evolutionary reason why females are attracted to status?

[Deleted member 6403]

?

 

[Deleted member 6403]

 

[Zygos4Life]

I wanna rape your avi tbh

 

[Deleted member 5927]

I don't think it's a biological reason (like the desire to get water) but rather a rational reason that all women come to easily realize, and that is the happiness that can be gained from being with a wealthy man is much more than a poor man.

Essentially it's just such basic logic that all women come to realize it, not because they are biologically driven to want a man with status.

 

[BigBoy]

Because high status men can provide resources for their children and secures them a high position in the social heirarchy.

 

[Deleted member 6400]

I wanna rape your avi tbh

 

[Deleted member 6403]

I don't think it's a biological reason (like the desire to get water) but rather a rational reason that all women come to easily realize, and that is the happiness that can be gained from being with a wealthy man is much more than a poor man.

Essentially it's just such basic logic that all women come to realize it, not because they are biologically driven to want a man with status.

that's crazy, one of the few rational decisions women can make

 

[BrendioEEE]

Since clearly nobody has actually given the reason, i'll tell you, in the past typically the men with the highest status were kings, warlords, people who ran entire towns, villiages, tribes, etc, these men took many women, much more than the average men, and no they weren't necessarily the most good looking or strongest either, and raped them and bred them, this caused a lot of women to develop a dysgenic attraction to extreme status in all forms, but this dysgenic trait primarily manifests itself in promiscuous females because promiscuity is seen as a sign of living in a primitive state. It's why women are what I like to call "Statussexual" the average woman has more status than the average men, so you see a resurgence in lesbianism, many animals such as dogs and horses have more status than the average white male, so you see white women fucking dogs and sucking on horse cock.

If somehow someway Jews managed to make literal fecal matter high status, expect to see women deepthroating logs of shit straight out of the toilet. This is clearly a very very dysgenic trait, and is one of biggest reasons why women make bad mate selection choices, but there are other reasons as to why other than just their attraction to status.

 

[Deleted member 6403]

Since clearly nobody has actually given the reason, i'll tell you, in the past typically the men with the highest status were kings, warlords, people who ran entire towns, villiages, tribes, etc, these men took many women, and raped them and bred them, this caused a lot of women to develop a dysgenic attraction to extreme status in all forms, but this dysgenic trait primarily manifests itself in promiscuous females because promiscuity is seen as a sign of living in a primitive state. It's why women are what I like to call "Statussexual" the average woman has more status than the average men, so you see a resurgence in lesbianism, many animals such as dogs and horses have more status than the average white male, so you see white women fucking dogs and sucking on horse cock.

If somehow someway Jews managed to make literal fecal matter high status, expect to see women deepthroating logs of shit straight out of the toilet. This is clearly a very very dysgenic trait, and is one of biggest reasons why women make bad mate selection choices, but there are other reasons as to why other than just their attraction to status.

so it's basically a mutation
, lifefuel tbh, do all women have this dysgenic attraction or only a few sluts here and there?

What's the percentage of women that are statussexuals?

 

[BrendioEEE]

so it's basically a mutation
, lifefuel tbh, do all women have this dysgenic attraction or only a few sluts here and there?

What's the percentage of women that are statussexuals?

A Very significant chunk of females are statussexual, but i'd imagine some are much less than others, like obviously not every woman is going to fuck dogs or horses, but now you know the reason to why they do.

In fact at the way things are going, being less statussexual is actually more likely to be a mutation than what we currently see, because of how common it is.

Good traits are mutations nowadays, bad dysgenic traits have become the norm because of really really bad primitive breeding behaviors and male selection patterns over the past several thousand years.

Funnily enough Eugenics and selective breeding could actually fix this among ALL the races and genders in a matter of a few generations, but the general populace and The Jews would never allow this because of how corrupt and low IQ they all truly are.

 

[Jagged0]

?

