Hi

[shibo]

Whats up

 

[Deleted member 3902]

Sup Bitxh

 

[wellthatsucks]

rejected irl and rejected on psl forums op your life is utterly over lmfao

 

[Arkantos]

Shalom

 

[StuffedFrog]

Whats up

how dare you show these plebs a pic of the mandalorian

 

[KEy21]

Whats up

Based profile picture. That is gonna be a great show

 

[Deleted member 3328]

Whats up

sky

 

[wellthatsucks]

As a citizen of the constitutional United States of America, you can rest assured that I would gladly contribute to resisting the treasonous insurgency that the religious traitors to our constitution have implemented in the name of their 20th century establishment of religion's themed collection of conclusively scientifically refuted fiction materials.

Quote:https://irl.umsl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi...ssertation

Quote:Moral Panic and Child Pornography
The public’s fear of child pornography that began in the 1970s and escalated with the
emergence of the Internet, has all the makings of moral panic. By definition, moral panic is the
sudden eruption of outrage towards a specific group disproportionate to any harm caused. Cohen
(1972) was first to coin the term and his definition more specifically includes: (1) concern about
the potential or imagined threat; (2) moral outrage toward the actors who embody the problem;
(3) widespread agreement that the threat exists and that something should be done about it; (4) an
exaggeration of the number or strength of cases, in terms of damages, moral offensiveness, and
risks if ignored; and (5) the panic erupts and dissipates suddenly without warning. Garland
(2008) added two more elements: (1) the actors who embody the problem are viewed as
threatening to the status quo; and (2) without action, they risk destroying society.
Jenkins (1998) and others have invoked Cohen’s model of moral panic to explain societal
fear of child pornography. Jenkins (2001) claims that it was during the initial crusade against
child pornography in the 1970s that moral crusaders competed to assert the most incendiary
claims about child pornography, including that it was a well-organized, multi-billion dollar
industry and that the number of children exploited was in the millions. Jenkins (2001) notes that
while most of these claims were discredited, fear persisted. As Walker (2010) describes:
“Anxiety over child sexual abuse and the inability to protect children from harm is a
salient fear in present society. Despite other, more probable dangers, these issues remain
a large concern. Moreover, they are an agreed upon social harm. Child sexual abuse is
decried unanimously as a moral wrong and a violation of social norms.” (p.198)
Similarly, Ost (2002) explains that the main causes of the moral panic over child pornography
“are the moral values which affirm the sacred status of the child and the rights that our society
has ascribed to children.” (p.443)

The only criterion of Cohen’s moral panic model that appears not to have been met in the
case of child pornography offenders is the fifth. Meaning, at this time, there is no dissipation of
the panic. Unlike other panics such as the Salem Witch trials or the crack cocaine epidemic,
both of which had a start and end date, the panic over child sexual exploitation has been durable,
long-lasting and now in its fourth decade (O’Hear, 2008). Walker (2010) argues the only thing
that has changed with the child pornography panic is the fervent role of the state in responding.
The federal government has created a number of laws intended to severely punish and control
child pornography offenders.

https://www.springer.com/about+springer/...-1042321-0

Quote:Could making child pornography legal lead to lower rates of child sex abuse? It could well do, according to a new study by Milton Diamond, from the University of Hawaii, and colleagues.

Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA), that rape and other sex crimes have not increased following the legalization and wide availability of pornography. And most significantly, the incidence of child sex abuse has fallen considerably since 1989, when child pornography became readily accessible – a phenomenon also seen in Denmark and Japan. Their findings are published online today in Springer’s journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.

The findings support the theory that potential sexual offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex crimes against children

Because of pledging my allegiance to the constitution of the United States of America, I would gladly help ensure the freedom of the speech of pedophiles --- regardless of the illegitimate and unbinding rulings that religious treason committers in our supreme court have made, in respect of their establishment of religion, by referencing the themed collection of scientifically refuted fiction materials of their faith.

Quote:ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume4/j4_2_1.htm

Quote:The Spread of Rumors

In 1986 the Senate Commission33 under the chairmanship of William V. Roth, Republican from Delaware, came to the same conclusion as the ILIC report. Nevertheless, neither the Roth report nor the ILIC report were able to dampen the spread of rumors about an enormous trade. Even in 1986, the claims of Lloyd and Densen-Gerber continued to come up as facts in official reports: the Meese Commission, initiated by the Reagan administration to prepare a drastic sharpening of the anti-pornography laws, uncritically took over these claims.34 According to the Meese Commission, Congress had discovered that child pornography and child prostitution "have become highly organized, multi-million dollar industries that operate on a nationwide scale."35 The monthly appearance of 264 magazines (Densen-Gerber) was again reported as truth, alongside the 30,000 exploited children of Los Angeles (Lloyd Martin).

