Europeans have the most sexually dimorphic faces, Africans the least (I.e. BBCs are more feminine).

incelmogger

incelmogger

Tall skull wasp’ism
Joined
Oct 10, 2023
Posts
4,129
Reputation
4,569
AA14B704 220B 4A14 ADBB D0D58CB9511D


“People of European origin and South Americans showed a higher level of sexual dimorphism in facial shape compared to people of African origin."

"All European countries revealed larger differences between male and female average faces than in all the other populations."

"The possible explanation of lower sexual dimorphism in Africa may be either relaxed selection pressure favoring morphological femininity of female faces or masculinity of male faces, alternatively due to positive selection for more feminine faces in males, or the masculinization of faces in females."

How and why patterns of sexual dimorphism in human faces vary across the world (2021)

Also JFL at the fact that White and Black men have the same level of testoreone but blacks have a higher level of estrogen 🤣:

“Contrary to the postulated racial difference, testosterone concentrations did not differ notably between black and white men. However, blacks had higher estradiol levels.”

 
  • +1
  • Woah
  • Love it
Reactions: Mewton, Jason Voorhees, 5'7 zoomer and 10 others
there's no way SEA is not the least. i don't trust any study that says otherwise
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: horizontallytall, TechnoBoss, fuxkdakikez and 4 others
there's no way SEA is not the least. i don't trust any study that says otherwise
Black women are more masculine looking than sea women nigga
 
  • +1
Reactions: PoopyFaceTomatoNose, Bitchwhipper2 and fuxkdakikez
why do all incels fascinated with these kinds studies ?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: OGJBSLAYER, Mewton, yirma19 and 9 others
Black women are more masculine looking than sea women nigga
Not their bodies. And while black women's faces can seem masculine, they never actually look like men, whereas there are many SEA women who look like they could be SEA men, especially with their little mustachios and complete lack of curves.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bitchwhipper2
Not their bodies. And while black women's faces can seem masculine, they never actually look like men, whereas there are many SEA women who look like they could be SEA men, especially with their little mustachios and complete lack of curves.
1700004516216
'never look like men' nigga this is literally the top famous celebrity black women,half of them have a fucking wig on and they still look like men,imagine the averages ones,nearly all black women with short hair look like men
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: OGJBSLAYER, Mewton, PointOfNoReturn and 3 others
View attachment 2552067 'never look like men' nigga this is literally the top famous celebrity black women,half of them have a fucking wig on and they still look like men,imagine the averages ones,nearly all black women with short hair look like men
Aside from bottom middle, none of them actually look like men, maybe they "look like men" but they don't look like men. SEA women actually look like SEA men, like it takes an in-depth investigation just to make sure you're talking to a woman.
 
  • +1
Reactions: g0op, TsarTsar444, sportsmogger and 2 others
If I were a white nationalist I would honestly be propponent of an idea to castrate all negro boys before puberty, put them on hrt and assign them to white men of culture as a loyal loving boywifes. But alas Im a Jew so I hate this idea, in fact I support an exact opposite of this.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: fuxkdakikez, Gilbert_Durandal and Kamui
View attachment 2552067 'never look like men' nigga this is literally the top famous celebrity black women,half of them have a fucking wig on and they still look like men,imagine the averages ones,nearly all black women with short hair look like men
Because they ARE MEN. This is what you guys don't get. They literally are men.
 
  • +1
Reactions: incelmogger
View attachment 2552031

“People of European origin and South Americans showed a higher level of sexual dimorphism in facial shape compared to people of African origin."

"All European countries revealed larger differences between male and female average faces than in all the other populations."

"The possible explanation of lower sexual dimorphism in Africa may be either relaxed selection pressure favoring morphological femininity of female faces or masculinity of male faces, alternatively due to positive selection for more feminine faces in males, or the masculinization of faces in females."

