B
benchcrab
Iron
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2024
- Posts
- 7
- Reputation
- 0
Hi everyone,
I’ve been delving into how different attractiveness scales, such as the PSL (Physical, Social, Lifestyle) scale and the Ideal Female Attractiveness scale, influence various aspects of life and the benefits one can derive from them. Specifically, I’m interested in understanding how these scales impact opportunities, social interactions, and overall life experiences.
Consider the examples of Jeremy Meeks and Hernan Drago versus Vasily Stepanov and Alain Delon. Meeks and Drago may exude a more aggressive or edgy appeal that could attract significant attention but might come across as polarizing. On the other hand, Vasily Stepanov and Alain Delon embody the “dreamy” or idealized attractiveness often seen in movies, which might appeal strongly to the female gaze but may not necessarily translate into the same level of tangible benefits in real-life situations.
To gain the most benefits from life, should one aim for the model-type look, similar to Meeks or Drago, which might attract more immediate, high-impact opportunities? Or should one strive for the dreamy, idealized appearance of figures like Vasily or Delon, which might offer more subtle, enduring advantages in terms of social influence and personal charm?
Which is more likely to yield greater rewards in terms of benefits, including:
Increased social opportunities
Higher chances of being hired
More job promotions
Social Media Success out of the the self help/ online business space
Social Media Success in the self help/ online business space
The Self Help/ Entrepreneurial success
Better networking opportunities
Enhanced social status
Easier access to social circles, specifically higher echelon with richer individuals
More invitations to events
Increased influence in social settings
More opportunities for sponsorships or endorsements
Easier access to exclusive clubs or groups
Increased likelihood of receiving help or assistance from others
Greater perceived charisma
Higher likelihood of being chosen for leadership roles
I’ve been delving into how different attractiveness scales, such as the PSL (Physical, Social, Lifestyle) scale and the Ideal Female Attractiveness scale, influence various aspects of life and the benefits one can derive from them. Specifically, I’m interested in understanding how these scales impact opportunities, social interactions, and overall life experiences.
Consider the examples of Jeremy Meeks and Hernan Drago versus Vasily Stepanov and Alain Delon. Meeks and Drago may exude a more aggressive or edgy appeal that could attract significant attention but might come across as polarizing. On the other hand, Vasily Stepanov and Alain Delon embody the “dreamy” or idealized attractiveness often seen in movies, which might appeal strongly to the female gaze but may not necessarily translate into the same level of tangible benefits in real-life situations.
To gain the most benefits from life, should one aim for the model-type look, similar to Meeks or Drago, which might attract more immediate, high-impact opportunities? Or should one strive for the dreamy, idealized appearance of figures like Vasily or Delon, which might offer more subtle, enduring advantages in terms of social influence and personal charm?
Which is more likely to yield greater rewards in terms of benefits, including:
Increased social opportunities
Higher chances of being hired
More job promotions
Social Media Success out of the the self help/ online business space
Social Media Success in the self help/ online business space
The Self Help/ Entrepreneurial success
Better networking opportunities
Enhanced social status
Easier access to social circles, specifically higher echelon with richer individuals
More invitations to events
Increased influence in social settings
More opportunities for sponsorships or endorsements
Easier access to exclusive clubs or groups
Increased likelihood of receiving help or assistance from others
Greater perceived charisma
Higher likelihood of being chosen for leadership roles
