GGM PUTS @DADDY'S HOME ON TRIAL FOR MOD ABUSE (PART 2)

[Gaygymmaxx]

Let's hope it was the associate mods who closed my thread

(ORIGINAL THREAD WAS LOCKED! AND JUSTICE WASNT SERVED

I WONT BE SILENCED)

And not the higher ups. If if it was, I'll be banned shortly for reposting this.

I, THE PROSECUTOR AND LEGAL ADVOCATE, GGM WILL SEE TO IT, THAT JUSTICE IS SERVED

Exhibit A: Unjustified ban of @@The Homelander

this was a retaliatory ban, the homelander had the following images for his profile picture and signature:

the given reason for the ban: "Inciting conflict", and "antagonize others"

Additionally, he later admitted it was not Reasonable and he stretched the rules (which didn't even apply anyway) to excert action.

The actual reason, for making fun of @@Daddy's Home

Additionally, daddy's home deleted the thread in which he announced what he was doing, why would he do this? Because he knew it was Unjustified and didn't want it to be used against him.

Exhibit B:

Retaliatory ban #2: NPCFIGHTER69

This random bluecel, was agreeing with my thread, in which I claimed @@Daddy's Home was abusing his power

He was
banned 11 minutes
later.

For "being an alt"

Actual reason, once again:

making fun of @@Daddy's Home

seriously? Was immediately banned for being an alt 11 fucking minutes after making fun of him?

Reaaaallly.... Quite a coincidence

Under the condition this user WAS an alt account,

@@Daddy's Home overtly ignored it, until he was made fun of.

Either way, it was retaliatory, clearly. 11 fucking minutes

Exhibit C:

Retaliatory ban, #3: @@Spur der Verwüstung

"spam + exists solely to troll"

Is trolling against the rules?

Now once again, reguardless, we are beginning to see a pattern here,

the message by which he was banned for, was deleted, as @@Daddy's Home... deleted it

Now why was he really banned? Well it was clearly because he was amongst the individuals who made fun of @@Daddy's Home, big suprise,

(Actual reason: making fun of @@Daddy's Home x3)

as the evidence has been once again deleted, I will unfortunately have to refer you to this picture

Btw, everybody here In this MEME PHOTO! was banned by @@Daddy's Home, except for @not_cel

All. Of. Them.

Quite the coincidence? Isn't it.

Exhibit D: additional evidence regarding @@Spur der Verwüstung

After being insulted, @@Daddy's Home says "you'll get off easy from me"

and was banned shortly after

And he makes use of this picture to threaten users who never broke any rules.

(Actual reason. Insulting @@Daddy's Home, x3 CONFIRMED)

what in the hell? Telling users to pick a number so he can assign a random punishment
(Obviously, if random, daddy's home does not give a damn about "the punishment which fits the crime)

He is simply having fun while terrorizing the forum.

EXHIBIT E: retaliatory ban of @@ascension

(YES FUCKING 5 EXAMPLES AND HES WALKING FREE, RETAINING HIS PERMS)

Clearly antagonizing another individual he banned, probably innocent

Most of His bans should be reversed regardless as he was never to be trusted with this power

PROPOSED VERDICT:

Unbelievable stuff. Especially the poor grey who was banned 11 minutes after making fun of @@Daddy's Home

I propose immediate permanent DE-MOD of @@Daddy's Home

and immedate reinstatement for all those whom he terrorized

once again, EVERYONE BESIDES @not_cel was banned from that meme photo

Free:
@@Spur der Verwüstung

@@itzyaboyJJ

@@NPCFighter69

@@gookcelriceR

@@ascension

All innocent. All banned by @@Daddy's Home for personal grudges
(CLEARLY!)

Unbelievable mod abuse. Tag everyone

(Formatting slightly off due to copying the thread)

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

@Master
@Administrator
@Quncho
@Gengar
@NumbThePain

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

@The Homelander
@Copercel
@alurmo
@Basedman420
@Randomized Shame

 

[inversions]

sounds pretty guilty mate and I've watched suits

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

Me rn

 

[The Homelander]

sounds pretty guilty mate and I've watched suits

Professional lawyer right here

 

[Vantablack]

Let's hope it was the associate mods who closed my thread

And not the higher ups. If if it was, I'll be banned shortly for reposting this.

