this is the offical graph in botb
| PSL Score | Rarity | Description |
| 1-2 | ~ Bottom 10% | Very unattractive, severe asymmetry or deformity, often bullied or ignored. |
| 3 | ~ Bottom 25% | Below average, unappealing facial features, often invisible to women. |
| 4 | ~ 25th–40th % | Slightly below average, not repulsive but still overlooked. |
| 5 | ~ 40th–60th % | Average guy, gets occasional attention, looks improve a lot with grooming. |
| 6 | ~ 60th–75th % | Above average, some girls are attracted, often seen as “cute†or “decent.†|
| 7 | ~ Top 15% | Very attractive, turns heads, great bone structure, jawline, harmony. |
| 8 | ~ Top 5% | Model-tier, elite looks, dominates dating apps, strong hunter eyes and jawline. |
| 9 | ~ Top 1% | Celebrity-level, extremely rare, genetic elite (e.g. young Brad Pitt). |
| 10 | < 0.01% | Near-perfect symmetry, maxed hunter eyes, god-tier facial harmony. Almost mythical. |
Can u give me solution? Upvote me, also dont get into bp, i see ur still fairly new
solution? it seems u dont knwo anything about psl why would u get solution u just used gpt
Yup, still gave the right answer. I see where ur coming from
why u so pressed,chill brono u didnt
i try to be nice but its embarrassing if u act like ur correct when ur not even closeno u didnt
not pressed but just be honest with the guy if u know it or not
no u didnt
hes a grey. He believed u since u made it sound like u knew what u were talking about
Ik it but thought it was better to make him a proper graph using gpt to not lead any miscommunication knowing relearning is always a pain
Good point
rep me back bhai. I understand u but that graph was not even close to being correct so in actuality it didnt help him at all
Lol just copy and pasted
i understand what ur saying but gpt wasnt right in this case it doesnt understand psl go to botb and read the guide if ur confused
You got another graph or something? Cuz everywhere I go the info is always mixed. Sometimes a 6 is top 30% and sometimes 15%
this is the offical graph in botb
fucking retard
U did this?this is the offical graph in botb
Normal Distribution Implies You See Just as Many Ugly People as Good Looking Ones, which I don't agree with tbh.
First off, this is my rating scale for PSL. You can agree or disagree with the exactness, but allow me ± .25 in digression.
Sub 4 PSL (Normie-ish and Below)
4-4.75 PSL (Normie to HTN)
5-5.75 PSL (Weak Chadlite to Strong Chadlite)
6-7 PSL (Weak Chad to GigaChad)
With a normal distribution with 4 PSL being average, these are the percentiles corresponding:
PSL 4 is equivalent to 50% (50/100)
PSL 5 is equivalent to 84.15% (16/100)
PSL 6 is equivalent to 97.25% (3/100)
PSL 7 is equivalent to 99.87% (1/1000)
These percentiles fall off hard after around the 5.25 PSL mark. Ask yourself, in a university class with 30 males, would 5 of them really be at the level of looks of Timothee Chalamet or Ronaldo (5.5 PSL's) or even Chris Pratt/Harry Styles (5.25)? And PSL 6 is even more absurd, if you went to a highschool of around 2000 kids, of the 1k males, are you really telling me you know 30 students at the looks level of Kelly Oubre, Cillian Murphy, or Siva Kanesweran (all low tier 6 psl's)?
FInally, PSL 7 implies that there are 5 or 6 Atesh Salih/Prime Gandy/ Drago level moggers at every college. Yeah, nah.
Here is the true Distribution:
2 psl is 10th percentile
3psl is 30th percentile
4 psl is 50th percentile
4.5 is 75th percentile
5 is 85-90th percentile
5.5 is 95th percentile
5.75 is 98th
6 is 99.5th
6.5 is 99.99th
7 is 99.9999th
maybe u should rope
No, I should've linked the thread, but I just copied since I'm lazy
Yeah I've always thought the distribution looked more like this, I could get behind this rating, seems accurate to me. Want solution?Here is the true Distribution:
if u dont mind yeah this isnt mine tho its the botb thread i jsut pasted it
