Good looks have nothing to do with genes for survival

Deleted member 2632

Deleted member 2632

Kraken
Joined
Jul 30, 2019
Posts
5,894
Reputation
19,099
After reading a post about how blue eyes dont pose any benefits to survival in the wild, I realized something I read a long time ago

Females of most animal species do not pick mates who offer the most protection, most likely to survive, or most alpha qualities

Females choose mates who are the best LOOKING to them because it means high chance offspring will also be attractive to find more mates

Females breed to spawn Chads to bang all the other females ensuring the population to continue

Only in animals when males kill each other for females will they develop evolutionary traits for survival and fighting, in animals were males are more passive like peacocks or malard ducks, males will be chosen purely based off how pretty they are to females
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 275, Deleted member 470 and onnysk
After reading a post about how blue eyes dont pose any benefits to survival in the wild, I realized something I read a long time ago

Females of most animal species do not pick mates who offer the most protection, most likely to survive, or most alpha qualities

Females choose mates who are the best LOOKING to them because it means high chance offspring will also be attractive to find more mates

Females breed to spawn Chads to bang all the other females ensuring the population to continue

Only in animals when males kill each other for females will they develop evolutionary traits for survival and fighting, in animals were males are more passive like peacocks or malard ducks, males will be chosen purely based off how pretty they are to females
Attractiveness indicates health and fertility. Good looking people are more intelligent. There is a high correlation between bone structure and testosterone.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hector, Bennett, Deleted member 2745 and 5 others
This is somewhat true, but then again there are females with strong bone structures and some males with weak bone structure, do you really think some women out mog men in T levels naturally?

Also intelligence and health being somewhat correlated with looks might be a simple byproduct, a side effect of chasing good looks

Its not a concidence males in several animal species are much better looking than females
 
Are you talking about caveman or modern day men? Or ducks? Chad ducks with blue eyes?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Cleftcel
This is somewhat true, but then again there are females with strong bone structures and some males with weak bone structure, do you really think some women out mog men in T levels naturally?

Also intelligence and health being somewhat correlated with looks might be a simple byproduct, a side effect of chasing good looks

Its not a concidence males in several animal species are much better looking than females
But I will say that blue eyes serve no evolutionary purpose
 
most retarded thread ive seen on here
 
Are you talking about caveman or modern day men? Or ducks? Chad ducks with blue eyes?

In most mammal and bird species, females choose mates based on how they look because it will allow their offspring to attract mates to reproduce, rather than choosing survival traits that would make males better hunters, or faster, or more camoflauged, or whatever
But I will say that blue eyes serve no evolutionary purpose

Evolutionary traits are not always based on survival of the fittest, blue eyes do serve a purpose, if offspring have blue eyes they will find mates easier thus allowing their genes to carry on
 
In human species males tend to complete with eatch other for the female attracrion kinda like deers, then female chooses who ever is the Best. Mariage and pair bonding was invented to keep the lower Men in chceck when socieity developed.
If the lesser Men dont have anything to fuck they tend to be aggresive and violent(like incels)
Females after ther inicial gay phase for preetyboys choose chads because he wins versus other males, strong bones= was feed enough. Good facial geowth=no mouthbreathing(more air to the brain), Wide shoulders= more strenght and percieved hunting skills, lomger legs= more suited for running for food. And So on and So forth.

Beauty=better survival skills
 
most retarded thread ive seen on here
this
Attractiveness indicates health and fertility. Good looking people are more intelligent. There is a high correlation between bone structure and testosterone.
Fabio Frittelli was a chad yet died cause of cancer.
 
Last edited:
Sexual selection and natural selection do seem to be separate in certain species, of which humans appear to be one of them. There are attractive traits which appear to have nothing to do with survival, such as long hair in females, and as mentioned, blue eyes.
 
I think there was a research on how females would prefer to sleep and get impregnated by good looking males then look for a large male or males with resources to protect her during her pregnancy.

So basically females get in relationship with a provider but cheat on him with good looking males and have the provider look after her during pregnancy.

But if a male is good looking, large and have resources/status. That male is ideal for the female.
 
  • +1
Reactions: tylerhunter97
Sigh, facial harmony tells a female your genetics makeup. The better harmony the less genetic defect you have. Bone structure tells a female how strong your immune system is. Only people with strong immune systems tend to have good bone structure. Test is related to bone structure. However growth hormone is related to dick size
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2227
Sigh, facial harmony tells a female your genetics makeup. The better harmony the less genetic defect you have. Bone structure tells a female how strong your immune system is.
And the more resistant to infection and parasites.

I think he was talking more about hunting, providing, protecting, and fighting success as determinants of attractiveness, for which they don't appear to be.

The example of blue eyes as attractive does not appear to be related to health indicators or provision of resources, and thus fall squarely in the realm of sexual selection.
 

Similar threads

Edgarpill
Replies
26
Views
2K
xombie
xombie
ragecel
Replies
21
Views
2K
incel-at-heart
I
Gengar
Replies
9
Views
299
incel-at-heart
I
mortis
Replies
68
Views
3K
Deleted member 46941
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top