trenace450
Gold
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2025
- Posts
- 928
- Reputation
- 1,589
DNR:
So usually there's a couple theories on how JFK actually died. All we know with absolute certainty, is that he was shot and killed in 1963. We're unsure about the amount of bullets that fired. We're unsure about the motive or exact perpetrator. We're even unsure if the official investigations were mislead.
The general consensus, is the lone gunman theory. The lone gunman theory, states that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in shooting JFK. This was the consensus by the CIA and the Warren commission(Commission established by the later president Lyndon B. Johnson in 1964 to investigate the assassination).
The evidence is pretty straightforward. The CIA investigated Oswald's background, and found out he was a former US marine. He had defected to the soviet union and was effectively an anti-american communist.
Oswald's bolt-action carcano rifle was found on the 6th floor of a building. 3 casings were found. 1 fully intact bullet(CE 399) was found in the hospital. This bullet matched the casings. Oswald was spotted nearby the building before the assassination. 90 seconds after the assassination, Oswald shot and killed a police officer with a handgun, confirming his guilt. Oswald was arrested and shot 2 days later by Jack Ruby, leaving him unable to testify further.
And that's where the confirming evidence for the lone gunman theory ends. Now let's go over some weaknesses and holes
It was very clear that Oswald was a soviet sympathizer. He was a self-proclaimed communist and Castro supporter. He escaped to the soviet union in 1959 and returned in 1962. JFK was shot in 1963. He believed in communist revolution and had tried to renounce his U.S. citizenship. He was so confident in revolution, that he was actually critical of the soviet system, for not being revolutionary enough.
This anti-american ideology, is most often claimed to be the primary motive. The problem with this, is it doesn't follow that he would assassinate a U.S. president just because he was revolutionary, and anti-american. JFK was also not particularly anti-communist in comparison to other politicians. What's odd, is that Oswald attempted to assassinate a right-wing general in April of 1963(JFK was assassinated in November). The right-wing general in question (Edwin Walker) was highly anti-communist and was praised by American nazi Lincoln Rockwell.
Walker planned a literal anti-communist tour(Operation Midnight ride) in February 1963. During the tour, in March, Walker held a speech where he encouraged the U.S. military to eradicate communism from Cuba. 7 days later, a carcano rifle matching Oswald's rifle, was purchased under an alias. The FBI also discovered photographs of Walker's house, taken by Oswald. This evidence was submitted to the Warren commission, and confirmed. Walker's assassination attempt was in April, and at the time, the assassin was unknown.
It was only AFTER the JFK assassination that the Warren commission, actually investigated and blamed Oswald. According to Marina Oswald, his wife, she testified that Oswald had planned Edwin Walkers assassination for 2 months. He had told her exactly what he was going to do, and why in private. This testimony obviously gives good evidence, that Oswald could have killed JFK right?
Well it's not that simple. See, Marina Oswald never testified that Oswald planned on killing JFK. There also wasn't any clear motive for killing JFK, like there was with Edwin Walker. According to Marina Oswald, she was convinced that Oswald did it. But this was only due to the circumstantial evidence, provided by the investigation. Seems odd that Oswald would confide with his wife about Walker, but not JFK. Also odd that he meticulously planned Edwin Walker's assassination, but apparently not when killing a U.S. president?
It should also be noted, that both Marina Oswald and Edwin Walker expressed serious doubts about the lone gunman theory later on. Marina Oswald later claimed Oswald was a "pantsy" in a larger conspiracy. Edwin Walker claimed that Jack Ruby(Oswald's killer) and Oswald were connected, and that the Warren commission was concealing evidence of this. This is despite the fact, that Oswald literally tried to assassinate Walker, which the Warren commission confirmed.
The Warren commission established that there were 3 shots. The 3 shots were fired as follows:
This is highly suspicious, since bullet 3 was allegedly found in fragments, despite only entering JFK's skull 1 time, and exiting through the front. This theory is also inconsistent with the testimony of Connally, the front passenger. He testified, that after hearing a gunshot, he turned to his right, and was then shot, meaning he wansn't instantly hit. He testified that it was in fact, not the same bullet, contradicting the Warren commission consensus. But wait! There's more.
