height blackpill straight from the demons mouth

eyebagcel

eyebagcel

overdosed on media and phenopill
Joined
Sep 16, 2019
Posts
1,649
Reputation
1,916


if you’re above 6’2 and not slaying, you need to NTMAXX not LOOKS MAXX
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • So Sad
  • JFL
Reactions: animo123, 444, Danish_Retard and 8 others
foids anticipating an incoming video game character be like

Tall
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Joe Rogancel, 444, PURE ARYAN GENETICS and 13 others
she says "gn to every male over 5'10". nigga its like half of the population. height alone wont do shit while there are tall, 6 psl absolute moggers outside.
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Joe Rogancel and infidel hunter
Most girls in the comments are actually disagreeing with her telling her face can make up for height but height can't make up for face

Jfl
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: Joe Rogancel, animo123, Deleted member 17829 and 4 others
Most girls in the comments are actually disagreeing with her telling her face can make up for height but height can't make up for face

Jfl
damage control to make women look less shallow
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Joe Rogancel, brainregeneration, PURE ARYAN GENETICS and 5 others
Most girls in the comments are actually disagreeing with her telling her face can make up for height but height can't make up for face

Jfl
cuz they’re in highschool they’ll probably change their opinion when they’re college age like her
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17829, Deleted member 15827 and alriodai
cuz they’re in highschool they’ll probably change their opinion when they’re college age like her
Yea you're probably right
 
One can't compensate for the other... you need both. 95 percentile facially and 6'5 height. Anything lower and it's over.
 
I'm gonna have to disagree, face is everything, I swear I have manlets in my small town with harems.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: Joe Rogancel, Deleted member 17736, Danish_Retard and 4 others
They say this, then sleep with the 5ft7 minichad
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 30439, Joe Rogancel, horizontallytall and 2 others
She’d crawl through glass to get railed out by zac efron or whoever

Listening to anything women ever say is beyond ridiculous
Especially when it’s an attention whore on tiktok jfl
Regardless of whether they agree or disagree with you, words are meaningless
 
  • +1
Reactions: PURE ARYAN GENETICS, Danish_Retard and ALP
The disconnect in opinion comes from the way each individual woman conceptualizes "height".
When she says "looks can't make up for height", the woman in OP's post is thinking about men so short they are undateable (whatever her preference may be, let's assume it's 6 feet for argument's sake).
Thus, since this is a REQUIREMENT, all men who don't meet this requirement are automatically rejected - looks cannot make her change her mind about the guy since he's below the height threshold. At a certain height, your face is irrelevant because your height dooms you; this does not however mean that she doesn't care about face or that height is the only thing that matters, only that below a certain height requirement your face is irrelevant, while the same isn't true for height.

The complex thing here is that facial looks aren't as easy to measure/define, while height is a simple number. So, while she may actually have an undefined "face threshold" too, it's quite hard for her to have a face requirement while it's really easy to have a height requirement. Therefore, a good height may positively impact her judgment in a less predictable way, since she doesn't have a simple number she can look at to decide whether said guy's face isn't good enough for her - "height can make up for looks".

damage control to make women look less shallow
How so? They are still equally shallow, just in a different way lmao.
 
height is extremely overplayed, it may come in handy in the dark to catch someone's attention but once the light is shed people will subliminally rate looks starting with face then physique
 
The disconnect in opinion comes from the way each individual woman conceptualizes "height".
When she says "looks can't make up for height", the woman in OP's post is thinking about men so short they are undateable (whatever her preference may be, let's assume it's 6 feet for argument's sake).
Thus, since this is a REQUIREMENT, all men who don't meet this requirement are automatically rejected - looks cannot make her change her mind about the guy since he's below the height threshold. At a certain height, your face is irrelevant because your height dooms you; this does not however mean that she doesn't care about face or that height is the only thing that matters, only that below a certain height requirement your face is irrelevant, while the same isn't true for height.

The complex thing here is that facial looks aren't as easy to measure/define, while height is a simple number. So, while she may actually have an undefined "face threshold" too, it's quite hard for her to have a face requirement while it's really easy to have a height requirement. Therefore, a good height may positively impact her judgment in a less predictable way, since she doesn't have a simple number she can look at to decide whether said guy's face isn't good enough for her - "height can make up for looks".


How so? They are still equally shallow, just in a different way lmao.
recognizing a beautiful face still signals somewhat higher intellect than just going for height. that's like going for a bish because she got big tits.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4614 and BucketCrab
Face = personality
Height and frame = confidence

Generally speaking
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tallooksmaxxer
The disconnect in opinion comes from the way each individual woman conceptualizes "height".
When she says "looks can't make up for height", the woman in OP's post is thinking about men so short they are undateable (whatever her preference may be, let's assume it's 6 feet for argument's sake).
Thus, since this is a REQUIREMENT, all men who don't meet this requirement are automatically rejected - looks cannot make her change her mind about the guy since he's below the height threshold. At a certain height, your face is irrelevant because your height dooms you; this does not however mean that she doesn't care about face or that height is the only thing that matters, only that below a certain height requirement your face is irrelevant, while the same isn't true for height.

The complex thing here is that facial looks aren't as easy to measure/define, while height is a simple number. So, while she may actually have an undefined "face threshold" too, it's quite hard for her to have a face requirement while it's really easy to have a height requirement. Therefore, a good height may positively impact her judgment in a less predictable way, since she doesn't have a simple number she can look at to decide whether said guy's face isn't good enough for her - "height can make up for looks".


How so? They are still equally shallow, just in a different way lmao.
Exactly this, this is why is normal for a girl to compliment a guy by saying “oh you’re so tall” but much less often for a girl to randomly say to a guy “oh you’re so hot”. Height cannot be argued so it’s socially acceptable to be complimented on it
 
The disconnect in opinion comes from the way each individual woman conceptualizes "height".
When she says "looks can't make up for height", the woman in OP's post is thinking about men so short they are undateable (whatever her preference may be, let's assume it's 6 feet for argument's sake).
Thus, since this is a REQUIREMENT, all men who don't meet this requirement are automatically rejected - looks cannot make her change her mind about the guy since he's below the height threshold. At a certain height, your face is irrelevant because your height dooms you; this does not however mean that she doesn't care about face or that height is the only thing that matters, only that below a certain height requirement your face is irrelevant, while the same isn't true for height.

The complex thing here is that facial looks aren't as easy to measure/define, while height is a simple number. So, while she may actually have an undefined "face threshold" too, it's quite hard for her to have a face requirement while it's really easy to have a height requirement. Therefore, a good height may positively impact her judgment in a less predictable way, since she doesn't have a simple number she can look at to decide whether said guy's face isn't good enough for her - "height can make up for looks".


How so? They are still equally shallow, just in a different way lmao.
i said the same thing about measure part before. i see a potential in you greycel.
 
This goes to show that heightpill only applies to manlets, height copers be like “ muh 6 foot 2 or it’s over for you”

If you’re 5’10-5’11 height isn’t the reason you’re not getting laid.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 18465


if you’re above 6’2 and not slaying, you need to NTMAXX not LOOKS MAXX

women are compulsive lairs, no point in believing a single word they say.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 30439 and PURE ARYAN GENETICS

Similar threads

UrGirlsMcm
Replies
20
Views
412
MaestheticMaso
MaestheticMaso
shredmaxer
Replies
7
Views
308
shredmaxer
shredmaxer
Z
Replies
0
Views
42
zyzz007 returns
Z
Z
Replies
6
Views
266
Zoom759
Z

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top