Essay 12: Women are merely inferior men. For the average user here, what does that mean?

[Deleted member 16501]

I have been on a roll lately in terms of inner revelations- everything about the world and human nature seems to be coming together in my mind; a mature understanding about the way we function, as well as what is happening in today’s society, solidifying. This is not all roses, however, as the truth about my own wasted life, repugnant qualities and precarious future is not an easy one to swallow.

I digress, though. Tonight, I had a true revelation- one that spiritually makes sense to me.

Women’s nature, behaviour and personality can simply be summarized in one way- they are basically inferior versions of men, yet have a beautiful exterior and crave cock.

That’s it. That’s all you need to know about women.

Think about the last time you behaved in a way that a group of honourable, strong men would frown upon. Think about what you thought, what your motivations were, what you did, the effect you wanted to have. That’s women, all the time.

It was always understood in history that women were the inferiors and men the superiors. Hence, religions always saw Man as the ultimate servant of God, the one who can truly achieve a higher, Godly state of being. Women, though, were told to obey and submit to such a man, and through that they will be brought into a higher state.

In these times, that is to say, basically every other time in history, virtuous male qualities were the ones glorified.

Now, think of today’s feminist environment. Out of pure butthurt at this fact and not being able to accept it, ‘feminists’ have inverted everything! They now have put the female on top, with women as the ideal, and men being the inferior!

So essentially, remembering that women are, behaviour wise, nothing more than the most inferior of male behaviour, they have put ‘inferior male behaviour’ on a pedestal.

You guys see Amber Heard, or Jada Pinkett Smith, or some Tiktok fatty proclaiming she only dates 6’5 men, and it doesn’t just anger you…..

It appeals to you. Those very same traits that they have: selfishness, desire to humiliate, jealousy, wanting what’s not theirs, having zero awareness of their own (lack of) value and what they bring to the table…this is EXACTLY what us men do when we are at our most foul and pathetic.

Yet because they are basically glorified as ‘empowering’ and ‘brave’, we are confused as hell. What do we do?

Well, the redpill essentially tells you to mirror this behaviour. ‘Give em a taste of their own medicine’. So, it can be said that the redpill teaches you to be an inferior man.

This is why so many men who ‘take the redpill’ lose drive for life and either become blackpilled or go MGTOW. What they are asking you do become, doesn’t appeal to the better part of you.

The truth? You need to act the opposite of these women.

You need to act like men of superior character again.

Problem is, most of you guys don’t have a clue what that is, such is the brainwashing you’ve received. You’ve likely never seen a man of superior character.

Polarity:

This brings me to a very important point. We all know that attraction is created by polarity between men and women. Ergo, If women are inferior men….then if you yourself act like an inferior man, you aren’t creating attraction.

I’m just going to pick a random comment from the first few threads on the Offtopic forum, and post it below. I’m also going to list in brackets the inferior qualities of this comment.

“If your cousin asked you to hop in bed with her, would you do it? I’d probably do it”

(Living in fantasy of something that will never happen. Lack of surety, deferring to the group. Lack of morals or self control)

Sure, even for this forum, the above is a crazy comment, but my point is, a lot of you guys are living as inferior men. You are indulging in inferior think, habits and behaviour, then you wonder why you’re a personalitycel and can’t attract a woman (talking about the normie tier guys who shouldn’t be incel here).

This culture that worships the feminine has basically made men comfortable with acting like inferior versions of themselves- ie women. Many men today act like women, because this is the example set, and it appeals to them.

No matter what is going on around you, you need to start thinking and acting with superior masculine qualities. Then you will start to feel like a virile, powerful, focussed man again. This involves taking the high road all the time though, and turning the other cheek to the things that piss you off.

Examples:

-Stop envying others. Be grateful for what you have, and focus only on working on that. That is your job

-If you see a woman who behaves badly, don’t be reduced to it. Don’t think or feel with hate. Realize that’s also in the most inferior version of you. Refocus on the highest vision, and live it.

-Stop lying to yourself about your value and what you deserve. See the harsh, brutal reality: “this is where I am currently, this is what my value is, this is what I want, this is what I have to do to get it.” In today’s landscape, the path may indeed be ugly and hard, but better to live with the pain of honour than as some deluded clown.


Refuse to give into this culture. Take the high road and get back your soul.

 

[Deleted member 23017]

Reposting this on Reddit, brb.

 

[Gandy]

I don't agree, tbh. Personal qualities in the end matter much more than gender. *Most* women suck at programming, but I would much rather hire the best female programmer in the world than an average male one.

Most good soldiers are men, but I'd much rather have 5 of the top special forces women protecting my life than 5 average male bodyguards from a private security firm (especially since getting into the Green Berets etc. as a woman has only been open for a decade or less, so they are the best of the best the gender has to offer)

You are more likely to meet both extreme ends of the bell curve in men: Total retards, and absolute geniuses.
Most women just sit in the middle, as they do on IQ scales. The world has very few female geniuses.

