GYMCELS HELP

RecessedCel5

RecessedCel5

Fixing my bones
Joined
Jan 27, 2021
Posts
4,985
Reputation
6,936
Is it worth it to stay natty , or should i get on gear or SARMs ?.
it seems that i will have to work for 5-6 years to get 50% of what people on gear/SARMS get.
also what are the pros and cons of gear and SARMs,
 
  • +1
Reactions: ItsOverCel
@indianascension @Dr. Bruh @heightface @Chad1212 @max_frisch @cutie @Blackgymmax @Arminius @LastTemp @theworstever
 
natty lifting is a meme
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: ItsOverCel, Deleted member 22780 and RecessedCel5
Is it worth it to stay natty , or should i get on gear or SARMs ?.
it seems that i will have to work for 5-6 years to get 50% of what people on gear/SARMS get.
also what are the pros and cons of gear and SARMs,

Stay natty until you have a good foundation with gear it could shrink your balls and girls will notice that so just be careful that's my advice

How tall r u and do you have a big frame?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 22886 and ItsOverCel
you still need to work out for a while before you can even hop on because you won't know how to train, what movements work for you, and your tendons won't be used to training, it doesn't make those recover quicker.

unsure where you got the idea that idea that you need to train for 5+ years, you get 90% of all the muscle you'll ever have in the first two years of proper training.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Dystopian and Deleted member 8608
Stay natty until you have a good foundation with gear it could shrink your balls and girls will notice that so just be careful that's my advice

How tall r u and do you have a big frame?
5'10
 
Test E is enough
 
you still need to work out for a while before you can even hop on because you won't know how to train, what movements work for you, and your tendons won't be used to training, it doesn't make those recover quicker.

unsure where you got the idea that idea that you need to train for 5+ years, you get 90% of all the muscle you'll ever have in the first two years of proper training.
what do you think about SARMs
 
SARMs are weak when it comes to anabolic effects, plus no one knows whether they will give you cancer or not. Long term effects are unknown. And they suppress testosterone, affect the liver too, so there is no real advantage in using sarms. Testosterone + mild steroid is much better
 
  • JFL
Reactions: ItsOverCel
what do you think about SARMs
I don't like the idea of temporally gains, if it's not sustainable long term (and sarms are not, they still fuck up your blood/liver values and you will have to come off eventually) there's no reason to do it, you will have to watch yourself deflate.

only basic test cycles are sustainable long term, I'm natural though.
 
I don't like the idea of temporally gains, if it's not sustainable long term (and sarms are not, they still fuck up your blood/liver values and you will have to come off eventually) there's no reason to do it, you will have to watch yourself deflate.

only basic test cycles are sustainable long term, I'm natural though.
don't gear gains remain even if you stop ?
 
don't gear gains remain even if you stop ?
Yes it remains don't listen to idiots on here you need to keep lifting though

How big are ur hands and feet
 
If your ugly use gear if your htn+ stay natty and lean max
 
Yes it remains don't listen to idiots on here you need to keep lifting though

How big are ur hands and feet
Idk about my hands but my shoe size is 43-43.5
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 20368
you still need to work out for a while before you can even hop on because you won't know how to train, what movements work for you, and your tendons won't be used to training, it doesn't make those recover quicker.

unsure where you got the idea that idea that you need to train for 5+ years, you get 90% of all the muscle you'll ever have in the first two years of proper training.
Jfl people cant even train hard for 2 years, fucking normies are so lazy
 
SARMs are weak when it comes to anabolic effects, plus no one knows whether they will give you cancer or not. Long term effects are unknown. And they suppress testosterone, affect the liver too, so there is no real advantage in using sarms. Testosterone + mild steroid is much better
In terms of anabolic induction via androgen receptor, sarms are not weaker than roids, they are actually stronger
They just dont affect liver glycogen preservation, IGF-1 and CNS and many other aspects roids affect that give temporary strength boost and muscle fullness and water weight. they only build hard solid muscle and increase strength directly due to muscle increase

they dont affect liver, bullshit

they suppress teststerone but thats not roids dude the suppression is subpar and u can come off without pct and dont even notice

