Having lots children is cope

[Beastimmung]

People act like having children is this grand act and makes you anything special.

If that were the case India would be the most successful society.

Meanwhile many of the greatest people in history never had children.

If you have children it should be quality over quantity, shitting out children for the sake of it is nonsensical cope

 

[Vincent Freeman]

the thing is those so called greatest people in the world had a career in some field, therefore they had no time or need to have children. An average schmuck has nothing else to do if you don't want to post on this forum in you 40 and over

 

[Basedman420]

I'll make them my slaves

 

[Beastimmung]

the thing is those so called greatest people in the world had a career in some field, therefore they had no time or need to have children. An average schmuck has nothing else to do if you don't want to post on this forum in you 40 and over

Yeah, thats the point of this thread, having many children is for the mediocre, not for the excellent.

 

[Vincent Freeman]

Yeah, thats the point of this thread, having many children is for the mediocre, not for the excellent.

guess which one is you

 

[Debetro]

If that were the case India would be the most successful society.

All they do is spawn dysgenic 80iqcels.

What exactly would make a white 115 iq family having 6 children worse than them having 1 or 2?

 

[Looks over NT]

guess who you are

you are the mediocre one

 

[Vincent Freeman]

you are the mediocre one

ok traumatisedogre

 

[optimisticzoomer]

L'eau

 

[Looks over NT]

ok traumatisedogre

wrong again

 

[Vincent Freeman]

wrong again

@Gargantuan

 

[Looks over NT]

All they do is spawn dysgenic 80iqcels.

What exactly would make a white 115 iq family having 6 children worse than them having 1 or 2?

you cant give each child the childhood they deserve unless you're giga rich

 

[optimisticzoomer]

All they do is spawn dysgenic 80iqcels.

What exactly would make a white 115 iq family having 6 children worse than them having 1 or 2?

On a personal level, 6 children would mean far more wageslaving required. 0 benefits to having children, especially for you, a 26 year old NEET

 

[Looks over NT]

@Gargantuan

You are wasting your time

 

[Petsmart]

I see reproduction as the ultimate success in biology, you further immortalize your DNA in the world with each child. Technically status, society, and legacy are all smoke and mirrors and immortalizing your DNA is the ultimate success. Indians are winning because there are like 1.5 billion of them, literally 1 in 7 people on earth are Indian that is crazy.

 

[Debetro]

On a personal level, 6 children would mean far more wageslaving required. 0 benefits to having children, especially for you, a 26 year old NEET

you cant give each child the childhood they deserve unless you're giga rich

Most 115 iq families are rich enough. OP is right, when it comes to poor families.

 

[Beastimmung]

I see reproduction as the ultimate success in biology, you further immortalize your DNA in the world with each child. Technically status, society, and legacy are all smoke and mirrors and immortalizing your DNA is the ultimate success. Indians are winning because there are like 1.5 billion of them, literally 1 in 7 people on earth are Indian that is crazy.

So a bug is more worth biologically in your eyes then a tiger.

Weird perspective

 

[Petsmart]

So a bug is more worth biologically in your eyes then a tiger.

Weird perspective
View attachment 3746725

Bugs ultimately dissolve the tiger when it dies and are super resilient. In the event of nuclear war, cockroaches will out live humanity jfl.