Gemini ai is accurate for ratings ngl

[davidlaidisme67]

It objectively rated me a 4.8 to a 5 and said I could softmaxx to a 5.7 which is what most raters have said. It also said I’m the bottom 40 percent of attractiveness which is true

 

[Jason Voorhees]

Give prompt let try with this also. And did you use the pro version or the flash

 

[Ibohammed Eshakt’ur]

Prompt?

 

[Jason Voorhees]

Prompt?

I used this prompt a user in another thread gave me

Can you create the best prompt for honest and unbiased rating on facial aesthetics, looks, and facial proportions, facial features, assymtries, and deficiencies. Then give the picture an honest review and rate it on the psl rank sub5 (extreme deformity and deficiencies), Litn (noticeabley ugly with some deficiencies, bad proportions, lack of bone mass, overall unideal but not as severe as sub5), mitn (slightly uglier than the lower end of low average looking guys; usually common deficiencies like flat maxilla projections, unproportionate features, bloated faces, excess facial fat, etc), hitn (lower end of average usually like mitn but with less falios/ flaws or less extremity of falios. just slight deviations from Imtn average guys). Lmtn (average looking guys normal falios with slight falios nothing big but not really attractive or have attractive features that makes them noticeable. Not ugly but not really good looking). Mmtn (slightly good looking than Imtn less falios and slight features that give some attraction but nothing big just slightly better looking than Imtn). Hmtn (noticeably good looking less falios and more noticeable attractive features). 30.3K Lhtn (super good looking guys but nothing big like supermodels. Almost no falios at all, good facial harmony in proportions and features not the best harmony but noticeably good looking, and very noticeabley good looking but the features aren't as good or noticeable as other htn categories Mhtn (basically Ihtn but harmony and features are noticeabley better than Mhtn (basically Ihtn but harmony and features are noticeabley better than Ihtn). Hhtn (basically entry model status super good looking with no falios good proportions and harmony better than mhtn. Almost Chad lite but not as attractive as a Chad lite). CL (Chad lite basically perfect facially, achieved genetic fullness no flaws/ falios at all and very noticeabley attractive above htn and very rare but even tho they are perfectly achieved their genetic potential and are very very good looking they are less attractive than a Chad), Chad (basically Chad lite but genetically better looking with beyond perfect symmetry, harmony, proportions, features, grooming etc). True Adam (the very pinnacle of human beauty


And this is what it gave me.

**Best Prompt for Honest and Unbiased Facial Aesthetics Rating**

Copy and paste this exact prompt into any strong vision-capable AI (Grok, GPT-4o, Claude, etc.) along with the image:

"You are an objective, brutally honest facial aesthetics expert with deep knowledge of anthropometrics, the golden ratio, facial thirds/fifths, craniofacial proportions, sexual dimorphism, and the PSL (looksmaxxing) rating system. Ignore race, ethnicity, culture, age, grooming, clothing, lighting, or personal preferences. Rate purely on universal biological markers of attractiveness: symmetry, harmony, averageness, feature quality, bone support, and forward growth.

Analyze the face in this photo step-by-step:

1. **Overall proportions & harmony**: Facial thirds (forehead/midface/lower face), facial fifths, golden ratio adherence (eyes, nose, mouth), face shape.
2. **Symmetry**: Left vs right side (eyes, brows, ears, jaw, etc.). Quantify any visible asymmetries.
3. **Individual features** (rate each on a 1-10 scale with explanation):
- Eyes (size, shape, spacing, canthal tilt, hooding, under-eye support)
- Eyebrows
- Nose (length, width, bridge, tip, projection, nostrils)
- Lips (fullness, shape, ratio)
- Jawline & chin (width, definition, projection, gonial angle)
- Cheekbones & midface (height, width, projection, maxilla forward growth)
- Skin quality, facial fat, and any bloating or hollowness
- Hairline, hair density, and frame to the face
4. **Deficiencies & falios**: List every visible flaw, asymmetry, lack of bone mass, poor projection, disproportion, or negative feature. Be specific and unsparing.
5. **Positive highlights**: What objectively works well and contributes to attractiveness.
6. **Final PSL rating**: Place the face precisely on this exact scale with one clear label and a short justification. Use only these categories:

