wishIwasSalludon
leave this place behind
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2023
- Posts
- 17,211
- Reputation
- 22,922
Quantum entanglement is the phenomenon of a group of particles being generated, interacting, or sharing spatial proximity in such a way that the quantum state of each particle of the group cannot be described independently of the state of the others, including when the particles are separated by a large distance. The topic of quantum entanglement is at the heart of the disparity between classical and quantum physics: entanglement is a primary feature of quantum mechanics not present in classical mechanics.[1]: 867
Spontaneous parametric down-conversion process can split photons into type II photon pairs with mutually perpendicular polarization.
Measurements of physical properties such as position, momentum, spin, and polarizationperformed on entangled particles can, in some cases, be found to be perfectly correlated. For example, if a pair of entangled particles is generated such that their total spin is known to be zero, and one particle is found to have clockwise spin on a first axis, then the spin of the other particle, measured on the same axis, is found to be anticlockwise. However, this behavior gives rise to seemingly paradoxical effects: any measurement of a particle's properties results in an apparent and irreversible wave function collapse of that particle and changes the original quantum state. With entangled particles, such measurements affect the entangled system as a whole.
Such phenomena were the subject of a 1935 paper by Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen,[2] and several papers by Erwin Schrödingershortly thereafter,[3][4] describing what came to be known as the EPR paradox. Einstein and others considered such behavior impossible, as it violated the local realism view of causality (Einstein referring to it as "spooky action at a distance")[5] and argued that the accepted formulation of quantum mechanics must therefore be incomplete.
Later, however, the counterintuitive predictions of quantum mechanics were verified[6][7][8] in tests where polarization or spin of entangled particles were measured at separate locations, statistically violating Bell's inequality. In earlier tests, it could not be ruled out that the result at one point could have been subtly transmitted to the remote point, affecting the outcome at the second location.[8]However, so-called "loophole-free" Bell tests have since been performed where the locations were sufficiently separated that communications at the speed of light would have taken longer—in one case, 10,000 times longer—than the interval between the measurements.[7][6]
Entanglement produces correlation between the measurements, the mutual information between the entangled particles can be exploited, but any transmission of information at faster-than-light speeds is impossible.[9][10] Quantum entanglement cannot be used for faster-than-light communication.[11]
Quantum entanglement has been demonstrated experimentally with photons,[12][13] electrons,[14][15]top quarks,[16] molecules[17] and even small diamonds.[18] The use of entanglement in communication, computation and quantum radar is an active area of research and development.
@cromagnon @ey88 @moredatesmorerapes
Spontaneous parametric down-conversion process can split photons into type II photon pairs with mutually perpendicular polarization.Measurements of physical properties such as position, momentum, spin, and polarizationperformed on entangled particles can, in some cases, be found to be perfectly correlated. For example, if a pair of entangled particles is generated such that their total spin is known to be zero, and one particle is found to have clockwise spin on a first axis, then the spin of the other particle, measured on the same axis, is found to be anticlockwise. However, this behavior gives rise to seemingly paradoxical effects: any measurement of a particle's properties results in an apparent and irreversible wave function collapse of that particle and changes the original quantum state. With entangled particles, such measurements affect the entangled system as a whole.
Such phenomena were the subject of a 1935 paper by Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen,[2] and several papers by Erwin Schrödingershortly thereafter,[3][4] describing what came to be known as the EPR paradox. Einstein and others considered such behavior impossible, as it violated the local realism view of causality (Einstein referring to it as "spooky action at a distance")[5] and argued that the accepted formulation of quantum mechanics must therefore be incomplete.
Later, however, the counterintuitive predictions of quantum mechanics were verified[6][7][8] in tests where polarization or spin of entangled particles were measured at separate locations, statistically violating Bell's inequality. In earlier tests, it could not be ruled out that the result at one point could have been subtly transmitted to the remote point, affecting the outcome at the second location.[8]However, so-called "loophole-free" Bell tests have since been performed where the locations were sufficiently separated that communications at the speed of light would have taken longer—in one case, 10,000 times longer—than the interval between the measurements.[7][6]
Entanglement produces correlation between the measurements, the mutual information between the entangled particles can be exploited, but any transmission of information at faster-than-light speeds is impossible.[9][10] Quantum entanglement cannot be used for faster-than-light communication.[11]
Quantum entanglement has been demonstrated experimentally with photons,[12][13] electrons,[14][15]top quarks,[16] molecules[17] and even small diamonds.[18] The use of entanglement in communication, computation and quantum radar is an active area of research and development.
@cromagnon @ey88 @moredatesmorerapes