I, THE PROSECUTOR AND LEGAL ADVOCATE, GGM WILL SEE TO IT, THAT JUSTICE IS SERVED

Exhibit A: Unjustified ban of @@The Homelander

this was a retaliatory ban, the homelander had the following images for his profile picture and signature:

the given reason for the ban: "Inciting conflict", and "antagonize others"

Additionally, he later admitted it was not Reasonable and he stretched the rules (which didn't even apply anyway) to excert action.

The actual reason, for making fun of @@Daddy's Home

Additionally, daddy's home deleted the thread in which he announced what he was doing, why would he do this? Because he knew it was Unjustified and didn't want it to be used against him.

Exhibit B:

Retaliatory ban #2: NPCFIGHTER69

This random bluecel, was agreeing with my thread, in which I claimed @@Daddy's Home was abusing his power

He was
banned 11 minutes
later.

For "being an alt"

Actual reason, once again:

making fun of @@Daddy's Home

seriously? Was immediately banned for being an alt 11 fucking minutes after making fun of him?

Reaaaallly.... Quite a coincidence

Under the condition this user WAS an alt account,

@@Daddy's Home overtly ignored it, until he was made fun of.

Either way, it was retaliatory, clearly. 11 fucking minutes

Exhibit C:

Retaliatory ban, #3: @@Spur der Verwüstung

"spam + exists solely to troll"

Is trolling against the rules?

Now once again, reguardless, we are beginning to see a pattern here,

the message by which he was banned for, was deleted, as @@Daddy's Home... deleted it

Now why was he really banned? Well it was clearly because he was amongst the individuals who made fun of @@Daddy's Home, big suprise,

(Actual reason: making fun of @@Daddy's Home x3)

as the evidence has been once again deleted, I will unfortunately have to refer you to this picture

Btw, everybody here In this MEME PHOTO! was banned by @@Daddy's Home, except for @not_cel

All. Of. Them.

Quite the coincidence? Isn't it.

Exhibit D: additional evidence regarding @@Spur der Verwüstung

After being insulted, @@Daddy's Home says "you'll get off easy from me"

and was banned shortly after

And he makes use of this picture to threaten users who never broke any rules.

(Actual reason. Insulting @@Daddy's Home, x3 CONFIRMED)

what in the hell? Telling users to pick a number so he can assign a random punishment
(Obviously, if random, daddy's home does not give a damn about "the punishment which fits the crime)

He is simply having fun while terrorizing the forum.

EXHIBIT E: retaliatory ban of @@ascension

(YES FUCKING 5 EXAMPLES AND HES WALKING FREE, RETAINING HIS PERMS)

Clearly antagonizing another individual he banned, probably innocent

Most of His bans should be reversed regardless as he was never to be trusted with this power

PROPOSED VERDICT:

Unbelievable stuff. Especially the poor grey who was banned 11 minutes after making fun of @@Daddy's Home

I propose immediate permanent DE-MOD of @@Daddy's Home

and immedate reinstatement for all those whom he terrorized

once again, EVERYONE BESIDES @not_cel was banned from that meme photo

Free:
@@Spur der Verwüstung

@@itzyaboyJJ

@@NPCFighter69

@@gookcelriceR

@@ascension

All innocent. All banned by @@Daddy's Home for personal grudges
(CLEARLY!)

Unbelievable mod abuse. Tag everyone

(Formatting slightly off due to copying the thread)

DNR tbh but bump

 

[InanimatePragmatist]

Let's hope it was the associate mods who closed my thread

And not the higher ups. If if it was, I'll be banned shortly for reposting this.

I, THE PROSECUTOR AND LEGAL ADVOCATE, GGM WILL SEE TO IT, THAT JUSTICE IS SERVED

Exhibit A: Unjustified ban of @@The Homelander

this was a retaliatory ban, the homelander had the following images for his profile picture and signature:

the given reason for the ban: "Inciting conflict", and "antagonize others"

Additionally, he later admitted it was not Reasonable and he stretched the rules (which didn't even apply anyway) to excert action.

The actual reason, for making fun of @@Daddy's Home

Additionally, daddy's home deleted the thread in which he announced what he was doing, why would he do this? Because he knew it was Unjustified and didn't want it to be used against him.

Exhibit B:

Retaliatory ban #2: NPCFIGHTER69

This random bluecel, was agreeing with my thread, in which I claimed @@Daddy's Home was abusing his power

He was
banned 11 minutes
later.

