First Stack

Deroga

Deroga

If God exists, then he's evil
Joined
Feb 12, 2026
Posts
801
Reputation
1,403
50mg of LUM-201

1mg of Anastrozole

5mg of Lemborexant

20mg of Melatonin

60mg of Apigenin

25mg of Eplerenone

1.5g of Gluco/Chro/MSM

600mg of ALA

400mcg of Chromium Picolinate

1g of Taurine

200mg of Theanine

400mg of Magnesium Bisglycinate

5g of Glycine

10,000 IU of Vitamin D

300mcg of Vitamin K2 (MK4)

2g of Vitamin C

Thinking About

Androgens like Test and Tren
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: ReformedChad, Stacyslayerᛉ, chudpiller and 3 others
@chudpiller @PharmaPhaggot @SlayerJonas @Sadist @ihatemySOST @Zagro
 
Test and Tren first cycle

And 1mg Anastrozole

Not ideal

I'd start with 200-250 test and titrate up.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Joeseminate, chudpiller and starvemaxxkingkong
You're missing ancillaries if you run gear
 
  • +1
Reactions: chudpiller, Joeseminate and Deroga
Test and Tren first cycle

And 1mg Anastrozole

Not ideal

I'd start with 200-250 test and titrate up.
I said thinking about, I haven't done it yet my primary compound is Mk -> indirect increase in test so im taking anastrozole -> ancillaries for insulin resistance are ala and pico -> and for bloating is eplerenone, others are basic ancillaries for sleep like apigenin, lemborexant, melatonin, mag bis, taurine, theanine, glycine -> very basics like vit c, k2, d
 
  • +1
Reactions: chudpiller and BR32
I said thinking about, I haven't done it yet my primary compound is Mk -> indirect increase in test so im taking anastrozole -> ancillaries for insulin resistance are ala and pico -> and for bloating is eplerenone, others are basic ancillaries for sleep like apigenin, lemborexant, melatonin, mag bis, taurine, theanine, glycine -> very basics like vit c, k2, d
You're barely getting anything out of mk.

Just run test and HGH
 
  • +1
Reactions: chudpiller
You're barely getting anything out of mk.

Just run test and HGH
Mk at 50mg is literally better than anything under 10 IU of HGH I have studies to prove this I can PM you, also can't run HGH since I probably wouldn't be able to hide it, might do test
 
  • +1
Reactions: BR32
Mk at 50mg is literally better than anything under 10 IU of HGH I have studies to prove this I can PM you, also can't run HGH since I probably wouldn't be able to hide it, might do test
HGH is easy to get, 10IU/day is not that expensive

send me the studies

@chudpiller
 
  • +1
Reactions: chudpiller
bro called mk the clinical trial name so nobody would catch it

@Deroga, you might be harming yourself by taking this many antioxidants since it's unlikely you are experiencing much oxidative stress.

HGH is easy to get, 10IU/day is not that expensive

send me the studies

@chudpiller
I took mk myself and it just made me fat so I don't recommend it. Although it is somewhat effective, I personally don't think the ghrelin receptor is good to fuck with.
 
  • +1
Reactions: aidentxst and BR32
bro called mk the clinical trial name so nobody would catch it
JFL
@Deroga, you might be harming yourself by taking this many antioxidants since it's unlikely you are experiencing much oxidative stress.
Maybe bros diet is 99% soybean oil
I took mk myself and it just made me fat so I don't recommend it. Although it is somewhat effective, I personally don't think the ghrelin receptor is good to fuck with.
Agreed, It does work but its better just to run HGH.

Fucking w the grehlin receptor is how you mess yourself up long term.
 
  • +1
Reactions: chudpiller
@Deroga

I read your studies bro

All four papers are about the same drug (LUM-201/ibutamoren) in the same narrow context: pediatric GHD clinical trials run by Lumos Pharma. They're literally from the same research group — Bright and Thorner appear as authors across all of them. This is essentially one research program's publication pipeline, not four independent lines of evidence.

None of these papers address healthy adults, bodybuilding contexts, dose-response at 50mg, or any comparison to supraphysiologic exogenous GH. They're studies of a pharmaceutical agent being developed to treat growth hormone deficient children as a needle-free alternative to rhGH — where the bar is "can we get reasonable catch-up growth without injections." That's a completely different question than "is 50mg MK-677 better than 10iu GH for a bodybuilder."