Witness testimonies, claim there were 4 shots, not 3. While investigators discovered 3 casings, witnesses claim they could hear 4 shots being fired. This was over 40 witnesses. A later investigation by the house select committee on assassinations(HSCA, 1979) analyzed an audio recording and concluded 4 shots were likely fired. They also concluded that 1 shot, came from a different location and that there was "high probablity" of a conspiracy and second gunman. The audio analysis was later criticized by the national academy of sciences in 1982, yet the HSCA did not retract their conclusions.
Some witnesses also claimed that shots came from different directions or different guns. And the most significant piece of evidence, is the speed of the shots. Remember, Oswald was using a bolt-action Carcano rifle. It'll approximately take you 2.5 seconds to rack and fire consecutively. Witnesses claimed it couldn't have been a bolt-action, since the shots were too fast. Video evidence also showed 5.6 seconds, between the first and last shot. This means Oswald would take around 1.8 seconds to rack and fire his rifle. Keep in mind, this is not an easy shot whatsoever. Oswald was on the 6th floor, 265 feet/81 meters away, aiming at a moving target going 11.2 mph/5 meters per second. Now you're thinking "Oh but he was a former U.S. marine, not an average joe". Yes and we actually have his exact ratings from military marksman training. He scored a 191 in 1959, being demoted to marksman rank. This is the lowest passing grade, like literally, the score is from 190-250. He had previously scored 212 earning the rank of sharpshooter, but this was in 1956. It should also be noted, Oswald was using a cheap rifle with a cheap scope, not high quality equipment, and he had been out of the military for years.
So what actually happened? The likely theory is that there was a second gunman, at the very least. The current body of evidence, just doesn't support that Oswald shot 3 bullets by himself, in 5.6 seconds. What's interesting, is that the FBI and CIA did very little effort to confirm any of this. They discovered bullet fragments, and "confirmed" that they matched Oswald's casings. Yet these were not necessarily "from" Oswald's gun, and they did not investigate so. Some fragments were also dismissed, due to being too small or irrelevant. The FBI and CIA could have recovered all fragments, weighed a total mass, compared the total fragment mass to bullets. This would have been very reliable evidence of the theory. So why didn't they?
Now for the fun part. As we've discussed, the lone gunman theory has major holes. The motive doesn't make sense, several people involved in the event are doubtful or suspicious, the magic bullet theory is highly improbable. Something else must be going on here.
Well, once you connect all of the dots, it starts to make a little bit more sense. So let's build a clear framework, showcasing inconsistencies and evidence that reveal what actually happened.
If you've actually read this far through this autistic thread, you might be wondering "What do the jews have to do with all this?".
Well as always, it's just classic Jewish shenanigans.
In 1958, with help from the French government, Israel started constructing a secret nuclear research plant named "Dimona".
It was claimed to be a textile plant, and was covered up very well. At the time, Israel was not permitted to have nuclear weapons according to international law. Somewhere around 1960, two American spy planes flew above the nuclear plant, and discovered the site. The U.S. officially confronted Israel in December of 1960. Israel denies and now claims it's a "research reactor". The U.S. remain highly suspicious. They used satellite imaging to verify military grade structures and a suspiciously high level of security. Thermal imaging also showed high levels of heat, matching a typical French nuclear reactor running at full power. Intelligence analysts were also specifically trained to recognize nuclear weapon infrastructure, so the suspicion was well grounded.
In 1961, the U.S. demands inspections of the site, to confirm that it is in fact a simple research reactor site. There was a lot of trouble with these inspections, as they were very often delayed and Israel wouldn't allow full inspection. The inspections had to be announced in advance and the inspectors weren't shown everything. Israel also hid critical labs and plutonium plants. JFK was highly critical of nuclear weapon proliferation and desperately wanted to prevent it. He saw global nuclear weapons as a threat, even if it was an ally.
In May of 1961, JFK holds a metting with Ben Gurion the one and only Israeli prime minister. JFK raises concerns about the Dimona plant and demands inspections. Ben Gurion insists that it's a peaceful research reactor, and allows restricted inspections. Fast forward to July 1963, and it gets interesting. At this time, the U.S. still hasn't been allowed full inspections and Israel still hasn't admitted anything.
JFK is getting tired of the restricted inspections, and at this point, it's pretty much well known that Israel is building nuclear weapons, in secret from the U.S.