SARMS are superior to roids
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 2130
Jfl people cant even train hard for 2 years, fucking normies are so lazy
If one values their time there is no use training for more than 6-12 months consistently without PEDs as thats enough time to learn to train and diet if not low iq
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 8608
In terms of anabolic induction via androgen receptor, sarms are not weaker than roids, they are actually stronger
They just dont affect liver glycogen preservation, IGF-1 and CNS and many other aspects roids affect that give temporary strength boost and muscle fullness and water weight. they only build hard solid muscle and increase strength directly due to muscle increase

they dont affect liver, bullshit

they suppress teststerone but thats not roids dude the suppression is subpar and u can come off without pct and dont even notice

SARMS are superior to roids
what are the main differences between gear and SARMs
 
what are the main differences between gear and SARMs
Sarms only affect androgen receptors in muscle and bone, hardly affect AR in other tissues

Roids affect ar in all tissues that causes side effects and moreover they affect estrogen, progesterone and corticoid receptors. they are much more unpredictable than sarms
 
If u don’t have good genetics it’s lowkey worthless aesthetics-wise

You’ll be better but you’ll probably develop dysmorphia along the way & end up hating yourself & jump on gear anyways so might as well

But then if u jump on gear & some fuked up shit happens like god forbid Hairloss you’ll end up cycling off then you’ll never train again after experiencing the high from roids

So in conclusion; don’t bother gymcelling if shit genetics
 
Why tag me? I'm not a gymcel.
I'd say stay natural. It's not worth destroying your long term health and mainly Testosterone production for some muscle. Once your testicles atrophy it's very hard to grow them back.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8608 and Deleted member 2130
.

there's evidence for liver damage in ligandrol, rad140 and ostarine, but it varies widely from person to person.
Dont know about ostarine but rad and lgd dont affect liver. i know s4 is quite toxic and we dont use it in russia

if you want to try real sarms buy them on boost4u.ru
 
. Once your testicles atrophy it's very hard to grow them back.
Not true actually
Hcg can regrow testicles no matter how long one has been shut down, the experience shows
 
  • +1
Reactions: omnimaxxer and Deleted member 2130
Not true actually
Hcg can regrow testicles no matter how long one has been shut down, the experience shows
do sarms affect your testicles ?
 
If one values their time there is no use training for more than 6-12 months consistently without PEDs as thats enough time to learn to train and diet if not low iq
what bullshit you sying?
 
do sarms affect your testicles ?
Yes if used for too long in very high dosages without hcg and without pcting
But never expect sarms to make you hypogonadal permanently. the potential atrophy from long term sarms abuse is small
 
Dont know about ostarine but rad and lgd dont affect liver. i know s4 is quite toxic and we dont use it in russia

if you want to try real sarms buy them on boost4u.ru
it doesn't seem to be common but there's a few reports.

on 140:

on lgd:

your tendons don't adapt to resistance training any faster from steroids or sarms, hopping on them early will make you prone to an injury.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2130
it doesn't seem to be common but there's a few reports.

on 140:

on lgd:

your tendons don't adapt to resistance training any faster from steroids or sarms, hopping on them early will make you prone to an injury.
In these studies the subjects report to have been using the sarms, but we dont actually know what they really were taking. the sarms were probably faked
 
even if you keep working out ?(just stopping the sarms/gear)
You may not lose muscle but your body redistributes water more under skin and less in the muscle as soon as you stop gear so that you become a little smaller and less leaner and less vascular
 
SARMs are weak when it comes to anabolic effects, plus no one knows whether they will give you cancer or not. Long term effects are unknown. And they suppress testosterone, affect the liver too, so there is no real advantage in using sarms. Testosterone + mild steroid is much better
Stop that u hater
 

Similar threads

ajshabs
Replies
25
Views
616
limerence
limerence
Zeekie
Replies
10
Views
179
Elias144
E
O
Replies
3
Views
167
Kane211
K

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top