Women want wealth security and validation. A king is rich has an army and is the most famous person in his land this is why women go for high status men they’re the nobility of the modern era

 

[RODEBLUR]

?

when a girl sees that a bunch of girls are already fighting over one guy her system tells her this is a top-tier guy since everyone else has already made that decision and starts thirsting over him

 

[Entschuldigung]

Men are too but for other men
A nerd statusminned will never hangout with chads

 

[Deleted member 6403]

A Very significant chunk of females are statussexual, but i'd imagine some are much less than others, like obviously not every woman is going to fuck dogs or horses, but now you know the reason to why they do.

In fact at the way things are going, being less statussexual is actually more likely to be a mutation than what we currently see, because of how common it is.

Good traits are mutations nowadays, bad dysgenic traits have become the norm because of really really bad primitive breeding behaviors and male selection patterns over the past several thousand years.

Funnily enough Eugenics and selective breeding could actually fix this among ALL the races and genders in a matter of a few generations, but the general populace and The Jews would never allow this because of how corrupt and low IQ they all truly are.

Do women have other dysgenic traits other than attraction to status?

 

[Stare]

High status men will provide them more money and status, I don't think you need an evolutionary reason to explain why they prefer high status men.

Women with high status tend to select men based on looks from what I have seen but obviously they don't pick guys with very low status because they don't wanna look like sugar moms.

 

[Deleted member 6403]

when a girl sees that a bunch of girls are already fighting over one guy her system tells her this is a top-tier guy since everyone else has already made that decision and starts thirsting over him

So basically preselection, is there a way to fake it?

because its a cycle

good looking ∞ status

 

[RODEBLUR]

So basically preselection, is there a way to fake it?

because its a cycle

good looking ∞ status

instagrammaxx or something. buy fake followers idk. or just actually be goodlooking

 

[BrendioEEE]

Do women have other dysgenic traits other than attraction to status?

On average valuing their own people less than males or rather are much more likely to turn on them at a drop of a hat (this is because of invading tribes raping women)

Not valuing intelligence more than certain physical traits (this is because in our history we have been in more physical conflicts than times of peace) which continues to create more times of conflict

When a woman loses her virginity is correlated to how many years her biological father is in her life (this is because biologically females bodies think this means they are in a time war and need to breed as quickly as possible as the risk of death is higher) but in a modern society this only leads to massive amounts of whores, there's no need for this trait whatsoever, it literally only causes chaos, and hypergamy.

The fact that a womans mental stability is so fucking linked to her virginity in the first place is a bit of a dysgenic trait aswell because it really makes just about every non virgin woman unsalvagable as a proper mother.

Being into extreme forms of Sexual Degradation/BDSM much more so than the average male partner would enjoy (this is because again most of her female ancestors were likely descendants from women who betrayed their village/were raped/in a harem/etc)

Extreme sexual incompatibility with males is a pretty obvious one aswell with most females. Virgin females are much more willing to adapt, and course women are much more likely to do anything for Chad.

There's tons of dysgenic traits, and btw it's not just women who have dysgenic traits, men have quite a few aswell, it's just I suppose women's traits are a bit more illogical and extreme.

 

[Deleted member 6403]

On average valuing their own people less than males or rather are much more likely to turn on them at a drop of a hat (this is because of invading tribes raping women)

Not valuing intelligence more than certain physical traits (this is because in our history we have been in more physical conflicts than times of peace) which continues to create more times of conflict

When a woman loses her virginity is correlated to how many years her biological father is in her life (this is because biologically females bodies think this means they are in a time war and need to breed as quickly as possible as the risk of death is higher) but in a modern society this only leads to massive amounts of whores, there's no need for this trait whatsoever, it literally only causes chaos, and hypergamy.

The fact that a womans mental stability is so fucking linked to her virginity in the first place is a bit of a dysgenic trait aswell because it really makes just about every non virgin woman unsalvagable as a proper mother.

Being into extreme forms of Sexual Degradation/BDSM much more so than the average male partner would enjoy (this is because again most of her female ancestors were likely descendants from women who betrayed their village/were raped/in a harem/etc)

There's tons of dysgenic traits, and btw it's not just women who have dysgenic traits, men have quite a few aswell, it's just I suppose women's traits are a bit more illogical and extreme.

tbh most of these are actually an advantage just not in our modern society

if theoretically we manage to make women attracted to intelligence instead of physical traits, what would happen? Wouldn't it make us weaker?

and I'd say a harem is a natural way to mate because it means lot of women will the most desirable traits from one man, simple hypergamy

What dysgenic traits do men have?

