terachadfr
Lady GaGa enthusiast
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2024
- Posts
- 241
- Reputation
- 365
Genes is cope and i’ve seen ugly faggots give birth to a literal PSL God
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
jfl if you think im a stinky curryOp is indian thats why he tryna play it off. U were born subhuman and u will stay subhuman bhai im warning you, u might want to make more untermensch spawn in this gay world with ur arranged marriage poojeeta but u will not make an alain delon from ur genes if thats what u wanted
if genes make someone attractive then almost everyone on this planet wouldve been attractive as of now due to genetic multiplication, its just a lottery which 90% of us lose"Genes don't matter because I know one exceptional case of a genetic recombination."
KYS for the sake of humanity.
Obviously, attractive parents tend to have attractive children. Average parents tend to have average parents. And ugly parents tend to have ugly children. These things can vary, but there's a pattern.if genes make someone attractive then almost everyone on this planet wouldve been attractive as of now due to genetic multiplication, its just a lottery which 90% of us lose
attractiveness and hypergamy is relativeif genes make someone attractive then almost everyone on this planet wouldve been attractive as of now due to genetic multiplication, its just a lottery which 90% of us lose
Why you aré here then?attractiveness and hypergamy is relative
Like Leonardo DiCaprioGenes is cope and i’ve seen ugly faggots give birth to a literal PSL God
you misunderstandWhy you aré here then?
Go and slay with your relative attractivness you have. Or you cant?
"Genes don't matter because I know one exceptional case of a genetic recombination."
KYS for the sake of humanity.
Op is indian thats why he tryna play it off. U were born subhuman and u will stay subhuman bhai im warning you, u might want to make more untermensch spawn in this gay world with ur arranged marriage poojeeta but u will not make an alain delon from ur genes if thats what u wanted
im newcel bhai
So you aré saying no one Is attractive?you misunderstand
if everyone had a million dollars everyone wouldn’t be rich
if everyone had good genes relative to now the standards would just go up
people in the past were way shorter than now, it didn’t make them incel because of relativity
you can draw off this by geomaxxing
how tall is blackops2cel ?So you aré saying no one Is attractive?
So he Is at the same level
View attachment 3247684
As him?
View attachment 3247685
no im saying level of attractiveness depends on the place and time because its relativeSo you aré saying no one Is attractive?
So he Is at the same level
View attachment 3247684
As him?
View attachment 3247685
either equal to or taller than AlainGuess It:
View attachment 3247691
But you said:no im saying level of attractiveness depends on the place and time because its relative
it is impossible for everyone to be attractive
if everyone became attractive (attractive according to people before the change) then an initial effect would be felt because people’s standards would be initially the same but once people are used to that level of attractiveness, they would no longer be attractive. (if measured to past standards they would be considered attractive but not to present standards)But you said:
"if everyone had good genes relative to now the standards would just go up"
So you mean that everyone Is attractive and that makes everyone average. But now you say:
"it is impossible for everyone to be attractive"
So, who I must believe, you from a few second or you from a few minutes?
But we aré not talking about an hypothetical escenario like "if everyone became attractive...", we aré talking if now, in real life, everyone can be relative attractive or no.if everyone became attractive (attractive according to people before the change) then an initial effect would be felt because people’s standards would be initially the same but once people are used to that level of attractiveness, they would no longer be attractive. (if measured to past standards they would be considered attractive but not to present standards)
not everyone can be attractive in a practical sense unless we you count geomaxxing by counting everyone as in everyone in a local area or SS tier eugenics, and the effect could only last a few decadesBut we aré not talking about an hypothetical escenario like "if everyone became attractive...", we aré talking if now, in real life, everyone can be relative attractive or no.
So Its not relative because we need to focus on genes, meaning some beauty genes aré objectively better than others and suggesting Its not relative,because if It was relative, there would not exist superior genes that we would must achieve through eugenics.not everyone can be attractive in a practical sense unless we you count geomaxxing or SS tier eugenics, and the effect could only last a few decades
i don’t mean attractiveness relative by person to personSo Its not relative because we need to focus on genes, meaning some beauty genes aré objectively better than others and suggesting Its not relative,because if It was relative, there would not exist superior genes that we would must achieve through eugenics.
I didnt understandi mean attractiveness relative to other people’s objective smv
No because ugly women can procreate easily, unlike ugly menif genes make someone attractive then almost everyone on this planet wouldve been attractive as of now due to genetic multiplication, its just a lottery which 90% of us lose