Every photo posted here is so cringe

D

Deleted member 4430

Emerald
Joined
Dec 20, 2019
Posts
41,268
Reputation
110,580
there must be a 10000000/001 selfie candid ratio

then a 1000000/1 tryhard selfie to natural selfie ratio

literally worse than women on social media

just posting here means you are bottom 10% socially, but nothing is more telling of someones position in society than the content they put out on here, specially someone like larsanova69
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot, Danish_Retard, Deleted member 5912 and 7 others
20201016 154518

Rate candid
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Danish_Retard, Deleted member 6723 and Deleted member 4430
have sex
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Toth's thot and Deleted member 6403
thinwhiteduke said:
well they can take up any role online, but when they spam selfies its just full proof evidence they have nothing to lose aka 0 IRL status
Click to expand...
Fax, never posting my face on here
 
  • +1
Reactions: inceletto and Deleted member 4430
I think i'm the only one that doesn't fraud when posting for rates.
I actually post what i look like most of the time
 
MansNotHot said:
I think i'm the only one that doesn't fraud when posting for rates.
I actually post what i look like most of the time
Click to expand...
all or nothing strikes again

theres a difference between a bit of chit chat with a cider after a day of working and spamming selfies hitting f5 till another male says 6
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Toth's thot, Danish_Retard, Ocelot and 3 others
thinwhiteduke said:
all or nothing strikes again

theres a difference between a bit of chit chat with a cider after a day of working and spamming selfies hitting f5 till another male says 6
Click to expand...
I don't get what you mean, explain it for low iqcel
 
MansNotHot said:
I don't get what you mean, explain it for low iqcel
Click to expand...

I'll try my best but first forgive anyweird typos, this is being written via tablet.

Okay so to understand General Relativity (GR) it's easier if we first start with Special Relativity (SR)

SR comes from two simple postulates

No matter where you are the physical laws are the same
Click to expand...
No matter where you are the speed of light in vacuum (that is - how fast light moves when there's nothing for it to interact with it) doesn't change
Click to expand...
From this you can formulate SR and I would suggest looking up "light clocks" for an explanation of time dilation which is an immediate consequence of this.

Now from special relativity we know our two postulates and we can also derive the famous E = mc2 which is actually an special case of the total formula E2 = (mc2 )2 + (pc)2 what they represent mathematically isn't really of concern here - the important thing is that we can take from these equations are that mass and momentum are not as directly related as we think they are.

If a giant sumo wrestler runs at you and hits you, we say he has a lot of momentum - and this is true because he has high mass and when we're moving slowly we can guess how "hard" that sumo wrestler is going to hit you by his weight and speed.

Now if a photon hits you - infact if billions of photons hit you, it really doesn't make to much of a difference in your life and you can carry on without going to the hospital. We tend to think this is because photons are "massless" or simply don't weigh anything

But here is an oddity in our thought process. Because if photons are "massless"and we know that black holes exist - and they are black because they absorb light - how can we have something gravitationally attracting something without mass? Classically the little light particle should be unaffected by the black hole as the force exerted on it mathematically will be multiplied by 0 (dont worry about the math here although if you have taken an intro physics course or up to Gr 11 math you can probably math it if you're intrested).

This is because we are thinking incorrectly of momentum earlier - a particle does not need to weigh anything to have momentum we just normally don't realize this because if we math it out the contribution of the actual momentum is so small. And indeed if we graph it we will see at very low speeds momentum behaves very much like our equation above but at higher speeds it deviates from this.

So what am I getting at?

We know from our earlier thoughts above that we need to find a reason for light to travel into a black hole - because that's what we observe and not matter how pretty or elegant a theory is - if i3t doesn't match what we see it's wrong. GR is the tool we can use to model this physically and explain whats going on mathematically.

The none mathematical explanation is that light has funky properties that always lets it know how to get somewhere the fastest this comes from something called Quantum Chromo Dynamics and if you're intrested in it I would recommend the book:QCD The Strange Theory of Light and Matter by Richard Feynman or I can link you a youtube video later in an edit which is about 15 min long and explains the book a bit more ELI5. Since light always knows where to travel some place quickest mathematically it is analogous to a ball rolling down a hill. A ball never rolls up a hill, it always rolls down the hill. This is called the principle of least action and it basically states that the quickest way for a ball to get to a lowest energy state - that is the ball will "Die out the fastest" will be taken by the object. Similarly we can describe space as a fabric or manifold that light travels like the ball, always "rolling" down the easiest path for it to follow - nature is lazy.