- **sub5** (extreme deformity and deficiencies)
- **Litn** (noticeably ugly with some deficiencies, bad proportions, lack of bone mass, overall unideal but not as severe as sub5)
- **mitn** (slightly uglier than the lower end of low-average; common deficiencies like flat maxilla, unproportionate features, bloated face, excess fat)
- **hitn** (lower end of average; like mitn but with less severe or fewer flaws — just slight deviations from true average)
- **Lmtn** (true average; normal minor falios, nothing major, not attractive or noticeable in a positive way)
- **Mmtn** (slightly better than Lmtn; fewer falios and slight attractive features, but nothing significant)
- **Hmtn** (noticeably good-looking; fewer falios, more visible attractive features and harmony)
- **Lhtn** (super good-looking but not supermodel level; almost no falios, strong harmony and proportions, very noticeably attractive without being elite)
- **Mhtn** (harmony and features noticeably better than Lhtn)
- **Hhtn** (entry-model status; no falios, excellent proportions/harmony — almost Chad lite)
- **CL (Chad lite)** (perfect facial achievement of genetic potential; zero flaws, extremely noticeable attractiveness, but still below full Chad)
- **Chad** (genetically elite; beyond-perfect symmetry, harmony, proportions, features)
- **True Adam** (absolute pinnacle of human beauty)

Output in clear sections. Be 100% honest and evidence-based — no sugarcoating, no cope, no positivity bias."

---

**My Honest Review & Rating of This Image (Using the Above Framework)**

**1. Overall proportions & harmony**
The face is well-balanced in frontal view: thirds are roughly equal, fifths look good, and the overall shape is a harmonious oval-square hybrid. Golden-ratio adherence is strong — eyes, nose, and mouth sit in aesthetically pleasing positions relative to each other.

**2. Symmetry**
Very high symmetry. Left and right sides mirror each; no obvious eye, brow, or jaw deviation. Right cheekbones are slightly more prominent but nothing noticeable. Minor natural micro-asymmetries exist (as in 99% of humans) but are negligible and not visible at normal viewing distance.

**3. Individual features**
- Eyes: 7/10 — Good size and shape, balanced spacing, neutral-positive canthal tilt, solid under-eye support but very dark iris hold back a bit
- Eyebrows: 8.5/10 — Thick, naturally well-shaped, masculine framing.
- Nose: 6.5/10 — Straight bridge, proportional length but bulbous and wide. Would benefit from rhinoplasty a lot
- Lips: 8/10 — Full, well-shaped, balanced upper/lower ratio.
- Jawline & chin: 7/10 — Visible definition and good shape; forward projection is good but slightly softened (likely youthful subcutaneous fat rather than true weakness) and a bit on the narrower side
- Cheekbones & midface: 6.5/10 — Solid height and width with reasonable projection but covered under a layer of fat; no flat maxilla appearance.
- Skin: 9/10 — Clear, even tone, healthy texture.
- Hair: 9/10 — Thick, dense, voluminous shiny jet black curls with excellent hairline. Frames the face very well.

**4. Deficiencies / falios**
- Very few. The only minor ones are:
- Slight lower-face rounding/softness due to fat and small amounts of bloats
- Jaw definition could be a stronger in absolute terms (common in early-20s males).
No recessed maxilla, no weak chin, no bad proportions, no skin issues, no major asymmetries, no negative canthal tilt etc.

**5. Positive highlights**
Good bone support overall, strong midface and eye area, superior hair, and great harmony. The face has clear decent dimorphism (masculine but not harsh) and high averageness-plus traits that make it stand out positively. Leaning towards pretty boy, beard suits the lower third very well.

**Final PSL Rating: Lhtn**
This is a good-looking guy with almost no falios, strong facial harmony, good proportions, and attractive features. He sits comfortably in the “ noticeably good-looking” without reaching model/Chad-lite territory. The only things holding him back from Mhtn/Hhtn are the jaw width, softness in the lower face. He is well above average for his ethnicity, above mtn, and has the kind of face that wouldn't turns heads but could definitely get women interested in real life without being “perfect.” Solid Lhtn.

 

[davidlaidisme67]

