Fighting other groups is a jew trick and isn't natural

dimorphism

dimorphism

Tyronelite Potential
Joined
Aug 23, 2022
Posts
13,323
Reputation
18,031

Prehistoric warfare - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
According to cultural anthropologist and ethnographer Raymond C. Kelly, population density among the earliest hunter-gatherer societies of Homo erectus was probably low enough to avoid armed conflict. The development of the throwing-spear and ambush hunting techniques required cooperation, which made potential violence between hunting parties very costly. The need to prevent competition for resources by maintenance of low population densities may have accelerated the migration out of Africa of H. erectus some 1.8 million years ago as a natural consequence of conflict avoidance.

Kelly believes that this period of "Paleolithic warlessness" persisted until well after the appearance of Homo sapiens some 315,000 years ago, ending only at the occurrence of economic and social shifts associated with sedentism, when new conditions incentivized organized raiding of settlements.[5][6]

None of the many cave paintings of the Upper Paleolithic depicts people attacking other people explicitly,[7][8] but there are depictions of human beings pierced with arrows both of the Aurignacian-Périgordian (roughly 30,000 years old) and the early Magdalenian (c. 17,000 years old), possibly representing "spontaneous confrontations over game resources" in which hostile trespassers were killed; however, other interpretations, including capital punishment, human sacrifice, assassination or systemic warfare cannot be ruled out.[9]

Skeletal and artifactual evidence of intergroup violence between Paleolithic nomadic foragers is absent as well.[8][10]

Tldr: In prehistory groups of hunter gatherers dn fight each other, once there was a confrontation the cucked group just went to live in another place. I think this proves that the fighting ability of humans is to defend harems, not to occupy territories.
 
If only u dedicated this much effort into ur school essay back then
 
Please stop this anti-semitism


\\Makhachev
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Roquefort, ChiraqJihad, Trilogy and 2 others
Iasacrko said:
If only u dedicated this much effort into ur school essay back then
Click to expand...
My .org threads and school essays are the same, copied and pasted
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 21182
shut down this thread, worship civilization goym and hate tribal societies
 
Dn read but it's true, fighting among ourselves is not natural
 
Convenient coming from a black guy
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17872
dimorphism said:

Prehistoric warfare - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
According to cultural anthropologist and ethnographer Raymond C. Kelly, population density among the earliest hunter-gatherer societies of Homo erectus was probably low enough to avoid armed conflict. The development of the throwing-spear and ambush hunting techniques required cooperation, which made potential violence between hunting parties very costly. The need to prevent competition for resources by maintenance of low population densities may have accelerated the migration out of Africa of H. erectus some 1.8 million years ago as a natural consequence of conflict avoidance.

Kelly believes that this period of "Paleolithic warlessness" persisted until well after the appearance of Homo sapiens some 315,000 years ago, ending only at the occurrence of economic and social shifts associated with sedentism, when new conditions incentivized organized raiding of settlements.[5][6]

None of the many cave paintings of the Upper Paleolithic depicts people attacking other people explicitly,[7][8] but there are depictions of human beings pierced with arrows both of the Aurignacian-Périgordian (roughly 30,000 years old) and the early Magdalenian (c. 17,000 years old), possibly representing "spontaneous confrontations over game resources" in which hostile trespassers were killed; however, other interpretations, including capital punishment, human sacrifice, assassination or systemic warfare cannot be ruled out.[9]

Skeletal and artifactual evidence of intergroup violence between Paleolithic nomadic foragers is absent as well.[8][10]

Tldr: In prehistory groups of hunter gatherers dn fight each other, once there was a confrontation the cucked group just went to live in another place. I think this proves that the fighting ability of humans is to defend harems, not to occupy territories.
Click to expand...
Keep cherrypicking, goyim

Hypotheses which suggest that genocidal violence may have caused the extinction of the Neanderthals have been offered by several authors,[5] including Jared Diamond[6] and Ronald Wright.[7] The hypothesis that early humans violently replaced Neanderthals was first proposed by French paleontologist Marcellin Boule (the first person to publish an analysis of a Neanderthal) in 1912.
Click to expand...

The idea that prehistoric hunter gatherers were somehow peaceful is one of the biggest myth. Especially considering that modern populations most closely resembling them are the violent societies we know of.
 
David Rothschild said:
I lied to get that faggot Bashan off my ass.
Click to expand...
a03957b6f7a9ae02bbc923364e050f01.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 2)
Back
Top