JFK sends a letter to Levi Eshkol(New Israeli prime minister) demanding full inspections and transparency. In his letter, he says ""This government’s commitment to and support of Israel could be seriously jeopardized if it should be thought that we were unable to obtain reliable information on a subject as vital to peace as the question of Israel’s nuclear program."
Remember, Kennedy was shot in November of 1963. This letter was in July of 1963, only 4 months beforehand. The Israelis also didn't succumb to his demands. They further delayed negotiations, promised inspections but dragged them out. Meanwhile, they are well on their way, to build nuclear weaponry. So get this, 4 months after JFK writes an ultimatum to Israel, he gets assassinated. Now you're thinking "Oh well who cares, it's not like Israel suddenly gets the green light just because he's dead". Well actually, that is exactly what happened.
Lyndon B. Johnson was a jewish puppet
For context, LBJ was elected as vice president, and therefore took over the presidency when JFK died. This was not because JFK was friendly with him, but because LBJ would bring in southern state voters and because LBJ had powerful Jewish lobbyists as funding. Both JFK and his brother actually viewed LBJ as corrupt, they did not trust him.
Just to name a few, LBJ had backing from jews like Abe Fortas and Arthur Goldberg. So his pro-israeli stance doesn't come as a surprise.
The Dimona problem, practically vanished after LBJ became president. The previously demanded inspections weren't brought up ever again, and the fact that Israel lied to the U.S. was also forgotten. This was a green light for Israel, to continue nuclear warhead production with full speed.
It doesn't stop there. LBJ had close relationships to the CIA as well. Specifically Allen Dulles(Former CIA director) and James Angleton. Allen Dulles was the CIA director that JFK fired, after the failed bay of pigs invasion. James Angleton was the chief of counterintelligence. He had direct relationships with Mossad and Shin Bet. He was literally the liaison between the CIA and Mossad, meaning communication went through him. He also had a personal relationship with Mossad director Isser Harel.
James Angleton has also been accused of sharing nuclear secrets, slowing down American investigations of Dimona and making the U.S. intelligence investigate Dimona blind spots knowingly. He has been described as the most pro-israel Intelligence agent ever, in American history. Suddenly it seems a bit more rational, that LBJ would favor Israel over his own country. And it doesn't end there.
The USS liberty (1967), was an American ship that got attacked by Israeli jets during the six day war, with 34 American soldiers dying. The ship was clearly marked as American, and was in international waters north of Egypt. Israel apologized and called it accidental and mistaken identity. Several U.S. officials were skeptical of this claim and called the attack deliberate and intentional. After USS liberty distress calls to the American fleet, LBJ ordered the fleet to stand down. USS liberty survivors attribute the following quote to LBJ "I don't care if the ship sinks, I will not embarrass our ally."
The survivors of the USS liberty, were also threatened with prison time, for discussing the events of the attack. Declassified CIA intelligence reports from intercepted Israeli communications, indicated that they were perfectly aware that it was an American ship. It's likely that both LBJ and James Angleton played a role in suppressing these reports. LBJ also prevented a full congressional investigation into the event, the official cause was therefore written off as accidental, claiming that Israeli pilots mistakenly thought the ship was Egyptian, despite attacking the ship for over an hour.
With all this major evidence taken into account, along with the countless inconsistencies and holes, it seems we can provide a more coherent theory.
We have a lot of overlapping evidence. There is plenty of circumstantial evidence pointing towards three primary actors. The CIA, Israel and Lyndon B. Johnson.
