Growth plates status

S

Sardartalal

Iron
Joined
Jan 2, 2026
Posts
7
Reputation
1
I am 17 and 5'6 just got the x-rays am I cooked
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250323-222719.png
    Screenshot_20250323-222719.png
    518.1 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot_20250323-222829.png
    Screenshot_20250323-222829.png
    583.4 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot_20250323-223058.png
    Screenshot_20250323-223058.png
    670.9 KB · Views: 0
Not over but gains might be negligible
AI and HGH asap
 
”become retarded”
Holy cope
Just say you’re too retarded to do bloods
you're coping nigger. Such a negligible difference for something most people lack the capacity to properly execute.

All patients grew during the initial 24 months of treatment; hence, all within-group changes are highly significant (between-group comparisons are shown in parentheses): mean change (SE)—AI, +14.0 (0.8) cm; GH, +17.1 (0.9) cm; AI/GH, +18.9 (0.8) cm (P < .0006 between groups) (P value represents the probability of difference in mean changes between groups for all parameters. ANCOVA was used and model adjusted for baseline height.). The expected height gain in boys with height SDS of −2.0 is +10.1 cm in the same age period (25). At 36 months, those who continued treatments grew more (between 24 and 36 months) than those who discontinued: continued—AI, +4.9 (1.0) cm; GH, +6.8 (0.4) cm; AI/GH, +7.8 (0.5) cm (P = .032) (P value represents the probability of difference in mean changes between groups for all parameters. ANCOVA was used and model adjusted for baseline height.); discontinued—AI, +4.1 (1.1) cm; GH, +2.1 (0.6) cm; AI/GH, 3.0 (0.5) cm (P = .103) (P value represents the probability of difference in mean changes between groups for all parameters. ANCOVA was used and model adjusted for baseline height.) (P = < .001) [P value of overall difference in mean changes (from 24 mo to 36 mo) between continued and discontinued group]. Mean absolute height SDS in all three groups was comparable at baseline (−2.2 to −2.4 SDS) and improved at 24 months: AI, −1.73 (0.12) SDS; GH, −1.43 (0.14) SDS; AI/GH, −1.25 (0.12) SDS (P < .0012) (P value represents the probability of difference in mean changes between groups for all parameters. ANCOVA was used and model adjusted for baseline height.) (Figure 1A). The change in bone age in 24 months from baseline was: AI, +2.1 (0.3) years; GH, +2.5 (0.1) years; AI/GH, +1.9 (0.2) years (P = .002) (P value represents the probability of difference in mean changes between groups for all parameters. ANCOVA was used and model adjusted for baseline height.), larger change for the GH group (Figure 1B). Height SDS adjusted for bone age at 24 months was: AI, −1.06 (0.14); GH, −1.11 (0.20); AI/GH, −0.41 (0.13) (P = .0002) (P value represents the probability of difference in mean changes between groups for all parameters. ANCOVA was used and model adjusted for baseline height.).

Not to mention, mean age of 14.1, anyways whatever helps you feel better.
 
you're coping nigger. Such a negligible difference for something most people lack the capacity to properly execute.

All patients grew during the initial 24 months of treatment; hence, all within-group changes are highly significant (between-group comparisons are shown in parentheses): mean change (SE)—AI, +14.0 (0.8) cm; GH, +17.1 (0.9) cm; AI/GH, +18.9 (0.8) cm (P < .0006 between groups) (P value represents the probability of difference in mean changes between groups for all parameters. ANCOVA was used and model adjusted for baseline height.). The expected height gain in boys with height SDS of −2.0 is +10.1 cm in the same age period (25). At 36 months, those who continued treatments grew more (between 24 and 36 months) than those who discontinued: continued—AI, +4.9 (1.0) cm; GH, +6.8 (0.4) cm; AI/GH, +7.8 (0.5) cm (P = .032) (P value represents the probability of difference in mean changes between groups for all parameters. ANCOVA was used and model adjusted for baseline height.); discontinued—AI, +4.1 (1.1) cm; GH, +2.1 (0.6) cm; AI/GH, 3.0 (0.5) cm (P = .103) (P value represents the probability of difference in mean changes between groups for all parameters. ANCOVA was used and model adjusted for baseline height.) (P = < .001) [P value of overall difference in mean changes (from 24 mo to 36 mo) between continued and discontinued group]. Mean absolute height SDS in all three groups was comparable at baseline (−2.2 to −2.4 SDS) and improved at 24 months: AI, −1.73 (0.12) SDS; GH, −1.43 (0.14) SDS; AI/GH, −1.25 (0.12) SDS (P < .0012) (P value represents the probability of difference in mean changes between groups for all parameters. ANCOVA was used and model adjusted for baseline height.) (Figure 1A). The change in bone age in 24 months from baseline was: AI, +2.1 (0.3) years; GH, +2.5 (0.1) years; AI/GH, +1.9 (0.2) years (P = .002) (P value represents the probability of difference in mean changes between groups for all parameters. ANCOVA was used and model adjusted for baseline height.), larger change for the GH group (Figure 1B). Height SDS adjusted for bone age at 24 months was: AI, −1.06 (0.14); GH, −1.11 (0.20); AI/GH, −0.41 (0.13) (P = .0002) (P value represents the probability of difference in mean changes between groups for all parameters. ANCOVA was used and model adjusted for baseline height.).

Not to mention, mean age of 14.1, anyways whatever helps you feel better.
I grew at 17 from hgh
 

Similar threads

truekazak2839
Replies
39
Views
279
WhyNotMe??
WhyNotMe??
L
Replies
2
Views
111
MarlonBlackPill67
MarlonBlackPill67
P
Replies
7
Views
118
Elf
Elf
T
Replies
4
Views
160
brumbalascension
brumbalascension
gurt82647
Replies
5
Views
97
thereallegend
thereallegend

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top