Facial Averageness Explained - It is not Facial Harmony, which is a common misunderstanding.

iamnotaracist

iamnotaracist

high Iq larping truecel
Joined
Mar 8, 2026
Posts
525
Reputation
523
What Facial Averageness Really Is:
Facial Averageness is the mathematical resemblance of Proprtions on a specific population-which is linked to ethnicity. Different common phenotype traits and patterns in individuals which is then created into one average look of that population. The more you look like that Phenotype/Population in your ethnicity and area/or simply your Proprtions, the more attractive you look.

EXAMPLES:

1000006812
1000006811 1000006813

Matt Bomer and Ryan Gosling are both Great Examples of Very High Facial Averageness. They both share the same mathematical Proprtions of that Phenotype, for Example: they both have the same similar Tfwhr or Cranial Facial Height, which is roughly about 1.37-1.50 in this Phenotype-North Atlantid.
The ONLY broad difference between Bomer and Gosling's Proprtions is that Matt bomer still falls in the universal Mathematical Proportions, While Gosling's harmony isn't even close to that of Bomer, even though they pretty much have most of the same similar Proportions to that of the North Atlantid Phenotype, one can still fall in the ideal averageness yet still fail be in the universal ideal.
For Example:
The ideal Esr (Eye Separation Ratio) is 44.00 to 47.00, HOWEVER- the ideal Esr of the North Atlantid Phenotype is 43.00 to 44.50, as that is the average range of Eye Separation in that population. Since there is still a universal Ideal part of that Average proportion in that Specific Population, You can still fit in that phenotypic Average while still being in the Universal Ideal Range, which is 44.00 to 44.50- That is the key difference between Matt Bomer and Ryan Gosling, one fits both, the other only fits one.

Wait, why Exactly is it considered more Attractive if you fit in one Specific range of Average of a Population?
Biologically in Nature, Humans are Naturally Tribalistic. So Facial Averageness is linked with Tribalism- A Human being would trust their Family more than a stranger, because they have built attachment as a survival trait and teamwork. Therefore, if you look more like the average ranges of people around you, you will seem more trustworthy, more predictable, more cooperative and less impulsive. This Survival trait has worked again and again, as our brain's pattern recognition seem to relate and feel safer around people who have similar features and proportions as of ourselves. High Facial Averageness also means you have a lot of Genetic Variation, as Incest/Inbreeding can lead to less Genetic Diversity, making your triats less broad in proportional ranges of that of your Population, which signals Good Health, Survival Chances, and Reproduction. People who have bad Facial Averageness, may seem overly Striking, Low Trust, and Even Uncanny sometimes.

Summary of the Difference between Facial Harmony and Facial Averageness-
Facial Harmony are Universal Ideal Proportions, While Facial Averageness is the ideal and Average Ranges of Facial Proportions on a Population.


Summing it All Up (For those who Dnr)

Facial Averageness is the Ideal Range or Average
Proprtions of a Population all Averaged into a Broad Phenotype.
 

Attachments

  • 1000006812.png
    1000006812.png
    48.5 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: hattrick, Divineincel, nvr3noug6 and 1 other person
Dnrd water kys
 
What Facial Averageness Really Is:
Facial Averageness is the mathematical resemblance of Proprtions on a specific population-which is linked to ethnicity. Different common phenotype traits and patterns in individuals which is then created into one average look of that population. The more you look like that Phenotype/Population in your ethnicity and area/or simply your Proprtions, the more attractive you look.

EXAMPLES:

View attachment 4786649View attachment 4786638View attachment 4786641

Matt Bomer and Ryan Gosling are both Great Examples of Very High Facial Averageness. They both share the same mathematical Proprtions of that Phenotype, for Example: they both have the same similar Tfwhr or Cranial Facial Height, which is roughly about 1.37-1.50 in this Phenotype-North Atlantid.
The ONLY broad difference between Bomer and Gosling's Proprtions is that Matt bomer still falls in the universal Mathematical Proportions, While Gosling's harmony isn't even close to that of Bomer, even though they pretty much have most of the same similar Proportions to that of the North Atlantid Phenotype, one can still fall in the ideal averageness yet still fail be in the universal ideal.
For Example:
The ideal Esr (Eye Separation Ratio) is 44.00 to 47.00, HOWEVER- the ideal Esr of the North Atlantid Phenotype is 43.00 to 44.50, as that is the average range of Eye Separation in that population. Since there is still a universal Ideal part of that Average proportion in that Specific Population, You can still fit in that phenotypic Average while still being in the Universal Ideal Range, which is 44.00 to 44.50- That is the key difference between Matt Bomer and Ryan Gosling, one fits both, the other only fits one.

Wait, why Exactly is it considered more Attractive if you fit in one Specific range of Average of a Population?
Biologically in Nature, Humans are Naturally Tribalistic. So Facial Averageness is linked with Tribalism- A Human being would trust their Family more than a stranger, because they have built attachment as a survival trait and teamwork. Therefore, if you look more like the average ranges of people around you, you will seem more trustworthy, more predictable, more cooperative and less impulsive. This Survival trait has worked again and again, as our brain's pattern recognition seem to relate and feel safer around people who have similar features and proportions as of ourselves. High Facial Averageness also means you have a lot of Genetic Variation, as Incest/Inbreeding can lead to less Genetic Diversity, making your triats less broad in proportional ranges of that of your Population, which signals Good Health, Survival Chances, and Reproduction. People who have bad Facial Averageness, may seem overly Striking, Low Trust, and Even Uncanny sometimes.

Summary of the Difference between Facial Harmony and Facial Averageness-
Facial Harmony are Universal Ideal Proportions, While Facial Averageness is the ideal and Average Ranges of Facial Proportions on a Population.


Summing it All Up (For those who Dnr)

Facial Averageness is the Ideal Range or Average
Proprtions of a Population all Averaged into a Broad Phenotype.
Not gonna lie dnr but repped for effort lil bro
 
  • +1
Reactions: iamnotaracist
IMG 2760

insane facial averageness
 
Read everything, good thread.
 
What Facial Averageness Really Is:
Facial Averageness is the mathematical resemblance of Proprtions on a specific population-which is linked to ethnicity. Different common phenotype traits and patterns in individuals which is then created into one average look of that population. The more you look like that Phenotype/Population in your ethnicity and area/or simply your Proprtions, the more attractive you look.

EXAMPLES:

View attachment 4786649View attachment 4786638View attachment 4786641

Matt Bomer and Ryan Gosling are both Great Examples of Very High Facial Averageness. They both share the same mathematical Proprtions of that Phenotype, for Example: they both have the same similar Tfwhr or Cranial Facial Height, which is roughly about 1.37-1.50 in this Phenotype-North Atlantid.
The ONLY broad difference between Bomer and Gosling's Proprtions is that Matt bomer still falls in the universal Mathematical Proportions, While Gosling's harmony isn't even close to that of Bomer, even though they pretty much have most of the same similar Proportions to that of the North Atlantid Phenotype, one can still fall in the ideal averageness yet still fail be in the universal ideal.
For Example:
The ideal Esr (Eye Separation Ratio) is 44.00 to 47.00, HOWEVER- the ideal Esr of the North Atlantid Phenotype is 43.00 to 44.50, as that is the average range of Eye Separation in that population. Since there is still a universal Ideal part of that Average proportion in that Specific Population, You can still fit in that phenotypic Average while still being in the Universal Ideal Range, which is 44.00 to 44.50- That is the key difference between Matt Bomer and Ryan Gosling, one fits both, the other only fits one.

Wait, why Exactly is it considered more Attractive if you fit in one Specific range of Average of a Population?
Biologically in Nature, Humans are Naturally Tribalistic. So Facial Averageness is linked with Tribalism- A Human being would trust their Family more than a stranger, because they have built attachment as a survival trait and teamwork. Therefore, if you look more like the average ranges of people around you, you will seem more trustworthy, more predictable, more cooperative and less impulsive. This Survival trait has worked again and again, as our brain's pattern recognition seem to relate and feel safer around people who have similar features and proportions as of ourselves. High Facial Averageness also means you have a lot of Genetic Variation, as Incest/Inbreeding can lead to less Genetic Diversity, making your triats less broad in proportional ranges of that of your Population, which signals Good Health, Survival Chances, and Reproduction. People who have bad Facial Averageness, may seem overly Striking, Low Trust, and Even Uncanny sometimes.

Summary of the Difference between Facial Harmony and Facial Averageness-
Facial Harmony are Universal Ideal Proportions, While Facial Averageness is the ideal and Average Ranges of Facial Proportions on a Population.


Summing it All Up (For those who Dnr)

Facial Averageness is the Ideal Range or Average
Proprtions of a Population all Averaged into a Broad Phenotype.
Retarded thread only applies to good phenos
The more you look like the average gook the more its over for you
 
Retarded thread only applies to good phenos
The more you look like the average gook the more its over for you
Apparently Matt Bomer is the average gook now according to you
 
Apparently Matt Bomer is the average gook now according to you
When did I ever say that u dumbfuck
I meant that this only could apply to those with good phenos like Matt boner
There exists no tribalism for gookoids the more gook you look the more disgusted everyone is by you
Should make it clear in the title that this doesnt apply to gooks
 
  • +1
Reactions: iamnotaracist
What Facial Averageness Really Is:
Facial Averageness is the mathematical resemblance of Proprtions on a specific population-which is linked to ethnicity. Different common phenotype traits and patterns in individuals which is then created into one average look of that population. The more you look like that Phenotype/Population in your ethnicity and area/or simply your Proprtions, the more attractive you look.

EXAMPLES:

View attachment 4786649View attachment 4786638View attachment 4786641

Matt Bomer and Ryan Gosling are both Great Examples of Very High Facial Averageness. They both share the same mathematical Proprtions of that Phenotype, for Example: they both have the same similar Tfwhr or Cranial Facial Height, which is roughly about 1.37-1.50 in this Phenotype-North Atlantid.
The ONLY broad difference between Bomer and Gosling's Proprtions is that Matt bomer still falls in the universal Mathematical Proportions, While Gosling's harmony isn't even close to that of Bomer, even though they pretty much have most of the same similar Proportions to that of the North Atlantid Phenotype, one can still fall in the ideal averageness yet still fail be in the universal ideal.
For Example:
The ideal Esr (Eye Separation Ratio) is 44.00 to 47.00, HOWEVER- the ideal Esr of the North Atlantid Phenotype is 43.00 to 44.50, as that is the average range of Eye Separation in that population. Since there is still a universal Ideal part of that Average proportion in that Specific Population, You can still fit in that phenotypic Average while still being in the Universal Ideal Range, which is 44.00 to 44.50- That is the key difference between Matt Bomer and Ryan Gosling, one fits both, the other only fits one.

Wait, why Exactly is it considered more Attractive if you fit in one Specific range of Average of a Population?
Biologically in Nature, Humans are Naturally Tribalistic. So Facial Averageness is linked with Tribalism- A Human being would trust their Family more than a stranger, because they have built attachment as a survival trait and teamwork. Therefore, if you look more like the average ranges of people around you, you will seem more trustworthy, more predictable, more cooperative and less impulsive. This Survival trait has worked again and again, as our brain's pattern recognition seem to relate and feel safer around people who have similar features and proportions as of ourselves. High Facial Averageness also means you have a lot of Genetic Variation, as Incest/Inbreeding can lead to less Genetic Diversity, making your triats less broad in proportional ranges of that of your Population, which signals Good Health, Survival Chances, and Reproduction. People who have bad Facial Averageness, may seem overly Striking, Low Trust, and Even Uncanny sometimes.

Summary of the Difference between Facial Harmony and Facial Averageness-
Facial Harmony are Universal Ideal Proportions, While Facial Averageness is the ideal and Average Ranges of Facial Proportions on a Population.


Summing it All Up (For those who Dnr)

Facial Averageness is the Ideal Range or Average
Proprtions of a Population all Averaged into a Broad Phenotype.
Probably the best 2026 user so far, great thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: iamnotaracist

Similar threads

lemureater
Replies
4
Views
387
avgsub5human
avgsub5human
iqi
Replies
24
Views
944
IronMike
IronMike
alurmo
Replies
42
Views
803
DownBadForRamus
DownBadForRamus
River25
Replies
7
Views
444
karmacitathugmaxx
karmacitathugmaxx
ascendrx
Replies
61
Views
991
Sett
Sett

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top