The basic propositions of this theory are as follows:
In conclusion, it's most likely that JFK's assassination was not a single man operation. It was a multi-factorial plot, that was orchestrated very successfully. The Warren commission relied on the CIA to investigate, and therefore falsely concluded the lone gunman theory. The former CIA director Allen Dulles, was appointed to the Warren commission. He directed the conclusion to the lone gunman theory, with the help of other CIA investigators. It was one of the biggest American tragedies since Abraham Lincoln, and they were tricked. It was only in 1979, well over a decade after, that the HSCA re-investigated the event. The new conclusion, rejected the former lone gunman theory, when taking a look at more declassified evidence and audio recordings. They concluded that the assassination was indeed a conspiracy. Only they couldn't pinpoint the perpetrators. Now 62 years later, it appears the full scope of the conspiracy has been exposed. It was of course the jews
I WOULD NEVER COMMIT SUICIDE IF I DIE IT WAS THE JEWS
The CIA, Israel and vice president Lyndon B. Johnson plotted to kill Kennedy. The official lone gunman consensus makes no sense and is very inconsistent. All of this is public knowledge from various declassified files and testimonies. The Americans were tricked by the jews, and this assassination kickstarted jewish mass control over America
So usually there's a couple theories on how JFK actually died. All we know with absolute certainty, is that he was shot and killed in 1963. We're unsure about the amount of bullets that fired. We're unsure about the motive or exact perpetrator. We're even unsure if the official investigations were mislead.
The lone gunman theory
The general consensus, is the lone gunman theory. The lone gunman theory, states that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in shooting JFK. This was the consensus by the CIA and the Warren commission(Commission established by the later president Lyndon B. Johnson in 1964 to investigate the assassination).
The evidence is pretty straightforward. The CIA investigated Oswald's background, and found out he was a former US marine. He had defected to the soviet union and was effectively an anti-american communist.
Oswald's bolt-action carcano rifle was found on the 6th floor of a building. 3 casings were found. 1 fully intact bullet(CE 399) was found in the hospital. This bullet matched the casings. Oswald was spotted nearby the building before the assassination. 90 seconds after the assassination, Oswald shot and killed a police officer with a handgun, confirming his guilt. Oswald was arrested and shot 2 days later by Jack Ruby, leaving him unable to testify further.
And that's where the confirming evidence for the lone gunman theory ends. Now let's go over some weaknesses and holes
Lack of motive
It was very clear that Oswald was a soviet sympathizer. He was a self-proclaimed communist and Castro supporter. He escaped to the soviet union in 1959 and returned in 1962. JFK was shot in 1963. He believed in communist revolution and had tried to renounce his U.S. citizenship. He was so confident in revolution, that he was actually critical of the soviet system, for not being revolutionary enough.
This anti-american ideology, is most often claimed to be the primary motive. The problem with this, is it doesn't follow that he would assassinate a U.S. president just because he was revolutionary, and anti-american. JFK was also not particularly anti-communist in comparison to other politicians. What's odd, is that Oswald attempted to assassinate a right-wing general in April of 1963(JFK was assassinated in November). The right-wing general in question (Edwin Walker) was highly anti-communist and was praised by American nazi Lincoln Rockwell.
Walker planned a literal anti-communist tour(Operation Midnight ride) in February 1963. During the tour, in March, Walker held a speech where he encouraged the U.S. military to eradicate communism from Cuba. 7 days later, a carcano rifle matching Oswald's rifle, was purchased under an alias. The FBI also discovered photographs of Walker's house, taken by Oswald. This evidence was submitted to the Warren commission, and confirmed. Walker's assassination attempt was in April, and at the time, the assassin was unknown.
It was only AFTER the JFK assassination that the Warren commission, actually investigated and blamed Oswald. According to Marina Oswald, his wife, she testified that Oswald had planned Edwin Walkers assassination for 2 months. He had told her exactly what he was going to do, and why in private. This testimony obviously gives good evidence, that Oswald could have killed JFK right?
Well it's not that simple. See, Marina Oswald never testified that Oswald planned on killing JFK. There also wasn't any clear motive for killing JFK, like there was with Edwin Walker. According to Marina Oswald, she was convinced that Oswald did it. But this was only due to the circumstantial evidence, provided by the investigation. Seems odd that Oswald would confide with his wife about Walker, but not JFK. Also odd that he meticulously planned Edwin Walker's assassination, but apparently not when killing a U.S. president?
It should also be noted, that both Marina Oswald and Edwin Walker expressed serious doubts about the lone gunman theory later on. Marina Oswald later claimed Oswald was a "pantsy" in a larger conspiracy. Edwin Walker claimed that Jack Ruby(Oswald's killer) and Oswald were connected, and that the Warren commission was concealing evidence of this. This is despite the fact, that Oswald literally tried to assassinate Walker, which the Warren commission confirmed.
