D
Deleted member 20704
Doesn't vibe with humans much anymore.
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2022
- Posts
- 1,484
- Reputation
- 2,378
Forget about individual, hyperanalyzed face features/ratios/etc. and consider a faraway pic ... What -- not focusing only on features -- makes a guy gl? What makes him BROADLY look better even if we can't put our autistic finger on what facial feature is "wrong?"
It's simple: head-to-body ratio; that's it basically.
All gl guys who may not have traditionally PSL aspie-tier "perfect" faces always have the right head-to-body ratio: that is, big frame/body relative to head. It's not some retarded obsession over tiny numbers -- it's mostly that "whoa" factor in seeing good frame/body:head.
Look at any incel photo and guess what you're bound to find? Either a small head and equally small body, or a big head on a too small frame/body. It's literally like a child; non-dimorphic. The "dimorphic" males that are considered to have sex appeal ALL HAVE BIGGER BODIES RELATIVE TO HEAD -- NEVER THE OTHER WAY. Incels are stuck in the juvenile look -- they never got the superhero proportions.
SUPERHERO PROPORTIONS. "MASC" PROPORTIONS, NOT BIG BABY HEAD ON BABY BODY.
The only reason roids SOMETIMES makes guys better looking is because it makes the body appear bigger RELATIVE TO THE SIZE OF THEIR HEAD. If you took any incel pics with face & body & see what I'm saying, simply make the frame/body bigger & they're more gl.
Tall guys tend to be considered sexier even if their faces are lackluster. Why? GOOD HEAD-TO-BODY RATIO USUALLY -- & that's 99% of "sexiness" IRL/pics. So this explains why muh "guy gets Tinder matches but he is not Chad in face." No ... He's Chad in PROPORTIONS.
Give any Chad incel proportions and watch him fall WAY down to see how face carries weakly if other features are childlike. He won't likely get tons of matches if he had GigaChad face with puny, unfitting, juvenile & childlike, "small" framecel/bodycel type body:
It's simple: head-to-body ratio; that's it basically.
All gl guys who may not have traditionally PSL aspie-tier "perfect" faces always have the right head-to-body ratio: that is, big frame/body relative to head. It's not some retarded obsession over tiny numbers -- it's mostly that "whoa" factor in seeing good frame/body:head.
Look at any incel photo and guess what you're bound to find? Either a small head and equally small body, or a big head on a too small frame/body. It's literally like a child; non-dimorphic. The "dimorphic" males that are considered to have sex appeal ALL HAVE BIGGER BODIES RELATIVE TO HEAD -- NEVER THE OTHER WAY. Incels are stuck in the juvenile look -- they never got the superhero proportions.
SUPERHERO PROPORTIONS. "MASC" PROPORTIONS, NOT BIG BABY HEAD ON BABY BODY.
The only reason roids SOMETIMES makes guys better looking is because it makes the body appear bigger RELATIVE TO THE SIZE OF THEIR HEAD. If you took any incel pics with face & body & see what I'm saying, simply make the frame/body bigger & they're more gl.
Tall guys tend to be considered sexier even if their faces are lackluster. Why? GOOD HEAD-TO-BODY RATIO USUALLY -- & that's 99% of "sexiness" IRL/pics. So this explains why muh "guy gets Tinder matches but he is not Chad in face." No ... He's Chad in PROPORTIONS.
Give any Chad incel proportions and watch him fall WAY down to see how face carries weakly if other features are childlike. He won't likely get tons of matches if he had GigaChad face with puny, unfitting, juvenile & childlike, "small" framecel/bodycel type body:
Last edited:
