SharpOrange
Khhv mentalcel Gymcel Abused dog
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2023
- Posts
- 531
- Reputation
- 967
Feminism Is Not Real: Women Were Always Sheltered, Not Oppressed
Feminism teaches that women were “oppressed” throughout history by men. But this is a lie built on a selective reading of history and complete ignorance of biology.
Let’s break it down from first principles—starting with nature, not politics.
In evolutionary biology, reproductive value determines how a species protects its members:
This makes eggs (women) scarce and high-value, and sperm (men) plentiful and disposable.
So, what does nature do?
This is why men are sent to war, made to do dangerous labor, and expected to die for the group. Because society can afford to lose 50 men. It can’t afford to lose 5 women.
Look at every pre-modern society:
Feminists point to things like lack of voting rights as “proof of oppression.” But here’s the truth:
Think about the phrase: “women and children first.” That wasn’t oppression. That was moral elevation.
Feminists say, “But women weren’t allowed to do X, Y, Z.” True—but this was not because they were hated. It was because they were too biologically important to be risked.
Women were:
These were not chains they were privileges disguised as limitations.
Feminism reframes this sheltering as oppression to flip the victim narrative. But the biological logic has always been clear: protect the egg, spend the sperm.
Feminism only looks at what men had, not what they endured to get it. It ignores that privileges for women always existed, just in different forms:
It also ignores that societies collapsed when women were mistreated or unprotected. The most successful civilizations treated women as sacred, not secondary.
Women weren’t oppressed by history they were sheltered by necessity. Men weren’t privileged they were used by biology.
Feminism reverses reality. It pretends protection was persecution, and sacrifice was privilege.
But if women were truly “oppressed,” ask yourself this:
Why was it always the man expected to die so she could live?
Spartan men were bred for war they died young, trained in brutal camps, and were shamed if they showed weakness.
Meanwhile, Spartan women owned land, managed estates, and were exempt from war.
Spartan women had more freedom and wealth than women in other Greek states. Why? Because the survival of Sparta depended on protecting the womb.
Feminists often cite Islam as "oppressive." But reality is more nuanced.
In classical Islamic law:
Yes, women were veiled and secluded but this was not hatred, it was honor-based sheltering to preserve their dignity and reproductive value. Women were seen as carriers of izzat (honor) and barakah (blessing), not burdens.
Often used as a symbol of patriarchal control, but again, that’s a distortion.
Voting? Yes, men had it first. But voting came with conscription, taxation, and civic burden. Women didn’t vote but they also didn’t die in trenches or coal mines.
The real tragedy? Even men don’t care about male suffering. Why?
Because for millennia, society trained men to believe:
It’s not social it’s evolutionary. A tribe can lose 50 men and still function. Lose 10 women, and the future collapses.
That’s why we still hear “women and children first” not because society hates men, but because it’s wired to protect the egg at all costs.
These examples work because women frame the world morally, not logically.
They judge men as a collective using the apex fallacy assuming all men have power just because some do.
So when an average man speaks of rejection or depression, women don’t see his pain they see an attack on their moral victimhood.
And to defend that position, they go nuclear:
It’s not about truth. It’s about preserving the narrative that only women struggle and only men dominate.
Feminism promised “equality between the sexes.”
But here’s the biological truth: even if men and women became perfectly equal, society would still collapse.
Why?
Because women don’t want equals.
They are biologically programmed to desire men who are superior in strength, status, confidence, resources, or social value.
This is called hypergamy and it’s not a social construct.
It’s evolution.
It’s nature saying: “Choose the best genes and provider for your offspring.”
So even if:
Women will still only want the top 10%ile of men.
The rest will be invisible.
That’s why dating apps show this brutal reality:
Equality has only made the dating game more savage.
And if it continues, society will revert back to traditional gender roles where men lead, and women follow.
Because biology doesn’t care about politics.
And when biology wins, feminism dies.
mostly water for real black Pillers but i wanted to put all this in one post
@Lightskin Ethnic @browncurrycel @thecel @Aladin @
Feminism teaches that women were “oppressed” throughout history by men. But this is a lie built on a selective reading of history and complete ignorance of biology.
Let’s break it down from first principles—starting with nature, not politics.
Biology Decides Value, Not Morality
In evolutionary biology, reproductive value determines how a species protects its members:
- One man can impregnate dozens of women.
- One woman can only carry one child every 9 months.
This makes eggs (women) scarce and high-value, and sperm (men) plentiful and disposable.
So, what does nature do?
- It protects what’s rare (eggs).
- It sacrifices what’s common (sperm).
This is why men are sent to war, made to do dangerous labor, and expected to die for the group. Because society can afford to lose 50 men. It can’t afford to lose 5 women.
History Reflects This Biological Reality
Look at every pre-modern society:
- Women were sheltered: kept indoors, hidden behind veils, guarded by family honor.
- Men were expendable: sent to war, executed for failure, enslaved or beaten into labor.