For "being an alt"

Actual reason, once again:

making fun of @@Daddy's Home

seriously? Was immediately banned for being an alt 11 fucking minutes after making fun of him?

Reaaaallly.... Quite a coincidence

Under the condition this user WAS an alt account,

@@Daddy's Home overtly ignored it, until he was made fun of.

Either way, it was retaliatory, clearly. 11 fucking minutes

Exhibit C:

Retaliatory ban, #3: @@Spur der Verwüstung

"spam + exists solely to troll"

Is trolling against the rules?

Now once again, reguardless, we are beginning to see a pattern here,

the message by which he was banned for, was deleted, as @@Daddy's Home... deleted it

Now why was he really banned? Well it was clearly because he was amongst the individuals who made fun of @@Daddy's Home, big suprise,

(Actual reason: making fun of @@Daddy's Home x3)

as the evidence has been once again deleted, I will unfortunately have to refer you to this picture

Btw, everybody here In this MEME PHOTO! was banned by @@Daddy's Home, except for @not_cel

All. Of. Them.

Quite the coincidence? Isn't it.

Exhibit D: additional evidence regarding @@Spur der Verwüstung

After being insulted, @@Daddy's Home says "you'll get off easy from me"

and was banned shortly after

And he makes use of this picture to threaten users who never broke any rules.

(Actual reason. Insulting @@Daddy's Home, x3 CONFIRMED)

what in the hell? Telling users to pick a number so he can assign a random punishment
(Obviously, if random, daddy's home does not give a damn about "the punishment which fits the crime)

He is simply having fun while terrorizing the forum.

EXHIBIT E: retaliatory ban of @@ascension

(YES FUCKING 5 EXAMPLES AND HES WALKING FREE, RETAINING HIS PERMS)

Clearly antagonizing another individual he banned, probably innocent

Most of His bans should be reversed regardless as he was never to be trusted with this power

PROPOSED VERDICT:

Unbelievable stuff. Especially the poor grey who was banned 11 minutes after making fun of @@Daddy's Home

I propose immediate permanent DE-MOD of @@Daddy's Home

and immedate reinstatement for all those whom he terrorized

once again, EVERYONE BESIDES @not_cel was banned from that meme photo

Free:
@@Spur der Verwüstung

@@itzyaboyJJ

@@NPCFighter69

@@gookcelriceR

@@ascension

All innocent. All banned by @@Daddy's Home for personal grudges
(CLEARLY!)

Unbelievable mod abuse. Tag everyone

(Formatting slightly off due to copying the thread)

I never liked daddyshome. He is a foid worshipping humanimal. If not the biggest one of them all.

 

[Basedman420]

Lol if @The Homelander made fun of another user nothing would ever happens.

 

[valentine]

ban everyone ban ban ban!

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

IF IM BANNED AFTER RESPOSTING THIS

NEVER FORGET GGM

 

[Copercel]

Let's hope it was the associate mods who closed my thread

And not the higher ups. If if it was, I'll be banned shortly for reposting this.

I, THE PROSECUTOR AND LEGAL ADVOCATE, GGM WILL SEE TO IT, THAT JUSTICE IS SERVED

Exhibit A: Unjustified ban of @@The Homelander

this was a retaliatory ban, the homelander had the following images for his profile picture and signature:

the given reason for the ban: "Inciting conflict", and "antagonize others"

Additionally, he later admitted it was not Reasonable and he stretched the rules (which didn't even apply anyway) to excert action.

The actual reason, for making fun of @@Daddy's Home

Additionally, daddy's home deleted the thread in which he announced what he was doing, why would he do this? Because he knew it was Unjustified and didn't want it to be used against him.

Exhibit B:

Retaliatory ban #2: NPCFIGHTER69

This random bluecel, was agreeing with my thread, in which I claimed @@Daddy's Home was abusing his power

He was
banned 11 minutes
later.

For "being an alt"

Actual reason, once again:

making fun of @@Daddy's Home

seriously? Was immediately banned for being an alt 11 fucking minutes after making fun of him?

Reaaaallly.... Quite a coincidence

Under the condition this user WAS an alt account,

@@Daddy's Home overtly ignored it, until he was made fun of.

Either way, it was retaliatory, clearly. 11 fucking minutes

Exhibit C:

Retaliatory ban, #3: @@Spur der Verwüstung

"spam + exists solely to troll"

Is trolling against the rules?