The U.S. Supreme Court took over these claims in their first child pornography case, New York v Ferber (1982), saying that child pornography comprised, "highly organized multimillion dollar industries that operate on a nationwide scale."36 The otherwise dignified court was so upset by the alleged extent of the problem that the solicitor for the accused, Herald Price Fahringer, lost his composure and fled the sitting as fast as he could.37

The claims of Lloyd and Densen-Gerber also appeared outside the U.S.A. The report, Exploitation of Child Labour, which was submitted in 1981 to the Commission for Human Rights of the United Nations, claimed: "In the United States there are at least 264 pornographic magazines specializing in pornography concerning children."38 It was claimed that in 1977, 15,000 slides and 4,000 films of child pornography had been intercepted by the police, which was, according to the report, 5% of the total stock in circulation.

According to the United Nations report, the value of trade in child pornography in 1977 was estimated at $500 million. Such estimates are not based on any kind of empirical evidence, and are easy to refute. If these claims were true then the allegedly intercepted slides and films would have had a value of thousands of dollars each.39 In reality, these films were sold for much less, which can be checked with reference to the advertisement brochures of Deltaboek, publisher of homosexual pornography and literature. From here it is apparent that the Golden Boys film series, produced by COQ in Denmark, cost 85 guilders each, which is about $35.

In 1986, Defence for Children International prepared a report on child prostitution in which they claimed: "Estimates on the number of child prostitutes vary from 300,000 to several millions for the U.S. and Canada."40 A year later these figures were taken over by the Norwegian Ministry of Justice.41 This report was later submitted to the Ministers of Justice of the member countries of the Council of Europe. Within the Council of Europe a report on child exploitation was written in which it was claimed that: "A study of boy prostitutes had suggested that there were 300,000 boy prostitutes in the United States, many of whom are designated runaways."42 The claims of the United Nations report were also repeated. As late as 1988 the Dutch language world development magazine, Onze Wereld (Our World), claimed that: "The American (sic) periodical43 Child Abuse and Neglect reported that in the United States at least 264 different child pornography magazines are in circulation. The kiddieporn stars are drawn from the numerous American runaway teenagers."44 The same article made similar exaggerated claims about alleged illicit trade in donor organs obtained from children killed for the purpose. The story about donor organs had also appeared in the report of the Council of Europe, although there was never any evidence and the story was not credible from the beginning.45

The alleged size of the child pornography trade and the many children said to have been involved, are little more than myths. They are the result of the arbitrary multiplication of arbitrary numbers of alleged victims made by a journalist. The claims had taken on a life of their own. The fact that these claims had by 1980 been rejected by thorough official investigations was insufficient to prevent the claim from reappearing, not only in the media but also in other official circles, including the United States Senate, the United States Supreme Court, a Commission of the American Justice Department, the United Nations and the Council of Europe. After the number had been cited in the Hearings of the House of Representatives, it became associated with an ostensibly reliable source. The fact that the original source was anything but reliable was forgotten.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-...detention/

Quote:McKune provides a single citation to support its statement “that the recidivism rate of untreated offenders has been estimated to be as high as 80%”: the U.S. Dept. of Justice, Nat. Institute of Corrections, A Practitioner’s Guide to Treating the Incarcerated Male Sex Offender xiii (1988). Justice Kennedy likely found that reference in the amicus brief supporting Kansas filed by the Solicitor General, then Ted Olson, as the SG’s brief also cites it for the claim that sex offenders have this astonishingly high recidivism rate. This Practitioner’s Guide11 itself provides but one source for the claim, an article published in 1986 in Psychology Today, a mass market magazine aimed at a lay audience. That article has this sentence: “Most untreated sex offenders released from prison go on to commit more offenses– indeed, as many as 80% do.” But the sentence is a bare assertion: the article contains no supporting reference for it. But perhaps the author was merely offering an estimate based on his training and expertise. The problem there is that he had little of either.