This is where all those funky pictures of GR come from with the Earth in a warped grid and what not. However our minds like to visualize things in 3D so we picture it like that but that's not really what it is that's only a 2D representation of the potential the light has when traveling on that plane - just as we associate certain values on an x axis with a y axis we associate coordinates in space with a Certain potential (how fast the ball can roll). To fully visualize this GR Manifold we must rotate the picture we see on the interweb all around every point of the object so we get a sphere of influence and sometimes this sphere can be so powerful a drainage that light can't escape it and it sucks in light if it passes a point - this is called an event horizon.

TL;DR

GR comes from two postulates, anywhere you are physics laws can't be broken and the speed of light in vacuum is the speed of light in a vacuum. However these promote an odd understanding of some physical phenomena around us that can be solved by viewing space as a sort of hill that a ball can roll down. GR gives us the mathematical tools to start a ball at any point on a hill and calculate the path it takes - except the ball is light and the hill is the fabric of the cosmos itself.

TL;DR TL;DR

Everything moves relative to the speed of light which is constant and because of that physical laws act weird they look better if you think of them mathematically as balls rolling down a bunch of hills.

Edit: formatting sucks on a tablet.

Edit 2: I should mention that this isn't JUST what GR is. Just as Quantum Mechanics can boil down to essentially solving one equation in a variety of situations GR becomes extremely complicated because of how it affects the 4 fundamental forces - in this I have only discussed gravity there is also GR Electromagnetism and attempts at unifying smaller stuff on the Nuclear scale. Just as we can explain how light moves with this idea of the manifold GR gives us the mathematical tools to explain how mass moves, GR EM can modify a set of 4 equations called Maxwell's equations to explain the behaviour of light from a GR perspective. For example, if you were a photon (little particle of light) the time you are emitted (kicked out of something) and absorbed (taken into something) appears exactly the same as you, everything is instantaneous from the perspective of light.

Edit 3: An awesome video on SR in case you're intrested:

 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard, inceletto, Deleted member 6723 and 4 others
Toth's thot said:
I'll try my best but first forgive anyweird typos, this is being written via tablet.

Okay so to understand General Relativity (GR) it's easier if we first start with Special Relativity (SR)

SR comes from two simple postulates



From this you can formulate SR and I would suggest looking up "light clocks" for an explanation of time dilation which is an immediate consequence of this.

Now from special relativity we know our two postulates and we can also derive the famous E = mc2 which is actually an special case of the total formula E2 = (mc2 )2 + (pc)2 what they represent mathematically isn't really of concern here - the important thing is that we can take from these equations are that mass and momentum are not as directly related as we think they are.

If a giant sumo wrestler runs at you and hits you, we say he has a lot of momentum - and this is true because he has high mass and when we're moving slowly we can guess how "hard" that sumo wrestler is going to hit you by his weight and speed.

Now if a photon hits you - infact if billions of photons hit you, it really doesn't make to much of a difference in your life and you can carry on without going to the hospital. We tend to think this is because photons are "massless" or simply don't weigh anything

But here is an oddity in our thought process. Because if photons are "massless"and we know that black holes exist - and they are black because they absorb light - how can we have something gravitationally attracting something without mass? Classically the little light particle should be unaffected by the black hole as the force exerted on it mathematically will be multiplied by 0 (dont worry about the math here although if you have taken an intro physics course or up to Gr 11 math you can probably math it if you're intrested).

This is because we are thinking incorrectly of momentum earlier - a particle does not need to weigh anything to have momentum we just normally don't realize this because if we math it out the contribution of the actual momentum is so small. And indeed if we graph it we will see at very low speeds momentum behaves very much like our equation above but at higher speeds it deviates from this.

So what am I getting at?

We know from our earlier thoughts above that we need to find a reason for light to travel into a black hole - because that's what we observe and not matter how pretty or elegant a theory is - if i3t doesn't match what we see it's wrong. GR is the tool we can use to model this physically and explain whats going on mathematically.

