Halotestin mogs every compound for bone dimorphism and it’s not even close (No medical advice)

Halotestin mogs every compound for bone dimorphism and it’s not even close (No medical advice!)

halotestin (fluoxymesterone) is literally the most potent androgen receptor agonist you can put in your mouth.

AR binding potency:
- halo: 19x testosterone
- tren: 3-5x testosterone
- dht: 3x testosterone
- hgh: 0x (doesnt even bind AR lmfao)

source: saartok et al., j steroid biochem 1984
now why does this matter for dimorphism? because skeletal sexual dimorphism (wider jaw, brow ridge, broader frame) is driven by PERIOSTEAL APPOSITION. thats new bone being laid on the OUTSIDE of existing bone. and guess what activates osteoblasts on the periosteum? ANDROGEN RECEPTOR ACTIVATION. not estrogen. not gh. AR.

callewaert et al 2010 showed male periosteal bone formation is 70% higher than female during puberty. vanderschueren (endocr rev 2004) confirmed androgens via AR are the primary driver. vandenput & ohlsson (2014, PMC3955330) showed androgens promote cortical consolidation and maintain cortical thickness through periosteal apposition specifically.

why halo mogs tren:

tren is 3-5x test for AR. halo is 19x. simple math. but it gets worse for tren. tren is progestogenic which suppresses endogenous test AND estrogen. you actually NEED some estrogen for bone mineralization. tren nukes it. halo doesnt aromatize AT ALL (c11β hydroxyl blocks aromatase) but it also doesnt suppress e2 the same way. plus halo inhibits 11β-HSD2 (odermatt et al toxicol sci 2012 PMID 22273746) which blocks cortisol inactivation in bone tissue. tren doesnt do this.
net result: halo is roughly 4-5x more potent than tren for dimorphic bone remodeling

why halo mogs hgh:

this is where most of you are coping the hardest. “just run gh bro” gh/igf-1 drives LONGITUDINAL growth and overall bone SIZE. it does NOT create sexually dimorphic bone geometry. callewaert 2010 showed igf-1 knockout mice have ZERO skeletal sexual dimorphism. gh makes bones bigger. androgens make bones MALE. completely different mechanism. hgh is maybe 0.5x testosterone for dimorphic remodeling because it only works indirectly through igf-1 on general bone size not periosteal width.
halo is roughly 8-10x more potent than test, and functionally 15-20x more effective than gh for Dimorphism specifically
For comparison:
testosterone — 1x
tren — 3-4x
hgh — 0.5x
halotestin — 8-10x
these are mechanistic estimates from receptor binding data and non-aromatization advantage. no direct head to head clinical trial exists. but the pharmacology is clear.
before you retards run to your source:
halo is 17alpha alkylated. it will destroy your liver. hdl goes to zero within 2 weeks. its a potent 11β-HSD2 inhibitor so your blood pressure will be through the roof. cardiotoxic at literally any dose. if youre still growing it will fuse your plates FASTER and you will be shorter. this is not a recommendation. this is pharmacology.

tldr: halotestin has 19x the AR potency of test, AR drives periosteal bone apposition which IS skeletal dimorphism, it doesnt aromatize so theres no estrogenic brake on bone widening, and it mogs tren by 4-5x and test by 8-10x for dimorphic bone remodeling. hgh doesnt even compete because it drives size not shape. its also hepatotoxic poison so dont take it (or if you do, do it at your own risk).
 
  • +1
Reactions: Somatropin, tomahawk, Goymaxxer271 and 1 other person
1774383898298
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bitchwhipper2 and greylord
Halotestin mogs every compound for bone dimorphism and it’s not even close (No medical advice!)

halotestin (fluoxymesterone) is literally the most potent androgen receptor agonist you can put in your mouth.

AR binding potency:
- halo: 19x testosterone
- tren: 3-5x testosterone
- dht: 3x testosterone
- hgh: 0x (doesnt even bind AR lmfao)

source: saartok et al., j steroid biochem 1984
now why does this matter for dimorphism? because skeletal sexual dimorphism (wider jaw, brow ridge, broader frame) is driven by PERIOSTEAL APPOSITION. thats new bone being laid on the OUTSIDE of existing bone. and guess what activates osteoblasts on the periosteum? ANDROGEN RECEPTOR ACTIVATION. not estrogen. not gh. AR.

callewaert et al 2010 showed male periosteal bone formation is 70% higher than female during puberty. vanderschueren (endocr rev 2004) confirmed androgens via AR are the primary driver. vandenput & ohlsson (2014, PMC3955330) showed androgens promote cortical consolidation and maintain cortical thickness through periosteal apposition specifically.

