Having children might lower your testosterone

[Deleted member 3323]

Men's Health

Find information on men's health issues, fitness, and lifestyle at the Men's Health Center.

www.webmd.com

Interesting points -

Edelstein and her team followed 29 expectant heterosexual couples, all expecting their first child together. They looked at four different times throughout the pregnancy, evaluating salivary testosterone, cortisol, estradiol and progesterone. They looked at the levels of those hormones at weeks 12, 20, 28 and 36.

As expected, levels of all four of the hormones increased in women. (Women's testosterone declines after birth.) Meanwhile, men showed substantial declines in levels of both testosterone and estradiol but showed no changes in levels of cortisol or progesterone.

Also, looking at babies lowers your test

Get fucked.

The changes detected, she said, "are very small," and were not enough to be considered low-testosterone.

One idea, she said, is that men with lower testosterone might be better caregivers, as they would be less aggressive.

"They would probably have to repeat this in a larger group before coming to any conclusions," he said. Also, Singer said that testing saliva is less accurate than testing blood for the hormones studied.

 

[ReverseNorwoodPill]

Water
If you pop kids and providermax its over anyways

 

[Deleted member 4209]

yes goyim don't pass on your genes

 

[Deleted member 3323]

 

[straightwhitedude]

How are you this retarded, ofcourse testosterone levels are gonna drop if a adult needs to be more caring, less aggressive and more emotional cause you're raising a new born baby

 

[Deleted member 3323]

How are you this retarded, ofcourse testosterone levels are gonna drop if a adult needs to be more caring, less aggressive and more emotional cause you're raising a new born baby

 

[Deleted member 4332]

Even physically holding on to a baby for a few seconds, your testosterone levels are lower for several hours afterwards. Same thing for touching a pregnant woman's belly.

STAY AWAY FROM BABIES AND PREGNANT WOMEN IF YOU DON'T WANT TO CUCK YOUR HORMONES.

 

[Deleted member 6939]

Men's Health

Find information on men's health issues, fitness, and lifestyle at the Men's Health Center.

www.webmd.com

Interesting points -





Also, looking at babies lowers your test

View attachment 953240

Get fucked.

the point of being sexually dimorphic is to pop out as much babies as possible with another mate

the end
your sexualness has no more use



water

 

[Deleted member 3323]

yes goyim don't pass on your genes

 

[Deleted member 6939]

Men's Health

Find information on men's health issues, fitness, and lifestyle at the Men's Health Center.

www.webmd.com

Interesting points -





Also, looking at babies lowers your test

View attachment 953240

Get fucked.

also this study is SUPER unscientific


29 COUPLES?????


LMAOOOOOOO THAT PORTION SAMPLE IS SO SMALL THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE A CONTROL GROUP

 

[Deleted member 3323]

also this study is SUPER unscientific


29 COUPLES?????


LMAOOOOOOO THAT PORTION SAMPLE IS SO SMALL THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE A CONTROL GROUP

Yes it's in the post

 

[Mouthbreath]

Even physically holding on to a baby for a few seconds, your testosterone levels are lower for several hours afterwards. Same thing for touching a pregnant woman's belly.

STAY AWAY FROM BABIES AND PREGNANT WOMEN IF YOU DON'T WANT TO CUCK YOUR HORMONES.

even looking at them lowers your testosterone already

 

[Deleted member 6939]

Yes it's in the post

what is the point of this thread then OP?

 

[Deleted member 3323]

what is the point of this thread then OP?

Doesn't mean the study is utterly incorrect with no hope of being correct, it's both wrong and right. The data sample is small but if it were bigger and yielded the same results then it will be true. Baiscally, you can take this study however you want, wrong or right, we will never know until it has been done properly. We can still extract value from this.

 

[ifyouwannabemylover]

walked by a woman with a stroller the other day and my T instantly dropped

 

[Deleted member 6939]

Doesn't mean the study is utterly incorrect with no hope of being correct, it's both wrong and right. The data sample is small but if it were bigger and yielded the same results then it will be true. Baiscally, you can take this study however you want, wrong or right, we will never know until it has been done properly. We can still extract value from this.

That information is just as useful as not even have done the experiment in the first place

it still is at the stage of a hypothesis

 

[Deleted member 3323]

walked by a woman with a stroller the other day and my T instantly dropped

The t drop is very small, dont worry.

 

[Deleted member 3323]

That information is just as useful as not even have done the experiment in the first place

it still is at the stage of a hypothesis

Even an hypothesis holds some value. I mean, no one can say for sure if the hypothesis is true but with the data presented we cant just say it isnt true at all, there is a good possibility that is true and that's the value of it. It would be utterly useless if the hypothesis was debunked later in the article but that didn't happen so it's still open for further testing and being true.

 

[Deleted member 6939]

Even an hypothesis holds some value. I mean, no one can say for sure if the hypothesis is true but with the data presented we cant just say it isnt true at all, there is a good possibility that is true and that's the value of it. It would be utterly useless if the hypothesis was debunked later in the article but that didn't happen so it's still open for further testing and being true.

The data is so low, it is at the level of chance, their isn't even a control group so we cannot observe what may happen without interaction with pregnant mothers and babies.

It is a hypothesis which even if it is proven to be very true, the whole reason for sexuality is to bring good offspring so in the end it doesn't matter

 

[pizza]

the point of being sexually dimorphic is to pop out as much babies as possible with another mate

the end
your sexualness has no more use



water

just have a harem theory

 

[Deleted member 3323]

The data is so low, it is at the level of chance, their isn't even a control group so we cannot observe what may happen without interaction with pregnant mothers and babies.

It is a hypothesis which even if it is proven to be very true, the whole reason for sexuality is to bring good offspring so in the end it doesn't matter

I agree.

 

[antiantifa]

Why does it matter? Cope. Adult T levels after 25 are useless. I'm hopping on hormone therapy if I measure low T, not gonna lie.

 

[Deleted member 6939]

just have a harem theory

The problem is the low status males get angry because they have no women so they kill the high status human male to distribute the females

"Wait... this sounds familiar. Modern day sexuality....Chads ( High status males) body count in the hundreds....Incels (Low status males) getting angry and commiting acts against society (Females and Chads).....+

 

[R@m@]

Look at animals, chad cats just fuck and leave, incel cat takes care of the baby cats, chad dom cats are always fighting and fucking different hoes

 

[Deleted member 4054]

Yeah if you hang around to raise them like a white cuck. Be like Tyrone: 30 kids, t level 1500 cuz he's never met them