The none mathematical explanation is that light has funky properties that always lets it know how to get somewhere the fastest this comes from something called Quantum Chromo Dynamics and if you're intrested in it I would recommend the book:QCD The Strange Theory of Light and Matter by Richard Feynman or I can link you a youtube video later in an edit which is about 15 min long and explains the book a bit more ELI5. Since light always knows where to travel some place quickest mathematically it is analogous to a ball rolling down a hill. A ball never rolls up a hill, it always rolls down the hill. This is called the principle of least action and it basically states that the quickest way for a ball to get to a lowest energy state - that is the ball will "Die out the fastest" will be taken by the object. Similarly we can describe space as a fabric or manifold that light travels like the ball, always "rolling" down the easiest path for it to follow - nature is lazy.

This is where all those funky pictures of GR come from with the Earth in a warped grid and what not. However our minds like to visualize things in 3D so we picture it like that but that's not really what it is that's only a 2D representation of the potential the light has when traveling on that plane - just as we associate certain values on an x axis with a y axis we associate coordinates in space with a Certain potential (how fast the ball can roll). To fully visualize this GR Manifold we must rotate the picture we see on the interweb all around every point of the object so we get a sphere of influence and sometimes this sphere can be so powerful a drainage that light can't escape it and it sucks in light if it passes a point - this is called an event horizon.

TL;DR

GR comes from two postulates, anywhere you are physics laws can't be broken and the speed of light in vacuum is the speed of light in a vacuum. However these promote an odd understanding of some physical phenomena around us that can be solved by viewing space as a sort of hill that a ball can roll down. GR gives us the mathematical tools to start a ball at any point on a hill and calculate the path it takes - except the ball is light and the hill is the fabric of the cosmos itself.

TL;DR TL;DR

Everything moves relative to the speed of light which is constant and because of that physical laws act weird they look better if you think of them mathematically as balls rolling down a bunch of hills.

Edit: formatting sucks on a tablet.

Edit 2: I should mention that this isn't JUST what GR is. Just as Quantum Mechanics can boil down to essentially solving one equation in a variety of situations GR becomes extremely complicated because of how it affects the 4 fundamental forces - in this I have only discussed gravity there is also GR Electromagnetism and attempts at unifying smaller stuff on the Nuclear scale. Just as we can explain how light moves with this idea of the manifold GR gives us the mathematical tools to explain how mass moves, GR EM can modify a set of 4 equations called Maxwell's equations to explain the behaviour of light from a GR perspective. For example, if you were a photon (little particle of light) the time you are emitted (kicked out of something) and absorbed (taken into something) appears exactly the same as you, everything is instantaneous from the perspective of light.

Edit 3: An awesome video on SR in case you're intrested:

Click to expand...

Read every single word ngl, thank you for iq increase
 
  • +1
Reactions: RAITEIII and Deleted member 6997
Toth's thot said:
I'll try my best but first forgive anyweird typos, this is being written via tablet.

Okay so to understand General Relativity (GR) it's easier if we first start with Special Relativity (SR)

SR comes from two simple postulates



From this you can formulate SR and I would suggest looking up "light clocks" for an explanation of time dilation which is an immediate consequence of this.

Now from special relativity we know our two postulates and we can also derive the famous E = mc2 which is actually an special case of the total formula E2 = (mc2 )2 + (pc)2 what they represent mathematically isn't really of concern here - the important thing is that we can take from these equations are that mass and momentum are not as directly related as we think they are.

If a giant sumo wrestler runs at you and hits you, we say he has a lot of momentum - and this is true because he has high mass and when we're moving slowly we can guess how "hard" that sumo wrestler is going to hit you by his weight and speed.

Now if a photon hits you - infact if billions of photons hit you, it really doesn't make to much of a difference in your life and you can carry on without going to the hospital. We tend to think this is because photons are "massless" or simply don't weigh anything

But here is an oddity in our thought process. Because if photons are "massless"and we know that black holes exist - and they are black because they absorb light - how can we have something gravitationally attracting something without mass? Classically the little light particle should be unaffected by the black hole as the force exerted on it mathematically will be multiplied by 0 (dont worry about the math here although if you have taken an intro physics course or up to Gr 11 math you can probably math it if you're intrested).

This is because we are thinking incorrectly of momentum earlier - a particle does not need to weigh anything to have momentum we just normally don't realize this because if we math it out the contribution of the actual momentum is so small. And indeed if we graph it we will see at very low speeds momentum behaves very much like our equation above but at higher speeds it deviates from this.

So what am I getting at?

We know from our earlier thoughts above that we need to find a reason for light to travel into a black hole - because that's what we observe and not matter how pretty or elegant a theory is - if i3t doesn't match what we see it's wrong. GR is the tool we can use to model this physically and explain whats going on mathematically.

