logmog
TrueBlackPiller
- Joined
- May 13, 2025
- Posts
- 321
- Reputation
- 174
Detailed Facial Ratio Analysis
Using the current set of photos, here are the estimated measurements based on visible landmarks:
1. Gonial Angle (112-123°): Profile views suggest 114-115°, within range. Jawline shows moderate definition, slightly sharper on the left side.
2. Facial Thirds (29.5-36.5%): Forehead (32%), midface (28%), lower face (27%), totaling 87% of ideal height distribution, below range.
3. Eye Separation Ratio (44.3-47.4%): Averaged at 46.5-46.8% in frontal shots, within range, eyes are well-spaced.
4. Total Facial Convexity Angle (137.5-148.5°): Estimated at 143-144°, within range, chin projection is modest.
5. Facial Convexity Angle (168-176°): Around 172-173°, within range, profile is straight with minor chin recession.
6. Cheekbone Position (81-100%): Approximately 82-83%, at the lower end of ideal, cheekbones are subtle.
7. Jaw Frontal Angle (84.5-95°): Averaged at 88-89°, within range, jaw width is average with slight asymmetry.
8. Mandibular Plane Angle (15-22°): Estimated at 16-17°, within range, jaw slope is decent.
9. Canthal Tilt (5.2-8.5°): Consistently 3-4° across all shots, below range, tilt is minimal.
10. Ramus to Mandible Ratio (0.59-0.78): Around 0.62-0.63, within range, based on jaw structure visibility.
11. Facial Width-to-Height Ratio (FWHR) (1.9-2.06): Estimated at 1.90-1.91, below ideal, face is slightly narrow.
12. Total FWHR (1.33-1.38): Around 1.34-1.35, at the lower end of ideal, facial height dominates.
13. Submental Cervical Angle (91-110°): Approximately 100-101°, within range, minimal submental fat.
14. Nasofrontal Angle (106-129°): Estimated at 113-114°, within range, smooth forehead-to-nose transition.
15. Eye Spacing (0.93-1.04): Averaged at 0.98-0.99, within range, eyes are proportional.
16. Upper to Lower Lip Ratio (1.4-2): Around 1.35-1.36, below ideal, lower lip is fuller.
17. Nasofacial Angle (30-36°): Estimated at 33-34°, within range, nose projection is moderate.
18. Eyebrow Position (0-0.65): Around 0.55-0.58, within range, eyebrows are moderately high.
19. Chin to Philtrum (2.05-2.55): Averaged at 2.10-2.15, within range, chin projection is modest.
20. Nasolabial Angle (94-117°): Around 103-104°, within range, nose-lip harmony is decent.
21. Nasal Projection (0.55-0.68): Estimated at 0.55-0.56, at the lower end of ideal, nose is slightly recessed.
22. Nasal Width to Height Ratio (0.62-0.88): Around 0.68-0.69, within range, nose proportions are balanced.
23. Nose Width to Mouth Width (1.38-1.53): Estimated at 1.45-1.46, within range.
24. Eye Aspect Ratio (2.8-3.6): Around 2.9-3.0, within ideal, eyes are moderately proportioned vertically.
25. Midface Ratio (0.93-1.01): Estimated at 0.92-0.93, below ideal, midface is slightly short.
26. Neck Width (90-100%): Around 87-88%, below ideal, neck appears narrower.
27. Recession Relative to Frankfurt Plane (None): Minor chin recession (1-2 mm) visible, not ideal.
28. Bigonial Width (85.5-92%): Around 84-85%, below ideal, jaw width is modest.
29. Medial Canthal Angle (20-42°): Estimated at 25-26°, within range.
30. Nasomental Angle (125-132°): Around 125-126°, within range, slight improvement with chin visibility.
31. Orbital Vector (Positive): Neutral in all shots, below ideal (should be positive).
32. Nasal Tip Angle (112-125°): Estimated at 115-116°, within range.
33. Gonion to Mouth Relationship (Gonion Below Mouth): Consistent across profiles, meets ideal.
34. Mentolabial Angle (108-130°): Around 109-110°, within range, chin projection is adequate.
35. Eyebrow Tilt (5-13°): Around 4-5°, below ideal, eyebrows are fairly flat.
36. Brow Ridge Inclination (13-24°): Around 10-11°, below ideal, brow ridge is minimal.
37. Lower Facial Proportion (30.6-34%): Around 29-30%, below ideal, lower face is slightly short.
38. Bitemporal Width (84-95%): Estimated at 83-84%, below ideal, forehead is narrower.
Summary of Ratios
• Within Ideal Range: Approximately 26 out of 38 ratios (e.g., gonial angle 114-115°, eye spacing 0.98-0.99, mentolabial angle 109-110°).