Now once again, reguardless, we are beginning to see a pattern here,

the message by which he was banned for, was deleted, as @@Daddy's Home... deleted it

Now why was he really banned? Well it was clearly because he was amongst the individuals who made fun of @@Daddy's Home, big suprise,

(Actual reason: making fun of @@Daddy's Home x3)

as the evidence has been once again deleted, I will unfortunately have to refer you to this picture

Btw, everybody here In this MEME PHOTO! was banned by @@Daddy's Home, except for @not_cel

All. Of. Them.

Quite the coincidence? Isn't it.

Exhibit D: additional evidence regarding @@Spur der Verwüstung

After being insulted, @@Daddy's Home says "you'll get off easy from me"

and was banned shortly after

And he makes use of this picture to threaten users who never broke any rules.

(Actual reason. Insulting @@Daddy's Home, x3 CONFIRMED)

what in the hell? Telling users to pick a number so he can assign a random punishment
(Obviously, if random, daddy's home does not give a damn about "the punishment which fits the crime)

He is simply having fun while terrorizing the forum.

EXHIBIT E: retaliatory ban of @@ascension

(YES FUCKING 5 EXAMPLES AND HES WALKING FREE, RETAINING HIS PERMS)

Clearly antagonizing another individual he banned, probably innocent

Most of His bans should be reversed regardless as he was never to be trusted with this power

PROPOSED VERDICT:

Unbelievable stuff. Especially the poor grey who was banned 11 minutes after making fun of @@Daddy's Home

I propose immediate permanent DE-MOD of @@Daddy's Home

and immedate reinstatement for all those whom he terrorized

once again, EVERYONE BESIDES @not_cel was banned from that meme photo

Free:
@@Spur der Verwüstung

@@itzyaboyJJ

@@NPCFighter69

@@gookcelriceR

@@ascension

All innocent. All banned by @@Daddy's Home for personal grudges
(CLEARLY!)

Unbelievable mod abuse. Tag everyone

(Formatting slightly off due to copying the thread)

He literally got his mod badge less than a month ago, no?

 

[rrm_ss2]

Let's hope it was the associate mods who closed my thread

And not the higher ups. If if it was, I'll be banned shortly for reposting this.

I, THE PROSECUTOR AND LEGAL ADVOCATE, GGM WILL SEE TO IT, THAT JUSTICE IS SERVED

Exhibit A: Unjustified ban of @@The Homelander

this was a retaliatory ban, the homelander had the following images for his profile picture and signature:

the given reason for the ban: "Inciting conflict", and "antagonize others"

Additionally, he later admitted it was not Reasonable and he stretched the rules (which didn't even apply anyway) to excert action.

The actual reason, for making fun of @@Daddy's Home

Additionally, daddy's home deleted the thread in which he announced what he was doing, why would he do this? Because he knew it was Unjustified and didn't want it to be used against him.

Exhibit B:

Retaliatory ban #2: NPCFIGHTER69

This random bluecel, was agreeing with my thread, in which I claimed @@Daddy's Home was abusing his power

He was
banned 11 minutes
later.

For "being an alt"

Actual reason, once again:

making fun of @@Daddy's Home

seriously? Was immediately banned for being an alt 11 fucking minutes after making fun of him?

Reaaaallly.... Quite a coincidence

Under the condition this user WAS an alt account,

@@Daddy's Home overtly ignored it, until he was made fun of.

Either way, it was retaliatory, clearly. 11 fucking minutes

Exhibit C:

Retaliatory ban, #3: @@Spur der Verwüstung

"spam + exists solely to troll"

Is trolling against the rules?

Now once again, reguardless, we are beginning to see a pattern here,

the message by which he was banned for, was deleted, as @@Daddy's Home... deleted it

Now why was he really banned? Well it was clearly because he was amongst the individuals who made fun of @@Daddy's Home, big suprise,

(Actual reason: making fun of @@Daddy's Home x3)

as the evidence has been once again deleted, I will unfortunately have to refer you to this picture

Btw, everybody here In this MEME PHOTO! was banned by @@Daddy's Home, except for @not_cel

All. Of. Them.

Quite the coincidence? Isn't it.

Exhibit D: additional evidence regarding @@Spur der Verwüstung

After being insulted, @@Daddy's Home says "you'll get off easy from me"

and was banned shortly after

And he makes use of this picture to threaten users who never broke any rules.