The bullet confusion
The Warren commission established that there were 3 shots. The 3 shots were fired as follows:
- Missed, evidence shows that it hit a curb, potentially ricocheted with a bystander.
- Bullet CE 399, also called the magic bullet. Entered in JFK's back, exited through his throat, entered governor Connally(Front passenger) through the back, exits through his chest, enters his wrist and then enters his thigh. That's quite a long trajectory. The bullet was discovered in undamaged condition
- Headshot, entered the back of JFK's skull and exited through the front
This is highly suspicious, since bullet 3 was allegedly found in fragments, despite only entering JFK's skull 1 time, and exiting through the front. This theory is also inconsistent with the testimony of Connally, the front passenger. He testified, that after hearing a gunshot, he turned to his right, and was then shot, meaning he wansn't instantly hit. He testified that it was in fact, not the same bullet, contradicting the Warren commission consensus. But wait! There's more.
Witness testimonies, claim there were 4 shots, not 3. While investigators discovered 3 casings, witnesses claim they could hear 4 shots being fired. This was over 40 witnesses. A later investigation by the house select committee on assassinations(HSCA, 1979) analyzed an audio recording and concluded 4 shots were likely fired. They also concluded that 1 shot, came from a different location and that there was "high probablity" of a conspiracy and second gunman. The audio analysis was later criticized by the national academy of sciences in 1982, yet the HSCA did not retract their conclusions.
Some witnesses also claimed that shots came from different directions or different guns. And the most significant piece of evidence, is the speed of the shots. Remember, Oswald was using a bolt-action Carcano rifle. It'll approximately take you 2.5 seconds to rack and fire consecutively. Witnesses claimed it couldn't have been a bolt-action, since the shots were too fast. Video evidence also showed 5.6 seconds, between the first and last shot. This means Oswald would take around 1.8 seconds to rack and fire his rifle. Keep in mind, this is not an easy shot whatsoever. Oswald was on the 6th floor, 265 feet/81 meters away, aiming at a moving target going 11.2 mph/5 meters per second. Now you're thinking "Oh but he was a former U.S. marine, not an average joe". Yes and we actually have his exact ratings from military marksman training. He scored a 191 in 1959, being demoted to marksman rank. This is the lowest passing grade, like literally, the score is from 190-250. He had previously scored 212 earning the rank of sharpshooter, but this was in 1956. It should also be noted, Oswald was using a cheap rifle with a cheap scope, not high quality equipment, and he had been out of the military for years.
So what actually happened? The likely theory is that there was a second gunman, at the very least. The current body of evidence, just doesn't support that Oswald shot 3 bullets by himself, in 5.6 seconds. What's interesting, is that the FBI and CIA did very little effort to confirm any of this. They discovered bullet fragments, and "confirmed" that they matched Oswald's casings. Yet these were not necessarily "from" Oswald's gun, and they did not investigate so. Some fragments were also dismissed, due to being too small or irrelevant. The FBI and CIA could have recovered all fragments, weighed a total mass, compared the total fragment mass to bullets. This would have been very reliable evidence of the theory. So why didn't they?
The CIA
Now for the fun part. As we've discussed, the lone gunman theory has major holes. The motive doesn't make sense, several people involved in the event are doubtful or suspicious, the magic bullet theory is highly improbable. Something else must be going on here.
Well, once you connect all of the dots, it starts to make a little bit more sense. So let's build a clear framework, showcasing inconsistencies and evidence that reveal what actually happened.
- Oswald defected without major issues. He was dishonorably discharged from the military due to defecting. He also attempted to share U.S. military secrets with the soviets. Yet he was able to immigrate back to America without trouble in 1962? He had been gone for 2.5 years, in a country, that was considered the biggest enemy of the U.S, at a time when spies and defectors were rampant. It's highly suspicious that he was let back into America, without trouble. His return was in fact, facilitated by the U.S. embassy in Moscow.
