Guaranteed ascension GTFIH

Jason Voorhees

Jason Voorhees

Mod
Staff
Joined
May 15, 2020
Posts
36,639
Reputation
91,955
Minimum requirement
1) Don't be a manlet(below 5'10)
2)Don't have a terrible frame

Step 1
1000069724


Step-2
1000069725


Step 3. Skip this if your an ethnic

1000069726
 
  • JFL
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: watah, itzyaboyJJ, PLA1092 and 11 others
Haram.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: watah, itzyaboyJJ, HTNcutecel and 8 others
haram
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: watah, itzyaboyJJ, wsada and 4 others
haram
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ, Snowskinned, ayusshhhh and 3 others
Haram
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: wsada and ryuken
haram
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: wsada, deadstock and serialcoper
haram

 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur, wsada, overtier1011 and 2 others
Based
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ascеnd and Aero
You forgot lifts, hairstyle, and jaw fillers
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, cc_7373 and Alt Number 3
Haram
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: wsada and ryuken
haram
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: wsada and ryuken
Very haram bro
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: wsada and ryuken
haram
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: wsada and ryuken
gayram
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aero
Least obvious goy subversion attempt.
 
thats haram bro
 
  • JFL
Reactions: wsada
haram
 
  • JFL
Reactions: wsada
haram bud
 
  • JFL
Reactions: wsada
If your ethnic, none of this applies to you
 
If your ethnic, none of this applies to you
Cope




 
pale non tatted skin is superior
 
  • +1
Reactions: egyptianKang and LancasteR
Good post but change the height requirement to 6'2
 
They're not
Leviticus 19:28, “You shall not make gashes in your flesh for the dead, or incise any marks on yourselves.”

Every priest I spoke 2 stated this much lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: LancasteR
Leviticus 19:28, “You shall not make gashes in your flesh for the dead, or incise any marks on yourselves.”

Every priest I spoke 2 stated this much lol
That's just so wrong...
Do you even know the context for this?

The Orthodox church doesn't prohibit tattoos
 
Yes. That verse is extremely out of context
Generally Christians reject tattoos only Ethiopian, Copts and Serbs love it

As somebody who used to be Ethiopian/eritrean sect I can say about 50% of them you meet will have cross tattoos on their necks and arms, for them it’s a big part of their identity my own m8 and barber has one on his neck and wrist.

But generally most Christian dossier of those 3 reject the idea. Honestly from my research it seems to vary from individual so there’s not the consensus
 
  • +1
Reactions: i_love_roosters
Yes. That verse is extremely out of context

In response to a catechumen who has religious tattoos, and similarly questioned whether the Church really has rejected tattoos.

Not all of the Tradition of the Church has been written out in the form of canons. We generally only have canons to guard against people doing something when there are some people in the Church who are doing it. Tattoos were something that no Christians (outside of the exception I discussed) did. Until only very recently, no Christian group of any kind would have suggested that such a practice was befitting a Christian. Now, in your case, your tattoos were probably very well intentioned, but people often do things in ignorance that they should not do. As St. Paul put it in 1 Corinthians 11:16: "But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, nor do the churches of God."

And on the authority of unwritten Traditions, consider St. Basil's words, which were specifically endorsed by the 4th, 6th, and 7th Ecumenical Councils:

http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf208.vii.xxviii.html

In response to some who have disputed whether Christians really have historically rejected tattoos:

It is not merely coincidence that the pagan Romans, Slavs, and Germans practiced various forms of tattooing, but when Christianity was established in those areas, these practices ceased. Even the word "tattoo" demonstrates that this was not part of the Christian culture, because it is a Polynesian word, that was not in use in English prior to the 18th century, and there is no record of any tattoo artists in either England or the United States prior to the 19th century.”

So it seems it’s kind of up for debate but dtill better to air on caution and not bother unless your African church branch like copic and Ethiopian
 
Failed the first step.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ
Haram
 
  • JFL
Reactions: ryuken

Similar threads

suessgott
Replies
28
Views
642
suessgott
suessgott
50ordeath
Replies
9
Views
199
50ordeath
50ordeath
veppandi guhan
Replies
7
Views
163
normie_joe
normie_joe
N9wiff•˚₊‧⋆.
Replies
13
Views
117
try2beme
try2beme

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top