girls actually don't love chads or rich dudes.( bleak blackpill warning, long ass essay warning, walls of text warning)

mortis

mortis

htn+pilled
Joined
May 6, 2020
Posts
13,909
Reputation
22,164
disclaimer : this thread is very interesting, and very helpful for teenagercels and sub adultcels to learn more about human nature. will be water for adults.

Like everything in life, we, as selfish creatures that strive to survive, try our hardest to achieve our needs to survive. we use others, we build relations, live together and find different ways to achieve that goal. let me explain it simply for you :
I need food to survive, but i can't farm animals or wheat all by myself because i have different interests and jobs, but other people do farming so i rely on others to survive and get my food related needs fulfilled. im basically using others for my own survival sake. the farmer needs education too, so i can teach him english (imagine im an english teacher). he basically uses me as a tool to learn english. this chain continues in society, we all use each other as TOOLS in a way for our survival, and our overall survival depends on the others. but there is a caveat, he gives me bread and food because he needs education or money (an exchange), he doesn't like me at all, he can wish me the worst death even but still gives me food cus he needs my money or my lessons. also i teach him english because i expect him a thing in return, i wouldn't do that because i like him or i wanna benefit him as an individual for 0 return.
love and sexual relationships also works like that, men and woman got needs like sexual needs, emotional needs, and social needs. me, as a dude need to put my cock in a woman to fulfill my sexual needs, i need a woman beside me to fulfill my social and instinctive needs so in another words i use a woman like a tool to fulfill MY selfish desires. this means that i love my own desires and not woman, and woman are a tool to achieve my needs. i look at woman as a whole and choose one like an object to achieve my needs and i don't value individuals for example. i wouldn't date an ugly woman because she can't fulfill my sexual needs for example. all woman also behave this way, they all have sexual and social needs, they also have financial needs so they choose a man so he can fulfill their needs as a tool. woman don't like men in general, woman don't love chads even, they like themselves, they like their own desires and chad is only a tool for them to achieve their goals(goals like having a good looking off spring or fulfilling their sexual needs or achieving a successful life by choosing a rich dude), they look men as a whole and choose the best they can get so he can be the best tool for her.
and this is where everything turns a brutal turn,
why brutal you ask ? this makes everything nihilistic, this kinda shows us we are ALL alone in this plant thats floating in a massive void and all we do is to achieve what we as individuals need. we are alone, and would be alone if we can't benefit others, even if you look it in more realistic way, even if i benefit others im still worthless and alone because an individual ME doesn't matter, but my benefits to others matters. this shows that even if i was a chad, i would be technically alone because woman want to achieve their needs by using me as a tool, or even if i was rich, others would use me for my money so my money can make them happier, at the end of the day i would end up alone again. the further you think about it, all the friendships or relations and jobs and interactions and even the family love would become pointless and you would really get to the point where you accept that we are all alone in this random gay ass universe and after a while we all die and be forgotten forever, and even if you were a chad, life would become meaningless and nihilistic after a while knowing what woman actually want.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: SubhumanEyeArea, HostSamurai, gothmog6 and 2 others
dnr op, take your pills and go to an eternal sleep nobody gonna read all that shizoid water cope essay.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Soylentlover, ltn_looksminner and HostSamurai
sub htn male essay, chad just finished in the 5th stacy today and you were busy writing novels here, kys tbh.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: ltn_looksminner and HostSamurai
we all use each other as TOOLS

i use a woman like a tool to fulfill MY selfish desires


1741389891349


nigga you are not HIM


jokes aside tho, solid thread. however female attraction solely comes from a primal desire to reproduce with the best possible candidate, hence the tallest, healthiest, best looking man you can find. men have a primal desire to fuck around as much as possible and leave as much offspring behind as possible, hence why male standards are lower compared to female ones. it's all biology and human nature, and there's nothing you can really do about it, except looksmax and meet those primal requisites of foids.