How and why patterns of sexual dimorphism in human faces vary across the world (2021)

Also JFL at the fact that White and Black men have the same level of testoreone but blacks have a higher level of estrogen 🤣:

“Contrary to the postulated racial difference, testosterone concentrations did not differ notably between black and white men. However, blacks had higher estradiol levels.”

dnr dark triad menas/meds mog nigga slaves and cumskin masters to the testosterone clinic
 
AI Impact type beat
 
  • JFL
Reactions: OGJBSLAYER, Mewton, dimorphism and 1 other person
BrahminBoss
 
  • Love it
Reactions: incelmogger
My nigger
 
  • Woah
Reactions: incelmogger
i wish they'd done this with more countries, need to see the stats for asians, nordics
i guess romanians have the most masc men and fem women @exo
 
  • Woah
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 32285, exo and incelmogger
there's no way SEA is not the least. i don't trust any study that says otherwise



The authors' conclusions about relaxed selection for sexual dimorphism in African populations are challenged by Weston et al. (2007), who found that masculinity preferences were actually stronger in Jamaica than in the UK. This casts doubt on the assumption that traditional populations exhibit reduced dimorphism due to weakened sexual selection.

As noted by Özener (2010), facial morphology is influenced by a multitude of genetic and environmental factors beyond sexual selection, including climate adaptation, random genetic drift, mutation load, and caloric resources. The study failed to control for these key factors that differ across regions.

The reliance on 2D photographs is a major limitation, as emphasized by Claes et al. (2018) in their recent 3D morphometric study. Unlike 2D images, 3D scans capture soft tissue depth and asymmetry, enabling more valid quantification of true anatomical dimorphism.

The study's small sample sizes, particularly for the African populations, constrain the ability to make broad generalizations, a point emphasized by Kleisner et al. (2014) in their critique of Marcinkowska et al. (2018). Larger sample sizes, especially from understudied traditional societies, are needed.

As noted in the critique by Stephen et al. (2009), attractiveness studies frequently suffer from weak effect sizes and lack of ecological validity when considering only shape outside of natural social contexts. The weak links found between dimorphism and attractiveness cast doubt on assumptions about signaling theories.

Scott et al. (2014) tested the harsh environment hypothesis directly and found no evidence for increased masculinity preferences in populations facing adverse conditions. This challenges the logic underlying many evolutionary arguments about environmental pressures driving sexual selection for dimorphism.

In sum, this study provides preliminary evidence of cross-cultural variation in facial dimorphism, but relies on assumptions about sexual selection that are not empirically supported. A more sophisticated research program incorporating 3D morphometrics, genetic analyses, and large samples from diverse populations will be needed to elucidate the complex and multifactorial drivers of human facial diversity. The evolutionary significance of dimorphism remains conjectural absent direct evidence about mating behavior and fitness outcomes in contemporary societies.>>
 
  • +1
Reactions: g0op
i wish they'd done this with more countries, need to see the stats for asians, nordics
i guess romanians have the most masc men and fem women @exo


They used 2d studies with low sample sizes Africa is also a diverse place they never did an in-depth study on which African population groups used.


In terms of a critique of the maths in the study

Equation used:

sexscore(A⃗ )=A⃗ ⋅(MM−FM)→

Where A is the individual facial configuration, MM is the male mean facial configuration, and FM is the female mean facial configuration.

Critique:

As Claes et al. (2018) emphasized, the use of 2D photographs to derive the male and female mean configurations is problematic, lacking 3D shape information that is needed to accurately characterize sexual dimorphism. The means calculated from small sample sizes may also not well represent the true population averages.

Equation used:

cos(α)=v1→⋅v2→∥∥v1→∥∥∥∥v2→∥∥

Where α is the angle between the vectors v1 and v2. v1 is the overall sexual dimorphism vector and v2 is the allometric component of dimorphism.

Critique:

As Mitteroecker et al. (2013) noted, allometry calculated from total craniofacial size conflates size-related shape changes due to sexual dimorphism and general scaling effects. Therefore, v2 may not accurately capture allometric variation due to sexual selection specifically.

Equation used:

sexscore(A)=b1*(height) + b0

Where b1 is the regression coefficient for height predicting facial shape, used to calculate allometric SShD.

Critique:

As Özener (2010) emphasized, facial shape is influenced by many factors beyond size and sexual dimorphism. By solely regressing face shape on height, this equation fails to isolate allometric variation due to sexual selection specifically.

In summary, the critiques highlight limitations in how sexual dimorphism and its allometric components were quantified from 2D photographs and simplified regression models. More sophisticated morphometric and statistical analyses are needed to accurately characterize dimorphism
 
  • +1
Reactions: g0op
@Ai Impact
 
Contrary to the postulated racial difference, testosterone concentrations did not differ notably between black and white men. However, blacks had higher estradiol levels.”
Cherry picking here is a meta analysis done on 5000 different studies

Blacks do indeed have higher T


or the masculinization of faces in females.
As for the others you not read this part of the quote.

