good news, townie

[_MVP_]

c you cant certainty guarantee it just reduce the likelyhood crime.

c reduce likelyhood of getting caught to a minimum crime

you cant guarantee you will get away with crime but you can reduce the likelyhood u will get caught to a minimum, if you can do that, the crime will be worth doing

@paladincel_

 

[_MVP_]

townie, what do you think of forensics as a flawed, bogus pseudoscience?

maybe the cop-state is indeed not all powerful as we thought

we have been tricked by csi miami and medical detectives

 

[paladincel_]

townie, what do you think of forensics as a flawed, bogus pseudoscience?

maybe the cop-state is indeed not all powerful as we thought

we have been tricked by csi miami and medical detectives

The likelihood of your DNA sample really getting you caught is low, and is not a factor unless you are either tied to the crime by something else which leads them to forcing you to giving them your DNA sample, or, being in a country where having an ID requires giving a DNA sample.

I don't think it qualifies as pseudoscience, but is it as advanced as people think? Not at all. Cameras are the biggest obstacle but as long as you find a point without them and change clothes, there's no evidence.

 

[Lord Shadow]

townie, what do you think of forensics as a flawed, bogus pseudoscience?

maybe the cop-state is indeed not all powerful as we thought

we have been tricked by csi miami and medical detectives

Yeah i mean for DNA, it can only put a suspect in a crime scene if there are direct links or matches with an existing database, it doesn't guarantee we'll know who done iit.CCameras and other forms of surveillances can be tricky so investigators usually use a combination of different kinds of evidence to catch their suspect like dna, eyewitness testimony, and any other digital footprints. Which is haard to get around depending on where you are