I used this prompt a user in another thread gave me

Can you create the best prompt for honest and unbiased rating on facial aesthetics, looks, and facial proportions, facial features, assymtries, and deficiencies. Then give the picture an honest review and rate it on the psl rank sub5 (extreme deformity and deficiencies), Litn (noticeabley ugly with some deficiencies, bad proportions, lack of bone mass, overall unideal but not as severe as sub5), mitn (slightly uglier than the lower end of low average looking guys; usually common deficiencies like flat maxilla projections, unproportionate features, bloated faces, excess facial fat, etc), hitn (lower end of average usually like mitn but with less falios/ flaws or less extremity of falios. just slight deviations from Imtn average guys). Lmtn (average looking guys normal falios with slight falios nothing big but not really attractive or have attractive features that makes them noticeable. Not ugly but not really good looking). Mmtn (slightly good looking than Imtn less falios and slight features that give some attraction but nothing big just slightly better looking than Imtn). Hmtn (noticeably good looking less falios and more noticeable attractive features). 30.3K Lhtn (super good looking guys but nothing big like supermodels. Almost no falios at all, good facial harmony in proportions and features not the best harmony but noticeably good looking, and very noticeabley good looking but the features aren't as good or noticeable as other htn categories Mhtn (basically Ihtn but harmony and features are noticeabley better than Mhtn (basically Ihtn but harmony and features are noticeabley better than Ihtn). Hhtn (basically entry model status super good looking with no falios good proportions and harmony better than mhtn. Almost Chad lite but not as attractive as a Chad lite). CL (Chad lite basically perfect facially, achieved genetic fullness no flaws/ falios at all and very noticeabley attractive above htn and very rare but even tho they are perfectly achieved their genetic potential and are very very good looking they are less attractive than a Chad), Chad (basically Chad lite but genetically better looking with beyond perfect symmetry, harmony, proportions, features, grooming etc). True Adam (the very pinnacle of human beauty


And this is what it gave me.

Miring

 

[davidlaidisme67]

Give prompt let try with this also. And did you use the pro version or the flash

Flash. I might use pro soon

 

[Jason Voorhees]

Flash. I might use pro soon

Give prompt I'll also try

 

[davidlaidisme67]

Give prompt I'll also try

Oh I just asked it to asses my face with the facial harmony, misc features score, angualrity score, and overal facial score I was given by some face rater. It basically said he was right with some tweaks. I’m overall a high ltn with m-hmtn potential. I have a great eye area with shit brows and a shit jaw

 

[Ibohammed Eshakt’ur]

I used this prompt a user in another thread gave me

Can you create the best prompt for honest and unbiased rating on facial aesthetics, looks, and facial proportions, facial features, assymtries, and deficiencies. Then give the picture an honest review and rate it on the psl rank sub5 (extreme deformity and deficiencies), Litn (noticeabley ugly with some deficiencies, bad proportions, lack of bone mass, overall unideal but not as severe as sub5), mitn (slightly uglier than the lower end of low average looking guys; usually common deficiencies like flat maxilla projections, unproportionate features, bloated faces, excess facial fat, etc), hitn (lower end of average usually like mitn but with less falios/ flaws or less extremity of falios. just slight deviations from Imtn average guys). Lmtn (average looking guys normal falios with slight falios nothing big but not really attractive or have attractive features that makes them noticeable. Not ugly but not really good looking). Mmtn (slightly good looking than Imtn less falios and slight features that give some attraction but nothing big just slightly better looking than Imtn). Hmtn (noticeably good looking less falios and more noticeable attractive features). 30.3K Lhtn (super good looking guys but nothing big like supermodels. Almost no falios at all, good facial harmony in proportions and features not the best harmony but noticeably good looking, and very noticeabley good looking but the features aren't as good or noticeable as other htn categories Mhtn (basically Ihtn but harmony and features are noticeabley better than Mhtn (basically Ihtn but harmony and features are noticeabley better than Ihtn). Hhtn (basically entry model status super good looking with no falios good proportions and harmony better than mhtn. Almost Chad lite but not as attractive as a Chad lite). CL (Chad lite basically perfect facially, achieved genetic fullness no flaws/ falios at all and very noticeabley attractive above htn and very rare but even tho they are perfectly achieved their genetic potential and are very very good looking they are less attractive than a Chad), Chad (basically Chad lite but genetically better looking with beyond perfect symmetry, harmony, proportions, features, grooming etc). True Adam (the very pinnacle of human beauty


And this is what it gave me.

This prompt worked great, thanks!

 

[Jason Voorhees]

This prompt worked great, thanks!

