opposite sign, and it was later confirmed real through an experiment by Andreson

its cope

anti matter was added to mainly solve the mystery around star formation, without this magical thing all the formulas collapse

instead of admitting that their model may be wrong they started adding magical shit

 

[willsmith]

its cope

anti matter was added to mainly solve the mystery around star formation, without this magical thing all the formulas collapse

instead of admitting that their model may be wrong they started adding magical shit

Carl Anderson discovers the positron | timeline.web.cern.ch

timeline.web.cern.ch

 

[LefortCandidate]

bruh. weak field approximation is just the low field limit of GR. the formula uses the newtonian potential but it comes from the GR metric not newtonian mechanics. newtonian physics has absolute time so it cant derive that result at all. and gps was just the first example that came to mind but it doesnt matter because what youre saying makes no sense at all.

buddy the formula literally doesn't require you to solve stein field equations

it is just newtons relativity with some correction

 

[LefortCandidate]

Carl Anderson discovers the positron | timeline.web.cern.ch

timeline.web.cern.ch

Carl Anderson discovers the positron | timeline.web.cern.ch

timeline.web.cern.ch

bruh my bad i read it as dark matter not anti matter

 

[lastofus123]

Well yea that was his job as a theoretical physisist

 

[molecule00]

buddy the formula literally doesn't require you to solve stein field equations

it is just newtons relativity with some correction

I have no idea what youre talking about anymore. not needing to solve the field equations every time doesnt mean its not from GR. the gps formula is derived from the GR metric. newtonian physics has absolute time so it has no way of producing gravitational time dilation at all. if you add that term youre just importing results from relativity. also what exactly do you mean by “newtons relativity”? do you mean galilean invariance? because that still assumes absolute time.

 

[bourgeoizyzz]

and is simpler thats it

that's literally how theories work, brainlet

 

[causeimight]

Not how it works, there multiple ways of writing the same formula or model, but mathematicians do typically prefer something that is considered "elegant" which Einstein's formula is by their standards

From what I've learned they're also lazy. Example is multiplication, nobody wants to write out 4+4+4+4 when you can just do 4x4