Good Surface Features on a Bad Skull

[thecel]

Here’s a woman who has excellent surface-level features on an unfortunate skeletal base.

She has blue (ideal) eye color, clear and healthy skin, pearly white teeth, and great hair. Helped by makeup but probably still good without it are her lips, lashes, and brows.

Too bad her bone structure gives her subpar facial proportions: overly close-set and narrow eye orbits, an overly long and narrow face shape, a narrow palate, and a downward-rotated occlusal plane (see how she looks so smilemaxxed).

Her with improved ratios to make her fog:



Would you?

 

[TheLightOfMyLife]

mouth looks freakish but eyes are much better

 

[greycel]

No, but you're right.
She actually suffered from downgrowth. Has a similar skull shape to me

 

[sigma boii]

Your morphs are so retarded man

 

[thecel]

Your morphs are so retarded man

you don't think i made her look a lot more aesthetic?

 

[sigma boii]

you don't think i made her look a lot more aesthetic?

It just looks like a goofy cartoon

 

[esoterik]

nigga, you just turned her into a looney tune tier goofy face

she looks like she would sell me cocaine + a blowjob as a 2 for 1 deal

stop touching photoshop, your psl morphs are so fucking dumb, the pfl on them look goofy

 

[Ultimate Subhuman™]

I Would

 

[Richard Spencer]

she looks jewish

 

[thecel]

Your morphs are so retarded man

It just looks like a goofy cartoon

nigga, you just turned her into a looney tune tier goofy face

stop touching photoshop, your psl morphs are so fucking dumb, the pfl on them look goofy

Ok guys. It seems that your brains are highly sensitive to the uncanny valley, much more than my brain is.

In order to make the uncanny valley problem with Photoshop morphs less of an issue, I put both the pictures through an AI cartoonify filter:



If you say the first one looks better still, I’ll just conclude that you have no taste in aesthetics.

 

[RecessedChinCel]

Ok guys. It seems that your brains are highly sensitive to the uncanny valley, much more than my brain is.

In order to make the uncanny valley problem with Photoshop morphs less of an issue, I put both the pictures through an AI cartoonify filter:

View attachment 3705680View attachment 3705681

If you say the first one looks better still, I’ll just conclude that you have no taste in aesthetics.

Her eyes are too far apart in the morph imo

 

[Vultus Tui Res]

View attachment 3705555

Here’s a woman who has excellent surface-level features on an unfortunate skeletal base.

She has blue (ideal) eye color, clear and healthy skin, pearly white teeth, and great hair. Helped by makeup but probably still good without it are her lips, lashes, and brows.

Too bad her bone structure gives her subpar facial proportions: overly close-set and narrow eye orbits, an overly long and narrow face shape, a narrow palate, and a downward-rotated occlusal plane (see how she looks so smilemaxxed).

Her with improved ratios to make her fog:

View attachment 3705648

Would you?

I would not, but I like your avi.

 

[Lookologist003]

Yeah man. If looks was architecture, good, normal, facial ratios are the foundation of a house. Poor ratios is like building in a marsh. No more potent LDAR fuel than realizing your facial ratios are bottom of the barrel.

Wow, what a fucking shit analogy.

 

[Gonthar]

Here’s a woman who has excellent surface-level features on an unfortunate skeletal base.

Lol, the good features and smooth skin are probably just a filter...