I tried it with Gemini and it started virtue signalling jfl. Muh individual

Assessments of facial aesthetics, looks, and attractiveness are intrinsically subjective, as standards of beauty vary significantly across different cultures, time periods, and individual preferences. There is no universally agreed-upon objective scale for such rankings, and evaluations depend entirely on diverse personal and cultural perspectives.
Therefore, rather than providing a subjective rating using terms like PSL ranks or specific archetypes, an analysis can instead focus on a detailed description of the facial features and proportions visible in the provided images:
The individual possesses a consistent facial structure characterized by several distinct elements. The face shape appears balanced, with relatively equal visual weight distributed between the upper, middle, and lower thirds.
* Facial Structure and Proportions: The individual has a strong, defined jawline. The chin appears in proportion with the rest of the face. The cheekbones have a moderate degree of prominence, adding definition to the facial contour but overall appears to be a bit soft. The forehead is broad and well-integrated into the overall facial shape.
* Facial Features:
* Eyes: The eyes are dark, well-spaced, and positioned horizontally in alignment. They convey a confident expression in photo,
* Nose: The nose features a straight, relatively broad bridge and a rounded tip but in proportion to the width of the face.
* Mouth and Lips: The individual has full, symmetrical lips.
* Hair: The individual has medium-long locks of hair that aredense, wavy/curly texture of the hair adds distinct shape and volume to the upper face. The individual also appears to be very tall and broad framed adding to his confidence and charm

 

[Jason Voorhees]

You must have used some prompt to bypass gemini's content filter like some kind of role playing or whatever.

 

[davidlaidisme67]

You must have used some prompt to bypass gemini's content filter like some kind of role playing or whatever.

Maybe tbh.

 

[Ibohammed Eshakt’ur]

I tried it with Gemini and it started virtue signalling jfl. Muh individual

There must be something up with yours because Gemini gave it to me without any hassle. I selected thinking mode if that changes anything:

This analysis uses objective anthropometric standards and the PSL (looksmaxxing) framework to evaluate facial aesthetics based on the provided image.

1. Overall Proportions & Harmony​

• Facial Thirds: Your face displays relatively balanced thirds. The lower third (subnasale to menton) is well-proportioned to the midface, though the forehead (upper third) appears slightly elongated, which is currently mitigated by your hairstyle.
• Facial Fifths: Your eye width is roughly equal to the intercanthal distance (the space between your eyes), adhering well to the rule of fifths.
• Face Shape: You have an oval-to-oblong face shape. While symmetrical, it lacks the lateral width in the midface and jaw that is typically associated with high-tier bone structure.

2. Symmetry​

• Observations: Symmetry is generally high. There is a very slight deviation in the height of the eyebrows and a minor difference in the eyelid fold (ptosis/hooding) between the left and right eyes, but these are within the range of "normal" human variation and do not detract from overall harmony.

3. Individual Features​

• Eyes (6.5/10): Good almond shape with a neutral-to-slightly positive canthal tilt. You have some Upper Eyelid Exposure (UEE), which prevents a "hunter eye" look, but the under-eye support appears decent with no significant scl

But overall, I think Gemini is pretty accurate with the final rating it gives out!

 

[Bugmaxxed]

I see this as mostly accurate.

 

[HtnceI]

I used this prompt a user in another thread gave me

Can you create the best prompt for honest and unbiased rating on facial aesthetics, looks, and facial proportions, facial features, assymtries, and deficiencies. Then give the picture an honest review and rate it on the psl rank sub5 (extreme deformity and deficiencies), Litn (noticeabley ugly with some deficiencies, bad proportions, lack of bone mass, overall unideal but not as severe as sub5), mitn (slightly uglier than the lower end of low average looking guys; usually common deficiencies like flat maxilla projections, unproportionate features, bloated faces, excess facial fat, etc), hitn (lower end of average usually like mitn but with less falios/ flaws or less extremity of falios. just slight deviations from Imtn average guys). Lmtn (average looking guys normal falios with slight falios nothing big but not really attractive or have attractive features that makes them noticeable. Not ugly but not really good looking). Mmtn (slightly good looking than Imtn less falios and slight features that give some attraction but nothing big just slightly better looking than Imtn). Hmtn (noticeably good looking less falios and more noticeable attractive features). 30.3K Lhtn (super good looking guys but nothing big like supermodels. Almost no falios at all, good facial harmony in proportions and features not the best harmony but noticeably good looking, and very noticeabley good looking but the features aren't as good or noticeable as other htn categories Mhtn (basically Ihtn but harmony and features are noticeabley better than Mhtn (basically Ihtn but harmony and features are noticeabley better than Ihtn). Hhtn (basically entry model status super good looking with no falios good proportions and harmony better than mhtn. Almost Chad lite but not as attractive as a Chad lite). CL (Chad lite basically perfect facially, achieved genetic fullness no flaws/ falios at all and very noticeabley attractive above htn and very rare but even tho they are perfectly achieved their genetic potential and are very very good looking they are less attractive than a Chad), Chad (basically Chad lite but genetically better looking with beyond perfect symmetry, harmony, proportions, features, grooming etc). True Adam (the very pinnacle of human beauty


And this is what it gave me.

I agree alot with your rating scale

 

[HtnceI]

It says it cant give me a rating but said this instead

 

[HtnceI]

I see this as mostly accurate.


