![Roge](/data/avatars/l/48/48014.jpg?1704847026)
Roge
Heightfidence and faceonality
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2023
- Posts
- 2,510
- Reputation
- 1,370
Do you guys agree?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
as a 5,6 man i agreed with the fisherean runaway theory and your chart makes me sadDo you guys agree?
View attachment 2804096
Well do you actually agree or it needs to be corrected?be a bird theory
I agree. I would place optimal at 6’1 but close enoughtDo you guys agree?
View attachment 2804096
The female choice is 7 foot thenOptimal height is 6'4-6'5
What? I mean for female choice and general respectThe female choice is 7 foot then
be a bird theory
As you guys can see even birds cant escape the blackpillbirds can't wear lifts, over for their ass.
I mean by this chart if 6’5 is ideal then 6’9 is female choice so basically its 7 footersWhat? I mean for female choice and general respect
Shorter heights are less likely to get cancer so survival in that sense, but you can't really base it off one trait
Useless chartDo you guys agree?
View attachment 2804096
Offer your ranges thenUseless chart
Taller better until it's awkward, quit thinking about height unless you're gonna actually do something about itOffer your ranges then
Im doing something. Suggest when its awkward thenTaller better until it's awkward, quit thinking about height unless you're gonna actually do something about it
i agree tbh to a certain extentDo you guys agree?
View attachment 2804096
i agree tbh to a certain extent
@Greypiller if you disagree with something you can change it like this guyMetric + changed value
nah , i agree to an extent tbh . if your a chad or a normie you become more attractive if your tall if your a sub5 then your cooked@Greypiller if you disagree with something you can change it like this guy
Wouldn’t a taller height be better tho evolutionary like 6’4 even because it would be easier to chuck a spear to kill an animal or something jflDo you guys agree?
View attachment 2804096
Well for short term only. No tall grandpasWouldn’t a taller height be better tho evolutionary like 6’4 even because it would be easier to chuck a spear to kill an animal or something jfl
I guess but JFL my paternal grandpa is even taller than me by an inch and my dad- 6’1Well for short term only. No tall grandpas
What do ya think makes zoomer girls fetishize height like women never beforeWell for short term only. No tall grandpas
Idk i dont care about themWhat do ya think makes zoomer girls fetishize height like women never before
Well who cares about Scandinavia, Netherlands ans Bosnia? Nothing to do there and its not the center of the world so you can live peacefully at 6'2 somewhere in eastern europeif it wasn't for Scandinavia, the Netherlands and Bosnia I'd say 6'2 is ideal too, that's what the model industry thinks and it's the perfect "neutral tall" height, i.e. you're solidly tall on a global scale but your height isn't the center of your appearance, it just neatly blends with the overall package. It's also the minimum to avoid the majority of heightmogging. But because of those countries I'd say 6'3-6'4 is, with 6'5 the beginning of too tall imo unless top-0.01% genetics. I also don't think 6'6 is female choice, that's already height fetish territory.