The none mathematical explanation is that light has funky properties that always lets it know how to get somewhere the fastest this comes from something called Quantum Chromo Dynamics and if you're intrested in it I would recommend the book:QCD The Strange Theory of Light and Matter by Richard Feynman or I can link you a youtube video later in an edit which is about 15 min long and explains the book a bit more ELI5. Since light always knows where to travel some place quickest mathematically it is analogous to a ball rolling down a hill. A ball never rolls up a hill, it always rolls down the hill. This is called the principle of least action and it basically states that the quickest way for a ball to get to a lowest energy state - that is the ball will "Die out the fastest" will be taken by the object. Similarly we can describe space as a fabric or manifold that light travels like the ball, always "rolling" down the easiest path for it to follow - nature is lazy.

This is where all those funky pictures of GR come from with the Earth in a warped grid and what not. However our minds like to visualize things in 3D so we picture it like that but that's not really what it is that's only a 2D representation of the potential the light has when traveling on that plane - just as we associate certain values on an x axis with a y axis we associate coordinates in space with a Certain potential (how fast the ball can roll). To fully visualize this GR Manifold we must rotate the picture we see on the interweb all around every point of the object so we get a sphere of influence and sometimes this sphere can be so powerful a drainage that light can't escape it and it sucks in light if it passes a point - this is called an event horizon.

TL;DR

GR comes from two postulates, anywhere you are physics laws can't be broken and the speed of light in vacuum is the speed of light in a vacuum. However these promote an odd understanding of some physical phenomena around us that can be solved by viewing space as a sort of hill that a ball can roll down. GR gives us the mathematical tools to start a ball at any point on a hill and calculate the path it takes - except the ball is light and the hill is the fabric of the cosmos itself.

TL;DR TL;DR

Everything moves relative to the speed of light which is constant and because of that physical laws act weird they look better if you think of them mathematically as balls rolling down a bunch of hills.

Edit: formatting sucks on a tablet.

Edit 2: I should mention that this isn't JUST what GR is. Just as Quantum Mechanics can boil down to essentially solving one equation in a variety of situations GR becomes extremely complicated because of how it affects the 4 fundamental forces - in this I have only discussed gravity there is also GR Electromagnetism and attempts at unifying smaller stuff on the Nuclear scale. Just as we can explain how light moves with this idea of the manifold GR gives us the mathematical tools to explain how mass moves, GR EM can modify a set of 4 equations called Maxwell's equations to explain the behaviour of light from a GR perspective. For example, if you were a photon (little particle of light) the time you are emitted (kicked out of something) and absorbed (taken into something) appears exactly the same as you, everything is instantaneous from the perspective of light.

Edit 3: An awesome video on SR in case you're intrested:

Click to expand...

výborně
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot and Deleted member 6997
Toth's thot said:
I'll try my best but first forgive anyweird typos, this is being written via tablet.

Okay so to understand General Relativity (GR) it's easier if we first start with Special Relativity (SR)

SR comes from two simple postulates



From this you can formulate SR and I would suggest looking up "light clocks" for an explanation of time dilation which is an immediate consequence of this.

Now from special relativity we know our two postulates and we can also derive the famous E = mc2 which is actually an special case of the total formula E2 = (mc2 )2 + (pc)2 what they represent mathematically isn't really of concern here - the important thing is that we can take from these equations are that mass and momentum are not as directly related as we think they are.

If a giant sumo wrestler runs at you and hits you, we say he has a lot of momentum - and this is true because he has high mass and when we're moving slowly we can guess how "hard" that sumo wrestler is going to hit you by his weight and speed.

Now if a photon hits you - infact if billions of photons hit you, it really doesn't make to much of a difference in your life and you can carry on without going to the hospital. We tend to think this is because photons are "massless" or simply don't weigh anything

But here is an oddity in our thought process. Because if photons are "massless"and we know that black holes exist - and they are black because they absorb light - how can we have something gravitationally attracting something without mass? Classically the little light particle should be unaffected by the black hole as the force exerted on it mathematically will be multiplied by 0 (dont worry about the math here although if you have taken an intro physics course or up to Gr 11 math you can probably math it if you're intrested).

This is because we are thinking incorrectly of momentum earlier - a particle does not need to weigh anything to have momentum we just normally don't realize this because if we math it out the contribution of the actual momentum is so small. And indeed if we graph it we will see at very low speeds momentum behaves very much like our equation above but at higher speeds it deviates from this.