If anything, the Bright 2021 paper directly undermines the 50mg premise the efficacy plateau in these studies was at the 0.8 mg/kg/day pediatric dose, and even then rhGH outperformed it in most subjects.

@chudpiller


Also FYM don't share these, bro thinks he owns pubmed
 
  • +1
Reactions: chudpiller
@Deroga

I read your studies bro

All four papers are about the same drug (LUM-201/ibutamoren) in the same narrow context: pediatric GHD clinical trials run by Lumos Pharma. They're literally from the same research group — Bright and Thorner appear as authors across all of them. This is essentially one research program's publication pipeline, not four independent lines of evidence.

None of these papers address healthy adults, bodybuilding contexts, dose-response at 50mg, or any comparison to supraphysiologic exogenous GH. They're studies of a pharmaceutical agent being developed to treat growth hormone deficient children as a needle-free alternative to rhGH — where the bar is "can we get reasonable catch-up growth without injections." That's a completely different question than "is 50mg MK-677 better than 10iu GH for a bodybuilder."

If anything, the Bright 2021 paper directly undermines the 50mg premise the efficacy plateau in these studies was at the 0.8 mg/kg/day pediatric dose, and even then rhGH outperformed it in most subjects.

@chudpiller


Also FYM don't share these, bro thinks he owns pubmed
@Zagro
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zagro
@chudpiller
If I remember correctly, the gh dose was also not very high (at least in a bodybuilding/late puberty height-maximizing context) in the mk comparison studies on ISS/GHD children.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BR32
If I remember correctly, the gh dose was also not very high (at least in a bodybuilding/late puberty height-maximizing context) in the mk comparison studies on ISS/GHD children.
No children get dosed at 10IU lol

Thats what I was reacting to
 
  • +1
Reactions: chudpiller
@Deroga

I read your studies bro

All four papers are about the same drug (LUM-201/ibutamoren) in the same narrow context: pediatric GHD clinical trials run by Lumos Pharma. They're literally from the same research group — Bright and Thorner appear as authors across all of them. This is essentially one research program's publication pipeline, not four independent lines of evidence.

None of these papers address healthy adults, bodybuilding contexts, dose-response at 50mg, or any comparison to supraphysiologic exogenous GH. They're studies of a pharmaceutical agent being developed to treat growth hormone deficient children as a needle-free alternative to rhGH — where the bar is "can we get reasonable catch-up growth without injections." That's a completely different question than "is 50mg MK-677 better than 10iu GH for a bodybuilder."

If anything, the Bright 2021 paper directly undermines the 50mg premise the efficacy plateau in these studies was at the 0.8 mg/kg/day pediatric dose, and even then rhGH outperformed it in most subjects.

@chudpiller


Also FYM don't share these, bro thinks he owns pubmed
1. Why would any of these studies test healty adults, what health adults or teenagers would willingly take 50mg of Mk, the response should theoritically be the same
2. I extrapolated the 10IU its probably closer to 8IU but Mk is still comparable to that amount and any amount of GH under 6-7, Mk is better for longitudal and radial growth
3. 0.8mg/kg was literally the same as 1.6 did we read the same studies
4. Why are you using chat gpt dawg
 
Mk at 50mg is literally better than anything under 10 IU of HGH I have studies to prove this I can PM you, also can't run HGH since I probably wouldn't be able to hide it, might do test
that's why all the bodybuilders are running mk and not just teenagers right lul
 
  • +1
Reactions: chudpiller
Omg! 🤯

Exogenous growth hormone outperformed a growth hormone secretagogue in kids with GHD???

That’s impossible!

Maybe if he can take 2 minutes of his precious time and read the study he can see that mk only produces 20% of the systemic levels and achieves 80% of the results 🤯

Don’t tag me for people with zero heightmaxxing knowledge this nigga thinks estrogen is important
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deroga
will read soon
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deroga
So up the adex to 3+mg or your gay :feelsokman:
 

Similar threads

wsxcel
Replies
12
Views
90
irishltn
irishltn
D
Replies
6
Views
61
Don_and-idk
D
volgaTz
Replies
49
Views
267
Wurttzcope_.
Wurttzcope_.
RanvarPlart
Replies
2
Views
36
godlenwind47
G
viiivacious
Replies
0
Views
71
viiivacious
viiivacious

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top