God never has sex. So those who never get to have sex resemble God more than those who get to have sex & hence are superior to the latter

Aristotélēs

Aristotélēs

πάντες ἄνθρωποι τοῦ εἰδέναι ὀρέγονται φύσει
Joined
Nov 6, 2025
Posts
991
Reputation
1,410
Title
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: raumDEuter, bakpaokukus, nel9d and 5 others
elite level of cope
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: PrettyLights, fabri_1742, Sacrimoon and 9 others
elite level of cope
It's basically the entire reasoning behind monks/priests being the leaders of the world & superior to the rest in a traditional setting
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mainlander, Bars, alexias and 2 others
God could have sex if he wanted it. Hes a volcel, we are incels. Theres a difference
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: bakpaokukus, Bars, alexias and 3 others
very good thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: devi0us_jester, alexias, iblamexyz and 1 other person
Well im not religious but I resemble God anyway apparently
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: alexias, iblamexyz and Aristotélēs
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: alexias, iblamexyz and Aristotélēs
God could have sex if he wanted it. Hes a volcel, we are incels. Theres a difference
Nope. Even if you believe Jesus was an incarnation of God, he could never have sex. That would too degrading & prove flesh is victorious over the spirit.
 
  • +1
Reactions: alexias and iblamexyz
1000046698
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: alexias, iblamexyz and FrancoAgain
Peter Scully is god...
so this is objectively false.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: bakpaokukus, alexias, iblamexyz and 3 others
Hernan Drago is chad and he is Argentinian hence if im Argentinian too i must be chad
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: bakpaokukus, Bars, alexias and 3 others
Bro, god impregnated mary

She's only a virgin due to the technicality of god being a ghost
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Bars, alexias, iblamexyz and 1 other person
Bro, god impregnated marry

She's only a virgin due to the technicality of god being a ghost
But it was without sex...so still proves my point 👉 👈
 
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur, alexias and FrancoAgain
Hernan Drago is chad and he is Argentinian hence if im Argentinian too i must be chad
Chadlike, sure. But not Chad.

There's a reason it's better to be Argentinian than Indian.
 
  • +1
Reactions: alexias and FrancoAgain
Also God is non binary
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur, Aristotélēs and alexias
Depends what religion you believe. I think Mormons and some Hindus believe that their respective God have sex
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur, Aristotélēs and alexias
If we never had sex, our bloodline ends here, eventually humans will cease to exist. God can choose to not have sex and never cease to exist. He is eternal and has full control of what happens and what doesn't. We are just mere humans who shall live on Earth for 60 years and be forgotten.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Aristotélēs
You are infinitely removed from him by being a biological being so it doesn't make a difference.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: alexias and Aristotélēs
You are infinitely removed from him by being a biological being so it doesn't make a difference.
Except we are not merely biological beings...
 
  • +1
Reactions: alexias
Not a word son, dnrd coper
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: alexias, paladincel_ and Aristotélēs
Guy got a statue avi and thinks he is philosophical :lul:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: bakpaokukus, PrinceLuenLeoncur, alexias and 2 others
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: alexias, nel9d and Aristotélēs
  • +1
Reactions: alexias, SilvioMoltisantiDan and caleb555
If we never had sex, our bloodline ends here, eventually humans will cease to exist. God can choose to not have sex and never cease to exist. He is eternal and has full control of what happens and what doesn't. We are just mere humans who shall live on Earth for 60 years and be forgotten.
Nah. Our soul is eternal.
 
  • +1
Reactions: alexias
Except we are not merely biological beings...

Right, so don't get up out of bed because God doesn't do it, great counter-argument.

And since you're talking about actual God not some hypothetical, do you have any argument for why he should be believed in?
 
  • +1
Reactions: alexias
Right, so don't get up out of bed because God doesn't do it, great counter-argument.

And since you're talking about actual God not some hypothetical, do you have any argument for why he should be believed in?
God doesn't get in bed either, so your comparison is flawed.

