girl at my school ranted about how being a woman is harder

[nolpolin2]

Every single point applied to men as well, and she made a weird ass point about how girls are slut shamed if they have a boyfriend?
she also talked about how girls get made fun of if they don't have sex with every dude that asks for it?
then she showed a whole ass book that said the same things
not even joking, first page was about choosing which boys to date and how hard it is
what fucking world do women think we live in?
im so confused

 

[isis_Bleach]

women live in a diffsrent world, where theyre treated fairly. so they assume men are too

 

[totalynotme]

She's half right

 

[Deleted member 45175]

 

[dreamcake1mo]

Dunning Kruger.

She thinks she knows more, or has great expertise about something but does not. For one, girls and slut shaming is a thing.

But its a valid concern from men considering MOST guys slut shaming women do not have prolific women interaction at ALL. So from a mans perspective, yes, your being a slut. At the very least something slutty and unfair is going on. Because, why do a majority of men go through life with no girlfriends, no women interaction, yet the majority of women go through many boyfriends before marriage, as well as a bunch of attention from men?

Clearly there's a discrepancy, and the reason why we started researching all sorts of ideologies such as hypergamy, women prepositions, and other sociopathic revelations about dating, is because we logically analyze why this discrepancy is occurring. One example is how men are still held to traditional standards. If you do the full scope of research about this, combined with the marriage rates of lesbians and homosexuals (lesbians divorce more than homosexual men and straight relationships), you'd have data to start building a very strong point and conclusion that STATISTICALLY, not even women can tolerate their own behavior/prepositions as much as a men will, and that men by far are simply MORE interested in women than women are to men, at the least way far too lenient and tolerable to women behaviors than what women are to their own behavior and preposition.

You could also look at the data from official sources that factually show men successfully commit suicide globally 4x more than women on all metrics including race. That alone should be enough to say men's lives are probably harder, but only to someone who is honestly aware of these metrics and not parroting out of self interest.

This is the difference between knowing something with logic, studies, observation, vs just speaking about something because you feel like somethings wrong. In a way, she's right to "feel" something is wrong about the women/men situation, but the failure comes when she interprets those feelings. Because she has no logical data foundation to come to the right conclusions. So why does she parrot this?

Self interest. Before she'd expand the range on her research, getting facts and observation on what she would call "incel" content, she rather parrot the false interpretations of womanhood and modern feminism for self benefit. Its a very self absorbed way of thinking and its precisely this train of thought why most men like me and you consider women who say such things way less honest than a man and evil of sorts, because they are prone to parrot beliefs that fulfill self absorbed selfishness and sociopathy due to their lack of understanding/empathy.

Her second point also makes no sense and would apply to a male more than a women. Straight men by far get called gay the most when they do not reciprocate women's attention and charm. They are called weak when they do not protect women. They are disregarded in relationships if they do not adhere to traditional ideologies of men providing. Not even an argument. Men also by far like loyalty the most, and would prefer you dont sleep around when dating.

But since this IS her "interpretation", my conclusion when considering all of this is that, like the subject of hypergamy, perhaps the only case study of men she refers to are those who gain her attention, aka people we call the top 10% of men. That or shes projecting a hypersensitivity to her claims. Because men DO get mad if you deny them sex, but even if so, how does this go back to your main thesis about how being a women is harder? You can hypersensitize any situation. Technically, life is shit. Even eating food is tiresome. I would be right, but what does that have to do with women or mens lives being harder? Its not a strong point, just hypersensitivity to the idea that men shaming you for sex (a notoriously pleasurable thing to do by the way) is such a big inconvenient.

We live in a world where half of the population is seriously out of touch with the other half due to privilege. Think of how the elites push all of these laws and stuff that kill millions of people a year simply because they are not able to comprehend the environmental and social impact of their regimes. Lack of insight, intelligence, observation, empathy and care in short.

 

[vratisevojvodo]

Every single point applied to men as well, and she made a weird ass point about how girls are slut shamed if they have a boyfriend?
she also talked about how girls get made fun of if they don't have sex with every dude that asks for it?
then she showed a whole ass book that said the same things
not even joking, first page was about choosing which boys to date and how hard it is
what fucking world do women think we live in?
im so confused

did she said about percentage of women who have rape fantasies??

 

[Klasik616]

Donning Kruger.

She thinks she knows more or is informed more about something that she is not. For one, girls and slut shaming is a thing.

But its a valid concern from men considering MOST guys slut shaming women do not have prolific women interaction at ALL. So from a mans perspective, yes, your being a slut. At the very least something slutty and unfair is going on. Because, why do a majority of men go through life with no girlfriends, yet the majority of women go through many boyfriends before marriage?

Clearly there's a discrepancy, and the reason why we started coming up with all sort of ideologies such as hypergamy, women prepositions, and other sociopathic revelations about dating is because we logically analyzed why this discrepancy is occurring. One example is how men are still held to traditional standards. If you do the full scope of research about this, combined with the marriage rates of lesbians and homosexuals (lesbians divorce more than homosexual men and straight relationships), youd have data to start building a very strong point and conclusion that STATISTICALLY, not even women can tolerate their own behavior/prepositions as much as a men will, and that men by far are simply MORE interested in women than women are to men, at the least way far too lenient and tolerable to women behaviors than what women are to their own behavior and preposition.

This is the difference between knowing something with logic, studies, observation, vs just speaking about something because you feel like somethings wrong. In a way, she's right to "feel" something is wrong about the women/men situation, but the failure comes when she interprets those feelings. Because she has no logical data foundation to come to the right conclusions. So why does she parrot this?

Self interest. Before she'd expand the range on her research, getting facts and observation on what she would call "incel" content, she rather parrot the false interpretations of womanhood and modern feminism for self benefit. Its a very self absorbed way of thinking and its precisely this train of thought why most men like me and you consider women who say such things way less honest than a man and evil of sorts, because they are prone to parrot beliefs that fulfill self absorbed selfishness and sociopathy due to their lack of understanding/empathy.

Her second point also makes no sense and would apply to a male more than a women. Straight men by far get called gay the most when they do not reciprocate women's attention and charm. They are called weak when they do not protect women. They are disregarded in relationships if they do not adhere to traditional ideologies of men providing. Not even an argument. Men also by far like loyalty the most, and would prefer you dont sleep around when dating. But since this IS her "interpretation", my conclusion when considering all of this is that, like the subject of hypergamy, perhaps the only case study of men she refers to are those who gain her attention, aka people we call the top 10% of men. That or shes projecting a hypersensitivity to her claims. Because men DO get mad if you deny them sex, but even if so, how does this go back to your main thesis about how being a women is harder? You can hypersensitize any situation. Technically, life is shit. Even eating food is tiresome. I would be right, but what does that have to do with women or mens lives being harder? Its not a strong point, just hypersensitivity to the idea that men shaming you for sex (a notoriously pleasurable thing to do by the way) is such a big inconvenient.

We live in a world where half of the population is seriously out of touch with the other half due to privilege. Think of how the elites push all of these laws and stuff that kill millions of people a year simply because they are not able to comprehend the environmental and social impact of their regimes. Lack of insight, intelligence, observation, empathy and care in short.

I'm not reading all that schizo

 

[Entschuldigung]

Do you expect her to be the advocate for men?

 

[illusivespirits]

Women now feel so bored with how easy it is to get almost very guy and getting pure validation on all social media platforms.

So they want to make this fake "personality" to appear like its wayyyyyyy harder for them.