![spoou](/data/avatars/l/122/122979.jpg?1737547902)
spoou
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2025
- Posts
- 164
- Reputation
- 209
If an action that can be done by each person in a population and that action causes success, the group that doesn't act dies out. If an immoral act causes worldly succession, is violence justified then? An Abrahamic person would respond no since they would be rewarded in the afterlife. So if God no longer favors the worshipers, over time an inevitable moment will come when God no longer suits life, then Abrahamic religion will die out.
Life is justified by emotion. Emotion is justified and created by darwinism. Hence, actions are justified by life which is justified by emotion which is justified by life.
Some like Adam Lanza and Mitchell Heisman pick death as a revolt against this justification.
What are you and are you what is yours? The sense of self is an illusion driven by darwinistic factors. What is true for a living person is what continues life. If you want to live, then you imply that you want to make your truth by what is best for your own succession. 1+1=3 if it is good for you. What's ironic is your desire to live is driven by emotions from darwinism.
@ey88
Life is justified by emotion. Emotion is justified and created by darwinism. Hence, actions are justified by life which is justified by emotion which is justified by life.
Some like Adam Lanza and Mitchell Heisman pick death as a revolt against this justification.
What are you and are you what is yours? The sense of self is an illusion driven by darwinistic factors. What is true for a living person is what continues life. If you want to live, then you imply that you want to make your truth by what is best for your own succession. 1+1=3 if it is good for you. What's ironic is your desire to live is driven by emotions from darwinism.
@ey88