Face or height [poll]

[Diremeyer]

What's best? Being one standard deviation below in looks or height.

Doomed either way, you'd say? Yeah. True. Like what you'd rather have, lungs or heart?

 

[Julian]

Top 32% of looks is NOT enough especially at 5’7. 6’1 is not tall but somewhat enough for normies

 

[nvck_pilled]

not extreme enough
for girls would you
rather an acid attack victim face with your ideal girls body
or a quadruple amputee with taylor hill tier face

 

[Diremeyer]

I'd say face trumps height.

Data source for height and standard deviations.

If we are to believe this chart, then being in the top 32 % of looks would make a woman think you're smack down average.

Certainly no bell curve. Being shorter than average would certainly limit the dating pool as well, though by how much I don't know.

 

[Diremeyer]

Top 32% of looks is NOT enough especially at 5’7. 6’1 is not tall but somewhat enough for normies

Agree! Damned either way!

If we'd do 1.5 standard deviations, we'd get:

• top 13 % in looks and 5'5.5", or
• bottom 13 % in looks and 6'2.5"

 

[Diremeyer]

Ain't that bad, nvck_pilled. Short good okay looking guys do well in SEA. Just last week I saw a short good looking guy with a fairly good looking gal.

 

[Hapafetishist]

not extreme enough
for girls would you
rather an acid attack victim face with your ideal girls body
or a quadruple amputee with taylor hill tier face

We.have paper bags for a reason. I'll take her body.

 

[Richard_Hungwell]

I'm already short. I'd rather have a better face.

 

[Tyronecell]

ANOTHER DAY
ANOTHER GREYCELL SHIT THREAD

 

[AlphaDude]

Why the fuck would you write 32%? do 15-20%. You are probably 6'1 and using this to validate your height over the face. Face any day except in this case cause most of those 32 ain't considered really ugly.

 

[Diremeyer]

Why the fuck would you write 32%? do 15-20%. You are probably 6'1 and using this to validate your height over the face. Face any day except in this case cause most of those 32 ain't considered really ugly.

The way it makes sense to compare it, at least how I see it, is using standard deviations.

One standard deviation above the mean is top 32 percentile, two standard deviations is top 5 percentile. One standard deviation above or below the mean in height is three inches.

Argument against it would be women's ratings don't follow a bell curve, but rather something looking like a right skewed curve, at least according to OkCupid's results, but again how this would possibly translate to somewhat different numbers, I won't get into.

You are probably 6'1 and using this to validate your height over the face. Face any day except in this case cause most of those 32 ain't considered really ugly.

Alright, Sherlock.

 

[NarcyChadlite]

First off top 32% = not good enough
And second.. you can surgerymax a 6'1 low tier normie to ascension but you cant LL, lift fraud high tier normie 5'7 manletcel to 6ft +

 

[jackthenerd]

Being top32% in looks or bottom 32% is literally no difference JFL. Meanwhile a height difference of 5'7 vs 6'1 is quite massive.

 

[Diremeyer]

First off top 32% = not good enough
And second.. you can surgerymax a 6'1 low tier normie to ascension but you cant LL, lift fraud high tier normie 5'7 manletcel to 6ft +

We could put surgerymaxxing into the equation. Let's say the our guys would pony up 50k for surgeries. I think neither would put the money on getting taller, as there's no bang for your bucks, but rather go for the face.

 

[Deleted member 5927]

Moment

 

[MisterMercedes]

An easier way of asking this would be: “6’1, 3/10 face, or 5’7, 7/10 face?”

Anyone who interacts with real people knows the right answer.

 

[eduardkoopman]

Manlet > Face > Height

 

[klamus]

32%?

Low iq moment

 

[CommanderCope]

depends where you are in the top 32%. If you are at the bottom end of that 'top 32%' then 6'1 is the better choice, the height would be of far more benefit that simply looking normie. 6'1 is close the ideal height but being top 32% in terms of looks isn't.

 

[Deleted member 7313]

That awkward moment when you're 5'7 AND bottom 32% in looks.....

 

[Deleted member 4362]

Race

 

[Diremeyer]

depends where you are in the top 32%. If you are at the bottom end of that 'top 32%' then 6'1 is the better choice, the height would be of far more benefit that simply looking normie. 6'1 is close the ideal height but being top 32% in terms of looks isn't.

Bottom end of the top, for the short guy.

Both would struggle, that's for sure. The 6'1" would be in the 32th percentile of looks, from the bottom.

You could argue that neither of them have the looks to succeed, and being a short normie rather than a slightly uggo tall guy, then the latter is better. Could very well be that most women consider both non-attractive facially so it doesn't matter.

I don't know is face or height counts the most, but I do think using standard deviations is a good way of measuring them against each other.

 

[Subhuman trash]

Top 32% of looks is NOT enough especially at 5’7. 6’1 is not tall but somewhat enough for normies

bottom 32% of looks isnt good but yea 5'7" you need top 2% of looks maybe 3%

 

[Looksmax305]

Elite face with average height has unlimited access to woman. Elite height With average face can do well but 6”4 with average face isn’t a slayer

 

[Deleted member 1400]

An easier way of asking this would be: “6’1, 3/10 face, or 5’7, 7/10 face?”

Anyone who interacts with real people knows the right answer.

What's the right answer?
I think height. Right?

 

[CommanderCope]

What's the right answer?
I think height. Right?

In reality the 5'7 dude with 7/10 face would have more success.

 

[MisterMercedes]

What's the right answer?
I think height. Right?

No. It’s face.

 

[MisterMercedes]

In reality the 5'7 dude with 7/10 face would have more success.

Correct.

 

[MedPrettyBoy]

IMO 5'7 but good looks is better than 6'1 bad looks... As long as frame is not considered. In that case, 6'1 with good frame would easily mog the 5'7 good looking one

 

[CsCurry]

If the height comes with a good frame and I balding genetics, tall can just run gear game and get a lot of women that way.

just make sure not to end up like Connor Murphy

 

[Deleted member 5818]

the rope

 

[Deleted member 5393]

6ft1 is better if u gymcel