everyone tell rl i belive in bigfoot and he cant debate me on this

[dwohh]

@Harold O'brien telll rl i belive in bigfoot and if he tries to de bate me ont hsi i will win

 

[realrob]

Are the Irish brothers still incel?

 

[dwohh]

Are the Irish brothers still incel?

that nigga ksoo is a bitch atk aint on shit

 

[Harold O'brien]

no + if you believe in bigfoot you are retard

 

[dwohh]

no + if you believe in bigfoot you are retard

its real and ihave the evidnece to prove it


after many months of research i concluded bigfoot has to be real theres no inbetween the evi9dnece ismply to compelling

 

[DwayneWhite55]

Nigga didn't get past the 2nd grade with that writing

 

[dwohh]

Nigga didn't get past the 2nd grade with that writing

bigfoot ral

 

[dwohh]

im ready im militant about thuis thsi debate will go down in history if it happens but it weont because he knows he cant win this one

 

[Glokknine]

he's real, and so is Yeti

 

[dwohh]

he's real, and so is Yeti

and so is yowie

 

[player1]

i would have called you naive, but look what i caught with my phone last week:

 

[slayer69]

bigfoot lives in chi town cuz

 

[dwohh]

i would have called you naive, but look what i caught with my phone last week:

you cant debate this i have the proof itsreal

 

[player1]

you cant debate this i have the proof itsreal

why would i waste time debating whether bigfoot is real or not, though

 

[player1]

what's the plural for bigfoot, btw

bigfoots or bigfeet

 

[dwohh]

what's the plural for bigfoot, btw

bigfoots or bigfeet

first one OBIVOSULY

why would i waste time debating whether bigfoot is real or not, though

it has been proven in sciesnistifc studies

you relaize u cant take the debate as i repdicted indewed

https://www.isu.edu/media/libraries/rhi/research-papers/ANALYSIS-INTEGRITY-OF-THE-PATTERSON-GIMLIN-FILM-IMAGE_final.pdf

only liberals deny bigfoot

 

[Harold O'brien]

first one OBIVOSULY


it has been proven in sciesnistifc studies

you relaize u cant take the debate as i repdicted indewed

https://www.isu.edu/media/libraries/rhi/research-papers/ANALYSIS-INTEGRITY-OF-THE-PATTERSON-GIMLIN-FILM-IMAGE_final.pdf

only liberals deny bigfoot

it seems you're serious

I have some questions:

1. why is this footage the only evidence that isn't clearly a hoax? massive red flag

2. isn't it just a little too convenient that is was found by bigfoot hunters on an expedition to find bigfoot?

3. the creature in the film isn't exactly running away. why didn't they just follow it and get more footage or shoot it?

 

[dwohh]

it seems you're serious

I have some questions:

1. why is this footage the only evidence that isn't clearly a hoax? massive red flag

2. isn't it just a little too convenient that is was found by bigfoot hunters on an expedition to find bigfoot?

3. the creature in the film isn't exactly running away. why didn't they just follow it and get more footage or shoot it?

pgf footage has been verified as real it cna not be fake(in 1968 before anoamtroimxc eqipment and muscle suits) u havent looked into the topic

why would it be weird to find the creature your looking for in a hotspot of the creature with rampent activity

verified footprints by phds prove that the bigfoot in the film was a female who was apart ofa family unit, most likley it was leading them away from her children(known animal tactic)

after it got out of view it started running(proven by foot morphpolgoy of footprints)

bob gimlin didnt run after it because they thought more was around and since bob was the only one with the rifle patterson would be open to be killed and also they was out of film

 

[dwohh]

the muscle movements showed in my video(thigh/shin/tibia) are impossible in 1968

i will list of more detiaals that are impossible in 1968

a unhuman arm length with fingers turning which is impossible since it would require animatronics

all holywood custome experts know at the very least it had to be a man with hair glued on which its obivosuly not

its gait/strde is to fast and natural for a human to reproduce for that amount of time and speed(grover krantz PHD proved htis)

for more real info abotu bigfoot look grover krantz and jeff meldrum

BOTH PHD in anaatomy

jeff meldrum spsecialtiy is litrally foot morphology and primate locamotion

 

[dwohh]

state of art suit tech in 1968

all legitmate prints have legtimiante foot morpolohy

 

[Harold O'brien]

pgf footage has been verified as real it cna not be fake(in 1968 before anoamtroimxc eqipment and muscle suits) u havent looked into the topic

why would it be weird to find the creature your looking for in a hotspot of the creature with rampent activity

verified footprints by phds prove that the bigfoot in the film was a female who was apart ofa family unit, most likley it was leading them away from her children(known animal tactic)

after it got out of view it started running(proven by foot morphpolgoy of footprints)

bob gimlin didnt run after it because they thought more was around and since bob was the only one with the rifle patterson would be open to be killed and also they was out of film