(Actual reason. Insulting @@Daddy's Home, x3 CONFIRMED)

what in the hell? Telling users to pick a number so he can assign a random punishment
(Obviously, if random, daddy's home does not give a damn about "the punishment which fits the crime)

He is simply having fun while terrorizing the forum.

EXHIBIT E: retaliatory ban of @@ascension

(YES FUCKING 5 EXAMPLES AND HES WALKING FREE, RETAINING HIS PERMS)

Clearly antagonizing another individual he banned, probably innocent

Most of His bans should be reversed regardless as he was never to be trusted with this power

PROPOSED VERDICT:

Unbelievable stuff. Especially the poor grey who was banned 11 minutes after making fun of @@Daddy's Home

I propose immediate permanent DE-MOD of @@Daddy's Home

and immedate reinstatement for all those whom he terrorized

once again, EVERYONE BESIDES @not_cel was banned from that meme photo

Free:
@@Spur der Verwüstung

@@itzyaboyJJ

@@NPCFighter69

@@gookcelriceR

@@ascension

All innocent. All banned by @@Daddy's Home for personal grudges
(CLEARLY!)

Unbelievable mod abuse. Tag everyone

(Formatting slightly off due to copying the thread)

I agree but this is useless tbh the admins won’t do anything about it

 

[Vantablack]

I never liked daddyshome. He is a foid worshipping humanimal. If not the biggest one of them all.

tbh he gave me some good advice , considering he is one of the few older users of the forum

 

[puniteking]

Dnr as usual

 

[InanimatePragmatist]

tbh he gave me some good advice , considering he is one of the few older users of the forum

I cannot respect a man who values women above his own existential purpose

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

I agree but this is useless tbh the admins won’t do anything about it

If they ban me, good riddance, I should get off the forum anyway. Like most of us.

 

[ascension]

Claiming my early parking spot here, gonna read now

 

[Vantablack]

I cannot respect a man who values women above his own existential purpose

i agree, maybe i haven't seen enough of his posts

 

[rrm_ss2]

@ToryToad

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

Claiming my early parking spot here, gonna read now

You were in the thread btw you responded earlier than you weren't

 

[ToryToad]

Let's hope it was the associate mods who closed my thread

(ORIGINAL THREAD WAS LOCKED! AND JUSTICE WASNT SERVED

I WONT BE SILENCED)
View attachment 3902208
And not the higher ups. If if it was, I'll be banned shortly for reposting this.

I, THE PROSECUTOR AND LEGAL ADVOCATE, GGM WILL SEE TO IT, THAT JUSTICE IS SERVED

Exhibit A: Unjustified ban of @@The Homelander

this was a retaliatory ban, the homelander had the following images for his profile picture and signature:

the given reason for the ban: "Inciting conflict", and "antagonize others"

Additionally, he later admitted it was not Reasonable and he stretched the rules (which didn't even apply anyway) to excert action.

The actual reason, for making fun of @@Daddy's Home

Additionally, daddy's home deleted the thread in which he announced what he was doing, why would he do this? Because he knew it was Unjustified and didn't want it to be used against him.

Exhibit B:

Retaliatory ban #2: NPCFIGHTER69

This random bluecel, was agreeing with my thread, in which I claimed @@Daddy's Home was abusing his power

He was
banned 11 minutes
later.

For "being an alt"

Actual reason, once again:

making fun of @@Daddy's Home

seriously? Was immediately banned for being an alt 11 fucking minutes after making fun of him?

Reaaaallly.... Quite a coincidence

Under the condition this user WAS an alt account,

@@Daddy's Home overtly ignored it, until he was made fun of.

Either way, it was retaliatory, clearly. 11 fucking minutes

Exhibit C:

Retaliatory ban, #3: @@Spur der Verwüstung

"spam + exists solely to troll"

Is trolling against the rules?

Now once again, reguardless, we are beginning to see a pattern here,

the message by which he was banned for, was deleted, as @@Daddy's Home... deleted it

Now why was he really banned? Well it was clearly because he was amongst the individuals who made fun of @@Daddy's Home, big suprise,

(Actual reason: making fun of @@Daddy's Home x3)

as the evidence has been once again deleted, I will unfortunately have to refer you to this picture

Btw, everybody here In this MEME PHOTO! was banned by @@Daddy's Home, except for @not_cel

All. Of. Them.