It just means the gap between black men and women is smaller not that blacks are less masculine.

Just taking a look at skulls and faces it should be clear
IMG 0075
IMG 0076

IMG 0077


Plus even whites rate black faces as being more masculine looking jfl
Masculinity is a cope anyways tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bitchwhipper2 and Looks234
hello

white power
 
  • +1
Reactions: incelmogger
Cherry picking here is a meta analysis done on 5000 different studies

Blacks do indeed have higher T



As for the others you not read this part of the quote.

It just means the gap between black men and women is smaller not that blacks are less masculine.

Just taking a look at skulls and faces it should be clear
View attachment 2575981View attachment 2575983
View attachment 2575987

Plus even whites rate black faces as being more masculine looking jfl
Masculinity is a cope anyways tho
Shut up you niggers arent masculine
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 32410, incelmogger and wishIwasSalludon
Cherry picking here is a meta analysis done on 5000 different studies

Blacks do indeed have higher T



As for the others you not read this part of the quote.

It just means the gap between black men and women is smaller not that blacks are less masculine.

Just taking a look at skulls and faces it should be clear
View attachment 2575981View attachment 2575983
View attachment 2575987

Plus even whites rate black faces as being more masculine looking jfl
Masculinity is a cope anyways tho
How are the black faces more masculine? You know that flat eyebrows are linked to higher prenatal T and arching eyebrows are linked to lower prenatal T, yes? Whites also have the largest chins of all races. I'm not necessarily saying the white ones look more masculine, but they each have different features related to masculinity.
 
  • +1
Reactions: incelmogger and Deleted member 45118
As for the others you not read this part of the quote.

It just means the gap between black men and women is smaller not that blacks are less masculine.

Just taking a look at skulls and faces it should be clear
IMG 0075
IMG 0076

IMG 0077


Plus even whites rate black faces as being more masculine looking jfl
Masculinity is a cope anyways tho
All incorrect.

It would seem you cant read the chart OP posted which demonstartes his points (white males being more dimorphic than black males)

Taking a look at black skulls:
No brow rifge
No chin
No jawline
Rounded forehead
Proganthism
All feminine traits + having big dick sucking lips

On the pictures you posted the white faces look more masculine and dimorphic
 
  • +1
Reactions: incelmogger
Women like feminine features
 
  • +1
Reactions: Looks234 and incelmogger
Proganthism
prognathism isnt feminine it makes you look like a chimp theres a reason why hominids are less prognathic the younger they are.

blacks dont have weak chins its hidden by prognathism
1701136613314

No jawline
whites having defined jaws is a meme
even african women are more robust than white men

1701136697426

1701136735788


It would seem you cant read the chart OP posted which demonstartes his points (white males being more dimorphic than black males)
read the quote from the study
"feminine faces in males, or the masculinization of faces in females."
blacks being less dimorphic doesnt mean more feminine it either implies more masculine looking females or more feminine looking males the researches literally say this in the study jfl.

Taking a look at black skulls:
blacks also have the most square eye orbits, higher set sharper cheek bones, more forward growth, lower gonial angles, thicker ramuses, longer jaws, longer ramuses, wider faces etc. Every race has feminine characteristics you listing off random features doesnt mean shit.

All incorrect.
yeah bro a meta analysis published in one of the best journals taking into account 5000 studies is incorrect because rando on .org said so. :feelskek:

On the pictures you posted the white faces look more masculine and dimorphic
youre delusional if you think the face on the left looks more masculine jfl
1701137085686


maybe I have to point it out
european cranial base is on the left african cranial base is on the right
1701137139697


european
-more circular eye orbits
-narrow palate
-narrow alar base
-less forward growth
-smaller teeth
-less prominent cheek bones
-less sharp cheek bones
-lower set cheekbones


How are the black faces more masculine

1701137359237

which face looks more masculine? and be honest. Bro this isnt even debatable even whites think black faces are more masculine(statistically)


 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Bitchwhipper2, Looks234, Deleted member 33136 and 1 other person
All incorrect.

