Even in a studycel friendly country like China, nerds still lose out at the top sadly

D

Deleted member 6186

Zephir
Joined
Apr 5, 2020
Posts
1,815
Reputation
4,653
OJ-AM722_XILI_P_20160720040305.jpg

In my last thread I was wondering why many leaders in the world right now don't have the best credentials. While I was looking up different countries, I came across something related to China and would like to share my findings.

A lot of people blame the west especially USA saying its a Chad friendly nation and if nerds went somewhere else, things would be much better. I'm here to tell you that sadly might not be the case. At least when it comes to China. I honestly thought they would be nerd friendly but not really.

Now lets use the example above. Left is Xi Jinping, the big boss of China. Right is Li Keqiang, the 2nd in command.

If you were to guess which one is smarter, you would probably say it’s the guy with glasses. And you would be correct. However, that doesn't mean anything.

Xi Jinping had his schooling was interrupted due to the cultural revolution in China. Also his dad went to jail. During the time in the fields, he basically had to do a lot of self-studying at night. He went to uni as a Worker-Peasant-Soldier student (Due to circumstances back then, its not really the same as full time college education). Basically, he went through his share of struggles.

Li Keqiang on the other hand is pretty much a stereotypical nerd. He went to Tsinghua (The top uni in China) by beating everyone else in his province via exam. He would later get a PHD in economics from the same uni and was even awarded a prize. Its pretty safe to say he would be damn smart or at least damn good at studying so his journey was a lot smoother.

People say Li was handpicked to become the next leader of China. However, in the end, Xi got the job.

Now why did that happen? Why did the party snub the nerd? Its hard to say to be honest. But here’s my opinion

1.Xi is simply stronger. He is more cunning and ruthless when dealing with others. He is basically more high T which is important in tough times like right now. There's gonna be a lot of conflict in the future with many countries so they want someone who is loyal but also strong to deal with future opponents. He's supposedly also better at handling people, getting favorable deals donem giving strong images etc. . The other guy is very good with numbers and technical knowledge etc. But this doesn't necessarily translate to statecraft fighting.

2.Appearences. Xi is a northerner. Li is a southerner. Northerners are taller and have bigger frames (Closer to Koreans and Mongolians). When world leaders shake hands with each other, its always a mogging battle. Frankly I don't know how manlet Putin can cope coz he always gets heightmogged.

3. A leader doesn’t need to be a subject matter expert. He is just there to manage. He just needs to be able to delegate the right tasks to the experts. So people skills are far more important. Also how is a PHD who never had to struggle that much supposed to relate to the common people who proabably can't even go to uni? Especially in China which is still a developing nation.

Screenshot 2020 11 16 195043



In short, nerds still dabbed on sadly. Strength is still more important in politics. The blackpill isn’t limited to a continent. It’s a human thing. Some will say this is obvious but I frankly didn't know this would even apply to someplace like China until I looked it up.

I'm pretty sure some commies are not gonna be happy at me dissing their government. But I'm just stating some observations for most part. Better than lying to ricecels thinking they can just study their way to the top.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • So Sad
  • JFL
Reactions: ALP, kebabcoper, Looks234 and 8 others
Like i said before. Nothing is more important than looks and dominant personality.

im even thinking of not letting my future kid going to school. But just focus on looks and social skills.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: YoungRichNigga, Deleted member 10524 and poloralf
Just look at the height of us presidents and you will realize that height is number 1 factor in success in politics.
 
  • +1
Reactions: YoungRichNigga, Deleted member 6403, Lux and 1 other person
Like i said before. Nothing is more important than looks and dominant personality.

im even thinking of not letting my future kid going to school. But just focus on looks and social skills.
I wouldn't advise skipping school.

But he should know there are many other factors which are just as important. Don't make the same mistake many ricecels or currycels make where they think studying is the only thing that matter.

Even Modi isn't the smartest dude in India. Yet he's the boss coz he's arguably ruthless too.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BigBoy and Vaptor
It really depends on the type of job. A management type of job would require more people skills and chad traits. A specialist kind of job more knowledge. Still then you need some chad traits. If you are completely autistic you could still got fired and replaced by a more charismatic chad person.
 
  • +1
Reactions: YoungRichNigga, BigBoy and Deleted member 5292
@Collagen or rope muh prestigious degree
 
  • +1
Reactions: Looks234 and Deleted member 5292
@Collagen or rope muh prestigious degree
one my friends who is turkish studies in tsinghua, i didn't know it was that much of a mogger school

edit : sry bro didn't mean to reply to you lol
 
Like i said before. Nothing is more important than looks and dominant personality.

im even thinking of not letting my future kid going to school. But just focus on looks and social skills.
but on school thats acquired social skills, lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: hairyballscel
but on school thats acquired social skills, lol

no school is chad playground. Not saying normies dont aquire social skills from school but the whole school environment is too cucked.

Maybe Im going to homeschool him. Social skills and maturity is better learned when i choose the right environment for him.
 
  • +1
Reactions: YoungRichNigga
@Collagen or rope muh prestigious degree
OJ-AM722_XILI_P_20160720040305.jpg

In my last thread I was wondering why many leaders in the world right now don't have the best credentials. While I was looking up different countries, I came across something related to China and would like to share my findings.

A lot of people blame the west especially USA saying its a Chad friendly nation and if nerds went somewhere else, things would be much better. I'm here to tell you that sadly might not be the case. At least when it comes to China. I honestly thought they would be nerd friendly but not really.

Now lets use the example above. Left is Xi Jinping, the big boss of China. Right is Li Keqiang, the 2nd in command.