Quite the coincidence? Isn't it.

Exhibit D: additional evidence regarding @@Spur der Verwüstung

After being insulted, @@Daddy's Home says "you'll get off easy from me"

and was banned shortly after

And he makes use of this picture to threaten users who never broke any rules.

(Actual reason. Insulting @@Daddy's Home, x3 CONFIRMED)

what in the hell? Telling users to pick a number so he can assign a random punishment
(Obviously, if random, daddy's home does not give a damn about "the punishment which fits the crime)

He is simply having fun while terrorizing the forum.

EXHIBIT E: retaliatory ban of @@ascension

(YES FUCKING 5 EXAMPLES AND HES WALKING FREE, RETAINING HIS PERMS)

Clearly antagonizing another individual he banned, probably innocent

Most of His bans should be reversed regardless as he was never to be trusted with this power

PROPOSED VERDICT:

Unbelievable stuff. Especially the poor grey who was banned 11 minutes after making fun of @@Daddy's Home

I propose immediate permanent DE-MOD of @@Daddy's Home

and immedate reinstatement for all those whom he terrorized

once again, EVERYONE BESIDES @not_cel was banned from that meme photo

Free:
@@Spur der Verwüstung

@@itzyaboyJJ

@@NPCFighter69

@@gookcelriceR

@@ascension

All innocent. All banned by @@Daddy's Home for personal grudges
(CLEARLY!)

Unbelievable mod abuse. Tag everyone

(Formatting slightly off due to copying the thread)

We won't be silenced

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

We won't be silenced

Well... I may be soon

No matter.

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

TAG EVERYONE.

 

[alurmo]

Is trolling against the rules?

jfll this reminds me of that one time where clav banned someone for "shitposting endlessly"

And he makes use of this picture to threaten users who never broke any rules.

(Actual reason. Insulting @@Daddy's Home, x3 CONFIRMED)

sum sadistic psychopathic shit cuhh
bro thinks he's a movie villain muh pic a number or ill do it


the purple color changes people, it happened with techno now him, I'm not fully turned on him cus he showed me some mercy(didn't ban me bc I was posted sum stupid shit)

but he isn't very merciful when he's being threatened directly......

 

[Proex]

Jfl at locking a thread instead of deleting

 

[VV62]

They deleted the original thread?

 

[alurmo]

We won't be silenced

bro.....

unless u have some smart ass shit planned if ur banned
staff would legit ban like 30 users all at once bc they were involved
happened with repfarm threads earlier this year, nothings gonna change.....

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

They deleted the original thread?

The locked it off to further replies.

 

[pajjeetslayer]

Let's hope it was the associate mods who closed my thread

(ORIGINAL THREAD WAS LOCKED! AND JUSTICE WASNT SERVED

I WONT BE SILENCED)
View attachment 3902208
And not the higher ups. If if it was, I'll be banned shortly for reposting this.

I, THE PROSECUTOR AND LEGAL ADVOCATE, GGM WILL SEE TO IT, THAT JUSTICE IS SERVED

Exhibit A: Unjustified ban of @@The Homelander

this was a retaliatory ban, the homelander had the following images for his profile picture and signature:

the given reason for the ban: "Inciting conflict", and "antagonize others"

Additionally, he later admitted it was not Reasonable and he stretched the rules (which didn't even apply anyway) to excert action.

The actual reason, for making fun of @@Daddy's Home

Additionally, daddy's home deleted the thread in which he announced what he was doing, why would he do this? Because he knew it was Unjustified and didn't want it to be used against him.

Exhibit B:

Retaliatory ban #2: NPCFIGHTER69

This random bluecel, was agreeing with my thread, in which I claimed @@Daddy's Home was abusing his power

He was
banned 11 minutes
later.

For "being an alt"

Actual reason, once again:

making fun of @@Daddy's Home

seriously? Was immediately banned for being an alt 11 fucking minutes after making fun of him?

Reaaaallly.... Quite a coincidence

Under the condition this user WAS an alt account,

@@Daddy's Home overtly ignored it, until he was made fun of.

Either way, it was retaliatory, clearly. 11 fucking minutes

Exhibit C:

Retaliatory ban, #3: @@Spur der Verwüstung

"spam + exists solely to troll"

Is trolling against the rules?