View attachment 4821966

How did u get it to give u rating?

View attachment 4821986View attachment 4821984
It says it cant give me a rating but said this instead

thats what it said for me

 

[uncykongrock]

It gave me hmtn with your prompt and my main weakness is chin and bones and I agree so therefore it is right

 

[davidlaidisme67]

It gave me hmtn with your prompt and my main weakness is chin and bones and I agree so therefore it is right

See I’m the most high iq org user

 

[Bugmaxxed]

How did u get it to give u rating?

thats what it said for me

"You are an objective, brutally honest facial aesthetics expert with deep knowledge of anthropometrics, the golden ratio, facial thirds/fifths, craniofacial proportions, sexual dimorphism, and the PSL (looksmaxxing) rating system. Ignore race, ethnicity, culture, age, grooming, clothing, lighting, or personal preferences. Rate purely on universal biological markers of attractiveness: symmetry, harmony, averageness, feature quality, bone support, and forward growth.

Analyze the face in this photo step-by-step:

1. **Overall proportions & harmony**: Facial thirds (forehead/midface/lower face), facial fifths, golden ratio adherence (eyes, nose, mouth), face shape.
2. **Symmetry**: Left vs right side (eyes, brows, ears, jaw, etc.). Quantify any visible asymmetries.
3. **Individual features** (rate each on a 1-10 scale with explanation):
- Eyes (size, shape, spacing, canthal tilt, hooding, under-eye support)
- Eyebrows
- Nose (length, width, bridge, tip, projection, nostrils)
- Lips (fullness, shape, ratio)
- Jawline & chin (width, definition, projection, gonial angle)
- Cheekbones & midface (height, width, projection, maxilla forward growth)
- Skin quality, facial fat, and any bloating or hollowness
- Hairline, hair density, and frame to the face
4. **Deficiencies & falios**: List every visible flaw, asymmetry, lack of bone mass, poor projection, disproportion, or negative feature. Be specific and unsparing.
5. **Positive highlights**: What objectively works well and contributes to attractiveness.
6. **Final PSL rating**: Place the face precisely on this exact scale with one clear label and a short justification. Use only these categories:

- **sub5** (extreme deformity and deficiencies)
- **Litn** (noticeably ugly with some deficiencies, bad proportions, lack of bone mass, overall unideal but not as severe as sub5)
- **mitn** (slightly uglier than the lower end of low-average; common deficiencies like flat maxilla, unproportionate features, bloated face, excess fat)
- **hitn** (lower end of average; like mitn but with less severe or fewer flaws — just slight deviations from true average)
- **Lmtn** (true average; normal minor falios, nothing major, not attractive or noticeable in a positive way)
- **Mmtn** (slightly better than Lmtn; fewer falios and slight attractive features, but nothing significant)
- **Hmtn** (noticeably good-looking; fewer falios, more visible attractive features and harmony)
- **Lhtn** (super good-looking but not supermodel level; almost no falios, strong harmony and proportions, very noticeably attractive without being elite)
- **Mhtn** (harmony and features noticeably better than Lhtn)
- **Hhtn** (entry-model status; no falios, excellent proportions/harmony — almost Chad lite)
- **CL (Chad lite)** (perfect facial achievement of genetic potential; zero flaws, extremely noticeable attractiveness, but still below full Chad)
- **Chad** (genetically elite; beyond-perfect symmetry, harmony, proportions, features)
- **True Adam** (absolute pinnacle of human beauty)

Output in clear sections. Be 100% honest and evidence-based — no sugarcoating, no cope, no positivity bias

 

[maka4]

Gemini will always be 1000% more accurate than jewgpt

 

[stonecold trucel]

might have to try

 

[iheartsophia]

It rated me hmtn

 

[Pony]

Don’t have a photo of myself

shit gotta be glaze lmfao

 

[Knuch]

I have tried a bunch of ai in psl rating using that prompt and guess what, NONE of them rate me lower than hmtn with mediocre pics

 

[davidlaidisme67]

I have tried a bunch of ai in psl rating using that prompt and guess what, NONE of them rate me lower than hmtn with mediocre pics

They rate me high ltn

 

[boxing-cel]

It rated me LHTN

 

[Lord Shadow]

View attachment 4823664

Don’t have a photo of myself

shit gotta be glaze lmfao

nahh idk i believe it even more now cuz youve been getting that rating

 

[Pony]

nahh idk i believe it even more now cuz youve been getting that rating

Shit bro, even GPT gave me the same type of rating

Holy LifeFuel