still, was a decent read.
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Raja Porus, HostSamurai, Bars and 1 other person
Water Bucket JE2 BE2
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: HostSamurai, mortis and staton
dnr listen to this
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Raja Porus and HostSamurai
Water
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: HostSamurai, mortis and staton
View attachment 3546948

nigga you are not HIM


jokes aside tho, solid thread. however female attraction solely comes from a primal desire to reproduce with the best possible candidate, hence the tallest, healthiest, best looking man you can find. men have a primal desire to fuck around as much as possible and leave as much offspring behind as possible, hence why male standards are lower compared to female ones. it's all biology and human nature, and there's nothing you can really do about it, except looksmax and meet those primal requisites of foids.

still, was a decent read.
thank you for reading my essays:owo:
 
  • +1
Reactions: HostSamurai
DNR.

OP presents a highly cynical and transactional view of human relationships, arguing that all interactions, whether economic, romantic, or social, are based on mutual utility rather than genuine affection or connection. The idea is that people don't truly care about each other as individuals; they only care about what others can provide. While this perspective contains some elements of truth, it's ultimately a mistaken and pessimistic way to look at life.

The human society indeed does operate on a system of mutual exchange. No one is entirely self-sufficient; we all rely on others to meet our needs, whether it's through work, trade, or relationships. And that would answer all questions. A farmer produces food, a teacher provides education, and an employer pays wages in exchange for labor. This kind of interdependence is fundamental to civilization. Even relationships have give-and-take dynamics; people seek companionship, support, and love, and in return, they offer the same, or or something else of value.

However, it doesn't mean that something involving mutual benefit purely selfish or devoid. Not every interaction is as cold and emotionless as a business transaction. If that were the case, people wouldn’t grieve the loss of loved ones, and they wouldn’t go out of their way to help others with no direct benefit. You would argue that they only want to fill their instincts, lusts, to feel better, and that saving people is the key that will give him peace of mind, in short gets a high from it.

The OP argues that love is purely a matter of fulfilling one's own needs and that neither men nor women truly love each other; they only love what the other provides. Yes, love is conditional, just like almost everything in life. People don’t randomly love strangers with zero connection or shared experience. But to say that love is only about using each other is missing the bigger picture.

If relationships were only about using each other, why do people stay with partners who are sick, disabled, or financially struggling? Why do people sacrifice for their loved ones? Why do parents, in particular, go to extreme lengths for their children even when they receive nothing in return? If love were truly just about fulfilling needs, then as soon as a person stopped providing benefits, they would be abandoned. Again we would argue that they are just fulfilling their desires by doing that.

Thinking this way, believing that all human interactions are purely selfish and transactional, will lead to depression, isolation, and nihilism. If you convince yourself that no one truly values you as a person, only what you can provide, then life will start to feel meaningless. This kind of thinking leads to self-isolation, bitterness and resentment, and hopelessness.

The solution is simple. Overanalyzing and overcomplicating human interactions like this makes life unnecessarily miserable. Chads and stacies don't do that and enjoy life. Life is already difficult and such things make it even more depressing. Instead of obsessing over whether relationships are "genuine" or just "transactional," it’s better to simply live and experience things for yourself. Just don't care about it. If someone makes you happy, enjoy it.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: mortis and HostSamurai
good
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: mortis and HostSamurai


Just let this happen. Punish the world.
 
  • +1
Reactions: mortis
High IQ, but the break in reasoning is that women loving themselves is like them loving chad. Chads a manifestation of selflove.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: mortis

Similar threads

Panzram
Replies
28
Views
164
Panzram
Panzram
gymcel64
Replies
36
Views
522
gymcel64
gymcel64
mortis
Replies
5
Views
255
chucky
chucky
enchanted_elixir
Replies
43
Views
381
enchanted_elixir
enchanted_elixir
beyondbirthday
Replies
28
Views
347
the_nextDavidLaid
the_nextDavidLaid

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top