thecel
morph king
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
- Posts
- 24,092
- Reputation
- 50,828
John Anthony’s lay count definitely is higher than the model’s.
Maxilla doesn’t matter.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
View attachment 2323517
John Anthony’s lay count definitely is higher than the model’s.
Maxilla doesn’t matter.
dude had to move to south america to run jbw what slayying
he is 6'4 and whiteHe slayed in the US too. Such incel cope to conclude “he must be geomaxing cuz he can’t get nun in the West” whenever a sexually successful man moves out of the West, even temporarily. People here say Alex PWF just runs JBW in Colombia, but he’s lived in Miami for years and had been in Colombia for a short period of time.
he is 6'4 and white
why does he slayys in your opnion ?OK and? This is blackpill cognitive dissonance right here. Blackpillers go “oh he’s 6'4" and White, so he slays easily” yet they say it never began for some 6'4" White members on this site because of a few mm of facial bone.
why does he slayys in your opnion ?
but why ?It’s clear he slays
but why ?
How does that prove anything?
Just because he doesn't have one trait befitting of a slayer, doesn't mean that one trait doesn't matter. Is height irrelevant because Tom Cruise managed to become a sex icon despite his height? No, considering he had a lot of other factors in play. If there are ten problems on a test, and you need a 7/10 to pass, every question matters. But you still have some leeway and are allowed to have some parts and not others.
"slaying" in itself also doesn't answer the question. You need to know the frequency, the ratings of the girls, and so on.
You're referring to "blackpillers" as some sort of bogeyman when even on this site there is a lot of variance of opinionCope. Blackpillers believe that without a dog maxilla you cannot attract any women regardless of their SMV.
You're referring to "blackpillers" as some sort of bogeyman when even on this site there is a lot of variance of opinion
Those who believe NTpill is law
those who think height > all
Prettyboymaxxers
Mascmaxxers
Gymcels
Dark triadmaxxers
and those who think pheno > all
I agree with the NTpillers not being blackpillers, however that's besides the pointNone of them are blackpillers. The types you listed are all bluepillers.
this is what fundementaly wrong with this autistic site, whenever somebody finds legitmate success these retards will cope hard with excuses to as why they aare still an incelHe slayed in the US too. Such incel cope to conclude “he must be geomaxing cuz he can’t get nun in the West” whenever a sexually successful man moves out of the West, even temporarily. People here say Alex PWF just runs JBW in Colombia, but he’s lived in Miami for years and had been in Colombia for a short period of time.
Most people have decent maxillas so I doubt recession there really matters. It’s upper maxilla that’s rare and important.
Yes but if the average guy has a decent lower maxilla then it can’t be that important for attractiveness.His entire maxilla is retruded.
Lay count doesn't determine SMV. I'm being ded srs.View attachment 2323515View attachment 2323518
John Anthony’s lay count definitely is higher than the model’s.
Maxilla doesn’t matter.
Yes but if the average guy has a decent lower maxilla then it can’t be that important for attractiveness.
Yes but if the average guy has a decent lower maxilla then it can’t be that important for attractiveness.
One of the worst threads I have ever read. The incel in the first pic doesn't slay anything but prostitutes
Guy look giga ultra mumbai morning road cleaning janitorView attachment 2323515View attachment 2323518
John Anthony’s lay count definitely is higher than the model’s.
Maxilla doesn’t matter.
You seem young and inexperienced with women. Real life outcomes is the only determinant of your appeal to opposite gender. Not your perceived mathematical formulas and ratios that SHOULD work in theory but don’t translate.Lay count doesn't determine SMV. I'm being ded srs.
You seem young and inexperienced with women. Real life outcomes is the only determinant of your appeal to opposite gender. Not your perceived mathematical formulas and ratios that SHOULD work in theory but don’t translate.
Real life “treatment” also doesn’t map very well because it is massively confounded by perception - and men tend to *over perceive* sexual interest from opposite gender (especially those who run high on testosterone and dopamine).Real life outcomes in terms of treatment, not lay count.
Lay count doesn’t map to SMV very well because people vary in promiscuity.
Partner quality is a better indicator of SMV than partner quality. Anyone who says they have a high body count just have low standards and are having sex with low quality women.You seem young and inexperienced with women. Real life outcomes is the only determinant of your appeal to opposite gender. Not your perceived mathematical formulas and ratios that SHOULD work in theory but don’t translate.
It is absolutely BOTH. Quality and quantity both matter and accurately reflect and capture SMV. Having low bodycount is especially common in sexually inexperienced/young and low SMV men who justify to themselves their lack of diverse sexual experience to them having “high standards” so they can preserve their ego. I freely admit I was one of those guys in my younger low SMV years who was going around claiming “high standards” although subconsciously I knew I was coping . Having banged models and/or very attractive girls (but lesser number due to their rarity) with tons of options also capture one’s SMV (as long as it is not done thru sugar daddy maxxing/betabuxxing).Partner quality is a better indicator of SMV than partner quality. Anyone who says they have a high body count just have low standards and are having sex with low quality women.
Having a high body count just increases the chances of contracting and spreading STIs.It is absolutely BOTH. Quality and quantity both matter and accurately reflect and capture SMV. Having low bodycount is especially common in sexually inexperienced/young and low SMV men who justify to themselves their lack of diverse sexual experience to them having “high standards” so they can preserve their ego. I freely admit I was one of those guys in my younger low SMV years who was going around claiming “high standards” although subconsciously I knew I was coping . Having banged models and/or very attractive girls (but lesser number due to their rarity) with tons of options also capture one’s SMV (as long as it is not done thru sugar daddy maxxing/betabuxxing).
When people look at their own individual results as an accurate rating of their SMV they will stop asking for ratings as well. It is really that simple. Real life outcomes is the best integrator of all the tiny intricacies , ratios and details that collectively define SMV.
Having said that, I absolutely believe that sticking to ONE partner (a high quality one) is the best strategy for building and maintaining a robust thriving society overall. Hook up culture decays society from within.
Even Gandy’s lower maxilla is shit:
View attachment 2323661View attachment 2323668
Forward growth morph:
View attachment 2323662
PSA: David Gandy Is SEVERELY RECESSED
This guy is NOT a PSL God. His maxilla is very far below average. It's extremely retruded and downswung, creating a horrible convex nose shape. We need to stop idolizing this Gandy dude as the pinnacle of male aesthetics, because he clearly isn't. To put his recessed face into perspective, this...looksmax.org