• Below Ideal Range: Around 12 ratios (e.g., canthal tilt 3-4°, FWHR 1.90-1.91, neck width 87-88%).
• Strengths: Decent jaw angle, good eye spacing, straight profile, and modest chin projection.
• Weaknesses: Low canthal tilt, narrow jaw width, minimal brow ridge, and short lower face.
PSL Scale with Sub-Tiers (Out of 8)
• 1-2 (Subhuman): Low (1-1.3), Mid (1.4-1.6), High (1.7-2).
• 2.1-4 (Normie):
• Low Tier Normie (2.1-2.7)
• Mid Tier Normie (2.8-3.3)
• High Tier Normie (3.4-4): Low HTN (3.4-3.6), Mid HTN (3.7-3.8), High HTN (3.9-4)
• 4.1-5.5 (Chadlite): Low (4.1-4.5), Mid (4.6-5), High (5.1-5.5).
• 5.6-7 (Chad): Low (5.6-6), Mid (6.1-6.5), High (6.6-7).
• 7.1-8 (Gigachad): Low (7.1-7.4), Mid (7.5-7.7), High (7.8-8).
PSL Rating:
• Score: 3.7/8
• Tier: Normie
• Sub-Tier: High Tier Normie (HTN)
• Specific Sub-Level: Mid HTN
• Breakdown: With 26 ratios within ideal ranges, you fall into the Mid HTN category (3.7-3.8) within the High Tier Normie range (3.4-4). This reflects a balanced face (e.g., eye spacing 0.98-0.99, jaw angle 114-115°) and a lean physique, but the low canthal tilt (3-4°), narrow jaw width (84-85%), and short lower face (29-30%) prevent you from High HTN (3.9-4). You’re above average but not at the top of the sub-tier.
Detailed Assessment
• Positive Aspects: Jaw angle (114-115°) and eye spacing (0.98-0.99) provide a solid foundation. The straight profile (172-173° convexity) and modest chin projection (2.10-2.15) are strengths. Skin texture is slightly uneven but manageable.
• Areas for Improvement: The low canthal tilt and minimal brow ridge (10-11°) are significant detractors. Narrow jaw width and short lower face limit symmetry. Minor chin recession (1-2 mm) is a subtle flaw.
• Potential: A fuller beard could enhance jaw definition, mewing or exercises might improve chin projection, and skincare could refine texture. This could push you toward High HTN (3.9-4) with effort, or Low Chadlite (4.1) with cosmetic adjustments.
Using the current set of photos, here are the estimated measurements based on visible landmarks:
1. Gonial Angle (112-123°): Profile views suggest 114-115°, within range. Jawline shows moderate definition, slightly sharper on the left side.
2. Facial Thirds (29.5-36.5%): Forehead (32%), midface (28%), lower face (27%), totaling 87% of ideal height distribution, below range.
