D
Deleted member 30488
Kraken
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2023
- Posts
- 7,515
- Reputation
- 7,640
Him have perfect ratios holy shit, no single flaw, even Bomer who has practically impeccable ratios has more flaws, so let's go
Ipd ( eye spacing )
Its perfect, 0.47 is perfect range, not to much close or wide
FWHR
Perfect also, 1.93 not too much compact or long
Proportions
no third deviates too much, it has practically equal thirds with the lower third being the largest, which is ideal for a male face
face length, width vs height
1.35
Also perfect, 1.33-1.38 is ideal range, not too long or compact
Midface
0.96 is ideal, 0.93 to 1.0 is a perfect ratio
Chin to Philtrum ratio
2.3 also perfect, 2.2 to 2.5 is a perfect ratio
Eye shape
4.1 is a fucking masc eye shape
Jaw frontal angle
85° is perfect ratio, 84 to 93 is a perfect ratio, It's not as angular as Matt Bomer's, but it's still in the ideal range
Canthal tilt
6°, its ideal
not even a single flaw, holy shit and he still has a perfect phenotype, this is definitely the most handsome guy ever
Ipd ( eye spacing )
Its perfect, 0.47 is perfect range, not to much close or wide
FWHR
Perfect also, 1.93 not too much compact or long
Proportions
no third deviates too much, it has practically equal thirds with the lower third being the largest, which is ideal for a male face
face length, width vs height
1.35
Also perfect, 1.33-1.38 is ideal range, not too long or compact
Midface
0.96 is ideal, 0.93 to 1.0 is a perfect ratio
Chin to Philtrum ratio
2.3 also perfect, 2.2 to 2.5 is a perfect ratio
Eye shape
4.1 is a fucking masc eye shape
Jaw frontal angle
85° is perfect ratio, 84 to 93 is a perfect ratio, It's not as angular as Matt Bomer's, but it's still in the ideal range
Canthal tilt
6°, its ideal
not even a single flaw, holy shit and he still has a perfect phenotype, this is definitely the most handsome guy ever