It would seem you cant read the chart OP posted which demonstartes his points (white males being more dimorphic than black males)

Taking a look at black skulls:
No brow rifge
No chin
No jawline
Rounded forehead
Proganthism
All feminine traits + having big dick sucking lips

On the pictures you posted the white faces look more masculine and dimorphic

prognathism isnt feminine it makes you look like a chimp theres a reason why hominids are less prognathic the younger they are.


blacks dont have weak chins its hidden by prognathism
View attachment 2576205

whites having defined jaws is a meme
even african women are more robust than white men

View attachment 2576208
View attachment 2576210


read the quote from the study

blacks being less dimorphic doesnt mean more feminine it either implies more masculine looking females or more feminine looking males the researches literally say this in the study jfl.


blacks also have the most square eye orbits, higher set sharper cheek bones, more forward growth, lower gonial angles, thicker ramuses, longer jaws, longer ramuses, wider faces etc. Every race has feminine characteristics you listing off random features doesnt mean shit.


yeah bro a meta analysis published in one of the best journals taking into account 5000 studies is incorrect because rando on .org said so. :feelskek:


youre delusional if you think the face on the left looks more masculine jfl
View attachment 2576219

maybe I have to point it out
european cranial base is on the left african cranial base is on the right
View attachment 2576222

european
-more circular eye orbits
-narrow palate
-narrow alar base
-less forward growth
-smaller teeth
-less prominent cheek bones
-less sharp cheek bones
-lower set cheekbones




View attachment 2576224
which face looks more masculine? and be honest. Bro this isnt even debatable even whites think black faces are more masculine(statistically)


You've fallen into the retarded thinking that the prognathic maxilla is ideal because muh forward growth. The European face has a more projected upper midface. It is also a fact of physical anthropology that the European has the most projecting chin of all races and blacks do not have projecting chins racially.

The European face you have included is a gracile leptoprosopic Nordic phenotype - the definition of cherry-picking. It isn't typical of Europeans or even of Nordics. There are European ethnicities which tend to have very wide faces and palates, such as Baltic people.

In the picture you have provided comparing different skulls, the European skull has a far more developed and projected upper midface (orbitals, nasal bone, etc), chin, and brow ridge - owned by your own fucking image:

img_0075-jpeg.2575981


Another moron who thinks the alveolar process is the only part of the maxilla and ignores the upper midface entirely. And yes the negroid orbitals are more boxy and larger - that is they are LESS DEVELOPED and shield the eyes LESS.

There are features of black faces which are reflective of masculinity - wide faces and palates. Others are not, such as their small chins and lack of brow ridge.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: incelmogger
You've fallen into the retarded thinking that the prognathic maxilla is ideal because muh forward growth
it isnt you didnt read what I said at all I said it makes you look like a chimp. So either you think that i think looking like a chimp is ideal or you didnt read what I said. I just said prognathism isnt feminine which it isnt adult hominids are more prognathic as they get older never said it was "ideal"

proganathism isnt forward growth, I dont think a single person on this forum thinks prognathism is "ideal", forward growth is tho makes you look high class and sexy. Separates the kings from the fodder.

this is forward growth
1701141330827
1701141447676


Barrett might not be the best example since he sorta has chimp lip jfl

this is proganathism
1701141382460


the European face has a more projected upper midface.
they dont not the maxilla atleast but they do have more projected nasions
1701141285201

1701141555576


he European face you have included is a gracile leptoprosopic Nordic phenotype
its the most common germanic phenotype which is why its displayed on the front page of phenotypes.net and why it says so in the description.

Of course there are more masculine looking white phenos but it makes more sense to just talk about the most common ones.

baltics are more masculine looking the germanics but are still mogged(in terms of masculinity not PSL) by the more masculine black phenos
1701142072384

1701142065474
1701142084770
1701142093088
1701142122621


1701142141789


that the European has the most projecting chin of all races
That sentence doesnt even make sense theres no such thing as a "european" skull europeans, somalis, indians, arabs and certain west asians all have the same skull shape. Do you mean the caucasoid has the most projecting chin?

which tend to have very wide faces and palates, such as Baltics.
I know but in general, small teeth, narrow palates and narrow faces are Caucasoid traits. Look if you want to believe whites are the most masculine looking thats fine but blacks the most feminine? Come on you know thats bullshit

blacks do not have projecting chins racially.
everytime a black person gets extractions they pretty much always grow a chin
1701142696097


just extractions not even genio
 

Attachments

  • 1701141747434.png
    1701141747434.png
    220.3 KB · Views: 0
  • 1701141766164.png
    1701141766164.png
    185.4 KB · Views: 0
  • 1701141777894.png
    1701141777894.png
    225.4 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: Looks234 and Deleted member 33136
prognathism isnt feminine it makes you look like a chimp theres a reason why hominids are less prognathic the younger they are.