 

[EckhartTollemaxx]

Provision of resources, protection and proof of good genes.

 

[BrendioEEE]

tbh most of these are actually an advantage just not in our modern society

But that's the thing, we live in a Modern Society, so these things AREN'T an Advantage, not anymore, they just result in more suffering. Also most of these traits are activated primarily in non virgin women, and these traits were already being bred out in a natural form of domestication as recently as the 1950s.

If theoretically we manage to make women attracted to intelligence instead of physical traits, what would happen? Wouldn't it make us weaker?

No, it would make us stronger, and I can explain why, the more intelligent people we have, the more issues can be resolved, the longer our lifespans will become, the more likely we can use science to make us physically stronger, eugenics, less gullible, less prone to corruption, etc. We could achieve paradise on Earth in a matter of a few generations if women actually bred with genetically compatible high IQ mates.

and I'd say a harem is a natural way to mate because it means lot of women will the most desirable traits from one man, simple hypergamy

Most men who ran and run harems now aren't even men with the most desireable traits from either a warrior perspective or modern culturally advanced perspective, they're just high status men with tons of resources and power.

What dysgenic traits do men have?

Willingness to breed/fuck/be attracted/overvalue women they mog looks wise and are genetically superior to is probably one of the most dysgenic traits men have, and kind of reinforces the a lot of negative female traits in the first place.

Simping for women you'll never ever ever be with.

Giving and pouring tons of resources into women you'll never be with.

BEING ABLE TO UNRECOGNIZE THEY WILL NEVER BE WITH YOU.

Changing your beliefs even at the detriment of other men and women and society itself because a girl you like doesn't like or agree with your views/beliefs/convictions.

I could go on and on, they're not just all related to women too, but these are definitely some of the most brutally dysgenic traits in men.

 

[Deleted member 6403]

No, it would make us stronger, and I can explain why, the more intelligent people we have, the more issues can be resolved, the longer our lifespans will become, the more likely we can use science to make us physically stronger, eugenics, less gullible, less prone to corruption, etc. We could achieve paradise on Earth in a matter of a few generations if women actually bred with genetically compatible high IQ mates.

Once this happens, what's gonna be the point of our animal-istic existence then? If surviving and everything in between isn't an issue then, what's next?

 

[Retrusion]

Because status is power. It’s control. It’s the ability to get what you want at the snap of a finger. Women have to be picky since they have to risk pregnancy so they have to look for guys with the most status so they can latch on the the guy to boost status. Women’s status has always been tied to their husband, look up coveture.

 

[SkinjobCatastrophe]

Status is resources. There is a huge selection pressure towards men with resources because they could have and raise more kids and have those kids survive. Status is also connected to power and of course women like powerful men for a lot of the same reasons, but also because they are a direct threat to other males and therefore a good protector. Of course none of this really works in the modern world like it did 14,000 years ago but you cant fight nature and most people are just glorified chimps.

If a feature is sexually attractive, it is almost always because it directly or indirectly leads to more natural fitness, with humans that is in the form of more kids as well as more sexual success per each kid.

 

[BrendioEEE]

Once this happens, what's gonna be the point of our animal-istic existence then? If surviving and everything in between isn't an issue then, what's next?

Forced Evolutionary Advancement, Genetic Engineering, exploration (there's still a lot to explore) and of course growing the species as much as possible (in numbers).

What a lot of cringe dysgenic, evolutionary blights of society want is for humanity to be wiped out and for breeding to stop. This goes against what it fundamentally means to be a human, to spread our genetics far and wide. People fall for the overpopulation meme, did you know a civilization involves cities, imagine cities without degeneracy, hypergamy, etc, imagine different races and cultures and countries actually thriving separately but also together, imagine cities in the sky, on land, underground, underwater, billions of us become trillions, there's an overabundance of resources, video games, stories, music, culture, people, knowledge, advancement, there's a lot of reason why we could exist.