Everyone here worships PSL…

[Deleted member 9801]

But has any of you faggots stopped for a second and thought ‘hold up…who created those ground rules for PSL ratings?”.. was it Isaac Newton? No, it was perma-rotting aspies with homoerotic fantasies over the mystical ‘Chad’. No one questions the validity of the rating system.

And before you start with “muh science of attraction”, “muh surgeons use these rules”, “muh objective facial aesthetics & facial harmony”…go outside bro, talk to normies and you’ll see that many in fact find the PSL standards to look quite uncanny. Was talking to this girl last week who said Somerhalder’s face is just “too angular” so looks a bit off, etc…(inb4 “muh virtue signaling”)

PSL is a hopeful cope for autists tbh, thinking it will change their lives if they look like exagerated faceapp morphs. Irl appeal differs from the weird standards of the looksmax stratosphere

And for the record, I am actually “high PSL”, so not coping at all. All that’s been said is simply the honest truth

 

[Deleted member 12002]

But has any of you faggots stopped for a second and thought ‘hold up…who created those ground rules for PSL ratings?”.. was it Isaac Newton? No, it was perma-rotting aspies with homoerotic fantasies over the mystical ‘Chad’. No one questions the validity of the rating system.

And before you start with “muh science of attraction”, “muh surgeons use these rules”, “muh objective facial aesthetics & facial harmony”…go outside bro, talk to normies and you’ll see that many in fact find the PSL standards to look quite uncanny. Was talking to this girl last week who said Somerhalder’s face is just “too angular” so looks a bit off, etc…(inb4 “muh virtue signaling”)

PSL is a hopeful cope for autists tbh, thinking it will change their lives if they look like exagerated faceapp morphs. Irl appeal differs from the weird standards of the looksmax stratosphere

And for the record, I am actually “high PSL”, so not coping at all. All that’s been said is simply the honest truth

You tell em, girlfriend.

 

[stevielake]

PSL is too critical on features and rejects facial harmony pill

 

[Deleted member 16371]

Your dumb

 

[Deleted member 17763]

 

[Deleted member 9801]

Your dumb

You’re*

Just your average psl user, so not surprised

 

[Deleted member 16371]

I bet your low psl

 

[Deleted member 16371]

You’re*

Just your average psl user, so not surprised

Tbh

 

[Deleted member 9801]

Should be water but many inkwells take psl as bible

 

[Scammer]

Legit, psl is too extreme, I’ve never had problem with women, I actually get approached a lot but on a psl scale I would be a 5 at best

Just be average and find girls that like u theory

 

[Deleted member 9801]

I bet your low psl

You suffer of brainrot, inkwell

If you finished my original post you’d know that’s not the case. Can’t even read a few paragraphs, over

 

[Deleted member 9801]

Legit, psl is too extreme, I’ve never had problem with women, I actually get approached a lot but on a psl scale I would be a 5 at best

Just be average and find girls that like u theory

Unironically, PSL is just inkwell cope
Some validity to it, but exaggerated to extremes

 

[Deleted member 16371]

You suffer of brainrot, inkwell

If you finished my original post you’d know that’s not the case. Can’t even read a few paragraphs, over

I read it. But you will have been overrated by others on this forum, my psl understanding is slightly different to the retards

 

[Korea]

This is exactly what I thought, and exactly why I've never used the scale to rate people.

 

[Bitch]

PSL doesn't and can't always get everything right, but it certainly helps a lot when analyzing facial features and ratios and comparing them to people who are perceived as attractive by the vast majority of people.

RTT normies who are NT can outslay autistic PSL 6 guys in some cases, but don't act like you've just discovered hot water greycel

 

[tyronelite]

Only autists take PSL seriously

 

[Deleted member 9801]

I read it. But you will have been overrated by others on this forum, my psl understanding is slightly different to the retards

My psl rating is besides the point of the thread though, just mentioned that so that everyone knows I’m not saying psl is cope just to suit my own agenda or anything (which this site is notorious of doing anyways. E.g twinks saying gym is cope, tall lanklets saying height is everything, manlets claiming shoulder width is king. Etc)

What’s your understanding of psl which differs from the rest here?

 

[the BULL]

Legit. This hunter eyes compact midface hollow cheeks Square head haver should be drawning in pussy by now

 

[Deleted member 9801]

PSL doesn't and can't always get everything right, but it certainly helps a lot when analyzing facial features and ratios and comparing them to people who are perceived as attractive by the vast majority of people.

