Great example of PROPER under-eye support and BAD under-eye support

[LoveSuckingFeet]

Guess which one is which? It's pretty obvious.

 

[Heinrich Schmidt]

This undereye support or death.

 

[LoveSuckingFeet]

Shit thread mods delete this and ban this guy pls

kill urself you zero appeal, ugly, fucking ogre-incel.

ugly fucking face that you can do nothing about to ascend. fucking over. you goddamn oaf.

 

[i_love_roosters]

Top 20 worst threads off all time

 

[sudanguy]

Guess which one is which? It's pretty obvious.



View attachment 2775702

No one on this forum has explained what under eye support is to this day

 

[optimisticzoomer]

No one on this forum has explained what under eye support is to this day

Psl meme

 

[sudanguy]

Psl meme

What? Explain what it is

 

[optimisticzoomer]

What? Explain what it is

A psl meme

 

[lestoa]

LoveSuckingFeet​

 

[ElTruecel]

No one on this forum has explained what under eye support is to this day

What about @Pei and @LeonidasGui

 

[mvp2v1]

Psl meme

No one on this forum has explained what under eye support is to this day

I’ll explain its simple. It’s the orbits height to width ratio. Verticaly short orbital = good under eye support, verticaly tall orbital = bad under eye support. Remember that the quality of the support is also dependent on your soft tissues and how your bones distribute them. You can see in simulations (you will have to search .org for source) that as the jaws become smaller and recessed the cheekbones fall down and back and seemingly much of the verticaly growth of the face goes into the orbitals (which also loose width).

 

[Deleted member 47180]

I’ll explain its simple. It’s the orbits height to width ratio. Verticaly short orbital = good under eye support, verticaly tall orbital = bad under eye support. Remember that the quality of the support is also dependent on your soft tissues and how your bones distribute them. You can see in simulations (you will have to search .org for source) that as the jaws become smaller and recessed the cheekbones fall down and back and seemingly much of the verticaly growth of the face goes into the orbitals (which also loose width).

Its not just vertically short orbital but u also need bone mass on top of that

 

[mvp2v1]

Its not just vertically short orbital but u also need bone mass on top of that

more bone mass more "under eye support" you will have, thats true. but more is not always better. Prettyboys, which just means less development of bones, for example can have attractive under-eye support without high bone density.

 

[Heinrich Schmidt]

I’ll explain its simple. It’s the orbits height to width ratio. Verticaly short orbital = good under eye support, verticaly tall orbital = bad under eye support. Remember that the quality of the support is also dependent on your soft tissues and how your bones distribute them. You can see in simulations (you will have to search .org for source) that as the jaws become smaller and recessed the cheekbones fall down and back and seemingly much of the verticaly growth of the face goes into the orbitals (which also loose width).

It's also depends on how on forward grown the orbital rims are (specifically the infraorbital rims/lower orbital bones) as well as how far the cheekbones anteriorly project.

 

[mvp2v1]

It's also depends on how on forward grown the orbital rims are (specifically the infraorbital rims/lower orbital bones) as well as how far the cheekbones anteriorly project.

ya i forgot to mention that usually the orbitals shape is correlated with how forward-placed the cheekbones (and maxilla) are. which displaces soft tissues favorably.

 

[piec]

No one on this forum has explained what under eye support is to this day

placement of zygos (high-low), projection of zygos, compactness of infras (how close they are to the eyeball), projection of infras (orbital vector)
its not rocket science

 

[Heinrich Schmidt]

ya i forgot to mention that usually the orbitals shape is correlated with how forward-placed the cheekbones (and maxilla) are. which displaces soft tissues favorably.

Eye orbit shape is also dependent on race as well (I'm surprised most people haven't said this yet).

 

[sudanguy]

placement of zygos (high-low), projection of zygos, compactness of infras (how close they are to the eyeball), projection of infras (orbital vector)
its not rocket science ugly nigger

It’s pretty hard to understand you fucking jackass

 

[LoveSuckingFeet]

placement of zygos (high-low), projection of zygos, compactness of infras (how close they are to the eyeball), projection of infras (orbital vector)
its not rocket science

 

[lonelycurry]

That's just two niggers.

 

[chadintraining]

This undereye support or death.
View attachment 2775707View attachment 2775708View attachment 2775710

Who’s that

 

[Heinrich Schmidt]

Who’s that

It's Maximilian Henhappel.

 

[chadintraining]

It's Maximilian Henhappel.

He kind of looks like a higher appeal version of Barrett ngl

 

[Heinrich Schmidt]

He kind of looks like a higher appeal version of Barrett ngl

True, I had that idea in mind when I first saw him as well. @Pei thoughts?

 

[Pei]

more bone mass more "under eye support" you will have, thats true. but more is not always better. Prettyboys, which just means less development of bones, for example can have attractive under-eye support without high bone density. View attachment 2777750View attachment 2777751View attachment 2777752

Barrett has high bones but is prettyboy

 

[Pei]

True, I had that idea in mind when I first saw him as well. @Pei thoughts?

Barrett mog

 

[Heinrich Schmidt]

Barrett mog

Max has higher appeal and looks less alien.

 

[LoveSuckingFeet]

placement of zygos (high-low), projection of zygos, compactness of infras (how close they are to the eyeball), projection of infras (orbital vector)
its not rocket science

how is this under eye area?

 

[piec]

View attachment 2778071

how is this under eye area?

its ok, mediocre but not recessed compact infras with mid-set zygos