I don't buy it

 

[dwohh]

I don't buy it

u would expect there to be good sceptical arguments against bigfoot but there are NONE

i can make better sceptical arguments then any non beliver since im a bliever so i analyazed it more

the best argumnet ever against bigfoot is
a) trailcams, but there is evidence some animals can avoid them and some times bigfoothasb en caught on them
b) PGF cant have been filmed on 20th october because the processing time when it came down was too low, so they had to be lying when they filmed it(it doenst matter of course because res ipsa loqitur)
c) the goverment has to know probably(but this dosent matter so much since there is presdecent for govemrents denying the existance of potenaitlly dangerous animals in america(montana sharks, mountain lions in ohio, ghost grizzlies) this is because it would cause to much issue

there are only 2000 bigfoots more or less spread out in americca mostly in the pacific north west primarly

 

[Harold O'brien]

u would expect there to be good sceptical arguments against bigfoot but there are NONE

i can make better sceptical arguments then any non beliver since im a bliever so i analyazed it more

the best argumnet ever against bigfoot is
a) trailcams, but there is evidence some animals can avoid them and some times bigfoothasb en caught on them
b) PGF cant have been filmed on 20th october because the processing time when it came down was too low, so they had to be lying when they filmed it(it doenst matter of course because res ipsa loqitur)
c) the goverment has to know probably(but this dosent matter so much since there is presdecent for govemrents denying the existance of potenaitlly dangerous animals in america(montana sharks, mountain lions in ohio, ghost grizzlies) this is because it would cause to much issue

there are only 2000 bigfoots more or less spread out in americca mostly in the pacific north west primarly

I will look into it when I have more time and give you a proper verdict

 

[dwohh]

I will look into it when I have more time and give you a proper verdict

THE EVIDENCE HAS GROWN TO BE UNDENIABLE

 

[Harold O'brien]

yeah it's complete bullshit

broke entrepreneur "stumbles" across bigfoot for a brief moment and only manages to get extremely poor quality footage of it, which he then makes money off. it just happens to rain so footprints can't be examined properly. and the timelines for developing the film don't add up. (almost like he filmed it in advance and waited for it to rain). the footage easily could have been faked and it is impossible to prove it because of how grainy and crap it is.

and there is also involvement by a notorious bigfoot hoaxer lol

how gullible are you?

 

[Harold O'brien]

@dwohh

 

[dwohh]

yeah it's complete bullshit

broke entrepreneur "stumbles" across bigfoot for a brief moment and only manages to get extremely poor quality footage of it, which he then makes money off. it just happens to rain so footprints can't be examined properly. and the timelines for developing the film don't add up. (almost like he filmed it in advance and waited for it to rain). the footage easily could have been faked and it is impossible to prove it because of how grainy and crap it is.

and there is also involvement by a notorious bigfoot hoaxer lol

how gullible are you?

how is it poor quality its ex tmreley high for circumstances, when law suits stetled it can be blown up to 4k



he previously went on a expdition around warshington where he lived and found 0

he was going out to film footprints in california and thats when he found patty aftrer weeks of searching for footprints


footprints can be examinded hae been by jeff meldrum and where matched with the films feet and it matches satisfactory



you dont know about human anatomy every expert who reviewd the film says its impossible to be made in 1968, i can show one example which is bill munns who wrote study how its not fake i can also show MONKEY ACTOR




you dont know that the arms are too long for it to be human and there being finger movements(impossible)

 

[dwohh]

im as gullable as top phds in anatomy compared to idiot who dont know

 

[Harold O'brien]

how is it poor quality its ex tmreley high for circumstances, when law suits stetled it can be blown up to 4k



he previously went on a expdition around warshington where he lived and found 0

he was going out to film footprints in california and thats when he found patty aftrer weeks of searching for footprints


footprints can be examinded hae been by jeff meldrum and where matched with the films feet and it matches satisfactory



you dont know about human anatomy every expert who reviewd the film says its impossible to be made in 1968, i can show one example which is bill munns who wrote study how its not fake i can also show MONKEY ACTOR




you dont know that the arms are too long for it to be human and there being finger movements(impossible)

im as gullable as top phds in anatomy compared to idiot who dont know

You are stupid and gullible lol

 

[dwohh]

You are stupid and gullible lol

you don relaize how high qualtiy the film is for 1968

and it can be blown up to 4k



the film has been prove nto be real its not even a question once u learn how the muscle groups are

 

[dwohh]

COUNTLESS of details(timstamepd=

 

[dwohh]

SO MANY DETAILS AND YET MORROCAN COPERS WILL DENY IT