blacks dont have weak chins its hidden by prognathism
View attachment 2576205

whites having defined jaws is a meme
even african women are more robust than white men

View attachment 2576208
View attachment 2576210


read the quote from the study

blacks being less dimorphic doesnt mean more feminine it either implies more masculine looking females or more feminine looking males the researches literally say this in the study jfl.


blacks also have the most square eye orbits, higher set sharper cheek bones, more forward growth, lower gonial angles, thicker ramuses, longer jaws, longer ramuses, wider faces etc. Every race has feminine characteristics you listing off random features doesnt mean shit.


yeah bro a meta analysis published in one of the best journals taking into account 5000 studies is incorrect because rando on .org said so. :feelskek:


youre delusional if you think the face on the left looks more masculine jfl
View attachment 2576219

maybe I have to point it out
european cranial base is on the left african cranial base is on the right
View attachment 2576222

european
-more circular eye orbits
-narrow palate
-narrow alar base
-less forward growth
-smaller teeth
-less prominent cheek bones
-less sharp cheek bones
-lower set cheekbones




View attachment 2576224
which face looks more masculine? and be honest. Bro this isnt even debatable even whites think black faces are more masculine(statistically)


Retard is it feminine flatter maxilla is legit more masculine
8014116D 41E1 4FFA A08D 61B5E5FAF692
 
flatter maxilla is legit more masculine
it isnt otherwise children would have more forward growth than adults, flat maxillas are a neotenous infant trait not masculine at all just because you found one cherry picked photo of a woman forward growth mogging a man doesnt mean forward growth is feminine
 
  • +1
Reactions: NoReedemingFeature, Bitchwhipper2, Deleted member 33136 and 1 other person
it isnt otherwise children would have more forward growth than adults, flat maxillas are a neotenous infant trait not masculine at all just because you found one cherry picked photo of a woman forward growth mogging a man doesnt mean forward growth is feminine
You’re so wrong, men tend to have flatter maxillas than women.
5729E98F D93B 4EF6 82B4 3CD1D22AACB2
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
You’re so wrong, men tend to have flatter maxillas than women. View attachment 2576428
maybe youre right seems strange to me I simply assumed more developed bone = more masculine. I wonder if theres an evolutionary reason for this
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bitchwhipper2 and Pei
it isnt otherwise children would have more forward growth than adults, flat maxillas are a neotenous infant trait not masculine at all just because you found one cherry picked photo of a woman forward growth mogging a man doesnt mean forward growth is feminine
338E2784 C7D8 451A B208 926B36E42914
5320168E ED9A 4070 8D3A 684874B87E9E
Ignoring browridge the left side profile is much more feminine Vs flat maxilla masculine. Prognathism makes soft feautures more pronounced like lips. Also Google robust and gracile austrolopithecus. Gracile version was prognathous while robust more flat profiled.
 
left side profile is much more feminine
left side looks more masculine to me sorta looks like a man in a wig to me (sorry nicky)

Gracile version was prognathous while robust more flat profiled.
prognathism is slightly more common in men than women
 
left side looks more masculine to me sorta looks like a man in a wig to me (sorry nicky)


prognathism is slightly more common in men than women
How? it makes your lip pouty, shortens your philtrum, and makes your chin weak. All soft features. Her level of anterior maxillary growth makes her face look way more feminine than any white women I’ve seen which is proof you’re wrong and it’s feminine
 
How? it makes your lip pouty, shortens your philtrum, and makes your chin weak. All soft features.
because it makes you look like a chimp I dont find chimp pheno attractive and most people male or female dont


more feminine than any white women I’ve seen which is proof you’re wrong and it’s feminine
so would you say you find prognathism attractive?

feminine than any white women
would you say shes more feminine than this
1701150442523
 
because it makes you look like a chimp I dont find chimp pheno attractive and most people male or female dont



so would you say you find prognathism attractive?


would you say shes more feminine than this
View attachment 2576447
Yeah she maxilla mogs all white women tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon

Similar threads

Zenis
Replies
87
Views
10K
crushing sluts@100%
crushing sluts@100%
D
Replies
31
Views
2K
Deleted member 30037
D
chief detectiveman
Replies
12
Views
6K
slavicpsycho
slavicpsycho
dreamcake1mo
Replies
53
Views
12K
abdullah23k
abdullah23k

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top