eduardkoopman
Kraken
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
- Posts
- 22,656
- Reputation
- 28,412
Exceptions that proves the rule.
Regularly. guys post some ugly dude with a hot/better looking woman.
AND, than they say: "explain this". As a way to debunk the common rule of: "women (and men) pair up with people of similar looks levels ranges (matching SMV/looks league)"
The answer to these dudes claiming to debunk the rule, with exceptions is:
"Exceptions exists. AND Exceptions prove the rule (due to being rare/out of norm/noticeable)".
For example. To demonstrate the ludicracy in a clear way:
Rule: "Rural villages are (generally) quiet places".
And than, a local farmer rents his fields for 1 day, to a rock festival, which disturbs the quiet.
And than, some dopehead posts online a video/audio of the noise of the rock festival in that rural erea.
And than says there: "You guys say that rural erea's are quit place. Well, then: "explain this! Rural erea's are NOT quit places, check this video! It's cope to say that rural erea's are quit places.""
Well, this above exception example, shows how the phrase draws attention to the rarity of the exception, and in so doing establishes the general accuracy of the rule.
LIKEWISE, with dudes showing ugly dudes with hot women. As a debunk for general rule of matching. The way they share and phrase it; ALREADY always shows the rarity of the exception, and in so doing establishes the general accuracy of the rule (in this case, matching principle of dating (that people date with their own looks league generally).
Last edited: