Female PSL scale is detached from reality and is female gaze

[alpomer7]

So while male one isn't perfect aswell, it still for most part reflects appeal, with few outliers like jordan barrett who appeal minning

Female PSL scale has nothing to do with reality, I think for the most part it is bcos it's based on female models-actresses and only people who they try to appeal to are other females, so it's purely female gaze.

With male models and actresses - they still appeal to females, barely any man watches male fashion shows, so it's more or less correlates with appeal.

 

[alpomer7]

There's no world where Adriana Lima is a 9.5 and Nina Dobrev is 6.5

I doubt Adriana would do better on dating sites for example, best case scenario same, my predicted scenario she will do much worse.

Ikn psl!=appeal, but there should be correlation(which there is with male psl ratings), but female ones just all over the place.

 

[Avagar Nexus]

So while male one isn't perfect aswell, it still for most part reflects appeal, with few outliers like jordan barrett who appeal minning

Female PSL scale has nothing to do with reality, I think for the most part it is bcos it's based on female models-actresses and only people who they try to appeal to are other females, so it's purely female gaze.

With male models and actresses - they still appeal to females, barely any man watches male fashion shows, so it's more or less correlates with appeal.

This ain’t even consistent within the Female PLS itself, let alone the other stuff, many photos were just seem randomly thrown like darts

 

[alpomer7]

This ain’t even consistent within the Female PLS itself, let alone the other stuff, many photos were just seem randomly thrown like darts

I couldn't find better psl pic for females, but point stands for all psl female scales I seen, even if consistent, pure female gaze, no relation to biology and what is attractive to males

 

[Avagar Nexus]

I couldn't find better psl pic for females, but point stands for all psl female scales I seen, even if consistent, pure female gaze, no relation to biology and what is attractive to males

I kind of agree, but the pictures here, some of them are just way, way off. But even within the “appeal”. I think there’s deff some subjectivity there also. Like u see some people calling certain girls attractive and you just don’t agree. Like people here claim “actor-halo” for males, they do the same when rating females also

 

[alpomer7]

I kind of agree, but the pictures here, some of them are just way, way off. But even within the “appeal”. I think there’s deff some subjectivity there also. Like u see some people calling certain girls attractive and you just don’t agree. Like people here claim “actor-halo” for males, they do the same when rating females also

Yea this is why my example with adriana lima is here. People often site her as most attractive one, but is anyone really thinks so? I would choice ton of mtb-htb over her.

And it's not just me, i feel like majority of guys would do the same(like in no world i see nina dobrev getting less votes than adriana), she isn't even uncanny(like jordan barrett), she is just not that attractive which imo proves that female psl is female gaze, if features which considered attractive on female really aren't all that attractive to majority of guys.