If you were to guess which one is smarter, you would probably say it’s the guy with glasses. And you would be correct. However, that doesn't mean anything.

Xi Jinping had his schooling was interrupted due to the cultural revolution in China. Also his dad went to jail. During the time in the fields, he basically had to do a lot of self-studying at night. He went to uni as a Worker-Peasant-Soldier student (Due to circumstances back then, its not really the same as full time college education). Basically, he went through his share of struggles.

Li Keqiang on the other hand is pretty much a stereotypical nerd. He went to Tsinghua (The top uni in China) by beating everyone else in his province via exam. He would later get a PHD in economics from the same uni and was even awarded a prize. Its pretty safe to say he would be damn smart or at least damn good at studying so his journey was a lot smoother.

People say Li was handpicked to become the next leader of China. However, in the end, Xi got the job.

Now why did that happen? Why did the party snub the nerd? Its hard to say to be honest. But here’s my opinion

1.Xi is simply stronger. He is more cunning and ruthless when dealing with others. He is basically more high T which is important in tough times like right now. There's gonna be a lot of conflict in the future with many countries so they want someone who is loyal but also strong to deal with future opponents. He's supposedly also better at handling people, getting favorable deals donem giving strong images etc. . The other guy is very good with numbers and technical knowledge etc. But this doesn't necessarily translate to statecraft fighting.

2.Appearences. Xi is a northerner. Li is a southerner. Northerners are taller and have bigger frames (Closer to Koreans and Mongolians). When world leaders shake hands with each other, its always a mogging battle. Frankly I don't know how manlet Putin can cope coz he always gets heightmogged.

3. A leader doesn’t need to be a subject matter expert. He is just there to manage. He just needs to be able to delegate the right tasks to the experts. So people skills are far more important. Also how is a PHD who never had to struggle that much supposed to relate to the common people who proabably can't even go to uni? Especially in China which is still a developing nation.

View attachment 807694


In short, nerds still dabbed on sadly. Strength is still more important in politics. The blackpill isn’t limited to a continent. It’s a human thing. Some will say this is obvious but I frankly didn't know this would even apply to someplace like China until I looked it up.

I'm pretty sure some commies are not gonna be happy at me dissing their government. But I'm just stating some observations for most part. Better than lying to ricecels thinking they can just study their way to the top.
tfw you didn't even do your research correctly.

Xi went to Tsinghua, China's number 1 uni. The fact that he didn't get there on academic qualifications doesn't mean jackshit - he still attained a Tsinghua degree.

Li went to Peking, China's number 2 uni. Tsinghua mogs Peking the same way Harvard mogs Yale. So it isn't surprising at all Xi became the big boss over Li - Xi went to Tsinghua, after all.

Genetics has absolutely nothing to do with it. Once again, it all comes down to ALMA MATER. Tsinghua > Peking. Xi > Li

Fucking brainlet.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6191
one my friends who is turkish studies in tsinghua, i didn't know it was that much of a mogger school

edit : sry bro didn't mean to reply to you lol
Tsinghua is legit mogger school tbh, like 0.1% acceptance rate and statistically only 1 kid in every province has a chance of attending. Too bad not many people outside of China are aware of its reputation, but inside China a Tsinghua degree is the ultimate statusmaxx.
 
no school is chad playground. Not saying normies dont aquire social skills from school but the whole school environment is too cucked.

Maybe Im going to homeschool him. Social skills and maturity is better learned when i choose the right environment for him.

Low IQ, a homeschooled child is almost guaranteed to be a social autist. You can't just teach your kid social skills, he needs to apply them. You can't shelter him from the world forever.

School is also important as it puts your child somewhere for 6 hours so you can wageslave without them being left at home alone.
 
  • +1
Reactions: kebabcoper, hairyballscel and BigBoy
Low IQ, a homeschooled child is almost guaranteed to be a social autist. You can't just teach your kid social skills, he needs to apply them. You can't shelter him from the world forever.

School is also important as it puts your child somewhere for 6 hours so you can wageslave without them being left at home alone.

Quality over quantity.

lets be honest how much canyou talk during school before the teacher gets fed up and constantly interrupts you? Even the breaks are too short to get a good amount of maturity and social skills atleast in europe.

in1/2 hours my kid will have done and seen more shit and has socialized more than some normiecuck in 7hours prison camp with limited social skills oppurtunities.
 
Quality over quantity.

lets be honest how much canyou talk during school before the teacher gets fed up and constantly interrupts you? Even the breaks are too short to get a good amount of maturity and social skills atleast in europe.

in1/2 hours my kid will have done and seen more shit and has socialized more than some normiecuck in 7hours prison camp with limited social skills oppurtunities.

Idk what school you went to but we got good sized breaks in school and we still had opportunities to talk when doing activities.
 
5D309708 78EE 4A31 8D96 6206F3C40FFF
2DF1D260 A192 4399 9999 998116D4029C
 
  • WTF
Reactions: Deleted member 756
im even thinking of not letting my future kid going to school. But just focus on looks and social skills.
ur retarded if you do this

you will fuck up ur kids life i promise you that
 
no school is chad playground. Not saying normies dont aquire social skills from school but the whole school environment is too cucked.
nigga what the fuck are you talking about

you sound like some low iq IT fag trying to sound like a .me autist, i can't tell if ur serious, rope if u are
 

Similar threads

K
Replies
5
Views
135
Kreier
K
yandex99
Replies
8
Views
322
Latinolooksmaxxer
Latinolooksmaxxer
LegitUser
Replies
62
Views
5K
PCT
PCT

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top