Now once again, reguardless, we are beginning to see a pattern here,

the message by which he was banned for, was deleted, as @@Daddy's Home... deleted it

Now why was he really banned? Well it was clearly because he was amongst the individuals who made fun of @@Daddy's Home, big suprise,

(Actual reason: making fun of @@Daddy's Home x3)

as the evidence has been once again deleted, I will unfortunately have to refer you to this picture

Btw, everybody here In this MEME PHOTO! was banned by @@Daddy's Home, except for @not_cel

All. Of. Them.

Quite the coincidence? Isn't it.

Exhibit D: additional evidence regarding @@Spur der Verwüstung

After being insulted, @@Daddy's Home says "you'll get off easy from me"

and was banned shortly after

And he makes use of this picture to threaten users who never broke any rules.

(Actual reason. Insulting @@Daddy's Home, x3 CONFIRMED)

what in the hell? Telling users to pick a number so he can assign a random punishment
(Obviously, if random, daddy's home does not give a damn about "the punishment which fits the crime)

He is simply having fun while terrorizing the forum.

EXHIBIT E: retaliatory ban of @@ascension

(YES FUCKING 5 EXAMPLES AND HES WALKING FREE, RETAINING HIS PERMS)

Clearly antagonizing another individual he banned, probably innocent

Most of His bans should be reversed regardless as he was never to be trusted with this power

PROPOSED VERDICT:

Unbelievable stuff. Especially the poor grey who was banned 11 minutes after making fun of @@Daddy's Home

I propose immediate permanent DE-MOD of @@Daddy's Home

and immedate reinstatement for all those whom he terrorized

once again, EVERYONE BESIDES @not_cel was banned from that meme photo

Free:
@@Spur der Verwüstung

@@itzyaboyJJ

@@NPCFighter69

@@gookcelriceR

@@ascension

All innocent. All banned by @@Daddy's Home for personal grudges
(CLEARLY!)

Unbelievable mod abuse. Tag everyone

(Formatting slightly off due to copying the thread)

Inb4 thread deleted

 

[alurmo]

Inb4 thread deleted

brb screenshotting this thread and rewriting it

 

[alurmo]

The locked it off to further replies.

oof was bound to happen the 8+ pages makes it look like a repfarm cuhh
repfarm threads give them ptsd don't u know that

 

[PseudoMaxxer]

Bumping this, curious of what will happen.

 

[Jager]

dnr but bump

 

[pajjeetslayer]

Bumping this, curious of what will happen.

Using Newton’s first law of nothing ever happens i presume nothing will happen

 

[Proex]

sum sadistic psychopathic shit cuhh
bro thinks he's a movie villain muh pic a number or ill do it

Muh it's an online forum nigga

 

[alurmo]

Bumping this, curious of what will happen.

either in a couple hours mods finally get active(rarely) and realise this thread is popular and ban gaygymmaxing and use some bs reason bc they're ego
or
they just ignore it completely and remove thread as soon as it reaches 6+ pages and ignore the topic forever
either way its most likely a loss

 

[PseudoMaxxer]

Muh it's an online forum nigga

It’s just losers picking on losers atp…

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

Bumping this, curious of what will happen.

Yeah me too

They didn't ban me for the old thread, for this they might

I reckon they know the user base would be pissed if I got banned for doing nothing wrong

Then again, we've seen they don't care about that if they can afford not to care.

Can they afford not to care in this case? We shall see

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

oof was bound to happen the 8+ pages makes it look like a repfarm cuhh
repfarm threads give them ptsd don't u know that

Not even though

Was a good thread and repped accordingly

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

Using Newton’s first law of nothing ever happens

Caged

 

[alurmo]

Not even though

Was a good thread and repped accordinglyokay...

whats the reason the thread got locked then....
do they not like when threads reach 8 pages or smt lol

 

[Mrinfinityx]

Let's hope it was the associate mods who closed my thread

(ORIGINAL THREAD WAS LOCKED! AND JUSTICE WASNT SERVED

I WONT BE SILENCED)
View attachment 3902208
And not the higher ups. If if it was, I'll be banned shortly for reposting this.

I, THE PROSECUTOR AND LEGAL ADVOCATE, GGM WILL SEE TO IT, THAT JUSTICE IS SERVED

Exhibit A: Unjustified ban of @@The Homelander

this was a retaliatory ban, the homelander had the following images for his profile picture and signature:

the given reason for the ban: "Inciting conflict", and "antagonize others"

Additionally, he later admitted it was not Reasonable and he stretched the rules (which didn't even apply anyway) to excert action.