- Oswald had CIA and FBI connections. This was found out through a guy named Guy. Guy Banister was an anti-communist, former FBI agent and owned a private investigation office. Witness reports, as well as his secretary, claim Banister knew Oswald and was familiar with him. On the day of the assassination, Banister had gotten into a dispute with one of his investigators, Jack Martin. According to Martin, Martin had accused Banister of assassinating Kennedy, to which Banister struck him with a revolver. Days after the assassination, Martin testified to the police, that Banisters colleague David Ferrie, was supposed to be the getaway driver. He claimed Ferrie had also taught Oswald how to use a rifle. This adds up, since Ferrie and Oswald had previously been in the civil air patrol together. Martin claimed Ferrie had "hypnotized" Oswald, yet this was deemed to speculative by the government investigators at the time. Banister and Ferrie were highly anti-castro and anti-cuban, both were highly critical of JFK, since JFK wanted peace with Cuba. No convictions or conclusions were made at the time. However, the evidence later became apparent to district attorney Jim Garrison, who ran a deeper investigation in 1969. He discovered a larger plot, involving a party at Ferries apartment, where key witness Perry Russo testified the following: A man named "Leon Oswald" was there at the party, David Ferrie was there and a man named "Clem Bertrand"(Later revealed to be Clay Shaw under an alias). He testified that they had been planning the killing of JFK, trying to set up alibis and triangulate crossfire. And guess who Clay Shaw is? A CIA intelligence contact. He supplied the CIA with intelligence. So we have a CIA intelligence supplier and a former FBI agent allegedly coercing Lee Harvey Oswald to assassinate the president. Highly suspicious.
- The CIA already knew about Oswald. They had a file on him since the 1960's, three years before the assassination. This was because Oswald was a defector. Interestingly enough, it took a whole year for the file to be established, meaning Oswald left in 1959, and the file was only established in 1960. This was very unusual for defectors. The CIA did know about his return and his whereabouts. They only got indirect information through contacts. Guess what contacts? The CIA domestic contact service, the exact same agency that Clay Shaw was an informant for. Now there's no smoking gun, linking the two directly, but it's pretty robust circumstantial evidence.
- Someone impersonated Oswald. In 1963 September to October, Oswald traveled to Mexico, to gain visa from the Cuban and Soviet embassies. Or at least that's what the records show. The records also show his name on bus rides, from Texas to Mexico city, as well as Hotel check-ins under his name. A witness at the embassy also reports a man identifying as Lee Harvey Oswald. Now here's the kicker. Both embassy buildings are under CIA surveillance and wiretapping. Yet the surveillance doesn't match Oswald. Not a single photo shows Oswald leaving or entering the buildings. One photo was claimed to be Oswald, but the CIA later admitted that it wasn't him. Wiretaps from October 1st 1963, indicate a man calling himself Oswald, speaking in broken Russian to the Soviet embassy over the phone. Yet the voice doesn't resemble Oswald's whatsoever, and the CIA themselves later admitted this. It was labeled a potential "impersonation". According to investigations by the HSCA (1979) “There is evidence that Oswald was impersonated in Mexico City... and the CIA did not fully cooperate with investigators.”. Why would someone impersonate Oswald right before the assassination, and have the CIA attempt to cover up the impersonation? Seems odd.
- The CIA withheld information from other investigators. This is a common theme for the CIA regarding this investigation. The Warren commission mostly relied on investigations by the FBI and CIA, so it's crucial that the CIA gives them every file and piece of information. Yet, the file created on Oswald in 1960, was never even mentioned to the commission. This was not just any file, this was a file on a military defector, willing to give information to the soviets. Considering it's the cold war, it was highly unusual to firstly, create a file an entire year after his defection, and secondly, not disclose the contents of the file. The CIA actually lied about this to the Warren commission, and claimed they had no interest in Oswald prior to 1963. This was revealed to be false, but only in the 1970's when limited parts were declassified. We still to this day, have not seen the full declassified contents of the Oswald files. And remember Oswald's impersonator trip to Mexico city? Well the CIA initially claimed to have voice recordings of Oswald, when asked by the FBI. They also withheld and destroyed pieces of tape. Why would they do that? The CIA also had an internal investigation in 1967, where they investigated themselves for withholding and covering up information. This was an entire report named the "Scelso report". It was kept classified until the late 1990's obviously, almost 40 years after the event.