Feminists point to things like lack of voting rights as “proof of oppression.” But here’s the truth:
- Most men didn’t have the vote either until recently.
- Voting was tied to property, status, and military service things men died to earn.
- Meanwhile, women were exempt from conscription, protected by law, and prioritized in survival.
Think about the phrase: “women and children first.” That wasn’t oppression. That was moral elevation.
Feminism Confuses Protection with Control
Feminists say, “But women weren’t allowed to do X, Y, Z.” True—but this was not because they were hated. It was because they were too biologically important to be risked.
Women were:
- Shielded from front-line dangers.
- Exempt from physical punishment in many legal systems.
- Provided for by men who were shamed if they didn’t.
These were not chains they were privileges disguised as limitations.
Feminism reframes this sheltering as oppression to flip the victim narrative. But the biological logic has always been clear: protect the egg, spend the sperm.
Modern Feminism Ignores This Because It’s Inconvenient
Feminism only looks at what men had, not what they endured to get it. It ignores that privileges for women always existed, just in different forms:
- Exemptions from labor.
- Social and emotional support.
- Legal leniency.
- Always being rescued first in crisis.
It also ignores that societies collapsed when women were mistreated or unprotected. The most successful civilizations treated women as sacred, not secondary.
Conclusion: Feminism Is a Myth Built on Selective Victimhood
Women weren’t oppressed by history they were sheltered by necessity. Men weren’t privileged they were used by biology.
Feminism reverses reality. It pretends protection was persecution, and sacrifice was privilege.
But if women were truly “oppressed,” ask yourself this:
Why was it always the man expected to die so she could live?
Historical Proof: Women Were Sheltered Across Cultures
1. Sparta (Ancient Greece)
Spartan men were bred for war they died young, trained in brutal camps, and were shamed if they showed weakness.
Meanwhile, Spartan women owned land, managed estates, and were exempt from war.
Spartan women had more freedom and wealth than women in other Greek states. Why? Because the survival of Sparta depended on protecting the womb.
2. Islamic Empires
Feminists often cite Islam as "oppressive." But reality is more nuanced.
In classical Islamic law:
- Women kept their property and inheritance, even after marriage.
- Men were obligated to financially provide, even if the woman was richer.
- Women were exempt from war, conscription, and harsh labor.
Yes, women were veiled and secluded but this was not hatred, it was honor-based sheltering to preserve their dignity and reproductive value. Women were seen as carriers of izzat (honor) and barakah (blessing), not burdens.
3. Victorian England
Often used as a symbol of patriarchal control, but again, that’s a distortion.
- The “Angel in the House” ideal romanticized women as pure, sacred, and above corruption.
- Men were expected to work, die in war, and sacrifice themselves for women and family.
- Women were seen as morally superior and thus needed protection.
Voting? Yes, men had it first. But voting came with conscription, taxation, and civic burden. Women didn’t vote but they also didn’t die in trenches or coal mines.
Even Men Don't Care Because Biology Taught Them Not To
The real tragedy? Even men don’t care about male suffering. Why?
Because for millennia, society trained men to believe:
It’s not social it’s evolutionary. A tribe can lose 50 men and still function. Lose 10 women, and the future collapses.
That’s why we still hear “women and children first” not because society hates men, but because it’s wired to protect the egg at all costs.
The Apex Fallacy + Female Moral Framing
These examples work because women frame the world morally, not logically.
They judge men as a collective using the apex fallacy assuming all men have power just because some do.
- A few men are CEOs → “All men are privileged.”
- One woman was mistreated → “All women are oppressed.”
So when an average man speaks of rejection or depression, women don’t see his pain they see an attack on their moral victimhood.
And to defend that position, they go nuclear:
It’s not about truth. It’s about preserving the narrative that only women struggle and only men dominate.
Why Equality Will Never Work: Hypergamy Makes It Biologically Impossible
Feminism promised “equality between the sexes.”
But here’s the biological truth: even if men and women became perfectly equal, society would still collapse.
Why?
Because women don’t want equals.
They are biologically programmed to desire men who are superior in strength, status, confidence, resources, or social value.
This is called hypergamy and it’s not a social construct.
It’s evolution.
It’s nature saying: “Choose the best genes and provider for your offspring.”
So even if:
- Men and women earn the same,
- Have equal opportunities,
- Share equal rights...
Women will still only want the top 10%ile of men.
The rest will be invisible.
That’s why dating apps show this brutal reality:
- Women swipe right on the top 5–10% of men and dating apps giving them men filtered by their choice.
Equality has only made the dating game more savage.
And if it continues, society will revert back to traditional gender roles where men lead, and women follow.
Because biology doesn’t care about politics.
And when biology wins, feminism dies.
mostly water for real black Pillers but i wanted to put all this in one post
@Lightskin Ethnic @browncurrycel @thecel @Aladin @
Last edited:
some .org slangs but made it readable.