why halo mogs tren:

tren is 3-5x test for AR. halo is 19x. simple math. but it gets worse for tren. tren is progestogenic which suppresses endogenous test AND estrogen. you actually NEED some estrogen for bone mineralization. tren nukes it. halo doesnt aromatize AT ALL (c11β hydroxyl blocks aromatase) but it also doesnt suppress e2 the same way. plus halo inhibits 11β-HSD2 (odermatt et al toxicol sci 2012 PMID 22273746) which blocks cortisol inactivation in bone tissue. tren doesnt do this.
net result: halo is roughly 4-5x more potent than tren for dimorphic bone remodeling

why halo mogs hgh:

this is where most of you are coping the hardest. “just run gh bro” gh/igf-1 drives LONGITUDINAL growth and overall bone SIZE. it does NOT create sexually dimorphic bone geometry. callewaert 2010 showed igf-1 knockout mice have ZERO skeletal sexual dimorphism. gh makes bones bigger. androgens make bones MALE. completely different mechanism. hgh is maybe 0.5x testosterone for dimorphic remodeling because it only works indirectly through igf-1 on general bone size not periosteal width.
halo is roughly 8-10x more potent than test, and functionally 15-20x more effective than gh for Dimorphism specifically
For comparison:
testosterone — 1x
tren — 3-4x
hgh — 0.5x
halotestin — 8-10x
these are mechanistic estimates from receptor binding data and non-aromatization advantage. no direct head to head clinical trial exists. but the pharmacology is clear.
before you retards run to your source:
halo is 17alpha alkylated. it will destroy your liver. hdl goes to zero within 2 weeks. its a potent 11β-HSD2 inhibitor so your blood pressure will be through the roof. cardiotoxic at literally any dose. if youre still growing it will fuse your plates FASTER and you will be shorter. this is not a recommendation. this is pharmacology.

tldr: halotestin has 19x the AR potency of test, AR drives periosteal bone apposition which IS skeletal dimorphism, it doesnt aromatize so theres no estrogenic brake on bone widening, and it mogs tren by 4-5x and test by 8-10x for dimorphic bone remodeling. hgh doesnt even compete because it drives size not shape. its also hepatotoxic poison so dont take it (or if you do, do it at your own risk).
i mean yea
but as you said, halo is so shit for the body you cant take it for long enough to reap its reward
btw gh and androgen agonism on their receptors both sensitise each other
 
basically you’re contradicting yourself

Even tho Halo has a higher AR binding potency than for example tren you cannot run it for nearly aslong and 2 weeks will not be enough time for your bones tren you can run for alot longer meaning its better if you could run halo for fucking 15 weeks id agree here but you cant
 
dnr give me a tldr
 
You can run Tren hgh and test for years, you would be in the hospital if you ran a decent dose of halo for a couple months. Also, the “19x” test shit doesn’t matter cuz you can’t run it long enough to see the benefits PLUS HALO DOSAGES ARE SMALL AS FUCK. That means the ratio really doesn’t matter since you’re only doing what’s equal to 300mgs of test lol. You’re actually wasting the years you have to run actually anabolic and androgenic comps like Tren hgh test and dht derivatives like var.
 
basically you’re contradicting yourself

Even tho Halo has a higher AR binding potency than for example tren you cannot run it for nearly aslong and 2 weeks will not be enough time for your bones tren you can run for alot longer meaning its better if you could run halo for fucking 15 weeks id agree here but you cant
They have given it to teens with idiopathic short stature for 6+ months
 
Binding affinity =/= transcription strength
 
You can run it long term if the dose is low
study was done in 1973 to 1984 so its old asf

the study does not even touch on the lipids or bio markers after the long term dose only that it helped them grow and can be used for that, that doesnt mean that it should be used for that theres tons of better options

however there are countless studies proving that it is extremely toxic and harmful long-term the people who took it definitely have fucked lipids and the study mentions not a single thing about the health of the research group which is also extremely small.

please learn to read studies next time
 
AR can saturate

plus anabolic potency isn't everything anavar is 3-6x more potent than test
 

Similar threads

egorkrasnov
Replies
3
Views
164
PharmaPhaggot
PharmaPhaggot
J
Replies
22
Views
462
jalooks
J
nicheroider
Replies
35
Views
1K
IbalmeHponeMin
IbalmeHponeMin
D
Replies
83
Views
11K
redaraln
R

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top