Genes is cope

terachadfr

terachadfr

Lady GaGa enthusiast
Joined
Jun 23, 2024
Posts
241
Reputation
365
Genes is cope and i’ve seen ugly faggots give birth to a literal PSL God :forcedsmile:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Carbine, greywind, noonespecial and 2 others
"Genes don't matter because I know one exceptional case of a genetic recombination."

KYS for the sake of humanity.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: greywind, watah, ey88 and 7 others
Op is indian thats why he tryna play it off. U were born subhuman and u will stay subhuman bhai im warning you, u might want to make more untermensch spawn in this gay world with ur arranged marriage poojeeta but u will not make an alain delon from ur genes if thats what u wanted
 
  • +1
Reactions: greywind, raleqtambrobret and noobs
Op is indian thats why he tryna play it off. U were born subhuman and u will stay subhuman bhai im warning you, u might want to make more untermensch spawn in this gay world with ur arranged marriage poojeeta but u will not make an alain delon from ur genes if thats what u wanted
jfl if you think im a stinky curry
 
  • +1
Reactions: Carbine
"Genes don't matter because I know one exceptional case of a genetic recombination."

KYS for the sake of humanity.
if genes make someone attractive then almost everyone on this planet wouldve been attractive as of now due to genetic multiplication, its just a lottery which 90% of us lose
 
  • +1
Reactions: Carbine
if genes make someone attractive then almost everyone on this planet wouldve been attractive as of now due to genetic multiplication, its just a lottery which 90% of us lose
Obviously, attractive parents tend to have attractive children. Average parents tend to have average parents. And ugly parents tend to have ugly children. These things can vary, but there's a pattern.
 
  • +1
Reactions: noodlelover
if genes make someone attractive then almost everyone on this planet wouldve been attractive as of now due to genetic multiplication, its just a lottery which 90% of us lose
attractiveness and hypergamy is relative
 
attractiveness and hypergamy is relative
Why you aré here then?
Go and slay with your relative attractivness you have. Or you cant?
 
  • +1
Reactions: noobs
Genes is cope and i’ve seen ugly faggots give birth to a literal PSL God :forcedsmile:
Like Leonardo DiCaprio

But what dictates that height,face and dick of a man? Exactly:genes.

So stop the coping know. Because genétics mutations exists and Its what creates genétic differentiation, otherwise every living beign would be the same.
 
Why you aré here then?
Go and slay with your relative attractivness you have. Or you cant?
you misunderstand

if everyone had a million dollars everyone wouldn’t be rich

if everyone had good genes relative to now the standards would just go up

people in the past were way shorter than now, it didn’t make them incel because of relativity

you can draw off this by geomaxxing
 
Last edited:
"Genes don't matter because I know one exceptional case of a genetic recombination."

KYS for the sake of humanity.
Op is indian thats why he tryna play it off. U were born subhuman and u will stay subhuman bhai im warning you, u might want to make more untermensch spawn in this gay world with ur arranged marriage poojeeta but u will not make an alain delon from ur genes if thats what u wanted
1729378622189
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Roquefort and sexy
you misunderstand

if everyone had a million dollars everyone wouldn’t be rich

if everyone had good genes relative to now the standards would just go up

people in the past were way shorter than now, it didn’t make them incel because of relativity

you can draw off this by geomaxxing
So you aré saying no one Is attractive?

So he Is at the same level
1729379021328

As him?
1729379090271
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: noobs
genes getting handed down is some cope

the genes you got dealt is real af
 
no im saying level of attractiveness depends on the place and time because its relative

it is impossible for everyone to be attractive
But you said:
"if everyone had good genes relative to now the standards would just go up"

So you mean that everyone Is attractive and that makes everyone average. But now you say:
"it is impossible for everyone to be attractive"

So, who I must believe, you from a few second or you from a few minutes?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: noobs and terachadfr
But you said:
"if everyone had good genes relative to now the standards would just go up"

So you mean that everyone Is attractive and that makes everyone average. But now you say:
"it is impossible for everyone to be attractive"

So, who I must believe, you from a few second or you from a few minutes?
if everyone became attractive (attractive according to people before the change) then an initial effect would be felt because people’s standards would be initially the same but once people are used to that level of attractiveness, they would no longer be attractive. (if measured to past standards they would be considered attractive but not to present standards)
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: imabetanumale
if everyone became attractive (attractive according to people before the change) then an initial effect would be felt because people’s standards would be initially the same but once people are used to that level of attractiveness, they would no longer be attractive. (if measured to past standards they would be considered attractive but not to present standards)
But we aré not talking about an hypothetical escenario like "if everyone became attractive...", we aré talking if now, in real life, everyone can be relative attractive or no.
 
  • +1
Reactions: noobs
But we aré not talking about an hypothetical escenario like "if everyone became attractive...", we aré talking if now, in real life, everyone can be relative attractive or no.
not everyone can be attractive in a practical sense unless we you count geomaxxing by counting everyone as in everyone in a local area or SS tier eugenics, and the effect could only last a few decades
 
not everyone can be attractive in a practical sense unless we you count geomaxxing or SS tier eugenics, and the effect could only last a few decades
So Its not relative because we need to focus on genes, meaning some beauty genes aré objectively better than others and suggesting Its not relative,because if It was relative, there would not exist superior genes that we would must achieve through eugenics.
 
  • +1
Reactions: noobs
So Its not relative because we need to focus on genes, meaning some beauty genes aré objectively better than others and suggesting Its not relative,because if It was relative, there would not exist superior genes that we would must achieve through eugenics.
i don’t mean attractiveness relative by person to person

i mean attractiveness is relative to other people’s smv, smv is objective
 
Last edited:
good england bhai
 
if genes make someone attractive then almost everyone on this planet wouldve been attractive as of now due to genetic multiplication, its just a lottery which 90% of us lose
No because ugly women can procreate easily, unlike ugly men
 

Similar threads

D
Replies
1
Views
61
shia.jihadist
shia.jihadist
Lord Shadow
Replies
25
Views
293
Lord Shadow
Lord Shadow
TrueRamirez
Replies
7
Views
61
TrueRamirez
TrueRamirez
Funnyunenjoyer1
Replies
1
Views
83
Funnyunenjoyer1
Funnyunenjoyer1
User28823
Replies
4
Views
58
User28823
User28823

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top