- The CIA wanted JFK gone. While Oswald has a lack of motive, the CIA certainly does not. The CIA at the time, was highly anti-cuban and wanted to overthrow Castro. They financed and planned an invasion named the "The bay of pigs invasion"(1961). The invasion failed, badly. There were many factors at play, but a big one was lack of air support. See, JFK wasn't as anti-castro, as the CIA. So he wouldn't authorize U.S. air support. Several CIA officers blamed JFK for the complete failure. This resulted in them being fired, as well as the deputy director being fired. JFK is famously quoted as saying he wanted to "splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.”. JFK was generally very anti-CIA and soft on communism. This provides a very clear motive, especially for using Oswald as a "pantsy". The entire event was basically framed to be "A loner commie anti-american brainwashed by soviets kills the president". This provides the CIA with a new president, one that may be more lenient or supportive of the CIA and harsher on communism. And it also provides more hatred and war support against communists, which was a clear goal of the CIA. They felt humiliated by JFK and felt they were doing it for the greater good, by assassinating him.
The Jews
If you've actually read this far through this autistic thread, you might be wondering "What do the jews have to do with all this?".
Well as always, it's just classic Jewish shenanigans.
In 1958, with help from the French government, Israel started constructing a secret nuclear research plant named "Dimona".
It was claimed to be a textile plant, and was covered up very well. At the time, Israel was not permitted to have nuclear weapons according to international law. Somewhere around 1960, two American spy planes flew above the nuclear plant, and discovered the site. The U.S. officially confronted Israel in December of 1960. Israel denies and now claims it's a "research reactor". The U.S. remain highly suspicious. They used satellite imaging to verify military grade structures and a suspiciously high level of security. Thermal imaging also showed high levels of heat, matching a typical French nuclear reactor running at full power. Intelligence analysts were also specifically trained to recognize nuclear weapon infrastructure, so the suspicion was well grounded.
In 1961, the U.S. demands inspections of the site, to confirm that it is in fact a simple research reactor site. There was a lot of trouble with these inspections, as they were very often delayed and Israel wouldn't allow full inspection. The inspections had to be announced in advance and the inspectors weren't shown everything. Israel also hid critical labs and plutonium plants. JFK was highly critical of nuclear weapon proliferation and desperately wanted to prevent it. He saw global nuclear weapons as a threat, even if it was an ally.
In May of 1961, JFK holds a metting with Ben Gurion the one and only Israeli prime minister. JFK raises concerns about the Dimona plant and demands inspections. Ben Gurion insists that it's a peaceful research reactor, and allows restricted inspections. Fast forward to July 1963, and it gets interesting. At this time, the U.S. still hasn't been allowed full inspections and Israel still hasn't admitted anything.
JFK is getting tired of the restricted inspections, and at this point, it's pretty much well known that Israel is building nuclear weapons, in secret from the U.S.
JFK sends a letter to Levi Eshkol(New Israeli prime minister) demanding full inspections and transparency. In his letter, he says ""This government’s commitment to and support of Israel could be seriously jeopardized if it should be thought that we were unable to obtain reliable information on a subject as vital to peace as the question of Israel’s nuclear program."
Remember, Kennedy was shot in November of 1963. This letter was in July of 1963, only 4 months beforehand. The Israelis also didn't succumb to his demands. They further delayed negotiations, promised inspections but dragged them out. Meanwhile, they are well on their way, to build nuclear weaponry. So get this, 4 months after JFK writes an ultimatum to Israel, he gets assassinated. Now you're thinking "Oh well who cares, it's not like Israel suddenly gets the green light just because he's dead". Well actually, that is exactly what happened.
Lyndon B. Johnson was a jewish puppet
For context, LBJ was elected as vice president, and therefore took over the presidency when JFK died. This was not because JFK was friendly with him, but because LBJ would bring in southern state voters and because LBJ had powerful Jewish lobbyists as funding. Both JFK and his brother actually viewed LBJ as corrupt, they did not trust him.
Just to name a few, LBJ had backing from jews like Abe Fortas and Arthur Goldberg. So his pro-israeli stance doesn't come as a surprise.
The Dimona problem, practically vanished after LBJ became president. The previously demanded inspections weren't brought up ever again, and the fact that Israel lied to the U.S. was also forgotten. This was a green light for Israel, to continue nuclear warhead production with full speed.