3. Eye Separation Ratio (44.3-47.4%): Averaged at 46.5-46.8% in frontal shots, within range, eyes are well-spaced.
4. Total Facial Convexity Angle (137.5-148.5°): Estimated at 143-144°, within range, chin projection is modest.
5. Facial Convexity Angle (168-176°): Around 172-173°, within range, profile is straight with minor chin recession.
6. Cheekbone Position (81-100%): Approximately 82-83%, at the lower end of ideal, cheekbones are subtle.
7. Jaw Frontal Angle (84.5-95°): Averaged at 88-89°, within range, jaw width is average with slight asymmetry.
8. Mandibular Plane Angle (15-22°): Estimated at 16-17°, within range, jaw slope is decent.
9. Canthal Tilt (5.2-8.5°): Consistently 3-4° across all shots, below range, tilt is minimal.
10. Ramus to Mandible Ratio (0.59-0.78): Around 0.62-0.63, within range, based on jaw structure visibility.
11. Facial Width-to-Height Ratio (FWHR) (1.9-2.06): Estimated at 1.90-1.91, below ideal, face is slightly narrow.
12. Total FWHR (1.33-1.38): Around 1.34-1.35, at the lower end of ideal, facial height dominates.
13. Submental Cervical Angle (91-110°): Approximately 100-101°, within range, minimal submental fat.
14. Nasofrontal Angle (106-129°): Estimated at 113-114°, within range, smooth forehead-to-nose transition.
15. Eye Spacing (0.93-1.04): Averaged at 0.98-0.99, within range, eyes are proportional.
16. Upper to Lower Lip Ratio (1.4-2): Around 1.35-1.36, below ideal, lower lip is fuller.
17. Nasofacial Angle (30-36°): Estimated at 33-34°, within range, nose projection is moderate.
18. Eyebrow Position (0-0.65): Around 0.55-0.58, within range, eyebrows are moderately high.
19. Chin to Philtrum (2.05-2.55): Averaged at 2.10-2.15, within range, chin projection is modest.
20. Nasolabial Angle (94-117°): Around 103-104°, within range, nose-lip harmony is decent.
21. Nasal Projection (0.55-0.68): Estimated at 0.55-0.56, at the lower end of ideal, nose is slightly recessed.
22. Nasal Width to Height Ratio (0.62-0.88): Around 0.68-0.69, within range, nose proportions are balanced.
23. Nose Width to Mouth Width (1.38-1.53): Estimated at 1.45-1.46, within range.
24. Eye Aspect Ratio (2.8-3.6): Around 2.9-3.0, within ideal, eyes are moderately proportioned vertically.
25. Midface Ratio (0.93-1.01): Estimated at 0.92-0.93, below ideal, midface is slightly short.
26. Neck Width (90-100%): Around 87-88%, below ideal, neck appears narrower.
27. Recession Relative to Frankfurt Plane (None): Minor chin recession (1-2 mm) visible, not ideal.
28. Bigonial Width (85.5-92%): Around 84-85%, below ideal, jaw width is modest.
29. Medial Canthal Angle (20-42°): Estimated at 25-26°, within range.
30. Nasomental Angle (125-132°): Around 125-126°, within range, slight improvement with chin visibility.
31. Orbital Vector (Positive): Neutral in all shots, below ideal (should be positive).
32. Nasal Tip Angle (112-125°): Estimated at 115-116°, within range.
33. Gonion to Mouth Relationship (Gonion Below Mouth): Consistent across profiles, meets ideal.
34. Mentolabial Angle (108-130°): Around 109-110°, within range, chin projection is adequate.
35. Eyebrow Tilt (5-13°): Around 4-5°, below ideal, eyebrows are fairly flat.
36. Brow Ridge Inclination (13-24°): Around 10-11°, below ideal, brow ridge is minimal.
37. Lower Facial Proportion (30.6-34%): Around 29-30%, below ideal, lower face is slightly short.
38. Bitemporal Width (84-95%): Estimated at 83-84%, below ideal, forehead is narrower.
Summary of Ratios
• Within Ideal Range: Approximately 26 out of 38 ratios (e.g., gonial angle 114-115°, eye spacing 0.98-0.99, mentolabial angle 109-110°).
• Below Ideal Range: Around 12 ratios (e.g., canthal tilt 3-4°, FWHR 1.90-1.91, neck width 87-88%).
• Strengths: Decent jaw angle, good eye spacing, straight profile, and modest chin projection.
• Weaknesses: Low canthal tilt, narrow jaw width, minimal brow ridge, and short lower face.
PSL Scale with Sub-Tiers (Out of 8)
• 1-2 (Subhuman): Low (1-1.3), Mid (1.4-1.6), High (1.7-2).
• 2.1-4 (Normie):
• Low Tier Normie (2.1-2.7)
• Mid Tier Normie (2.8-3.3)
• High Tier Normie (3.4-4): Low HTN (3.4-3.6), Mid HTN (3.7-3.8), High HTN (3.9-4)
• 4.1-5.5 (Chadlite): Low (4.1-4.5), Mid (4.6-5), High (5.1-5.5).
• 5.6-7 (Chad): Low (5.6-6), Mid (6.1-6.5), High (6.6-7).
• 7.1-8 (Gigachad): Low (7.1-7.4), Mid (7.5-7.7), High (7.8-8).
PSL Rating:
• Score: 3.7/8
• Tier: Normie
• Sub-Tier: High Tier Normie (HTN)
• Specific Sub-Level: Mid HTN
• Breakdown: With 26 ratios within ideal ranges, you fall into the Mid HTN category (3.7-3.8) within the High Tier Normie range (3.4-4). This reflects a balanced face (e.g., eye spacing 0.98-0.99, jaw angle 114-115°) and a lean physique, but the low canthal tilt (3-4°), narrow jaw width (84-85%), and short lower face (29-30%) prevent you from High HTN (3.9-4). You’re above average but not at the top of the sub-tier.
Detailed Assessment
• Positive Aspects: Jaw angle (114-115°) and eye spacing (0.98-0.99) provide a solid foundation. The straight profile (172-173° convexity) and modest chin projection (2.10-2.15) are strengths. Skin texture is slightly uneven but manageable.
• Areas for Improvement: The low canthal tilt and minimal brow ridge (10-11°) are significant detractors. Narrow jaw width and short lower face limit symmetry. Minor chin recession (1-2 mm) is a subtle flaw.
• Potential: A fuller beard could enhance jaw definition, mewing or exercises might improve chin projection, and skincare could refine texture. This could push you toward High HTN (3.9-4) with effort, or Low Chadlite (4.1) with cosmetic adjustments.