He is a counselor, not a scholar of sex crimes or re-offense rates, and the cited article is not about recidivism statistics. It’s about a counseling program for sex offenders he then ran in an Oregon prison. His unsupported assertion about the recidivism rate for untreated sex offenders was offered to contrast with his equally unsupported assertion about the lower recidivism rate for those who complete his program.

https://reason.com/blog/2018/11/14/the-f...id-about-s

Quote:That phrase comes from Justice Anthony Kennedy's plurality opinion in the 2002 Supreme Court case McKune v. Lile, where he claimed "the rate of recidivism of untreated offenders has been estimated to be as high as 80%." Kennedy's characterization of the recidivism risk as "frightening and high" has been echoed in scores of decisions upholding restrictions on sex offenders. But the original source for his recidivism estimate was an uncorroborated assertion in a 1986 Psychology Today article by a therapist who has repudiated the number, saying he is "appalled" at its lingering impact.

As a citizen of the constitutional United States of America, I don't recognize the rulings that these religious treason committers justified by referencing themed collections of fiction materials that don't correlate to anything in existence. Rather, I concur with these patriots to the constitution of my nation, who correctly determined that congress may make no law abridging the freedom of the speech of the press in respect of an establishment of religion.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/495/103

Quote:When speech is eloquent and the ideas expressed lofty, it is easy to find restrictions on them invalid. But were the First Amendment limited to such discourse, our freedom would be sterile indeed. Mr. Osborne's pictures may be distasteful, but the Constitution guarantees both his right to possess them privately and his right to avoid punishment under an overbroad law. I respectfully dissent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amen...ution#Text

Quote:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[1]

I give credibility solely to rulings of supreme court justices who don't reference scientifically refuted genres of religious fiction materials as the basis for their decisions; therefore, child pornography has never, in fact, been legally prohibited in my nation. As such, those enforcing such legislation are religious treason committers engaging in an illegal insurgency, and as my allegiance is to the constitution of the United States of America I view them as enemy combatants. I will gladly defend the freedom of the speech of the press of the citizens of the constitutional United States of America from the enemy combatants who are enslaving them and murdering them for their failure to adhere to the dictates of the scientifically refuted fiction materials of this 20th century establishment of religion that the traitorous religious members of our congress have illegally respected.

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/local/c...03286.html

Quote:Some law-enforcement officials contend that disrupting the companies making a profit off child pornography may only be the tip of the iceberg. Matt Dunn, of the Cyber Crimes Center at the Immigration and Customs Enforcement bureau, said that non-commercial child pornography -- images shared without money changing hands -- is more of a concern than the for-profit industry.

Swapping child porn over file-sharing networks is ongoing -- and it's usually non-commercial, Dunn said. "It's happening every second of every day," he said.

Dunn also questions the estimate that commercial child porn is a $20 billion a year industry -- a figure cited in a 2006 congressional hearing -- and instead thinks it's substantially lower, perhaps in the tens of millions of dollars.

http://www.freerangekids.com/group-that-...er-danger/

Quote:And I have even better news than Klein. The latest number we have for stranger kidnappings is 105/year, not 200. Still too many. Still not the 50,000/year NCMEC used to claim in Congressional hearings. (And for a good piece on how the number 50,000 is the “Goldilocks number” — big enough to scare people, but not SO big that it gets dismissed as implausible — here’s a story from NPR.)

https://jezebel.com/5785245/the-trouble-...statistics

Quote:"It's now clear [anti-trafficking groups] used fake data to deceive the media and lie to Congress," the story charges. "And it was all done to score free publicity and a wealth of public funding."

What's the meat behind those claims? The story details how the Women's Funding Network commissioned a study from a political consulting group run by Beth Schapiro, which devised a totally unscientific method for determining how many online classified ads depicted children. It entailed having a group of adults guess, by looking at a picture in an ad, how old the person depicted was, and then doing it again over time to fuel the charge of explosive growth. Experts interviewed by City Pages point out that this is ridiculous from a methodological point of view — among the many criticisms, there's no way of knowing how old someone is from a picture, there's no way of knowing when the picture was taken, and there's no way of knowing if the picture is even of someone behind the advertised service.

The study, which was funded with public money, was subsequently uncritically picked up nationwide in headlines trumpeting a massive rise in the trafficking of children.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...obots.html

Quote:House voice votes to BAN shipments of CHILD sex dolls and robots

...

Some scientist are actually claiming that child sex dolls may reduce pedophilia.

'To the contrary, these dolls create a real risk of reinforcing pedophilic behavior and they desensitize the user causing him to engage in sicker and sicker behavior,' Goodlatte stated.