It doesn't stop there. LBJ had close relationships to the CIA as well. Specifically Allen Dulles(Former CIA director) and James Angleton. Allen Dulles was the CIA director that JFK fired, after the failed bay of pigs invasion. James Angleton was the chief of counterintelligence. He had direct relationships with Mossad and Shin Bet. He was literally the liaison between the CIA and Mossad, meaning communication went through him. He also had a personal relationship with Mossad director Isser Harel.
James Angleton has also been accused of sharing nuclear secrets, slowing down American investigations of Dimona and making the U.S. intelligence investigate Dimona blind spots knowingly. He has been described as the most pro-israel Intelligence agent ever, in American history. Suddenly it seems a bit more rational, that LBJ would favor Israel over his own country. And it doesn't end there.
The USS liberty (1967), was an American ship that got attacked by Israeli jets during the six day war, with 34 American soldiers dying. The ship was clearly marked as American, and was in international waters north of Egypt. Israel apologized and called it accidental and mistaken identity. Several U.S. officials were skeptical of this claim and called the attack deliberate and intentional. After USS liberty distress calls to the American fleet, LBJ ordered the fleet to stand down. USS liberty survivors attribute the following quote to LBJ "I don't care if the ship sinks, I will not embarrass our ally."
The survivors of the USS liberty, were also threatened with prison time, for discussing the events of the attack. Declassified CIA intelligence reports from intercepted Israeli communications, indicated that they were perfectly aware that it was an American ship. It's likely that both LBJ and James Angleton played a role in suppressing these reports. LBJ also prevented a full congressional investigation into the event, the official cause was therefore written off as accidental, claiming that Israeli pilots mistakenly thought the ship was Egyptian, despite attacking the ship for over an hour.
The triangulation theory
With all this major evidence taken into account, along with the countless inconsistencies and holes, it seems we can provide a more coherent theory.
We have a lot of overlapping evidence. There is plenty of circumstantial evidence pointing towards three primary actors. The CIA, Israel and Lyndon B. Johnson.
The basic propositions of this theory are as follows:
- Kennedy was shot by more than one shooter, from more than one position. This explains the inconsistencies in the magic bullet(CE 399) and the contradicting witness testimonies + audio recording
- The other shooter(s) would likely have been highly trained contracted snipers, contracted by the CIA or Mossad
- The operation was meant to blame everything on Lee Harvey Oswald. This explains Oswald's CIA connections and the Mexico impersonator. This also explains the lack of motive. Oswald quite literally stated "I'm just a pantsy" when arrested.
- Israel cooperated with the CIA in some way or another, perhaps by funding or sharing intelligence secrets. This explains the CIA loyalty to Israeli intelligence. Israel also has a clear motive. They wanted to get rid of JFK, so they could continue building nuclear arms. It worked out very positively for Israel
- The CIA was the primary actor. They wanted to get rid of JFK, because he was trying to destroy the agency. They had also been humiliated in the bay of pigs invasion and blamed JFK. Getting rid of JFK, provided them with LBJ. LBJ was very pro-israel, and by cooperating with Israel, the CIA ensures good relations with LBJ.
- LBJ was controlled by the jews. His donors were jewish zionists and he had personal relationships with CIA agents that also supported Israel(James Angleton). Historically, LBJ favored Israeli interests over the American people, signifying that he would definitely engage in an anti-american plot.
- Oswald was shot to keep him quiet. His gunman (Jack Ruby) was jewish, and had changed his name from "Jacob Leon Rubenstein" to Jack Ruby. Oswald can be connected to Jack Ruby, as Oswald used the alias "Leon Oswald".
In conclusion, it's most likely that JFK's assassination was not a single man operation. It was a multi-factorial plot, that was orchestrated very successfully. The Warren commission relied on the CIA to investigate, and therefore falsely concluded the lone gunman theory. The former CIA director Allen Dulles, was appointed to the Warren commission. He directed the conclusion to the lone gunman theory, with the help of other CIA investigators. It was one of the biggest American tragedies since Abraham Lincoln, and they were tricked. It was only in 1979, well over a decade after, that the HSCA re-investigated the event. The new conclusion, rejected the former lone gunman theory, when taking a look at more declassified evidence and audio recordings. They concluded that the assassination was indeed a conspiracy. Only they couldn't pinpoint the perpetrators. Now 62 years later, it appears the full scope of the conspiracy has been exposed. It was of course the jews