There are more high value men in existence than high value women, that much is true. You have 4x as many men in Mensa as you do women. Creators of high value businesses are men by a margin of 10:1 or more.
But again, it depends on the *individual*. There are utterly useless men who can barely tie their shoelaces in existence as well.
My first impression of someone therefore only depends on what that person does and says rather than on their gender.

I make snap judgements based on gender obviously, some negative, but they can be proven wrong instantly or over time by doing rational and good things.

 

[Deleted member 19453]

people outside of the top .01% aren’t real people no point in comparing npcs to other npcs

 

[Deleted member 16501]

I don't agree, tbh. Personal qualities in the end matter much more than gender. *Most* women suck at programming, but I would much rather hire the best female programmer in the world than an average male one.

Most good soldiers are men, but I'd much rather have 5 of the top special forces women protecting my life than 5 average male bodyguards from a private security firm (especially since getting into the Green Berets etc. as a woman has only been open for a decade or less, so they are the best of the best the gender has to offer)

You are more likely to meet both extreme ends of the bell curve in men: Total retards, and absolute geniuses.
Most women just sit in the middle, as they do on IQ scales. The world has very few female geniuses.

There are more high value men in existence than high value women, that much is true. You have 4x as many men in Mensa as you do women. Creators of high value businesses are men by a margin of 10:1 or more.
But again, it depends on the *individual*. There are utterly useless men who can barely tie their shoelaces in existence as well.
My first impression of someone therefore only depends on what that person does and says rather than on their gender.

I make snap judgements based on gender obviously, some negative, but they can be proven wrong instantly or over time by doing rational and good things.

I don't mean in IQ or what skills they can learn. I mean in terms of morality, honour, ethics, character etc.

Ie Harvey Weinstein may have been a great film producer with a high IQ, but he was a terrible person with low morals

 

[Dystopian]

Read everything

Famous thinkers take on wymxn (HIGH IQ ONLY)

looksmax.org

 

[Deleted member 16501]

This thread is so high IQ most people don't even understand what I'm saying. I'm talking spiritual principles invented by God here. The purpose of why he created man and woman.

This is Evola level shit.

 

[Sleeper]

I don't agree, tbh. Personal qualities in the end matter much more than gender. *Most* women suck at programming, but I would much rather hire the best female programmer in the world than an average male one.

Most good soldiers are men, but I'd much rather have 5 of the top special forces women protecting my life than 5 average male bodyguards from a private security firm (especially since getting into the Green Berets etc. as a woman has only been open for a decade or less, so they are the best of the best the gender has to offer)

You are more likely to meet both extreme ends of the bell curve in men: Total retards, and absolute geniuses.
Most women just sit in the middle, as they do on IQ scales. The world has very few female geniuses.

There are more high value men in existence than high value women, that much is true. You have 4x as many men in Mensa as you do women. Creators of high value businesses are men by a margin of 10:1 or more.
But again, it depends on the *individual*. There are utterly useless men who can barely tie their shoelaces in existence as well.
My first impression of someone therefore only depends on what that person does and says rather than on their gender.

I make snap judgements based on gender obviously, some negative, but they can be proven wrong instantly or over time by doing rational and good things.

This is incorrect. By your own current logic, if your house was about to be bombed and you just rang up the pentagon and asked them to send over their best female swat members because you dont judge people by gender, they send over nobody because female swat members have never existed and now you're blown to smithereens. Not a single woman has ever passed the test to enter the special forces of any country in the world.

This is the issue with the idea trying to hold men and women to equal standards, the world of competency and standards for men is vastly higher and more competitive then whats possible for women to keep up with. The strongest man on the planet like Shaw or Bjornson can lift more weight than 99% of people who have ever lived and probably ever will live. The strongest woman on the planet is only stronger than maybe around 60% of people if even that. An average man is far above an average woman because we dont exist in equal playing fields. For a woman to even being to compete with the average man shes generally going to have to be in the top 10% of all women

 

[Marsiere214]

water

 

[Deleted member 27550]

You are more likely to meet both extreme ends of the bell curve in men: Total retards, and absolute geniuses.
Most women just sit in the middle, as they do on IQ scales. The world has very few female geniuses.

The IQ “bellcurve” has been debunked.

 

[Gandy]

The IQ “bellcurve” has been debunked.

Mensa has the official stats on their website though.
There are 4x as many men at 130+ IQ than there are women.

Not for a lack of applicants either, because about half the applicants are women.

 

[c0pemaxxer]

dog

 

[Deleted member 27550]

Mensa has the official stats on their website though.
There are 4x as many men at 130+ IQ than there are women.

Not for a lack of applicants either, because about half the applicants are women.

I’m talking about the bellcurve though. Like “men are on top and bottom” the video refutes the bottom portion.

 

[spark]

if women were inferior they would not live superior lives

women are superior