Extreme Hypergamy will not advance the male species

Will extreme hypergamy advance the male species

  • Yes

    Votes: 1 10.0%
  • No

    Votes: 9 90.0%

  • Total voters
    10
A

AscensionMan98

Kraken
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Posts
8,934
Reputation
9,286
As we all know hypergamy has gone rampant to the point that even subhuman ugly fat chicks feel entitled to a chad these days. I have heard arguments though that hypergamy would greatly benefit the future male species due to subhuman men getting eliminated from the gene pool. But there lies a serious flaw in there arguments. If subpar women feel entitled to only good looking men, the competition increases dramatically and you now have a pool of chads competing for some used up roast who might be barely a 6.For every chad there is just one more stacy, so sooner or later some chad will get outcucked by a turbo chad when he tries to bang stacy, and be forced to settle for a uglier chick who is below his looks match. Now the chads would impregnate women below there looks match and create below average kids.

In order to advance the looks of our population we would need only the best looking MEN and WOMEN to fuck. Hypergamy allows only the best looking men to fuck women far below there looks match that these good looking men would never even LOOK at before hypergamy became rampant. To create a attractive kid the best case is two attractive parents. So therefore the general attractiveness would go down since less chads are hooking up with stacies.Only turbo chads are so you have a small niche of men that are pulling there proper looks match while even chads and chad lines get fucked.
 
While your idea is right, its not really how genetics work, 2 below average parents can still make good looking kids and vice versa

Genetic recombination is a brutal thing
 
  • +1
Reactions: CopeIsReal, Taylorswift and Zercic
Every woman through history had easy access to marriage because they possessed the most valuable thing on planet. There was never a selective breeding with women so they are genetically average. And despite their revisionism it is also those genetics that contribute to their sons looking nonattractive which gets constantly overlooked because men today have a makeup face permanently taped to their mind as a real female face cause you never see them without it in public therefore all women must be pretty.
 
9B83418E 4401 4B4B B215 0E45F74A6921
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Toth's thot
The thing with hypergamy is that only men are the target.
Think about it: 80% of female have a living descendant today and 40% of males.
Every disease now is mostly because of women's bad genes. They carry you for 9 months, if they smoke or have bad habits during that period you're basically fucked. It's on THEM. And yet, it's still men to pay (they fell more ill, and get discriminated at the end).
Women made you disabled.
 
The only reason the human race developed to become as sophisticated as it is was because of enforced monogamy. There’s a lot of research that proves hypergamous societies are very violent and maladaptive
 
  • +1
Reactions: CopeIsReal, AscensionMan98 and verZYownZZun
Lfmao at the retards who think extreme hypergamy is good for mankind. If all the chads reproduce and produce chad children and the subhumans/average men get bred out, then that means chads will be the new average and now all women will only go for the extreme terachads and the process will continue.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscensionMan98 and Deleted member 5349
Unnamed

the future of human, its saddening
 
Tbh there needs to be more research done on gene dominance when it comes to facial features and build a complex eugenics program that pairs up the right people with the right facial features that if combined with each other would make a goodlooking face. This is what I imagine would have been implemented if Hitler won the war and eugenics were applied.
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top