"Eye of the Beholder" is not entirely untrue

RichmondBread

RichmondBread

Luminary
Joined
Nov 22, 2019
Posts
5,872
Reputation
8,940
People say beauty is in the eye of the beholder as a way they think they are coping for something that isn't. However, it is somewhat true in the sense that people have preferences. My sister, for example finds even "prime" Jude Law repulsive, and not in any way attractive to her. She likes Henry Cavill and Harrison Ford (prime). And I know women I find attractive who other men think are ugly and I don't know but if beauty were entirely objective and not at all subjective, then scenarios like these would never happen.
 
  • +1
Reactions: bimaxmaxxer and heightmaxxing
Woman will sometimes see htn as chad and chad as htn.
A woman will rarely see a mtn as chad and will rarely see a chad as mtn
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: RichmondBread
Woman will sometimes see htn as chad and chad as htn.
A woman will rarely see a mtn as chad and will rarely see a chad as mtn
I don't know how this works. And I know these are anectdotes, but I have heard women find Krispin Glover attractive and other unconventionally looking men attractive. So the "Chad" vs Un-Chad paradigm is not universal.
 
  • +1
Reactions: heightmaxxing

Similar threads

koalaboy999
Replies
2
Views
44
yyk117
yyk117
RandomAutist
Replies
10
Views
47
fynn
fynn
Regular Doomer
Replies
26
Views
104
Regular Doomer
Regular Doomer
vanshsengar11
Replies
2
Views
16
vanshsengar11
vanshsengar11
BlackFag
Replies
12
Views
70
Mik
Mik

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top