For a proof of Godhead, read Proclus's Elements of Theology
 
  • +1
Reactions: alexias
Nope. Even if you believe Jesus was an incarnation of God, he could never have sex. That would too degrading & prove flesh is victorious over the spirit.
He could if he wanted because God made
Man in his image and he made us to have sex after the fall so it’s not degrading that’s Islamic aristotilian nonsense that Mohammedens picked up. Jesus never had sex because that wasn’t part of gods divine plan

@iblamexyz @alexias dont Let this infidel influence you he’s very wrong on this.
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamexyz and alexias
God doesn't get in bed either, so your comparison is flawed.

For a proof of Godhead, read Proclus's Elements of Theology

God doesn't have urges to have sex either, so your comparison is a weak analogy fallacy going by your logic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: alexias
astounding idiocy of christianity summarized, lmfao. great post.
Nobody believes humans are literally gods children you fucking idiot retard.

You are adopted into being gods children when your Christian that’s all until then your just a human created creature that’s all there is to it

Instead of insulting a belif system because some child on the net who can’t articulate shit said something how about you do a Google search into what we belif instead of Strawmannirg us you dumb bitch get aids cancer and Syphilis and die
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: alexias and Aristotélēs
God doesn't have urges to have sex either, so your comparison is a weak analogy fallacy going by your logic.
That's irrelevant since the fact of the matter being discussed is sexual intercourse

God does not have it. Incels don't have it.

Ofcourse, killing your desires & keeping them under control at a minimal level is more Godly, but as I said, that's just a further detail which isn't relevant right now
 
  • +1
Reactions: alexias
hes a volcel tho so technically im superior since ive rejected a ltbs offer
He had access to literal Jewish and Roman elite Women stacies who worshipped him as a literal god


You have nothing that can compare
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: motionmantris and alexias
He could if he wanted because God made
Man in his image and he made us to have sex after the fall so it’s not degrading that’s Islamic aristotilian nonsense that Mohammedens picked up. Jesus never had sex because that wasn’t part of gods divine plan

@iblamexyz @alexias dont Let this infidel influence you he’s very wrong on this.
So Jesus could have sex even if I believed he was God is what you are saying?
 
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur
So Jesus could have sex even if I believed he was God is what you are saying?
Yes. Nothings degrading about the human body and functions

Only stupid gay religions and philosophers bekive this. Like Muslims who when you bow down and pray ifs Normal to fart well they say you do this cos Satan rices your anus and this your now unclean and have to wash again to repeat cos it’s invalidated

This is gay and retarded, if god didnt want you to fart then he’d not create you to fart when you go into that position. The human body is gods Magnum opus angry he made including its functions
 
  • +1
Reactions: alexias
That's irrelevant since the fact of the matter being discussed is sexual intercourse

God does not have it. Incels don't have it.

Ofcourse, killing your desires & keeping them under control at a minimal level is more Godly, but as I said, that's just a further detail which isn't relevant right now

I will read the book you named but;

Weak analogy fallacy basically means the exact same thing as "comparison is flawed." Re-read the above.

If the getting out of bed comparison is flawed, your comparison is necessarily flawed since God doesn't get sexual urges.
 
  • +1
Reactions: alexias
Yes. Nothings degrading about the human body and functions

Only stupid gay religions and philosophers bekive this. Like Muslims who when you bow down and pray ifs Normal to fart well they say you do this cos Satan rices your anus and this your now unclean and have to wash again to repeat cos it’s invalidated

This is gay and retarded, if god didnt want you to fart then he’d not create you to fart when you go into that position. The human body is gods Magnum opus angry he made including its functions
But why would he need to have sex in the first place? Jesus doesnt need to reproduce as he is God no?
 
But why would he need to have sex in the first place? Jesus doesnt need to reproduce as he is God no?
That’s the point he DIDNT need to have sex so he didn’t but there’s nothing wrong with it

Now illl be honest originally humans were supposed to procreate in a different way but after the fall the cosmology became corrupted and thus humans adapted to breed via sex however that was all according to Gods will for humanity. That’s why in heaven humans have no need for sex and stuff

But yeah Jesus being the literal word of
God hide him like gods body and the Father as the Brain and Holy Spirit as the organs and blood. So yeah I mean God didn’t need to have kids why would he. Do you know how terrible that would be cos you’d literally have a dynasty of demigods who would rule the world like the Pope on Turbo steroids even Muslims would bow to him :lul::lul::lul::lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: alexias
I will read the book you named but;

Weak analogy fallacy basically means the exact same thing as "comparison is flawed." Re-read the above.

If the getting out of bed comparison is flawed, your comparison is necessarily flawed since God doesn't get sexual urges.
You don't seem to understand my objection

Staying in bed or getting out of bed don't get you closer or away from God because God does niether of those

Whereas God does not have sex instead of having sex, so the first act gets you closer to him than the latter

As for sexual urges or desires in general, likewise, extinguishing them or keeping them under control is more Godly than cultivating them & being controlled by them. Why ? Because God has also extinguished all his desires by never having them in the first place & he is obviously in control over them, since they are non-existent.
 
He had access to literal Jewish and Roman elite Women stacies who worshipped him as a literal god


You have nothing that can compare
ye ik im not on his level im just saying im alittle surperior
 
You don't seem to understand my objection

I am literally the one making the objection.

Just go back to reddit with this 80 IQ shit and realize there are no smart Christians.

Whereas God does not have sex instead of having sex, so the first act gets you closer to him than the latter

If I respond with "he doesn't have the urges" that is the exact equivalent of you saying he doesn't get into bed in the first place.

I am going with your comparison of human beings to god.

As for sexual urges or desires in general, likewise, extinguishing them or keeping them under control is more Godly than cultivating them & being controlled by them. Why ? Because God has also extinguished all his desires by never having them in the first place & he is obviously in control over them, since they are non-existent.

Not the argument. I'll read the book you named soon enough but there seems to be no reason to believe in God.
 
I am literally the one making the objection.

Just go back to reddit with this 80 IQ shit and realize there are no smart Christians.



If I respond with "he doesn't have the urges" that is the exact equivalent of you saying he doesn't get into bed in the first place.

I am going with your comparison of human beings to god.



Not the argument. I'll read the book you named soon enough but there seems to be no reason to believe in God.
This is honestly a waste of time.

We are not essentially a body. Desires are associated with the body, not the higher soul [excluding animal & vegetative soil which help the body perform basic functions]

You seem totally incapable of understanding the fact our rational soul, the one which engages in discursive reasoning, is capable of detaching itself from the body. I'm talking about this getting in control

This rational soul then gets to contemplate the universal soul, which contemplates the intellects & intelligibles - ending with the universal intellect contemplating the One - Godhead

The higher & essential aspects of human beings are divine. So the comparison to God is totally justified & in fact, we can even say God is present in every being apart from the body, which is pure privation.
 
Last edited:
ye ik im not on his level im just saying im alittle surperior
You’re not superior in anyway that’s the truth. No woman ever calls you pretty sexy or says there’s anything remarkable about you. Your are an bland unremarkable normgroid
 
Further proof that Christianity is cucked.
Zeus fucked all the gigastacies though
Later pagans, esp Platonists, denied all of that as false or reinterpreted it

But Platonism is basically the Christianity of the elite, so you may have a point there
 
  • +1
Reactions: Soter
You’re not superior in anyway that’s the truth. No woman ever calls you pretty sexy or says there’s anything remarkable about you. Your are an bland unremarkable normgroid
nope my grandma says im handsome

jokes aside multiple women have complimented my looks
 

Similar threads

foidaddict
Replies
4
Views
81
SvtvnTr14d
SvtvnTr14d
nsk4ll
Replies
16
Views
243
wastedspermcel
wastedspermcel
Gentleman Unknown
Replies
5
Views
179
enlightful
enlightful
PsychoDsk
Replies
27
Views
395
abumaaan
abumaaan

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top