RTT normies who are NT can outslay autistic PSL 6 guys in some cases, but don't act like you've just discovered hot water greycel

I’m not claiming I’m the first person to think this, but just saying many people seem to be oblivious to this point and they embrace psl blindly. Similarly to religious people believing in things which can’t be proven. PSL is an obscure internet cult

 

[the BULL]

I’m not claiming I’m the first person to think this, but just saying many people seem to be oblivious to this point and they embrace psl blindly. Similarly to religious people believing in things which can’t be proven. PSL is an obscure internet cult

But looks theory Is real and that's all that matters. For 1 girl saying chad Is uncanny there are 99 saying he's hot

 

[Deleted member 15004]

PSL rating system is retarded but looks theory is legit.

Here's my logical rating system
1-very subhuman
2-subhuman
3-well below average
4-low tier normie
5-mid-tier normie
6-high-tier normie
7-chadlite
8-chad
9-gigachad
10-perfect

 

[Deleted member 16275]

PSL rating system is retarded but looks theory is legit.

Here's my logical rating system
1-very subhuman
2-subhuman
3-well below average
4-low tier normie
5-mid-tier normie
6-high-tier normie
7-chadlite
8-chad
9-gigachad
10-perfect

Do u think im low tier normie like @justadude says?

 

[EverythingMattersCel]

PSL is too critical on features and rejects facial harmony pill

PSL is literally the male gaze.

 

[germanlooks]

I actually get approached a lot but on a psl scale I would be a 5

Atleast one of these two claims is wrong

 

[Scammer]

Atleast one of these two claims is wrong

No ur just seething cause i mog u, many users here have rated me and I do get approached, probably have a higher body count than most of the forum

 

[germanlooks]

No ur just seething cause i mog u, many users here have rated me and I do get approached, probably have a higher body count than most of the forum

I‘m not seething a bit faggot. As I said one of these two claims is wrong.

 

[Scammer]

I‘m not seething a bit faggot. As I said one of these two claims is wrong.

They’re both right and I mog u there’s 3 true claims

 

[germanlooks]

I mog u

 

[Deleted member 5892]

It's much more simple than you think.

If what you mean by "PSL" is the "PSL rating system", then yes it's bullshit. There is no "low tier normie, mid tier chadlite".
Now, most people here (like 95%+ of users Ive seen) have no real understanding of looks theory, it's that simple. Looks Theory was NOT created by online autists, in fact, it originally comes from Ancient Greece (theories of facial proportions). So yes, there IS an objective way to measure attractiveness. Now, women have different tastes in good looking men. Some of them will find Somerhalder unattractive, and others will find him attractive. But, more women on average will prefer Somerhalder over a normal looking guy. That's how we know that beauty is objective (and that's where the words "conventionally attractive" come from). Furthermore, humans have the innate ability to distinguish beautiful faces from ugly ones (it's supported by scientific evidence).
Even Somerhalder's supposed excess of angularity can be explained by facial analysis methods ( he has a 1.0+ bigonial/bizygomatic ratio, which for some people can be perceived as weird/uncanny)
OK, so like I said, most users here have no real understanding of looks theory. They've never bothered opening a single LT textbook, and so they have a very naive/immature outlook on facial aesthetics. That's why you see a bunch of users talking about "hunter eyes", "jaw is law", etc.

 

[Deleted member 9801]

It's much more simple than you think.

If what you mean by "PSL" is the "PSL rating system", then yes it's bullshit. There is no "low tier normie, mid tier chadlite".
Now, most people here (like 95%+ of users Ive seen) have no real understanding of looks theory, it's that simple. Looks Theory was NOT created by online autists, in fact, it originally comes from Ancient Greece (theories of facial proportions). So yes, there IS an objective way to measure attractiveness. Now, women have different tastes in good looking men. Some of them will find Somerhalder unattractive, and others will find him attractive. But, more women on average will prefer Somerhalder over a normal looking guy. That's how we know that beauty is objective (and that's where the words "conventionally attractive" come from). Furthermore, humans have the innate ability to distinguish beautiful faces from ugly ones (it's supported by scientific evidence).
Even Somerhalder's supposed excess of angularity can be explained by facial analysis methods ( he has a 1.0+ bigonial/bizygomatic ratio, which for some people can be perceived as weird/uncanny)
OK, so like I said, most users here have no real understanding of looks theory. They've never bothered opening a single LT textbook, and so they have a very naive/immature outlook on facial aesthetics. That's why you see a bunch of users talking about "hunter eyes", "jaw is law", etc.

Interesting point, but while facial proportions and symmetry can objectively determine beauty, beauty itself does not always translate to attraction. You can admire a beautiful person while feeling 0 sexual attraction towards them. So aesthetics can be explained by looks theory, but not necessarily sexual attraction

 

[one job away]

This is exactly what I thought, and exactly why I've never used the scale to rate people.

 

[Deleted member 15827]

Legit, psl is too extreme, I’ve never had problem with women, I actually get approached a lot but on a psl scale I would be a 5 at best

Just be average and find girls that like u theory

Ur a Bangladeshi Manlet taxi driver stop larping