The actual reason, for making fun of @@Daddy's Home

Additionally, daddy's home deleted the thread in which he announced what he was doing, why would he do this? Because he knew it was Unjustified and didn't want it to be used against him.

Exhibit B:

Retaliatory ban #2: NPCFIGHTER69

This random bluecel, was agreeing with my thread, in which I claimed @@Daddy's Home was abusing his power

He was
banned 11 minutes
later.

For "being an alt"

Actual reason, once again:

making fun of @@Daddy's Home

seriously? Was immediately banned for being an alt 11 fucking minutes after making fun of him?

Reaaaallly.... Quite a coincidence

Under the condition this user WAS an alt account,

@@Daddy's Home overtly ignored it, until he was made fun of.

Either way, it was retaliatory, clearly. 11 fucking minutes

Exhibit C:

Retaliatory ban, #3: @@Spur der Verwüstung

"spam + exists solely to troll"

Is trolling against the rules?

Now once again, reguardless, we are beginning to see a pattern here,

the message by which he was banned for, was deleted, as @@Daddy's Home... deleted it

Now why was he really banned? Well it was clearly because he was amongst the individuals who made fun of @@Daddy's Home, big suprise,

(Actual reason: making fun of @@Daddy's Home x3)

as the evidence has been once again deleted, I will unfortunately have to refer you to this picture

Btw, everybody here In this MEME PHOTO! was banned by @@Daddy's Home, except for @not_cel

All. Of. Them.

Quite the coincidence? Isn't it.

Exhibit D: additional evidence regarding @@Spur der Verwüstung

After being insulted, @@Daddy's Home says "you'll get off easy from me"

and was banned shortly after

And he makes use of this picture to threaten users who never broke any rules.

(Actual reason. Insulting @@Daddy's Home, x3 CONFIRMED)

what in the hell? Telling users to pick a number so he can assign a random punishment
(Obviously, if random, daddy's home does not give a damn about "the punishment which fits the crime)

He is simply having fun while terrorizing the forum.

EXHIBIT E: retaliatory ban of @@ascension

(YES FUCKING 5 EXAMPLES AND HES WALKING FREE, RETAINING HIS PERMS)

Clearly antagonizing another individual he banned, probably innocent

Most of His bans should be reversed regardless as he was never to be trusted with this power

PROPOSED VERDICT:

Unbelievable stuff. Especially the poor grey who was banned 11 minutes after making fun of @@Daddy's Home

I propose immediate permanent DE-MOD of @@Daddy's Home

and immedate reinstatement for all those whom he terrorized

once again, EVERYONE BESIDES @not_cel was banned from that meme photo

Free:
@@Spur der Verwüstung

@@itzyaboyJJ

@@NPCFighter69

@@gookcelriceR

@@ascension

All innocent. All banned by @@Daddy's Home for personal grudges
(CLEARLY!)

Unbelievable mod abuse. Tag everyone

(Formatting slightly off due to copying the thread)

My scroll doesnt work anymore, so DNR

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

whats the reason the thread got locked then....
do they not like when threads reach 8 pages or smt lol

If it was repfarming I'd have been warned/banned, and I wasn't repfarming

They just wanted to silence me and prevent the news from spreading

That's my assumption

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

Me after I get banned for this and justice isn't served.

 

[ToryToad]

Me after I get banned for this and justice isn't served.
View attachment 3902242

If you get banned for this org is lost negl

 

[LegendaryKennen]

dude just bans anyone he doesnt like while the other mods have to withstand other people bullying them lmao

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

dude just bans anyone he doesnt like while the other mods have to withstand other people bullying them lmao

Pay to win

This is what 3x vip gets you.

 

[2025cel]

Shit's lowkey crazy tho, walls and walls of text just for that guy to respond with a gif of a woman wobbling her head

 

[alurmo]

If it was repfarming I'd have been warned/banned, and I wasn't repfarming

They just wanted to silence me and prevent the news from spreading

That's my assumption

this is my thoughts
unless u have some inside jobs/smart plans/monitoring/etc.

u cant just get mods demodded like that, as for admins, those people pay masters forum bill(at least numbthepain from what I know) ur not just getting them put out, unless other mods find them problematic too