eduardkoopman
Sub-Mod
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
- Posts
- 22,662
- Reputation
- 28,351
When dating = porking
I can only find solid data from online dating. A few from studies, but limited
The Gini coefficient, measures how equal the playing is. How much of chance one has. Gini coefficient means:
0 representing perfect equality; and
1 representing "perfect"/total inequality
How easy is it for men to attract random sex online?
Does the 80/20 rule exist online?
"heterosexual females faced a Gini coefficient of 0.324, while heterosexual males faced a much higher Gini coefficient of 0.542. So neither sex has complete equality: in both cases, there are some “wealthy” people with access to more romantic experiences and some “poor” who have access to few or none. But while the situation for women is something like an economy with some poor, some middle class, and some millionaires, the situation for men is closer to a world with a small number of super-billionaires surrounded by huge masses who possess almost nothing. According to the Hinge analyst:
So. it's as easy to get laid online. As it is to be able to rise to being well-off (economically speaking), in a shithole corrupt segregated place like South Africa. For men that is.
For women dating online, it's like a socialist Western world. It likely will work out good, and she has good options and possibility to rise up.
source: https://quillette.com/2019/03/12/attraction-inequality-and-the-dating-economy/
"the bottom 80% of men (in terms of attractiveness) are competing for the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are competing for the top 20% of men. The Gini coefficient for the Tinder economy based on “like” percentages was calculated to be 0.58. This means that the Tinder economy has more inequality than 95.1% of all the world’s national economies. In addition, it was determined that a man of average attractiveness would be “liked” by approximately 0.87% (1 in 115) of women on Tinder."
source:
Number of women that swiped "yes"/like for men in online dating:
Conclusion, So boyo's.
Good luck at husstling sex/pussy.
It's an uphill battle, you enter. Where she has most of the power. And you have little power.
To have any form fo semi-regular-success as a normie, getting random sex. You need to be brutal in your approach:. Which basically are:
1. (after looksmaxx) statusmaxxand/or moneymaxx
2. meet/chat up a lot of women (numbers-game), and be able to deal with the large amount of rejections
3. pretend to be taken/preselected by other woman (or women)
4. go locationmaxxing as much as possible.
Water = wet.
I can only find solid data from online dating. A few from studies, but limited
The Gini coefficient, measures how equal the playing is. How much of chance one has. Gini coefficient means:
0 representing perfect equality; and
1 representing "perfect"/total inequality
How easy is it for men to attract random sex online?
Does the 80/20 rule exist online?
"heterosexual females faced a Gini coefficient of 0.324, while heterosexual males faced a much higher Gini coefficient of 0.542. So neither sex has complete equality: in both cases, there are some “wealthy” people with access to more romantic experiences and some “poor” who have access to few or none. But while the situation for women is something like an economy with some poor, some middle class, and some millionaires, the situation for men is closer to a world with a small number of super-billionaires surrounded by huge masses who possess almost nothing. According to the Hinge analyst:
So. it's as easy to get laid online. As it is to be able to rise to being well-off (economically speaking), in a shithole corrupt segregated place like South Africa. For men that is.
For women dating online, it's like a socialist Western world. It likely will work out good, and she has good options and possibility to rise up.
source: https://quillette.com/2019/03/12/attraction-inequality-and-the-dating-economy/
"the bottom 80% of men (in terms of attractiveness) are competing for the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are competing for the top 20% of men. The Gini coefficient for the Tinder economy based on “like” percentages was calculated to be 0.58. This means that the Tinder economy has more inequality than 95.1% of all the world’s national economies. In addition, it was determined that a man of average attractiveness would be “liked” by approximately 0.87% (1 in 115) of women on Tinder."
source:
Number of women that swiped "yes"/like for men in online dating:
| Group | Men |
|---|---|
| Top 1% | 16.4% |
| Top 5% | 41.1% |
| Top 10% | 58.0% |
| Bottom 50% | 4.3% |
Conclusion, So boyo's.
Good luck at husstling sex/pussy.
It's an uphill battle, you enter. Where she has most of the power. And you have little power.
To have any form fo semi-regular-success as a normie, getting random sex. You need to be brutal in your approach:. Which basically are:
1. (after looksmaxx) statusmaxxand/or moneymaxx
2. meet/chat up a lot of women (numbers-game), and be able to deal with the large amount of rejections
3. pretend to be taken/preselected by other woman (or women)
4. go locationmaxxing as much as possible.
Water = wet.