So what am I getting at?

We know from our earlier thoughts above that we need to find a reason for light to travel into a black hole - because that's what we observe and not matter how pretty or elegant a theory is - if i3t doesn't match what we see it's wrong. GR is the tool we can use to model this physically and explain whats going on mathematically.

The none mathematical explanation is that light has funky properties that always lets it know how to get somewhere the fastest this comes from something called Quantum Chromo Dynamics and if you're intrested in it I would recommend the book:QCD The Strange Theory of Light and Matter by Richard Feynman or I can link you a youtube video later in an edit which is about 15 min long and explains the book a bit more ELI5. Since light always knows where to travel some place quickest mathematically it is analogous to a ball rolling down a hill. A ball never rolls up a hill, it always rolls down the hill. This is called the principle of least action and it basically states that the quickest way for a ball to get to a lowest energy state - that is the ball will "Die out the fastest" will be taken by the object. Similarly we can describe space as a fabric or manifold that light travels like the ball, always "rolling" down the easiest path for it to follow - nature is lazy.

This is where all those funky pictures of GR come from with the Earth in a warped grid and what not. However our minds like to visualize things in 3D so we picture it like that but that's not really what it is that's only a 2D representation of the potential the light has when traveling on that plane - just as we associate certain values on an x axis with a y axis we associate coordinates in space with a Certain potential (how fast the ball can roll). To fully visualize this GR Manifold we must rotate the picture we see on the interweb all around every point of the object so we get a sphere of influence and sometimes this sphere can be so powerful a drainage that light can't escape it and it sucks in light if it passes a point - this is called an event horizon.

TL;DR

GR comes from two postulates, anywhere you are physics laws can't be broken and the speed of light in vacuum is the speed of light in a vacuum. However these promote an odd understanding of some physical phenomena around us that can be solved by viewing space as a sort of hill that a ball can roll down. GR gives us the mathematical tools to start a ball at any point on a hill and calculate the path it takes - except the ball is light and the hill is the fabric of the cosmos itself.

TL;DR TL;DR

Everything moves relative to the speed of light which is constant and because of that physical laws act weird they look better if you think of them mathematically as balls rolling down a bunch of hills.

Edit: formatting sucks on a tablet.

Edit 2: I should mention that this isn't JUST what GR is. Just as Quantum Mechanics can boil down to essentially solving one equation in a variety of situations GR becomes extremely complicated because of how it affects the 4 fundamental forces - in this I have only discussed gravity there is also GR Electromagnetism and attempts at unifying smaller stuff on the Nuclear scale. Just as we can explain how light moves with this idea of the manifold GR gives us the mathematical tools to explain how mass moves, GR EM can modify a set of 4 equations called Maxwell's equations to explain the behaviour of light from a GR perspective. For example, if you were a photon (little particle of light) the time you are emitted (kicked out of something) and absorbed (taken into something) appears exactly the same as you, everything is instantaneous from the perspective of light.

Edit 3: An awesome video on SR in case you're intrested:

Click to expand...

:lul:
 
:ogre:
 
bumo
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Toth's thot
@larsanova69
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Lars, Deleted member 6723 and Deleted member 4430
I fully agree i need to post less i am Just being bored because this stupid corona virus :( i am really extroverted, when no one is around i feel fuckedup so i Just seek validation here to not feel alone
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: hairyballscel
larsanova69 said:
I fully agree i need to post less i am Just being bored because this stupid corona virus :( i am really extroverted, when no one is around i feel fuckedup so i Just seek validation here to not feel alone
Click to expand...
unrelated but how many matches do you get on tinder?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lars
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SomeoneYouCan'tMog
a reminder for retards who think they are moggers because cashiers are being nice to them, while being sexless truecels for years
Replies
16
Views
640
reeven
reeven
Tabula Rasa
Discussion I am convinced that Reptilian beings are REAL and that the tunnel of light that people see when they die is a trap.
Replies
8
Views
193
icemanleonard
icemanleonard
lifeless
Glossary
Replies
41
Views
2K
grungymallard97
grungymallard97
BucketCrab
Guide Female Psychology II - Sexual and Romantic Fantasies
Replies
31
Views
4K
aestheticsrespecter
A
leF
Looksmax My personal LIFEMAXXING guide (MEGATHREAD)
Replies
35
Views
6K
ShapeShifterMax
ShapeShifterMax

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 2)
Back
Top